Abstract
Metal cofactors are essential for catalysis and enable countless conversions in nature. Interestingly, the metal cofactor is not always static but mobile with movements of more than 4 Å. These movements of the metal can have different functions. In the case of the xylose isomerase and medium-chain dehydrogenases, it clearly serves a catalytic purpose. The metal cofactor moves during substrate activation and even during the catalytic turnover. On the other hand, in class II aldolases, the enzymes display resting states and active states depending on the movement of the catalytic metal cofactor. This movement is caused by substrate docking, causing the metal cofactor to take the position essential for catalysis. As these metal movements are found in structurally and mechanistically unrelated enzymes, it has to be expected that this metal movement is more common than currently perceived.
Key points
• Metal ions are essential cofactors that can move during catalysis.
• In class II aldolases, the metal cofactors can reside in a resting state and an active state.
• In MDR, the movement of the metal cofactor is essential for substrate docking.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Metals are omnipresent in nature. All the soluble and bioavailable metals have been associated with proteins to induce both stability and catalytic activity (Kunkle and Skaar 2023; Waldron and Robinson 2009). About a third of all enzymes are metalloenzymes and in many of these metalloenzymes, the metal is the cofactor that brings catalytic activity. The metal can induce oxidation and reduction activity, both via single electron radical processes as well as electron pair transfer as for instance in the case of hydride shifts. Isomerization and bond formation, including Lewis acid catalysis, extend the scale of reactions catalyzed by metalloenzymes even further. The metal can be complexed directly by amino acid residues of the protein or by a prosthetic group such as porphyrin-derived ligand systems (Frey and Hegeman 2007). Throughout all these conversions, one observation can be made: the metal site is perceived as stationary throughout the catalytic cycle (Ben-David et al. 2013; Torrance et al. 2008), just like in homogeneous catalysis (Hanefeld and Lefferts 2018). The substrate enters the enzyme active site, is activated by the metal, and after conversion to the product, leaves the enzyme. Substrate and product are mobile while the metal is static during the catalytic cycle. This is in great contrast to the metal mobility in protein stabilization, where in particular Zn is known to greatly influence protein structure via alternating binding modes (Maret and Li 2009). A comprehensive analysis of metalloenzymes shows that similar metal mobility can also be found in some metalloenzymes. Here, we review examples were the assumption of a stationary metal site is incorrect and look at possible functional roles of the mobility of the metal cofactor. We here discuss them in chronological order of discovery.
d-Xylose isomerase
The d-xylose isomerase (XI), also known as glucose fructose isomerase, converts d-xylose into d-xylulose and d-glucose into d-fructose (Scheme 1) (Lavie et al. 1994). For the latter reaction, XI is applied industrially in the High-Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS) production. With more than 10,000,000 tons of HFCS produced per year, this is the largest biocatalytic industrial process (DiCosimo et al. 2013). The enzyme’s intriguing mechanism of the two-stage reaction has attracted much interest. The ring opening of the substrate is followed by what in solution chemistry formally is a Lobry de Bruyn–Alberda van Ekenstein isomerization, then the product cyclizes again and leaves the active site. Intriguingly, the enzymatic mechanism follows a different pathway than the acid or base catalyzed Lobry de Bruyn–Alberda van Ekenstein isomerization, as will be discussed below.
To catalyze both ring opening and isomerization, the enzyme utilizes two divalent metal ions. In the key publication revealing the metal shift, the divalent metal is Mg(II) (Lavie et al. 1994). X-ray crystallographic studies of Streptomyces olivochromogenes XI (SoXI) revealed that one of these Mg ions is stationary but the other moves 1.8 Å to stabilize the open chain form of the substrate and enable the isomerization. In the resting state, both Mg ions are clearly defined. Mg-1 is coordinated by four acid groups (Asp286, Asp244, Glu180, and Glu216); Glu216 acts also as ligand for Mg-2. Mg-2 additionally is held in position by two other acid residues (Asp254 and Asp 256) and His219 (Fig. 1). Lys182 acts as base in isomerization reaction.
By combining X-ray and neutron diffraction studies, a more detailed insight into the mechanism of the two-step catalysis could be obtained (Kovalevsky et al. 2008, 2010). In these studies, XI from Streptomyces rubiginosus (SrXI) was used and again Mg is the metal at both metal binding sites. Based on seven crystal structures, replacing the active metals with inactive metals such as nickel and cadmium and additional D2O exchange, as well as locating hydrogen via neutron diffraction, allowed to identify the role of the different residues. Therefore, the metal is here indicated as M. M-1 binds to four acid groups (Glu181, Glu217, Asp245, and Asp287 as well as two water molecules); again one of them, here Glu217 is shared with M-2. M-2 is also coordinated by His220, Asp255 (bidentate), Asp257, and the catalytic water (Scheme 1B).
