Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Discussion
Ultrasound examination of the left knee demonstrated a 11 × 11 × 5 mm well-circumscribed hypoechoic subcutaneous mass with central tiny cystic space superficial to the quadriceps tendon (Fig. 1a). Spectral Doppler showed marked vascularity and ‘vascular stalk sign’. Arterial flow and to a lesser degree venous flow were demonstrated (Fig. 1b). The mass was non-compressible and very tender during assessment. On magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), it was T1W hypointense, T2W hyperintense and avidly enhancing (Fig. 2a-c). Internal cystic change was observed. Full-thickness sagittal maximum-intensity-projection (MIP) image from the time-resolved MR angiography (MRA) showed early marked arterial enhancement (Fig. 3). Imaging features were suggestive of glomus tumor. Surgical excision of the mass was performed, and histological diagnosis of glomus tumor was confirmed (Fig. 4). Knee pain had dissipated on follow-up.
Glomus tumor, first described by Masson in 1924, is a rare benign vascular tumor arising from the dermal neuromyoarterial glomus body, which is a specialised arteriovenous anastomosis responsible for blood flow and thermoregulation of the skin [1]. It accounts for 1.6% of all soft tissue tumors, and is typically located at subungual region [2]. Extradigital glomus tumor (EDGT) comprises approximate 61% of all glomus tumors with a male–female ratio of 4:1[3]. The mean size of EDGT is 0.66 cm, with knee being the second most common location [3]. Classic triad of symptoms- paroxysmal pain, cold intolerance and exquisite tenderness to touch is noted in 63–100% of cases [3]. Absence of classical symptoms in EDGT makes diagnosis challenging.
Glomus tumours are generally considered benign with limited risk of recurrence. Malignant glomus tumour is exceedingly rare. Criteria for malignant glomus tumour, symplastic glomus tumor and glomus tumor of uncertain malignant potential have been proposed [4]. Recently, Specht et al. has eliminated size and location from the diagnostic criteria for malignancy [5].
On ultrasound, glomus tumor classically appears as a hypervascular oval circumscribed hypoechoic nodule. Small central cystic space has been described. Spectral Doppler demonstrates both venous and arterial intralesional flow [6]. ‘Vascular stalk sign’, describing the presence of prominent vascular flow connecting the lesion to the adjacent soft tissue, was found in 67% of the tumor [6]. Due to its high vascularity, glomus tumor is T2W hyperintense and avidly enhancing. T1W hyperintense signal represents haemorrhage. Typical MRA findings include early and marked arterial enhancement, and tumor blush in venous and delayed phase [7, 8]. MRA maybe the only sequence to depict small early tumor [8]. The treatment of choice is complete surgical excision. Recurrence of symptoms may suggest inadequate excision [3].
The imaging differentials for our case include slow-flow vascular malformation, neurogenic tumor and angioleiomyoma. Unlike glomus tumor, venous malformation is compressible and demonstrates only venous flow on spectral ultrasound. Phleboliths, fat components and fluid–fluid levels typically present in venous malformation are not found in glomus tumor [9, 10]. Neurogenic tumor has typical ultrasound appearance of neural thickening of the entering and exiting nerves [10]. It demonstrates pathognomonic ‘target’ and ‘split fat’ sign on MRI [9]. Classic colour Doppler appearance of angioleiomyoma is linear clustered vessels with convergence to one point [10]. On MRI, it is T1W isointense to muscle with typical T2W hypointense rim which represent fibrous capsule [9].
EDGT should be considered as a possible diagnosis when a painful hypervascular nodule demonstrates both arterial and venous flow on Spectral Doppler, and hyperintense T2W signal with early intense arterial enhancement on MRI. MRA is a sensitive tool which allows early diagnosis of small EDGT. Recognising the clinical and radiological features of EDGT is of paramount importance for correct diagnosis and early treatment.
References
Le MC. glomus neuromyoarterial des regions tactiles et ses tumeurs. Lyon Chir. 1924;21:257.
Shugart RR, Soule EH, Johnson EW. Glomus tumor. Surg Gynechol Obstet. 1963;117:334–40.
Schiefer TK, Parker WL, Anakwenze OA, Amadio PC, Inwards CY, Spinner RJ. Extradigital glomus tumors: A 20-year experience. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81:1337–44.
Folpe AL, Fanburg-Smith JC, Miettinen M, Weiss SW. Atypical and malignant glomus tumors: analysis of 52 cases, with a proposal for the reclassification of glomus tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25:1–12.
Moch H. Soft tissue and Bone Tumours WHO Classification of Tumours/Volume 3. WHO Classification of Tumours. 2020; 3
Catalano O, AlfagemeRoldän F, Solivetti FM, Scotto di Santolo M, Bouer M, Wortsman X. Color Doppler Sonography of Extradigital Glomus Tumors. J Ultrasound Med. 2017;36(1):231–8.
Drapé JL, Idy-Peretti I, Goettmann S, et al. Subungual glomus tumors: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology. 1995;195(2):507–15.
Van Ruyssevelt CE, Vranchx P. Subungual glomus tumor: emphasis on MR angiography. AJR. 2004;182:263–4.
Hughes P, Miranda R, Doyle AJ. MRI imaging of soft tissue tumours of the foot and ankle. Insights Imaging. 2019;10(1):60.
Hung EH, Griffith JF. Pitfalls in ultrasonography of soft tissue tumours. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2014;18(1):79–85.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The case presentation can be found at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-021-03972-9.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chien, C.P.Y., Lee, V.K.H. Painful suprapatellar mass. Skeletal Radiol 51, 1517–1520 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-021-03973-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-021-03973-8