Abstract
Objective
The purpose of this study was to compare reliability of lower extremity imaging measurements using EOS and conventional X-ray (CR) of adult patients with mechanical axis malalignment.
Materials and methods
Ten patients (20 lower limbs) of mean age of 31.6 years (range 21–39) with post-traumatic deformities who presented for evaluation of osteotomies and/or ligament and cartilage reconstructions were prospectively enrolled. Two independent observers performed full-length anterior-posterior (AP) measurements 2 weeks apart on both CXR and two-dimensional (2D) EOS images. Measurements included weight-bearing axis (WBA), varus/valgus angle (V/V), femoral length (FL), tibial length (TL), femoral mechanical axis (FMA), tibial mechanical axis (TMA), and total limb length (TLL). Reliability was determined with random effects modeling of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) set to consistency. Three statistical operations were performed to compare interrater validity in CXR and EOS: students’ two-sample t test, paired two-sample t test, and Pearson’s correlative r-statistical agreement.
Results
There was a statistically significant difference for V/V, FL, and TLL (all p < 0.01) between CXR and EOS. A relatively large proportion of the population consistently had larger V/V measures for EOS compared to CXR. In contrast, the FL and TLL measures were consistently larger for CXR compared to EOS. The differences between CXR and EOS measurements were statistically significant, though the small differences in values were not clinically meaningful. Agreement of all measures remained high (r = 0.84–0.99).
Conclusion
Using 2D EOS for lower extremity measurements is reproducible, reliable, and comparable to the gold standard, standing long leg radiographs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burghardt RD, Hinterwimmer S, Bürklein D, Baumgart R. Lower limb alignment in the frontal plane: analysis from long standing radiographs and computer tomography scout views: an experimental study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013;133(1):29–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-012-1635-z.
Zampogna B, Vasta S, Amendola A, et al. Assessing lower limb alignment: comparison of standard knee Xray vs long leg view. Iowa Orthop J. 2015;35:49–54 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26361444, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4492139/pdf/IOJ_2015_49.pdf.
Escott BG, Ravi B, Weathermon AC, et al. EOS low-dose radiography: a reliable and accurate upright assessment of lower-limb lengths. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser A. 2013;95(23):1–7. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00989.
Guenoun B, Zadegan F, Aim F, Hannouche D, Nizard R. Reliability of a new method for lower-extremity measurements based on stereoradiographic three-dimensional reconstruction. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012;98(5):506–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2012.03.014.
Hull NC, Binkovitz LA, Schueler BA, Kolbe AB, Larson AN. Upright biplanar slot scanning in pediatric orthopedics: applications, advantages, and artifacts. Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205(1):W124–32. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.14022.
Blumer SL, Dinan D, Grissom LE. Benefits and unexpected artifacts of biplanar digital slot-scanning imaging in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2014;44(7):871–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-2908-1.
Dubousset J, Charpak G, Skalli W, Deguise J, Kalifa G. EOS: a new imaging system with low dose radiation in standing position for spine and bone and joint disorders. J Musculoskelet Res. 2010;13(01):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218957710002430.
Illés T, Somoskeöy S. The EOS™ imaging system and its uses in daily orthopaedic practice. Int Orthop. 2012;36(7):1325–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1512-y.
Melhem E, Assi A, El Rachkidi R, Ghanem I. EOS®biplanar X-ray imaging: concept, developments, benefits, and limitations. J Child Orthop. 2016;10(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-016-0713-0.
Stevens PM, Maguire M, Dales MD, Robins AJ. Physeal stapling for idiopathic genu valgum. J Pediatr Orthop. 1999;19(5):645–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004694-199909000-00018.
Sailer J, Scharitzer M, Peloschek P, Giurea A, Imhof H, Grampp S. Quantification of axial alignment of the lower extremity on conventional and digital total leg radiographs. Eur Radiol. 2005;15(1):170–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2436-8.
Cooke D, Scudamore A, Li J, Wyss U, Bryan T, Costigan P. Axial lower-limb alignment: comparison of knee geometry in normal volunteers and osteoarthritis patients. Osteoarthr Cartil. 1997;5(1):39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1063-4584(97)80030-1.
Delin C, Silvera S, Bassinet C, et al. Ionizing radiation doses during lower limb torsion and anteversion measurements by EOS stereoradiography and computed tomography. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83(2):371–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.10.026.
Folinais D, Thelen P, Delin C, Radier C, Catonne Y, Lazennec JY. Measuring femoral and rotational alignment: EOS system versus computed tomography. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99(5):509–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2012.12.023.
Luo TD, Stans AA, Schueler BA, Larson AN. Cumulative radiation exposure with EOS imaging compared with standard spine radiographs. Spine Deform. 2015;3(2):144–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2014.09.049.
Krug KB, Weber C, Schwabe H, et al. Comparison of image quality using a X-ray stereotactical whole-body system and a direct flat-panel X-ray device in examinations of the pelvis and knee. RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgeb Verfahren. 2014;186(1):67–76. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1350441.
Assi A, Chaibi Y, Presedo A, Dubousset J, Ghanem I, Skalli W. Three-dimensional reconstructions for asymptomatic and cerebralpalsy children’s lower limbs using a biplanar X-ray system: a feasibility study. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82(12):2359–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.07.006.
Pomerantz ML, Glaser D, Doan J, Kumar S, Edmonds EW. Three-dimensional biplanar radiography as a new means of accessing femoral version: a comparitive study of EOS three-dimensional radiography versus computed tomography. Skelet Radiol. 2015;44(2):255–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-014-2031-2.
Thelen P, Delin C, Folinais D, Radier C. Evaluation of a new low-dose biplanar system to assess lower-limb alignment in 3D: a phantom study. Skelet Radiol. 2012;41(10):1287–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-012-1438-x.
Gaumétou E, Quijano S, Ilharreborde B, et al. EOS analysis of lower extremity segmental torsion in children and young adults. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;100(1):147–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2013.09.010.
Gheno R, Nectoux E, Herbaux B, et al. Three-dimensional measurements of the lower extremity in children and adolescents using a low-dose biplanar X-ray device. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(4):765–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2308-y.
Lazennec JY, Brusson A, Rousseau MA, Robbins CB, Pour AE. Do patients’ perceptions of leg length correlate with standing 2- and 3-dimensional radiographic imaging? J Arthroplast. 2016;31(10):2308–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.065.
Guggenberger R, Pfirrmann CWA, Koch PP, Buck FM. Assessment of lower limb length and alignment by biplanar linear radiography: comparison with supine CT and upright full-length radiography. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(2). https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.10782.
IRB approval of study
This study was reviewed by the University of Minnesota’s Institutional Review Board as study #00000742 and was approved 11/8/2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wise, K.L., Kelly, B.J., Agel, J. et al. Reliability of EOS compared to conventional radiographs for evaluation of lower extremity deformity in adult patients. Skeletal Radiol 49, 1423–1430 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-020-03425-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-020-03425-9