The two metal ions act in concert to enable the catalysis. The α-pyranose enters the active site and doubly protonated His54 (proton from Asp57) induces a shift of a hydrogen from the α-hydroxy group and the following cascade opens the ring. The aldehyde is thus released from the hemiacetal and the hydroxy group of C-5 is deprotonated in the open chain. The M-2 then shifts to activate the aldehyde and the catalytic water is deprotonated. This generates the positive charge on C-1 enabling the hydride shift, which occurs from C-2 after deprotonation of the C-2 hydroxy group by Asp287. Subsequently, the isomerized sugar can again cyclize and leave the active site (Kovalevsky et al. 2010). In an extension of this study, also other sugars and their isomerization were investigated (Langan et al. 2014).
Very recently, it was shown that the metal motility of M-2 in XI can reach even further. Serial crystallography enabled the study of xylitol-bound SrXI (Nam 2021). When the inhibitor xylitol, i.e. the reduced form of the substrate, binds, the M-2 can even dissociate leading to deactivation of the enzyme. This is relevant in the HFCS production. Even low rates of deactivation have a significant influence on the industrial scale application of the enzyme (Nam 2022).
The ring opening and isomerization mechanism of XI are more widely spread in sugar metabolism. Also the l-rhamnose isomerase works according to this two-metal mechanism with a catalytic water molecule. In this case, the divalent metal is Mn. Here, the static M-1 always coordinates the C-2 O and the C-3 hydroxy group, both during catalysis of the ring opening and isomerization. M-2 coordinates the catalytic water, enables the isomerization, and displays a shift (Yoshida et al. 2010, 2013, 2024). Remarkably also for the unrelated enzyme bacterial tyrosinase which has two copper ions in the active site, a mobility of one of the two copper ions was observed (Sendovski et al. 2011).
Class II DHAP-dependent aldolases
Aldolases are classified into two classes according to their mechanism. Class I and class II aldolases both catalyze the same reaction, but while class I aldolases utilize an enamine mechanism, class II aldolases are metalloenzymes. The dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP)–dependent aldolases play an important role in sugar metabolism and they are synthetically of great interest. In the reaction, two new stereocenters are established generating four different stereoisomers. Due to their excellent stereoselectivity, the aldolases allow the selective synthesis of each stereoisomer (Scheme 2A). The class II DHAP-dependent aldolases employ divalent metal ions as Lewis acids that bind and activate the donor molecule, here DHAP. In the vast majority of the cases, the metal is Zn(II) (Blom et al. 1996; Brovetto et al. 2011; Clapés 2015; Hanefeld et al. 2022; Hélaine et al. 2022; Ranoux 2013; Sukumaran and Hanefeld 2005).
The focus of the mechanistic studies concentrates on the class II fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase (FBPA), central to sugar metabolism. This metal-dependent enzyme occurs in many pathogens, while the corresponding human aldolase is a class I enzyme with a catalytic lysine. The bacterial enzyme is consequently an ideal drug target and has been investigated in many pathogens (Capodagli et al. 2014a, b; Daher et al. 2010; Fonvielle et al. 2008; Pegan et al. 2009). In a study on the Escherichia coli FBPA (EcFBPA), it was noted that two mutually exclusive Zn(II) binding sites were present and that the binding of Zn(II) in either site also required a significant rearrangement of the side chains with the histidine ligands. This isomerization was suggested to allow for control of the catalytic activity by switching between a buried and an exposed site (Blom et al. 1996).
Spurred by this unique structure (Blom et al. 1996), EcFBPA (Hall et al. 1999; Tran et al. 2016; Zgiby et al. 2002), Giardia lamblia FBPA (GlFBPA)(Galkin et al. 2009), and Helicobacter pylori FBPA (HpFBPA) were studied in detail (Jacques et al. 2018). These studies revealed the putative mechanism (Scheme 2B) and considerable structural flexibility in all these FBPA’s. Due to this flexibility, a part of the crystallographic structures show a significant degree of disorder. In the buried site, the Zn(II) is coordinated by His110, 226, and 264 and by Glu174. The numbering of the residues here is that of EcFBPA. The stuctural flexibility includes the shift of the catalytic Zn(II) by ~ 4 Å and a rearrangement of the coordinating histidines 226 (on a flexible loop), 264 (itself flexible), and 110 (rigid) upon substrate docking. The DHAP is a bidentate ligand of Zn(II). The metal activates the carbonyl group and decreases the pKa of the proton at the alpha carbon (C-3) by a factor 10 to below 9 (Jacques et al. 2018; Kimura et al. 1999). Subsequently, Glu182 from a very flexible loop deprotonates the DHAP and carbon-carbon bond formation can take place. Nucleophilic attack of the enolate on the acceptor glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate (G3P) is enabled by concomitant protonation of the evolving hydroxy group by Asp109. The fructose-1,6-bisphosphate (FBP) then leaves the active site and the Zn(II) returns to its original buried coordination site.
