Introduction

Enzymes active on carbohydrates are grouped in CAZy database (https://www.cazy.org) where they are classified into families according to their primary, secondary, and tertiary structure similarity (Drula et al. 2022). Glycoside hydrolase family 30 (GH30) is currently divided into 10 subfamilies and contains diverse enzymatic activities including β-glucocerebrosidases (GH30_1), β-glucosidases (GH30_1, 6), β-1,6-glucanases (GH30_3), β-xylosidases (GH30_2), β-1,4-endoxylanases (GH30_7, 8), reducing end xylose releasing β-1,4-exoxylanases (GH30_7), β-1,4-xylobiohydrolases (GH30_7, 10), β-1,6-galactanases (GH30_5), β-glucuronidases (GH30_9), and β-fucosidases (GH30_4). A new subfamily GH30_11 has been proposed just recently and contains β-1,6-galactobiohydrolases (Li et al. 2022).

GH30 enzymes active on xylan have so far been found in the subfamilies GH30_7, GH30_8, and GH30_10 (Puchart et al. 2021). While bacterial GH30_8 members are mostly specific glucuronoxylanases (EC 3.2.1.136) requiring MeGlcA substitution of the xylan chain for their activity (St. John et al. 2006; Vršanská et al. 2007), fungal GH30_7 members show broader substrate specificity (Šuchová et al. 2021b). In addition to specific glucuronoxylanases (Biely et al. 2014), the GH30_7 subfamily contains non-specific endo-β-1,4-xylanases (EC 3.2.1.8) (Nakamichi et al. 2019c; Šuchová et al. 2021c), reducing end xylose releasing xylanases (Rex-es, EC 3.2.1.156) (Tenkanen et al. 2013; Nakamichi et al. 2019a), xylobiohydrolases (acting at the non-reducing end) (Šuchová et al. 2020) and bifunctional glucuronoxylanases/xylobiohydrolases (Nakamichi et al. 2019b; Katsimpouras et al. 2019). The GH30_10 subfamily was established just recently, and it contains bacterial xylobiohydrolases (Šuchová et al. 2021a; Crooks et al. 2021).

Acetivibrio clariflavus (basonym: Clostridium clariflavum, Hungateiclostridium clariflavum) is a Gram-positive, thermophilic, cellulolytic cellulosome-forming bacterium, isolated from an anaerobic sewage sludge (Shiratori et al. 2009). Analysis of the A. clariflavus cellulosome has shown that the GH30 enzymes (Clocl_1795, Clocl_2746) were highly abundant in all cellulosome fractions examined (Artzi et al. 2015). Both enzymes exhibited xylanolytic activity. Recently it was found that Clocl_1795 is a xylobiohydrolase AcXbh30A releasing xylobiose from the non-reducing end of xylan and xylooligosaccharides (Šuchová et al. 2021a; Crooks et al. 2021). The enzyme was crystallized, its 3-D structure was solved and the interactions of xylobiose with the enzyme active site were identified (St John et al. 2022). The AcXbh30A became a founding member of the GH30_10 subfamily. However, the second GH30 xylanolytic enzyme from A. clariflavus (Clocl_2746, AEV69300.1) has not been studied yet. Here we report its characterization, and we show that it is a non-specific endo-β-1,4-xylanase AcXyn30B. Based on phylogenetic analysis that distinguishes AcXyn30B and related proteins from other GH30 members, we propose to establish a new subfamily GH30_12.

