Abstract
The insect gut microbiome constitutes a substantial yet underexplored reservoir of microbial diversity with important implications for entomology and biotechnology. Gut-associated microbes are crucial for maintaining host physiology, encompassing digestion, nutrient absorption, immune function, and resistance to environmental stress. In addition to these biological functions, the insect gut contains metabolically versatile bacteria that can synthesise a variety of bioactive substances, including amino acids, vitamins, antimicrobial agents and a wide range of industrially important enzymes. Enzymes such as cellulases, amylases, proteases, lipases etc., isolated from insect gut microbes have attracted increasing attention owing to their stability, versatility and facilitation of optimisation for large-scale production. Insects, being able to thrive in extreme environments, possess gut-derived enzymes that demonstrate exceptional stability and catalytic effectiveness, rendering them suitable for industrial and biotechnological applications. The current review compiles contemporary findings on enzyme-producing gut bacteria from various insect orders, emphasising the main enzyme classes identified, potential microbial species, traditional as well as advanced screening methodologies for important enzymes reported, viz., cellulases, proteases, amylases and their multifaceted applications in bioconversion, bioremediation and other industrial domains.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The gut microbiome refers to the consortia of microbial communities residing in the gastrointestinal system. This includes bacteria, archaea, fungi, protists, etc. This microbial diversity creates intricate, dynamic communities that engage in mutualistic, commensal or occasionally pathogenic interactions with their hosts [1]. In many animals, the gut microbiome is known as a vital second genome. Recent studies exploring the gut microbiome explain their primary functions in nutrition uptake and metabolism. Microbes play a vital role in enzymatic systems to degrade complex dietary polymers, including cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin and resistant starches, which are otherwise indigestible to the host [2]. Fermentation activities yield short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and other metabolites that play a crucial role in host energy equilibrium and nutrient absorption [3]. In addition, gut microbes produce vital vitamins such as B and K, as well as amino acids, thereby favouring host nutrition [4]. The gut microbiota significantly impacts the host immunity and disease resistance by producing antimicrobial substances and promoting the development of the host immune system [5].
Insects account for almost 50 per cent of all identified living species that exhibit a wide array of behaviours and diets that are closely associated with their gut microbiota [6]. The insect gut is divided into foregut, midgut and hindgut, each exhibiting unique physicochemical conditions like pH, oxygen gradients, redox potential, etc. that favour specific microbial populations (Fig. 1a) [6, 7]. The midgut generally exhibits an alkaline environment, which is mostly detrimental to several bacteria, whereas the hindgut offers an anoxic, fermentation-supportive environment conducive to robust microbial communities [8]. Figure 1 (b) shows the difference in microbial communities across the three different gut compartments, wherein the hindgut possesses diverse microbial communities along with the midgut, suitable for isolating and harnessing beneficial microbiota for isolating enzymes and bioactive compounds. The predominant bacterial phyla in insects are Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria, although their relative abundances exhibit considerable variation [9, 10]. Studies have been done exploring the microbiome of termites and cockroaches, which are reported to possess complex hindgut communities predominantly composed of anaerobic microorganisms proficient in lignocellulose breakdown [11, 12]. Lepidopteran and Coleopteran larvae were also reported to harbour beneficial microorganisms in their gut [13, 14].
(a) & (b) Larval gut compartments illustrating differential microbial diversity- foregut (microbial diversity is less), midgut (consist of diverse microbial diversity) and hindgut (having rich microbial diversity)
The gut microbiome of insects produces several types of enzymes and metabolites that are important for the host’s nutrition and ability to adapt. A plethora of these compounds exhibits significant biotechnological potential [15]. These metabolites also have important antibacterial, antifungal, and medicinal properties that can be used in industries [16, 17]. Microbial enzymes such as cellulases, proteases, and amylases have garnered significant attention and application due to their stability, ease of production, and optimisation strategies at an industrial level, in contrast to other sources [15, 18]. Likewise, substances such as siderophores, iturin, surfactins, and others, extracted from the gut microbiota of beetles and wasps, exhibit potential antimicrobial and antifungal characteristics, respectively [19]. In a context where industries prioritise profit and effective scaling, microbial enzymes are significantly important, particularly in the exploration of a relatively under-researched area, the insect microbiome. Nonetheless, a restricted amount of research has examined microbiome patterns across ecologically diverse insect taxa, highlighting the importance of beneficial microorganisms on host physiology and behaviour. Recent recognition of the importance of insect-microbe interactions has led to various studies investigating the bioprospecting of commercial applications for gut microorganisms.