In crystallographic studies of EcFBPA, the Zn(II) was in several cases not only located in the buried site with Zn coordinated by His110, 226, and 264 and by Glu174 but also exposed site coordinated only by His110, 226, and 264 (Fig. 2) (Blom et al. 1996; Tran et al. 2016). Indeed this was the case in the initial report, and can also be seen for other FBPAs. The structural flexibility is clear from the different orientations of His264 for which part of the population coordinated Zn(II) in the buried and the other in the open coordination (Fig. 2A and B). In the overlay, it is evident that in particular the loops Cys176 to Leu195 and Gly223 to Val234 are ill-defined. These loops contain the residues which require high motility (Fig. 2C). As a consequence thereof, His226 is not always defined in the structures. For GlFBPA, similar observations were made (Galkin et al. 2009). These structural investigations were extended to a DHAP-dependent aldolase that catalyzes the formation of octuluronate-1-phosphate from DHAP and l-arabinuronate. Again, two mutually exclusive Zn(II) binding sites were identified, one buried and one exposed (Huddleston et al. 2019).
In a detailed study of HpFBPA, it was demonstrated that the same residues were essential for catalysis. In direct comparison to EcFBPA, both crystals were soaked with DHAP (Jacques et al. 2018). The same loop (Cys176 to Leu195 in EcFBPA numbering) was disordered. DHAP in both cases coordinated as bidentate ligand to the Zn(II) in the open coordination site (Fig. 3A and B). While in EcFBPA also here displays partial Zn(II) occupation of the buried site, HpFBPA has all the metal in the active position (Fig. 3A and B). When soaking HpFBAP with the product FBP, the retro-aldol reaction took place in the crystal (Fig. 3C). The enediolate from DHAP is oriented such that the nucleophilic attack will take place from its si face onto the si-face of G3P. A small fraction of the crystal is populated by a G3P with reversed aldehyde group, i.e. the re-face is oriented towards the DHAP binding site. In this case, the Zn(II) is in the buried binding site.
The fact that G3P can dock in two different orientations is of interest, as it would explain the occasionally observed lower stereospecificity of aldolases for this carbon (Marsden et al. 2020, 2021). This relaxed stereospecificity at the same time seems to be the functional basis of epimerase UxaE from Cohnella laeviribosi (Choi et al. 2020). This enzyme utilizes Zn(II) and similar divalent metals such as Mn(II) as cofactor and the proposed mechanism makes use of the relaxed docking of the aldehyde, such as in HpFBAP. d-Tagaturonate is deprotonated by Asp159 and a retro-aldol reaction occurs. The intermediate aldehyde group rotates and is now nucleophilically attacked by the enediolate. Glu126 protonates the evolving alcoholate and C-3 of d-tagaturonate is thus epimerized to d-fructuronate (Scheme 3). The active metal is in the exposed coordination during this process but otherwise is in the buried position. The buried position is clearly visible in a structure with Mn(II); no substrates are coordinated. When Zn(II) was used and glycerol was added as a mimic for dihydroxyacetone, the Zn(II) shifted by up to 4.3 Å to the open coordination site (Scheme 3).
Zn2+-dependent medium-chain dehydrogenase/reductase ADH
The medium-chain dehydrogenases/reductases (MDR) family typically has a Zn(II) in tetrahedral coordination. This Zn(II) is coordinated by a variety of amino acid residues, the imidazole of histidine, the thiol of cysteine, and the acid groups of aspartic or glutamic acid being the most common. Often one site is occupied by water and this has been speculated to occur as water or hydroxide ion. It was noted that in the course of the reaction, the Zn(II) shifts position (Sanghani et al. 2002). This shift of 1–2.3 Å is essential to enable catalysis and is linked both to improved Lewis acidity for the dehydrogenation step and increased alkalinity for the hydride attack (Baker et al. 2009; Guntupalli et al. 2021; Plapp et al. 2017; Sellés Vidal et al. 2018). In the human glutathione-dependent formaldehyde dehydrogenase (FDH), the shift was associated also with the conformational changes due to the nicotinamide cofactor entering and leaving the active site (Sanghani et al. 2002). In the glucose dehydrogenase from Haloferax mediterranei (HmGDH), these structural changes in the Zn(II) coordination were reported to occur while the protein ligands did not move. As part of the protein relay, it is proposed that a hydroxide is coordinated to the Zn(II) that can take up the proton of the hydroxy group of the substrate when this is oxidized. Both the Zn(II) and the water/hydroxide change position (Fig. 4A). The movement of Zn(II) here is approx. 1.3 Å.