Materials and methods

Substrates, standards, and enzymes

Beechwood 4-O-methylglucuronoxylan (GX) was prepared as described earlier (Ebringerová et al. 1967). Rhodymenan (Rho), an algal linear β-1,3-β-1,4-xylan from Palmaria palmata, was a gift from Prof. M. Claeyssens (University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium). Wheat arabinoxylan (AraX, Ara:Xyl 38:62, medium viscosity), 4-nitrophenyl glycosides of xylobiose and xylotriose, linear β-1,4-xylooligosaccharides (Xyl2-Xyl6), arabinoxylooligosaccharides A3X (α-l-Araf-1,3-β-d-Xylp-1,4-β-d-Xylp), A2XX (α-l-Araf-1,2-β-d-Xylp-1,4-β-d-Xylp-1,4-β-d-Xylp), A2+3XX (α-l-Araf-1,3-[α-l-Araf-1,2]-β-d-Xylp-1,4-β-d-Xylp-1,4-β-d-Xylp), XA3XX (β-d-Xylp-1,4-[α-l-Araf-1,3]-β-d-Xylp-1,4-β-d-Xylp-1,4-β-d-Xylp), a mixture of XA3XX and XA2XX (β-d-Xylp-1,4-[α-l-Araf-1,2]-β-d-Xylp-1,4-β-d-Xylp-1,4-β-d-Xylp), XA2+3XX (β-d-Xylp-1,4-[α-l-Araf-1,3]-[α-l-Araf-1,2]-β-d-Xylp-1,4-β-d-Xylp-1,4-β-d-Xylp) and GH67 α-glucuronidase from Geobacillus stearothermophilus (E-AGUBS) were purchased from Megazyme International (Wicklow, Ireland). Xylose was from Serva (Heidelberg, Germany). MeGlcA3Xyl3 and MeGlcA3Xyl4 were prepared from beechwood GX as described previously (Biely et al. 1997). GH3 β-xylosidase was a recombinant Aspergillus niger enzyme expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Biely et al. 2000). A. clariflavus AcXyn30B (product number: CZ0917) was purchased from NZYTech (Lisboa, Portugal).

Amino acid sequence and phylogenetic analysis

Proteins homologous to AcXyn30B (GenBank: AEV69300.1, Uniprot: G8M2Z1) were searched using the BlastP (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). Characterized GH30 enzymes were collected from CAZy database (http://www.cazy.org/GH30.html). For amino acid comparison and phylogenetic analysis, only the sequences of catalytic domains were used. Selected representatives from each GH30 subfamily were aligned using Clustal Omega server (Madeira et al. 2019) and Supplemental Fig. S1 was prepared using ESPript server (Robert and Gouet 2014). For phylogenetic analysis, 47 amino acid sequences of characterized GH30 members and 14 amino acid sequences of proteins most similar to AcXyn30B were firstly aligned in Clustal Omega, and the alignment was then analyzed in MEGAX using the Maximum Likelihood method and JTT matrix-based model (Jones et al. 1992; Kumar et al. 2018). Phylogenetic tree branch support values were obtained with 500 cycles of bootstrap analysis (Felsenstein 1985).

Hydrolysis of polysaccharides and oligosaccharides

Specific activity on polysaccharides was determined on the basis of released reducing sugars quantified by Somogyi-Nelson procedure (Paleg 1959). 10 mg.ml−1 solutions of GX, Rho, and AraX in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6, were mixed with AcXyn30B (final concentration 30.9 nM) and incubated at 40 °C. At time intervals 200 μl aliquots were taken for analysis. 2 mM solutions of 4-nitrophenyl glycosides (NP-Xyl3, NP-Xyl2) in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6, were incubated with 22.7 nM AcXyn30B at 40 °C and release of 4-nitrophenol was recorded for 1 h in 5 min intervals by measuring the absorbance at 410 nm. One unit of activity is defined as the amount of the enzyme liberating in 1 min 1 μmol of 4-nitrophenol (from the chromogenic NP-glycosides) or 1 μmol of reducing sugars expressed as an equivalent of xylose.

For thin layer chromatography (TLC) analysis, 10 mg.ml−1 polysaccharide solutions (GX, Rho, AraX) were incubated with 0.27 μM AcXyn30B at 40 °C. Aliquots of 5 μl were spotted on silica gel-coated aluminum sheets (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) after 10 min, 1 h, 5 h, and 24 h of hydrolysis. The reaction was terminated after 24 h by heating at 100 °C for 5 min. Subsequent treatment with β-xylosidase (1 U.ml−1) was done overnight at 40 °C after adjusting pH of the hydrolysates to 4.0 with 4 M acetic acid (due to a lower pH optimum of the β-xylosidase). The treatment with GH67 α-glucuronidase (10 U/ml) was done overnight at 40 °C and pH 6. Hydrolysis of oligosaccharides was done with 2 mM solutions of xylooligosaccharides (XOs) (Xyl2 – Xyl6), arabinoxylooligosaccharides (A3X, A2XX, A2+3XX, XA3XX, XA2+3XX and the mixture of XA3XX+XA2XX) or acidic XOs (MeGlcA3Xyl3 and MeGlcA3Xyl4) in 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 6, with 0.14 μM AcXyn30B. 2 μl of the mixtures were spotted onto the TLC plate after 10 min, 1 h, 5 h and 24 h of hydrolysis at 40 °C. TLC plates were developed twice for linear XOs Xyl2 – Xyl6 and once for the acidic XOs in the solvent system ethyl acetate/acetic acid/2-propanol/formic acid/water 25:10:5:1:15 (v/v). TLC plates with arabino-XOs were developed once in the solvent system n-butanol/ethanol/water 10:8:5 (v/v). In all cases, the sugars were visualized using orcinol reagent (0.5% orcinol in 5% sulfuric acid in ethanol) and a heating at 105 °C.

