Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling study of mecamylamine block of muscle type acetylcholine receptors

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Biophysics Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The blocking action of mecamylamine on different types of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) has been extensively studied and used as a tool to characterize the nAChRs from different synapses. However, mechanism of mecamylamine action was not fully explored for all types of nAChRs. In the present study, we provide brief description of the mecamylamine action on muscle nAChRs expressed at the frog neuromuscular junction. In this preparation mecamylamine block of nAChRs was accompanied by a use-dependent block relief induced by membrane depolarization combined with the activation of nAChRs by endogenous agonist acetylcholine (ACh). Further, three kinetic models of possible mecamylamine interaction with nAChRs were analyzed including simple open channel block, symmetrical trapping block and asymmetrical trapping block. This analysis suggested that mecamylamine action could be described on the basis of trapping mechanism, when the antagonist remained inside the channel even in the absence of bound agonist. Such receptors with trapped mecamylamine inside were predicted to have a closing rate constant about three times faster than resting one and a fast voltage-dependent unblocking rate constant. Specific experimental conditions and morphological organization of the neuromuscular synapses were considered to simulate time course of the mecamylamine block development. Thus, likewise for the neuronal nAChRs, the trapping mechanism determined the action of mecamylamine on synaptic neuromuscular currents evoked by the endogenous agonist acetylcholine (ACh), however specific morphological organization of the synaptic transmission delayed time development of the currents block.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albuquerque EX, Deshpande SS, Kawabuchi M, Aracava Y, Idriss M, Rickett DL, Boyne AF (1985) Multiple actions of anticholinesterase agents on chemosensitive synapses: molecular basis for prophylaxis and treatment of organophosphate poisoning. Fundam Appl Toxicol 5:S182–S203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anglister L, Stiles JR, Salpeter MM (1994) Acetylcholinesterase density and turnover number at frog neuromuscular junctions, with modeling of their role in synaptic function. Neuron 4:783–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ascher P, Large WA, Rang HP (1979) Studies on the mechanism of action of acetylcholine antagonists on rat parasympathetic ganglion cells. J Physiol 295:139–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker CT, Bocharov GA, Paul CA, Rihan FA (1998) Modelling and analysis of time-lags in some basic patterns of cell proliferation. J Math Biol 37:341–371

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Benveniste M, Mayer ML (1995) Trapping of glutamate and glycine during open channel block of rat hippocampal neuron NMDA receptors by 9-aminoacridine. J Physiol 483:367–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackman JG, Ray C (1964) Actions of mecamylamine, dimecamine, pempidine and their two quaternary metho-salts at the neuromuscular junction. Br J Pharmacol Chemother 22:56–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanpied TA, Boeckman FA, Aizenman E, Johnson JW (1997) Trapping channel block of NMDA-activated responses by amantadine and memantine. J Neurophysiol 77:309–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Brammar WJ (1996) Nicotinic acetylcholine-gated integral receptors-channels. In: Conley EC, Brammar WJ (eds) The ion channel FactsBook I: extracellular ligand-gated channels. Academic, London, pp 234–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen HS, Lipton SA (1997) Mechanism of memantine block of NMDA-activated channels in rat retinal ganglion cells: uncompetitive antagonism. J Physiol 499:27–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Chretien JM, Chauvet GA (1998) An algorithmic method for determining the kinetic system of receptor–channel complexes. Math Biosci 147:227–257

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Colquhoun D (1998) Binding, gating, affinity and efficacy: the interpretation of structure–activity relationships for agonists and of the effects of mutating receptors. Br J Pharmacol 125:924–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly J, Boulter J, Heinemann SF (1992) Alpha 4–2 beta 2 and other nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes as targets of psychoactive and addictive drugs. Br J Pharmacol 105:657–666