The mechanistic role of Zn(II) has been studied in detail in other ADH enzymes of the MDR family, such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae ADH1 (ScADH1) (Guntupalli et al. 2021; Plapp et al. 2016), horse liver ADH1E (HlADH) (Plapp et al. 2017), and Thermoanaerobacter pseudoethanolicus ADH (TpADH)(Dinh et al. 2022). In ScADH1, the Zn(II) is tetrahedrally coordinated and the two structures observed in the subunits indicate a double inversion of the Zn(II) during coordination; first, the coordinated water is released and replaced by glutamate; subsequently, the second inversion leads to the coordination of the substrate alcohol in the position previously taken by water (Fig. 4B). This occurs with a concomitant movement of Zn(II) and of the coordinating amino acid residues. The examination of HlADH includes a careful discussion of MDRs in general for each reaction step and concludes that a double displacement mechanism via a transition state with trigonal bipyramidal geometry is likely (Fig. 4C). At the same time, it is concluded that a penta-coordinated intermediate is unlikely. Interestingly, the double displacement mechanism is supported by the investigation of TpADH. When soaking the crystals of TpADH, tetrahedral complexes with the alcohol as a ligand were observed, similar to the coordination of trifluoroethanol in the active site of ScADH1 (Fig. 4B right). For TpADH, distorted penta-coordinated Zn(II) was also found when the crystals were soaked with (1S,3S)-3-methylcyclohexanol. This would support a trigonal bipyramidal transition state.
Overall, the picture arises that the MDR are rather flexible to allow NAD+/NADH exchange. The coordination of the substrate takes place via a double displacement, i.e. two SN2 reaction at the Zn(II) with rearrangement of the Zn(II) and the coordinating amino acid residues (Fig. 4B and C). In most cases, the Zn(II) has three amino acid residues and the substrate coordinated to it when the actual reaction occurs and the amino acids are rigid. However, if Zn(II) is coordinated by two amino acid residues, the substrate and water/hydroxide, then a shift of the metal and the water/hydroxide occurs during the reaction (Fig. 4A).
Class II pyruvate-dependent aldolases
As DHAP-dependent aldolases (see above), pyruvate-dependent aldolases (PDA) utilize two different mechanisms and are classified by them as class I and II. The class II PDA typically contain divalent metal ions, ranging from Mg(II) to Co(II). They have recently been studied for their synthetic utility with a focus on expanding the range of donor molecules beyond pyruvate (de Berardinis et al. 2017; Fang et al. 2019; Gastaldi et al. 2021; Laurent et al. 2020; Marsden et al. 2019). When studying Sphingomonas wittichii RW1 hydroketoacid aldoxy lase (SwHKA; recently the name of the organism was altered to Rhizorhabdus wittichii RW1), the active site was found to be located at the interface of two subunits, with six active sites in the trimer of the homodimers (Fig. 5). The hydroxy pyruvic acid (HPA) coordinates as bidentate ligand to the Mg(II), and the other four positions are taken by two acidic residues, Glu145 and Asp171 and two water molecules (Marsden et al. 2019, 2022). Ser116’ from the other subunit is close by and completes the active site. This coordination is not uniform for PDA (Coincon et al. 2012).
Careful comparison of the enzyme with and without substrate soaking revealed a resting state of the enzyme with the catalytic metal Mn(II) or Mg(II) coordinated 2.3 Å away from the active position. The hexacoordinated metal is now also attached to the Ser116’ of the neighbouring subunit. Again the two acidic residues, Glu145 and Asp171, are coordinated to the metal, as are three water molecules. Mutational and stability studies revealed that the metal does not contribute to the stabilization of the dimer (Marsden et al. 2022).
With Mg(II) as cofactor, the octahedral metal resided in the resting state, coordinated by three residues (Glu145, Asp171, and Ser116’) and three water molecules (Fig. 6A). The addition of the substrate HPA causes a shift to the active coordination site (Fig. 6C). Now, the octahedral Mg(II) is coordinated by Glu145, Asp171, HPA, and two water molecules. For Mn(II), a low occupancy of an intermediate position with a penta-coordinated metal was observed (Fig. 6B). Also here, only two amino acid residues, Glu145 and Asp171, bind the metal to the enzyme while the other three places are taken up by water molecules. This shift between resting and active position of the metal in the active site is similar to the movement of Zn(II) in the DHAP-dependent aldolases. However, the protein scaffold of the HKA is static.
The distribution of metal mobility among enzyme families and taxonomies
The above examples convincingly demonstrate the use of metal mobility and their underlying mechanisms in various metalloenzymes. However, only a few examples have been studied in detail from each enzyme family. In order to investigate whether metal mobility in catalytic conversions is a more general feature or rather an exception from metals that are stationary throughout the catalytic cycle, we performed a structure motif search using the crystal structures of the aforementioned enzymes and the RCSB PDB (Bittrich et al. 2020).