Determination of kinetic constants

Kinetic parameters for GX and AraX hydrolysis were determined at 40 °C in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6. For GX (0.5–20 mg.ml−1) and AraX (1–20 mg.ml−1), the amount of released reducing sugars was determined at several time points by Somogyi-Nelson procedure (Paleg 1959). For NP-Xyl2 and NP-Xyl3 (both 0.05–1 mM), the release of 4-nitrophenol was followed for 1 h, by measuring the changes in absorbance at 410 nm. Kinetic constants were calculated by a non-linear regression using Origin 6.0 program (OriginLab Corp., Northampton, MA, USA).

Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI–TOF MS)

The hydrolysates were decationized by Dowex 50 (H+ form) and 1 μl was mixed with 1 μl of the matrix (1% solution of 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid in 30% acetonitrile) directly on the MS target plate. After air-drying, the samples were analyzed by UltrafleXtreme MALDI TOF/TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) operating in reflectron positive mode.

Results

Amino acid sequence comparison

AcXyn30B (Clocl_2746, AEV69300.1, G8M2Z1) consists of 673 amino acids. The signal peptide is 28 amino acids long (SignalP) (Teufel et al. 2022) and the GH30 catalytic module (amino acids 29-446) is followed by a CBM6 module (amino acids 469-593), and a dockerin module (amino acids 602-673). A comparison of the full-length amino acid sequence to a protein database using the BlastP revealed that among the first 100 hits, there was only one characterized enzyme CpXyn30A from Ruminiclostridium papyrosolvens (WP_004618990.1, also containing CBM6 domain) (St John et al. 2014) which had 31.51% identity with AcXyn30B. The most similar proteins were uncharacterized GH30 proteins from the genera Clostridium, Anaerobacterium, and Bacillota. A pairwise sequence comparison of AcXyn30B catalytic domain with catalytic domains of several members of each GH30 subfamily showed that AcXyn30B is most similar to GH30_8 subfamily; however, the identity and similarity are quite low, about 24–27% and 38–44%, respectively. In the CAZy database, the enzyme is classified in the GH30 family but is not assigned to any subfamily. To reveal a relationship of AcXyn30B with other GH30 members, a phylogenetic tree was constructed (Fig. 1). Amino acid sequences of catalytic domains of characterized GH30 members from all known subfamilies and 14 amino acid sequences of proteins most similar to AcXyn30B according to BlastP search were initially aligned in Clustal Omega and the alignment was then analyzed in MEGAX. The phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1) shows that AcXyn30B and related proteins form a separate clade within group 2 (explained below) but clearly distinct from other subfamilies. Therefore, we propose AcXyn30B to be a founding member of a new GH30 subfamily, GH30_12.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Phylogenetic relationship of GH30 characterized enzymes and the enzymes having similarity to AcXyn30B. The alignment performed using Clustal Omega was analyzed in MEGAX. The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method and JTT matrix-based model. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (500 replicates) are shown next to the branches

