Abstract
Objective
Suspected soft-tissue sarcomas are typically investigated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with a view to planning image-guided core needle biopsy for confirmation of the histological diagnosis. Indeterminate superficial lesions may be small and therefore potentially difficult to biopsy safely, such lesions possibly being more amenable to primary excision biopsy. The aim of this study is to determine the suitability of this practice in the setting of a specialist sarcoma service.
Materials and methods
All patients referred over a 12-month period to the sarcoma service with a small (<3-cm), indeterminate, superficial soft-tissue mass according to MRI criteria, or a small lesion of the hand or foot deemed unsafe for percutaneous biopsy, and who underwent primary excision biopsy were included. The histology results were categorized into neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions, and assessed for resection completeness.
Results
Fifty-eight patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria from all patients referred to the sarcoma service in a 12-month period. Of these, 42 out of 58 (72.4%) had benign neoplasms, 4 out of 58 (6.9%) had malignant tumours, 2 out of 58 (3.4%) an intermediate grade lesion, while 10 out of 58 (17.2%) were non-neoplastic. All 4 malignant lesions were completely excised at the time of excision biopsy.
Conclusions
Primary excision biopsy of small, indeterminate soft-tissue masses within the setting of a specialist sarcoma service is a suitable management option. Only a small proportion of small superficial soft-tissue lesions with indeterminate MRI features are malignant tumours.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Goodwin RW, O’Donnell P, Saifuddin A. MRI appearances of common benign soft-tissue tumours. Clin Radiol. 2007;62:843–53.
Walker EA, Fenton ME, Salesky JS, Murphey MD. Magnetic resonance imaging of benign soft tissue neoplasms in adults. Radiol Clin N Am. 2011;49:1197–217. vi.
Crundwell N, O’Donnell P, Saifuddin A. Non-neoplastic conditions presenting as soft-tissue tumours. Clin Radiol. 2007;62:18–27.
Clarkson P, Ferguson PC. Primary multidisciplinary management of extremity soft tissue sarcomas. Curr Treat Options in Oncol. 2004;5:451–62.
Mendenhall WM, Indelicato DJ, Scarborough MT, et al. The management of adult soft tissue sarcomas. Am J Clin Oncol. 2009;32:436–42.
Grimer R, Judson I, Peake D, Seddon B. Guidelines for the management of soft tissue sarcomas. Sarcoma. 2010;2010:506182.
Hillen TJ, Baker JC, Jennings JW, Wessell DE. Image-guided biopsy and treatment of musculoskeletal tumors. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2013;17:189–202.
Avedian RS. Principles of musculoskeletal biopsy. Cancer Treat Res. 2014;162:1–7.
Traina F, Errani C, Toscano A, et al. Current concepts in the biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97.e7.
Berger-Richardson D, Swallow CJ. Needle tract seeding after percutaneous biopsy of sarcoma: risk/benefit considerations. Cancer. 2017;123:560–7.
UyBico SJ, Motamedi K, Omura MC, et al. Relevance of compartmental anatomic guidelines for biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors: retrospective review of 363 biopsies over a 6-year period. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23:511–8, 518.e1–2.
Noebauer-Huhmann IM, Weber M-A, Lalam RK, et al. Soft tissue tumors in adults: ESSR-approved guidelines for diagnostic imaging. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2015;19:475–82.
Dyrop HB, Safwat A, Vedsted P, et al. Characteristics of 64 sarcoma patients referred to a sarcoma center after unplanned excision. J Surg Oncol. 2016;113:235–9.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Referral guidelines for suspected cancer. NICE clinical guideline no.27. [Internet]. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. 2005. Available from: www.nice.org.uk/CG027
Datir A, James SLJ, Ali K, Lee J, Ahmad M, Saifuddin A. MRI of soft-tissue masses: the relationship between lesion size, depth, and diagnosis. Clin Radiol. 2008;63:373–78, commentary 379–80.
Calleja M, Dimigen M, Saifuddin A. MRI of superficial soft tissue masses: analysis of features useful in distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions. Skeletal Radiol. 2012;41:1517–24.
Blacksin MF, Ha D-H, Hameed M, Aisner S. Superficial soft-tissue masses of the extremities. Radiographics. 2006;26:1289–304.
Hung EHY, Griffith JF, Ng AWH, Lee RKL, Lau DTY, Leung JCS. Ultrasound of musculoskeletal soft-tissue tumors superficial to the investing fascia. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202:W532–40.
Zhuang KD, Tandon AA, Ho BCS, Chong BK. MRI features of soft-tissue lumps and bumps. Clin Radiol. 2014;69:e568–83.
Beaman FD, Kransdorf MJ, Andrews TR, Murphey MD, Arcara LK, Keeling JH. Superficial soft-tissue masses: analysis, diagnosis, and differential considerations. Radiographics. 2007;27:509–23.
Narvani AA, Tsiridis E, Saifuddin A, Briggs T, Cannon S. Does image guidance improve accuracy of core needle biopsy in diagnosis of soft tissue tumours? Acta Orthop Belg. 2009;75:239–44.
Khoo MMY, Saifuddin A. The role of MRI in image-guided needle biopsy of focal bone and soft tissue neoplasms. Skeletal Radiol. 2013;42:905–15.
Chandrasekar CR, Wafa H, Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Tillman RM, Abudu A. The effect of an unplanned excision of a soft-tissue sarcoma on prognosis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2008;90:203–8.
Koulaxouzidis G, Schwarzkopf E, Bannasch H, Stark GB. Is revisional surgery mandatory when an unexpected sarcoma diagnosis is made following primary surgery? World J Surg Oncol. 2015;13:306.
Pretell-Mazzini J, Barton MD, Conway SA, Temple HT. Unplanned excision of soft-tissue sarcomas: current concepts for management and prognosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:597–603.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khoo, M., Pressney, I., Hargunani, R. et al. Small, superficial, indeterminate soft-tissue lesions as suspected sarcomas: is primary excision biopsy suitable?. Skeletal Radiol 46, 919–924 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-017-2635-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-017-2635-4