For d-xylose isomerase, P15587 (PDB-ID 1XYA) from Streptomyces olivochromogenes and the residues Glu216, His219, Asp254, Asp256 including Glu180 (which is from the second metal binding site) were selected. Secondly, for fructose-bisphosphate aldolase class II, the protein P0AB71 (PDB-ID 5GK3) from Escherichia coli K12 was selected, and the residues His110, His226, His264, and Glu174. Finally, for Zn(II)-dependent medium-chain dehydrogenase/reductase ADH, B0KBL1 (PDB-ID 7UX4) from Thermoanaerobacter pseudethanolicus was selected, including the residues Cys37, His59, Glu60, and Asp150. For all searches, Asp and Glu were set to be interchangeable, while default settings were used otherwise. Unfortunately, for the class II pyruvate aldolase such as the HKA from Rhizorhabdus wittichii RW1 (formerly Sphingomonas wittichii; SwHKA), the active site is located at the interface of two subunits, which did not allow for a comparable search to be performed as with the other enzyme templates.
Interestingly, the search for XI revealed several additional XIs across the Terrabacteria group, including one from a fungus, but also a few Rhamnose isomerases from the genera Escherichia, Stutzerimonas, and Halalkalibacterium (Fig. 7A). Although this binding motif appears to be present across different bacterial phyla, it seems to be conserved in xylose and a few rhamnose isomerases.
The search with the FBPA class II motif template returned two FBPAs from the genus Candida, and a few more bacterial species (Fig. 7B). When excluding the very flexible branch with the His226 residue from the search, many more entries were returned, including other sugar bisphosphate aldolases. However, also a range of unrelated RNA and DNA binding proteins indicate that the search parameters were likely already too unspecific. Nevertheless, this binding motif is present in several different species, but seems to be more prevalent in FBPAs.
Finally, for the ADH from Thermoanaerobacter pseudoethanolicus, matches were obtained from across all domains of life (Fig. 7C). Interestingly, in addition to several different alcohol dehydrogenases, also matches with sorbitol dehydrogenase (Homo sapiens), glucose dehydrogenase (Thermoplasma volcanium GSS1), arabinose dehydrogenase (Saccharolobus solfataricus P2), and formaldehyde dehydrogenase (Pseudomonas putida) were identified. This suggests that the binding centre found in the ADH of Thermoanaerobacter pseudoethanolicus is present across a spectrum of dehydrogenases, throughout the tree of life. This is in line with the different MDR family enzymes described under the corresponding section.
Conclusions
To date, the vast majority of all metalloenzyme are considered to have a static metal cofactor that does not move prior or during catalysis. Exploring the field a number of different enzymes is found to display metal cofactor movement. In all the cases of metal movement known, the metal cofactor is directly complexed by the protein. The variety in the metal movement is surprising, clearly nature has found solutions suiting each single case.
In the XIs and the MDRs, the metal movement clearly is essential during the catalytic cycle. The reaction requires the movement of the Mg-2 in XI to enable the hydride shift catalysis to take place. This occurs while the protein remains almost stationary. In MDRs, the movement of the Lewis acid is also essential to dock the substrate and even during the catalytic cycle. Concerning the protein, it displays different behaviour to XI, as both the metal and the protein scaffold move for the double inversion at the metal cofactor of MDRs to take place. In view of the conformational changes linked to the NAD(P)H binding, this is not surprising. In both cases, the plasticity of the metal cofactor enables catalysis and thus provides an evolutionary advantage.
For the class II aldolases, a different reason for metal movement is observed. The cofactor is either in a resting or buried state, complexed by more amino acid residues. Upon docking of the substrate, it moves to more open active state. Here, the substrates DHAP and pyruvate act as bidentate ligands and the metal cofactor is less tightly coordinated to the protein. In the DHAP-dependent aldolases, metal shift occurs with a rearrangement of the coordinating amino acid residues and the scaffold displays great flexibility. In the PDA, the enzyme scaffold is static. However, in both cases, the shift from a more coordinated resting state to a less coordinated active state indicates that the metal shift might have evolved as a trade-off between optimal metal cofactor stability and catalytic plasticity.
The mobility of the metal cofactor can lead to evolutionary advantages was demonstrated for paraoxonase-1 (PON1). The wild-type enzyme catalyzes the hydrolysis of lipophilic lactones. The Ca(II) cofactor can however shift 1.8 Å and then enables a promiscuous reaction: the breakdown of organophosphates like paraoxon. Mutational studies were conducted to further developed this promiscuous activity (Ben-David et al. 2013).