The overall structure of GH30 enzymes is formed by (β/α)8 barrel which is linked to a side β-structure that is composed of 9 β-strands (Puchart et al. 2021). Based on the arrangement of the β9-domain relative to the (β/α)8 barrel, the GH30 family is divided into two groups: group 1 (subfamilies 1, 2, 3, 9) and group 2 (subfamilies 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11) (St John et al. 2010). In group 1 the first three β-strands of the β9-domain precede the (β/α)8 barrel (Supplemental Fig. S1, highlighted in yellow) while in group 2 just one β-strand of the β9-domain is located in front of the (β/α)8 barrel. From the amino acid sequence alignment (Supplemental Fig. S1), it is obvious that in AcXyn30B, there is only one β-strand of the β9-domain preceding the (β/α)8 barrel, thus placing AcXyn30B into the group 2. Based on the sequence alignment Glu171 (an acid/base) and Glu279 (a nucleophile) are predicted to be catalytic residues (Supplemental Fig S1, highlighted in magenta). AcXyn30B and related enzymes do not contain a prokaryotic Arg which is responsible for glucuronoxylan specificity of the GH30_8 members (Supplemental Fig S1, highlighted in green). A different arginine residue, which often plays a similar role in eukaryotic GH30_7 glucuronoxylanases, is also absent in the sequence of AcXyn30B where Trp52 is found (Supplemental Fig S1, highlighted in gray). In this aspect, AcXyn30B resembles a non-specific GH30_7 xylanase TcXyn30C having Phe47 in the corresponding position (Nakamichi et al. 2020).

There are several differences in primary structure between GH30_7 and GH30_8 sequences (Puchart et al. 2021). The most obvious is the presence of much longer β2-α2 loop in the eukaryotic GH30_7 enzymes. The corresponding region of AcXyn30B is shorter, more similar to GH30_8 representatives (Supplemental Fig S1, highlighted in cyan). Moreover, the GH30_7 members contain additional short β-strands β8A and β8B in the β8-α8 segment. This region of AcXyn30B more resembles GH30_7 enzymes, but actually it is even longer (Supplemental Fig S1, highlighted in blue). It seems that in contrast to GH30_7 members, AcXyn30B does not lack the α6 helix (which is present in GH30_8 members), but the α7 helix is shorter and most similar in length to the non-specific GH30_8 enzymes CpXyn30A and CaXyn30A (Supplemental Fig. S1, highlighted in orange). Based on the primary structure comparison we can conclude that AcXyn30B and related enzymes have a special combination of structural features found in the enzymes from both GH30_7 and GH30_8 subfamilies.

Catalytic properties

The activity of AcXyn30B was tested on different polysaccharides. The enzyme was not active on cellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose, starch, laminarin (β-1,3-glucan with β-1,6 branches), and pustulan (β-1,6-glucan) but depolymerized glucuronoxylan (GX), rhodymenan (β-1,3-β-1,4-xylan, Rho), and arabinoxylan (AraX). The specific activity of AcXyn30B on GX, Rho, and AraX was quite low and very similar, 3.5, 2.9, and 2.7 U/mg, respectively. AcXyn30B exhibited slightly higher specific activities of 4.8 and 9.3 U/mg on chromogenic substrates NP-Xyl2 and NP-Xyl3, respectively. Similar activity on the polysaccharides and aryl glycosides of linear xylooligosaccharides indicates a wide substrate specificity, which is in contrast with narrow specificities of GH30 glucuronoxylanases and xylobiohydrolases and suggests that AcXyn30B is a non-specific xylanase. The differences in catalytic properties also support the phylogenetic classification of AcXyn30B into the separate clade. Kinetic parameters (Table 1) showed that GX is a little bit better substrate than AraX due to lower Km value, and that the enzyme prefers longer oligosaccharides because the catalytic efficiency on NP-Xyl3 is higher than on NP-Xyl2.

Table 1 Kinetic parameters of AcXyn30B

The activity of AcXyn30B was also qualitatively examined on linear xylooligosaccharides (XOs) Xyl2 – Xyl6 (Fig. 2). Xyl2 was not attacked by the enzyme while Xyl3 was slowly converted to Xyl and Xyl2. Xyl4 was hydrolyzed to approximately equal amount of Xyl, Xyl2, and Xyl3. The enzyme thus has no significant preference for binding the substrate in subsites -2 and +2 (generating Xyl2) over the subsites either −3 to +1 or −1 to +3 (yielding Xyl3 and Xyl). Xyl2 and Xyl3 were the major products formed from Xyl5, and Xyl6 was cleaved to Xyl2, Xyl3, and Xyl4, so in both cases, at least two subsites are occupied on both sides from the catalytic amino acids (from −2 to +2). Longer XOs seem to be hydrolyzed faster than shorter ones and at least four catalytic subsites need to be occupied for effective cleavage. In the 5-h hydrolysates, tiny amounts of XOs longer than a substrate were observed as a result of transglycosylation reaction.