    Google Scholar 

  • Corringer PJ, Novere N le, Changeux JP (2000) Nicotinic receptors at the amino acid level. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 40:431–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dilmore JG, Johnson JW (1998) Open channel block and alteration of N-methyl-d-aspartic acid receptor gating by an analog of phencyclidine. Biophys J 75:1801–1816

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingledine R, Borges K, Bowie D, Traynelis SF (1999) The glutamate receptor ion channels. Pharmacol Rev 51:7–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorrscheidt-Kafer M (1981) Comparison of the action of La3+ and Ca2+ on contraction threshold and other membrane parameters of frog skeletal muscle. J Membr Biol 62:95–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fieber LA, Adams DJ (1991) Acetylcholine-evoked currents in cultured neurones dissociated from rat parasympathetic cardiac ganglia. J Physiol 434:215–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Friboulet A, Thomas D (1993) Reaction–diffusion coupling in a structured system: application to the quantitative simulation of endplate currents. J Theor Biol 160:441–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frishman WH, Mitta W, Kupersmith A, Ky T (2006) Nicotine and non-nicotine smoking cessation pharmacotherapies. Cardiol Rev 14:57–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giniatullin RA, Khamitov G, Khazipov R, Magazanik LG, Nikolsky EE, Snetkov VA, Vyskocil F (1989) Development of desensitization during repetitive end-plate activity and single end-plate currents in frog muscle. J Physiol 412:113–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Giniatullin RA, Sokolova EM, Angelantonio S di, Skorinkin A, Talantova MV, Nistri A (2000) Rapid relief of block by mecamylamine of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors of rat chromaffin cells in vitro: an electrophysiological and modeling study. Mol Pharmacol 58:778–787

    Google Scholar 

  • Giniatullin R, Nistri A, Yakel JL (2005) Desensitization of nicotinic ACh receptors: shaping cholinergic signaling. Trends Neurosci 28:371–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurney AM, Rang HP (1984) The channel-blocking action of methonium compounds on rat submandibular ganglion cells. Br J Pharmacol 82:623–642

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalamida D, Poulas K, Avramopoulou V, Fostieri E, Lagoumintzis G, Lazaridis K, Sideri A, Zouridakis M, Tzartos SJ (2007) Muscle and neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Structure, function and pathogenicity. FEBS 274:3799–3845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knisley SB, Smith WM, Ideker RE (1994) Prolongation and shortening of action potentials by electrical shocks in frog ventricular muscle. Am J Physiol 266:H2348–H2358

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert JJ, Durant NN, Reynolds LS, Volle RL, Henderson EG (1981) Characterization of end-plate conductance in transected frog muscle: modification by drugs. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 216:62–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingle C (1983a) Blockade of cholinergic channels by chlorisondamine on a crustacean muscle. J Physiol 339:395–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingle C (1983b) Different types of blockade of crustacean acetylcholine-induced currents. J Physiol 339:419–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Maconochie DJ, Knight DE (1992) Markov modelling of ensemble current relaxations: bovine adrenal nicotinic receptor currents analysed. J Physiol 454:155–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Magleby KL, Pallotta BS (1981) A study of desensitization of acetylcholine receptors using nerve-released transmitter in the frog. J Physiol 316:225–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Magleby KL, Stevens CF (1972) The effect of voltage on the time course of end-plate currents. J Physiol 223:151–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathie A, Colquhoun D, Cull-Candy SG (1990) Rectification of currents activated by nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in rat sympathetic ganglion neurones. J Physiol 427:625–655

    Google Scholar 

  • Naves LA, van der Kloot W (2001) Repetitive nerve stimulation decreases the acetylcholine content of quanta at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol 532:637–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neely A, Lingle CJ (1986) Trapping of an open-channel blocker at the frog neuromuscular acetylcholine channel. Biophys J 50:981–986