Structural motif searches show that the examples reported here are not rare cases, but may be far more prevalent in nature. Overall, it can be expected that the movement of the metal cofactor in metalloenzymes plays a more important role than perceived up to date.
References
Baker PJ, Britton KL, Fisher M, Esclapez J, Pire C, Bonete MJ, Ferrer J, Rice DW (2009) Active site dynamics in the zinc-dependent medium chain alcohol dehydrogenase superfamily. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(3):779–784 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0807529106
Ben-David M, Wieczorek G, Elias M, Silman I, Sussman JL, Tawfik DS (2013) Catalytic metal ion rearrangements underline promiscuity and evolvability of a metalloenzyme. J Mol Biol 425(6):1028–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2013.01.009
Bittrich S, Burley SK, Rose AS (2020) Real-time structural motif searching in proteins using an inverted index strategy. PLoS Comput Biol 16(12):e1008502. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008502
Blom NS, Tétreault S, Coulombe R, Sygusch J (1996) Novel active site in Escherichia coli fructose 1,6-bisphosphate aldolase. Nat Struct Biol 3(10):856–862. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsb1096-856
Brovetto M, Gamenara D, Saenz Méndez P, Seoane GA (2011) C – C bond-forming lyases in organic synthesis. Chem Rev 111(7):4346–4403. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr100299p
Capodagli GC, Lee SA, Boehm KJ, Brady KM, Pegan SD (2014a) Structural and functional characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus’s class IIb fructose 1,6-bisphosphate aldolase. Biochemistry 53(48):7604–7614. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi501141t
Capodagli GC, Sedhom WG, Jackson M, Ahrendt KA, Pegan SD (2014b) A noncompetitive inhibitor for Mycobacterium tuberculosis’s class IIa fructose 1,6-bisphosphate aldolase. Biochemistry 53(1):202–213. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi401022b
Choi MY, Shin K-C, Ho T-H, Park H, Nguyen DQ, Park YS, Kim DW, Oh D-K, Kang L-W (2020) Fructuronate-tagaturonate epimerase UxaE from Cohnella laeviribosi has a versatile TIM-barrel scaffold suitable for a sugar metabolizing biocatalyst. Int J Biol Macromol 163:1369–1374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.285
Clapés P (2015) Aldol reactions. In: Faber K, Fessner W-D, Turner NJ (eds) Science of synthesis biocatalysis in organic synthesis 2. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 31–93
Coincon M, Wang W, Sygusch J, Seah SYK (2012) Crystal structure of reaction intermediates in pyruvate class II aldolase. J Biol Chem 287(43):36208–36221. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m112.400705
Daher R, Coinçon M, Fonvielle M, Gest PM, Guerin ME, Jackson M, Sygusch J, Therisod M (2010) Rational design, synthesis, and evaluation of new selective inhibitors of microbial class II (zinc dependent) fructose bis-phosphate aldolases. J Med Chem 53(21):7836–7842. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm1009814
de Berardinis V, Guérard-Hélaine C, Darii E, Bastard K, Hélaine V, Mariage A, Petit J-L, Poupard N, Sánchez-Moreno I, Stam M, Gefflaut T, Salanoubat M, Lemaire M (2017) Expanding the reaction space of aldolases using hydroxypyruvate as a nucleophilic substrate. Green Chem 19(2):519–526. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6GC02652D
DiCosimo R, McAuliffe J, Poulose AJ, Bohlmann G (2013) Industrial use of immobilized enzymes. Chem Soc Rev 42(15):6437–6474. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cs35506c
Dinh T, Rahn KT, Phillips RS (2022) Crystallographic snapshots of ternary complexes of thermophilic secondary alcohol dehydrogenase from Thermoanaerobacter pseudoethanolicus reveal the dynamics of ligand exchange and the proton relay network. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform 90(8):1570–1583. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.26339
Fang J, Hait D, Head-Gordon M, Chang MCY (2019) Chemoenzymatic platform for synthesis of chiral organofluorines based on type II aldolases. Angew Chem Int Ed 58:11841–11845
Fonvielle M, Coinçon M, Daher R, Desbenoit N, Kosieradzka K, Barilone N, Gicquel B, Sygusch J, Jackson M, Therisod M (2008) Synthesis and biochemical evaluation of selective inhibitors of class II fructose bisphosphate aldolases: towards new synthetic antibiotics. Chem – Eur J 14(28):8521–8529. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.200800857
Frey PA, Hegeman AD (2007) Enzymatic reaction mechanisms. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York
Galkin A, Li Z, Li L, Kulakova L, Pal LR, Dunaway-Mariano D, Herzberg O (2009) Structural insights into the substrate binding and stereoselectivity. Biochemistry 48(14):3186–3196. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi9001166