Fig. 2
figure 2

TLC analysis of the products formed from linear XOs (Xyl2 – Xyl6) by AcXyn30B after 10 min, 1 h, 5 h, and 24 h. St, standards of linear XOs

To reveal the mode of action of AcXyn30B on GX, AraX, and rhodymenan, the hydrolysates were analyzed by TLC (Fig. 3) and MALDI-TOF MS (Fig. 4). The detectable products of different lengths were produced from GX already after 10 min of hydrolysis. After 24 h they were shortened to linear oligosaccharides Xyl – Xyl6 and acidic XOs MeGlcAXyl2 – MeGlcAXyl4. To determine the structure of the released acidic XOs, either GH3 β-xylosidase or GH67 α-glucuronidase was applied to the 24-h hydrolysate (Figs. 3 and 4). The GH3 β-xylosidase is able to release non-substituted xylopyranosyl residue from the non-reducing end of XOs (Biely et al. 2016). α-Glucuronidases from GH67 family are known to release the (4-O-methyl-)glucuronic acid (GlcA/MeGlcA) only from the non-reducing end xylopyranosyl residue (Biely et al. 2016). The application of β-xylosidase on the GX hydrolysate did not affect the amount of MeGlcAXyl2, while the application of α-glucuronidase resulted in its disappearance accompanied with an increase in xylobiose amount (Figs. 3 and 4). This means that MeGlcA is attached to the non-reducing end xylose moiety of this acidic XO and its structure is MeGlcA2Xyl2. However, in the case of MeGlcAXyl3 and MeGlcAXyl4, the results were not so straightforward. Most of MeGlcAXyl3 was cleaved by β-xylosidase to MeGlcAXyl2 but a smaller part remained in the hydrolysate indicating that the predominant form of MeGlcAXyl3 is MeGlcA2Xyl3, but MeGlcA3Xyl3 is also present. In contrast, most of MeGlcAXyl4 was hydrolyzed by α-glucuronidase to MeGlcA and Xyl4, meaning that MeGlcA4Xyl4 is the main MeGlcA-substituted Xyl4, but there are also other isomers (e.g., MeGlcA3Xyl4) present in the hydrolysate. To further inspect the hydrolysis of acidic XOs, AcXyn30B was applied on MeGlcA3Xyl3 and MeGlcA3Xyl4. After 24 h, MeGlcA3Xyl3 was not attacked, while MeGlcA3Xyl4 was hydrolyzed to MeGlcA2Xyl3 and Xyl. Prolonged incubation (3 days) led to a very slow cleavage of MeGlcA3Xyl3 to MeGlcA2Xyl2 and Xyl, while MeGlcA2Xyl3, a degradation product of MeGlcA3Xyl4, was slowly further converted to MeGlcA2Xyl2 (Supplemental Fig. S2).

Fig. 3
figure 3

a TLC analysis of hydrolysis products released by AcXyn30B from beechwood glucuronoxylan (GX), wheat arabinoxylan (AraX) and rhodymenan (Rho) after 10 min, 1 h, 5 h, and 24 h, and after subsequent addition of either β-xylosidase (x) or α-glucuronidase (g). St, standards of linear XOs. b Action of β-xylosidase and α-glucuronidase on different acidic XOs which are produced from GX by AcXyn30B

Fig. 4
figure 4

MALDI-TOF MS analysis of hydrolysis products released by AcXyn30B from beechwood glucuronoxylan after 24 h, and after subsequent addition of either α-glucuronidase or β-xylosidase