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooney JM, Peters JA, Lambert JJ (1992) A patch clamp study of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor of bovine adrenomedullary chromaffin cells in culture. J Physiol 455:503–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Papke RL, Sanberg PR, Shytle RD (2001) Analysis of mecamylamine stereoisomers on human nicotinic receptor subtypes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 297:646–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Parnas H, Flashner M, Spira ME (1989) Sequential model to describe the nicotinic synaptic current. Biophys J 55:875–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawson PA, Grinnell AD, Wolowske B (1998) Quantitative freeze-fracture analysis of the frog neuromuscular junction synapse—I. Naturally occurring variability in active zone structure. J Neurocytol 27:361–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryaznikov EG, Skorinkin AI, Garaev RS, Giniatullin RA (2002) The mechanism of dimephosphone action on neuromuscular junction. Neirofiziologiya/Neurophysiology 34:361–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryaznikov EG, Skorinkin AI, Garaev RS, Giniatullin RA, Visel AO, Shukina LI (2005) The mechanisms of the action of oxaphospholene derivatives on neuromuscular junction. Bull Exp Biol Med 139:432–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Riemer TL, Sobie EA, Tung L (1998) Stretch-induced changes in arrhythmogenesis and excitability in experimentally based heart cell models. Am J Physiol 275:H431–H442

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnoll RA, Lerman C (2006) Current and emerging pharmacotherapies for treating tobacco dependence. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 11:429–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen WX, Horn JP (1998) Mecamylamine selectively blocks nicotinic receptors on vasomotor sympathetic C neurons. Brain Res 788:118–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shytle RD, Penny E, Silver AA, Goldman J, Sanberg PR (2002) Mecamylamine (Inversine): an old antihypertensive with new research directions. J Hum Hypertens 16:453–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skorinkin AI (2005) The action of ganglioblocker mecamylamine on the rat’s ionotropic muscular cholinoreceptors. Neirofiziologiya/Neurophysiology 37:217–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Skorinkin AI, Shaikhutdinova AR (2004) Reconstruction of dynamics of change in the acetylcholine concentration in the synaptic cleft upon signal-quantum signal. Biofizika 49: 872–876

    Google Scholar 

  • Skorinkin AI, Ostroumov KB, Shaikhutdinova AR, Giniatullin RA (2004) Trapping blockage of muscle nicotinic cholinoreceptors by mecamylamine. Dokl Biol Sci 399:464–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiles JR, Kovyazina IV, Salpeter EE, Salpeter MED MER (1999) The temperature sensitivity of miniature endplate currents is mostly governed by channel gating: evidence from optimized recordings and Monte Carlo simulations. Biophys J 77:1177–1187

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiles JR, van Helden D, Bartol TM jr, Salpeter EE, Salpeter MM (1996) Miniature endplate current rise times less than 100 microseconds from improved dual recordings can be modeled with passive acetylcholine diffusion from a synaptic vesicle. Proc Natl Acad Sci 93:5747–5752

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Varanda WA, Aracava Y, Sherby SM, Vanmeter WG, Eldefrawi ME, Albuquerque EX (1985) The acetylcholine receptor of the neuromuscular junction recognizes mecamylamine as a noncompetitive antagonist. Mol Pharmacol 28:128–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargas-Caballero M, Robinson HP (2004) Fast and slow voltage-dependent dynamics of magnesium block in the NMDA receptor: the asymmetric trapping block model. J Neurosci 24:6171–6180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wathey JC, Nass MM, Lester HA (1979) Numerical reconstruction of the quantal event at nicotinic synapses. Biophys J 27:145–164

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. A. Nistri and Prof. R. Giniatullin for comments and suggestions during writing of this manuscript. Asya Shaikhutdinova and Andrey Skorinkin would like to thank the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and the Russian government for a Leading Scientific School grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konstantin Ostroumov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ostroumov, K., Shaikhutdinova, A. & Skorinkin, A. Modeling study of mecamylamine block of muscle type acetylcholine receptors. Eur Biophys J 37, 393–402 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-007-0224-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-007-0224-5

Keywords

Navigation