Gastaldi C, Ngahan Tagne R, Laurent V, Hélaine V, Petit JL, Traïkia M, de Berardinis V, Lemaire M, Guérard-Hélaine C (2021) One step forward in exploration of class II pyruvate aldolases nucleophile and electrophile substrate specificity. ChemCatChem 13(18):3920–3924
Guntupalli SR, Li Z, Chang L, Plapp BV, Subramanian R (2021) Cryo-electron microscopy structures of yeast alcohol dehydrogenase. Biochemistry 60(9):663–677. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00921
Hall DR, Leonard GA, Reed CD, Watt CI, Berry A, Hunter WN (1999) The crystal structure of Escherichia coli class II fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase in complex with phosphoglycolohydroxamate reveals details of mechanism and specificity. J Mol Biol 287(2):383–394. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1999.2609
Hanefeld U, Lefferts L (2018) Catalysis: an integrated textbook for students. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp 1–14, 73–126
Hanefeld U, Hollmann F, Paul CE (2022) Biocatalysis making waves in organic chemistry. Chem Soc Rev 51(2):594–627. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CS00100K
Hélaine V, Gastaldi C, Lemaire M, Clapés P, Guérard-Hélaine C (2022) Recent advances in the substrate selectivity of aldolases. ACS Catal 12(1):733–761. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c04273
Huddleston JP, Thoden JB, Dopkins BJ, Narindoshvili T, Fose BJ, Holden HM, Raushel FM (2019) Structural and functional characterization of YdjI, an aldolase of unknown specificity in Escherichia coli K12. Biochemistry 58(31):3340–3353. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.9b00326
Jacques B, Coinçon M, Sygusch J (2018) Active site remodeling during the catalytic cycle in metal-dependent fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolases. J Biol Chem 293(20):7737–7753. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.ra117.001098
Kimura E, Gotoh T, Koike T, Shiro M (1999) Dynamic enolate recognition in aqueous solution by zinc(II) in a phenacyl-pendant cyclen complex: implications for the role of zinc(II) in class II aldolases. J Am Chem Soc 121(6):1267–1274. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja982904e
Kovalevsky AY, Katz AK, Carrell HL, Hanson L, Mustyakimov M, Fisher SZ, Coates L, Schoenborn BP, Bunick GJ, Glusker JP, Langan P (2008) Hydrogen location in stages of an enzyme-catalyzed reaction: time-of-flight neutron structure of D-xylose isomerase with bound D-xylulose. Biochemistry 47(29):7595–7597. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi8005434
Kovalevsky AY, Hanson L, Fisher SZ, Mustyakimov M, Mason SA, Trevor Forsyth V, Blakeley MP, Keen DA, Wagner T, Carrell HL, Katz AK, Glusker JP, Langan P (2010) Metal ion roles and the movement of hydrogen during reaction catalyzed by D-xylose isomerase: a joint x-ray and neutron diffraction study. Structure 18(6):688–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2010.03.011
Kunkle DE, Skaar EP (2023) Moving metals: how microbes deliver metal cofactors to metalloproteins. Mol Microbiol 120(4):547–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.15117
Langan P, Sangha AK, Wymore T, Parks JM, Yang ZK, Hanson BL, Fisher Z, Mason SA, Blakeley MP, Forsyth VT, Glusker JP, Carrell HL, Smith JC, Keen DA, Graham DE, Kovalevsky A (2014) L-arabinose binding, isomerization, and epimerization by D-xylose isomerase: x-ray/neutron crystallographic and molecular simulation study. Structure 22(9):1287–1300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2014.07.002
Laurent V, Gourbeyre L, Uzel A, Hélaine V, Nauton L, Traïkia M, de Berardinis V, Salanoubat M, Gefflaut T, Lemaire M, Guérard-Hélaine C (2020) Pyruvate aldolases catalyze cross-aldol reactions between ketones: highly selective access to multi-functionalized tertiary alcohols. ACS Catal 10(4):2538–2543
Lavie A, Allen KN, Petsko GA, Ringe D (1994) X-ray crystallographic structures of D-xylose isomerase-substrate complexes position the substrate and provide evidence for metal movement during catalysis. Biochemistry 33(18):5469–5480
Maret W, Li Y (2009) Coordination dynamics of zinc in proteins. Chem Rev 109(10):4682–4707. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr800556u
Marsden SR, Mestrom L, Bento I, Hagedoorn PL, McMillan DGG, Hanefeld U (2019) CH-π interactions promote the conversion of hydroxypyruvate in a class II pyruvate aldolase. Adv Synth Catal 361(11):2649–2658
Marsden SR, Mestrom L, McMillan DGG, Hanefeld U (2020) Thermodynamically and kinetically controlled reactions in biocatalysis - from concepts to perspectives. ChemCatChem 12(2):426–437. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201901589
Marsden SR, Mestrom L, Wijma HJ, Noordam SJ, McMillan DGG, Hanefeld U (2021) Thermodynamics determine the diastereochemical outcome of catalytic reactions. ChemCatChem 13(10):2530–2536. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.202100178