AraX was hydrolyzed by AcXyn30B to a mixture of linear and Ara-substituted XOs which were difficult to identify (Fig. 3a). However, the mode of action of AcXyn30B on arabinosylated substrates can be assumed from the hydrolysis of short Ara-XOs of defined structure. After 24 h, the enzyme did not attack A3X, A2XX, and A2+3XX, but it released Xyl from XA3XX, XA2XX, and XA2+3XX (Fig. 5, Supplemental Fig. S3). When the mixtures were incubated for a prolonged time (3 days), a very low amount of Xyl was also liberated from A2+3XX (Supplemental Fig. S3). In all cases, Xyl was released from the reducing end of the substrates. This conclusion is based on experiments using the GH3 β-xylosidase or various α-arabinofuranosidases and is depicted and explained in Supplemental Fig. S4. The release of Xyl from the reducing end of XA3XX, XA2XX, and XA2+3XX means that these substrates are bound in the catalytic subsites −3, −2, −1, and +1 (cleavage occurring between the subsites −1 and +1). Singly or doubly Ara-substituted Xylp residue is then accommodated in the −2 subsite and unsubstituted Xylp residues are located in the subsites −3, −1, and +1. If we assume that one Xylp shorter substrates (A2XX vs XA2XX and A2+3XX vs XA2+3XX) are accommodated in a similar way, they occupy the subsites −2, −1 and +1, but they are not cleaved or are cleaved very slowly. This indicates that the occupation of the −3 subsite by Xylp residue promotes the hydrolysis of substituted XOs. In other words, substituted substrates are effectively cleaved only when at least four catalytic subsites of AcXyn30B are occupied (which is in consonance with hydrolysis of neutral and acidic XOs), Xylp residue in the −1 subsite is non-substituted, the −3 subsite is occupied and the substituted Xylp residue (at position 2 and/or 3) is located in the −2 subsite.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Various branched XOs tested as the substrates for AcXyn30B. The cleavage site is indicated by an arrow

Hydrolysis of Rho by AcXyn30B yielded a mixture of β-1,4-linked and β-1,3-1,4-linked XOs (Fig. 3). Similarly to AaXyn30A, the enzyme was able to release small amount of isomeric xylotriose having the structure of β-d-Xylp-1,3-β-d-Xylp-1,4-β-d-Xyl (X3X4X) as the shortest mixed linkage oligosaccharide. However, the amount of longer XOs (degrees of polymerization (DP) 4-6) was higher, and β-1,3-1,4-linked XOs were prevailing.

Discussion

Analysis of the A. clariflavus cellulosome has suggested that the GH30 enzymes (Clocl_1795, Clocl_2746) play a pivotal role in the A. clariflavus cellulosome as hemicellulases (Artzi et al. 2015). The recent discovery that Clocl_1795 is a xylobiohydrolase AcXbh30A and a founding member of the GH30_10 subfamily (Šuchová et al. 2021a; Crooks et al. 2021) prompted us to characterize the second GH30 xylanolytic enzyme AcXyn30B (Clocl_2746) of A. clariflavus. The protein had low amino acid sequence similarity to the characterized GH30 enzymes. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that AcXyn30B and related enzymes form a separate GH30_12 subfamily within group 2. Further inspection of AcXyn30B primary structure showed that the enzyme shares structural features of the enzymes from both GH30_7 and GH30_8 subfamilies. The shorter β2-α2 loop of AcXyn30B (similar to GH30_8 enzymes) can form less barriers for binding larger substrates to negative subsites, thus allowing a cleavage of the substrates by endo-mode. The presence of tryptophans in the positions corresponding to prokaryotic and eukaryotic arginines (that are responsible for glucuronoxylan specificity of GH30_8 and GH30_7 glucuronoxylanases) suggests that the catalytic site of AcXyn30B is paved by aromatic amino acids which allow non-specific binding of sugars. Due to the low similarity of AcXyn30B to other GH30 enzymes with solved 3-D structure, it was not possible to construct a reliable model of AcXyn30B and only its crystallization could shed more light on a role of particular amino acids in catalysis.