Marsden SR, Wijma HJ, Mohr MKF, Justo I, Hagedoorn PL, Laustsen J, Jeffries CM, Svergun D, Mestrom L, McMillan DGG, Bento I, Hanefeld U (2022) Substrate induced movement of the metal cofactor between active and resting state. Angewandte Chemie-International Ed 61(49). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202213338
Nam KH (2021) Room-temperature structure of xylitol-bound glucose isomerase by serial crystallography: xylitol binding in the M1 Site induces release of metal bound in the M2 site. Int J Mol Sci 22(8):3892. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22083892
Nam KH (2022) Glucose isomerase: functions, structures, and applications. Appl Sci 12(1):428. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12010428
Pegan SD, Rukseree K, Franzblau SG, Mesecar AD (2009) Structural basis for catalysis of a tetrameric class IIa fructose 1,6-bisphosphate aldolase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Mol Biol 386(4):1038–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2009.01.003
Plapp BV, Charlier HA, Ramaswamy S (2016) Mechanistic implications from structures of yeast alcohol dehydrogenase complexed with coenzyme and an alcohol. Arch Biochem Biophys 591:35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2015.12.009
Plapp BV, Savarimuthu BR, Ferraro DJ, Rubach JK, Brown EN, Ramaswamy S (2017) Horse liver alcohol dehydrogenase: zinc coordination and catalysis. Biochemistry 56(28):3632–3646. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00446
Ranoux A, Hanefeld U (2013) Enzyme-catalysed stereoselective C-C bond formation reactions in total synthesis. In: Andrushko V, Andrushko N (eds) Stereoselective synthesis of drugs and natural products. Wiley, pp 831–857
Sanghani PC, Bosron WF, Hurley TD (2002) Human glutathione-dependent formaldehyde dehydrogenase. Structural changes associated with ternary complex formation. Biochemistry 41(51):15189–15194. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi026705q
Sellés Vidal L, Kelly CL, Mordaka PM, Heap JT (2018) Review of NAD(P)H-dependent oxidoreductases: properties, engineering and application. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) Proteins Proteom 1866(2):327–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2017.11.005
Sendovski M, Kanteev M, Ben-Yosef VS, Adir N, Fishman A (2011) First structures of an active bacterial tyrosinase reveal copper plasticity. J Mol Biol 405(1):227–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2010.10.048
Sukumaran J, Hanefeld U (2005) Enantioselective C-C bond synthesis catalysed by enzymes. Chem Soc Rev 34(6):530–542. https://doi.org/10.1039/b412490a
Torrance JW, Macarthur MW, Thornton JM (2008) Evolution of binding sites for zinc and calcium ions playing structural roles. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform 71(2):813–830. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.21741
Tran H-T, Lee S-H, Ho T-H, Hong S-H, Huynh K-H, Ahn Y-J, Oh D-K, Kang L-W (2016) Crystallographic snapshots of active site metal shift in E. coli fructose 1, 6-bisphosphate aldolase. BMB Rep 49(12):681–686
Waldron KJ, Robinson NJ (2009) How do bacterial cells ensure that metalloproteins get the correct metal? Nat Rev Microbiol 6(1):25–35. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2057
Yoshida H, Yamaji M, Ishii T, Izumori K, Kamitori S (2010) Catalytic reaction mechanism of Pseudomonas stutzeri l-rhamnose isomerase deduced from X-ray structures. FEBS J 277(4):1045–1057. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07548.x
Yoshida H, Yoshihara A, Teraoka M, Yamashita S, Izumori K, Kamitori S (2013) Structure of L-rhamnose isomerase in complex with L‐rhamnopyranose demonstrates the sugar‐ring opening mechanism and the role of a substrate sub‐binding site. FEBS Open Bio 3:35–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fob.2012.11.008
Yoshida H, Yamamoto N, Kurahara LH, Izumori K, Yoshihara A (2024) X-ray structure and characterization of a probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus Probio-M9 L-rhamnose isomerase. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 108(1):249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-024-13075-9
Zgiby S, Plater AR, Bates MA, Thomson GJ, Berry A (2002) A functional role for a flexible loop containing Glu182 in the class II fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase from Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 315(2):131–140. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.2001.5237
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to colleagues past and present, in particular Dr. Isabel Bento from the EMBL and Dr. Stefan Marsden.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
PLH, MP, and UH wrote the review. UH edited and designed the structure of the review.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hagedoorn, PL., Pabst, M. & Hanefeld, U. The metal cofactor: stationary or mobile?. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 108, 391 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-024-13206-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-024-13206-2