Similar specific activity of AcXyn30B on GX, AraX, and linear oligosaccharides indicate that AcXyn30B is a non-specific xylanase not preferring any substrate. There are two non-specific xylanases in the GH30_8 subfamily – CpXyn30A and CaXyn30A (St John et al. 2014, 2018), both lacking so-called prokaryotic arginine which is otherwise conserved in the GH30_8 members and responsible for their strict glucuronoxylanase specificity. While CaXyn30A was shown to prefer Ara-substituted substrates, the specific activity of CpXyn30A on GX, AraX, and Xyl6 was similar (St John et al. 2014). CpXyn30A did not hydrolyze Xyl3 and hydrolysis of Xyl4 was slow. The shortest acidic fragment released from GX by CpXyn30A was MeGlcAXyl4. On the contrary, AcXyn30B was able to slowly cleave Xyl3 and the shortest acidic fragment released from GX was MeGlcA2Xyl2 which means that AcXyn30B is able to cleave the substrates to shorter products than CpXyn30A. MeGlcA2Xyl2 was observed as the shortest acidic product released from GX also by non-specific xylanases from the GH30_7 subfamily – TcXyn30C and TlXyn30A (Nakamichi et al. 2019c; Šuchová et al. 2021c). Both enzymes initially hydrolyzed GX to a series of acidic products of the general structure MeGlcA2Xyln similarly to GH30 glucuronoxylanases. However, these acidic XOs were not accumulated in the reaction mixture but were subsequently converted to MeGlcA2Xyl2 and the corresponding linear XOs, which were finally converted to Xyl and Xyl2. AcXyn30B liberated the same final products, but also longer linear and acidic XOs remained in the hydrolysate after 24 h. MeGlcA3Xyl3, A2XX, and A2+3XX which are bound to 3 catalytic subsites only, were hardly hydrolyzed by AcXyn30B but all three compounds served as a substrate for TcXyn30C and TlXyn30A. This means that AcXyn30B requires at least 4 occupied catalytic subsites for effective cleavage while three occupied subsites are sufficient for the action of TcXyn30C and TlXyn30A, thus enabling the latter two enzymes to release shorter products. The presence of longer acidic XOs in the GX hydrolysate generated by AcXyn30B may be also the result of transglycosylation reactions which may occur in the presence of suitable acceptors. The variety of acidic XOs (carrying the MeGlcA substituent on different xylosyl residues) found in the 24-h hydrolysate of GX by AcXyn30B suggests that the enzyme initially does not attack the substrate as glucuronoxylanase but rather cleave GX non-specifically. MeGlcA-substituted Xylp residue may be accommodated in several enzyme subsites except of the -1 subsite because none of the acidic XOs released from GX comprised MeGlcA-substituted Xylp at the reducing end. On the other hand, MeGlcA2Xyl2 formed from GX indicates that decoration with MeGlcA is readily allowed in the subsites −2 and +1. It seems that main chain decoration reduces the enzyme action since AcXyn30B hydrolyses Xyl4 significantly faster than MeGlcA3Xyl4. In contrast, TcXyn30C and TlXyn30A were shown to prefer a cleavage of MeGlcA-substituted XOs (Nakamichi et al. 2019c; Šuchová et al. 2021c).

Microorganisms developed different strategies for a deconstruction of lignocellulosic material. In A. clariflavus, this process involves at least two cellulosomal xylanolytic GH30 enzymes: AcXbh30A and AcXyn30B. AcXbh30A is a xylobiohydrolase able to release prebiotic sugar xylobiose from glucuronoxylan and xylooligosaccharides, while highly substituted arabinoxylan is attacked only weakly (Šuchová et al. 2021a; Crooks et al. 2021). AcXyn30B is a non-specific xylanase hydrolyzing different types of xylan including arabinoxylan to shorter fragments. The phylogenetic analysis placed AcXyn30B to a new GH30_12 subfamily which pave the way for the discovery of more enzymes belonging to the same subfamily and having similar specificity in other microorganisms. The GH30 enzymes may cooperate with other well known xylanolytic enzymes what seems to be the case of A. clariflavus since additional predicted xylanases from GH10 and GH11 families were identified in its cellulosome complexes (Artzi et al. 2015). The presence of enzymes with different and complementary specificities enables the microorganism to hydrolyze a variety of materials available in the nature and compete with others. Although the non-specific GH30 xylanases and xylanases from families GH10 and GH11 attack the same substrates (e.g., glucuronoxylan and arabinoxylan), they release the products differing in length and branching. Therefore, they may act in synergy as was shown by GH30_8 glucuronoxylan-specific BsXynC and GH11 xylanase A that are secreted simultaneously by B. subtilis (Rhee et al. 2014). Another cooperation of GH 30 xylanase (TtXyn30A) was found with lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase (LPMO) PcAA14B from Pycnoporus coccineus operating on xylan polysaccharide(s) (Zerva et al. 2020). Although the LPMOs are not produced by bacteria, their synergistic action with other carbohydrate-active enzymes including xylanases of prokaryotic origin is of upmost importance from a view of their biotechnological exploitation because the oxidative enzymes typically work on complex insoluble substrates, which are much more resistant to hydrolytic enzymes. In this way, a saccharification of crude plant biomass may be significantly enhanced.