The current review mainly focuses on the various enzymes reported from different insect orders and their screening, as well as prominent applications, for focusing more on the exploration of the insect gut microbiome and identification of several bioactive compounds for industrial production.
Collection of Literature for Review
The literature source for the current review was searched using several prominent online databases, such as Scopus, Google Scholar, Web of Science, PubMed, etc. We have done an extensive literature search to understand different insect orders and their gut microbiome studies. The former studies started way back in 1980, understanding the cellulolytic potential of the Eri silkworm, Philosamia ricini [20], a lepidopteran insect, studying only the host enzyme, but with several years forward, studies have begun on the gut microbiome and the biotechnological applications of enzyme-positive strains. Major works have been started from the year 2015, with breakthrough studies during the 2020s. We used specific keywords like insect gut microbiome, cellulase, lepidopteran gut microbiome, protease, coleopteran, etc. Around 200 articles appeared, and after scrutinising almost 100 papers were relevant to our focus. This includes mainly research articles and a few review articles. The number of review articles focusing on the current perspective is rare, and this highlights the importance of exploring the reported gut microbiome in each insect order and the techniques involved in screening several enzymes.
Insect Gut Microbiome and Bioactive Compounds – Beneficial Roles and Applications
The gut microbiota of insects is a dynamic environment that is habitant to many different groups of microbes that are important for the host’s nutrition, immune system, and ability to adapt to new environments [21]. These gut inhabitants act as a bioreactor to make enzymes and bioactive compounds that can be used in several biotechnological industries. The gut microbiome of insects facilitates various aspects of their life and metabolism. It provides nutritional support through the synthesis of essential amino acids and vitamins such as B-complex and Vit-K, the fermentation of plant-derived polysaccharides into short-chain fatty acids and nitrogen fixation by diazotrophic bacteria, including Enterobacter and Klebsiella [22, 23]. In addition to providing food, they help break down tough polymers like cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, pectin and chitin [24]. Figure 2 shows the main functions that the gut microbiome of insects performs.
Functions of the gut microbiota of insects
The gut microbiome of termites, particularly Spirochetes and Clostridia, is vital for the degradation of lignocellulose, enabling these insects to utilize indigestible plant materials and thrive in various ecological conditions [25]. These microbial communities are also very important for detoxification and defence, in addition to digestion. They break down harmful plant allelochemicals, insecticides and other xenobiotics while also making antimicrobial molecules that protect the host pathogens [26]. Additionally, gut microbiota enhances host immunity by modulating immunological responses [27]. Beetles, ants and wasps have symbiotic bacteria that make antifungal and antibacterial substances that protect their eggs and larvae [28]. This makes the host’s natural defences stronger.
The gut microbiota of insects are important sources of bioactive compounds that can be used in numerous applications. Enzymes like cellulases, xylanases, and ligninases are necessary for the conversion of biomass into biofuels, while chitinases are used as biocontrol agents, mainly as antifungal compounds [29, 30]. Proteases and lipases from gut bacteria are used in the pharmaceutical industry and in industrial processing [31]. Furthermore, cellulase enzymes are primarily utilised in saccharification, food processing, and biofuel production [32]. Additionally, compounds such as iturin, surfactin, and fengycin, derived from Bacillus and Pseudomonas isolated from insect guts, possess extensive applications as antibacterial and antifungal agents [33, 34]. Table 1 below lists different bioactive compounds that have been found in the gut microbiomes of different insects.
Ecological and Host-Driven Determinants of Gut Microbiome Assembly
The composition and functional ability of insect gut microbiota are significantly influenced by ecological factors, including nutrition, environment and gut morphology, which impose selective pressures affecting microbial colonisation and enzymatic capabilities [10]. The diet serves as the primary determinant for insects that consume cellulose-rich plant materials like termites, Lepidopterans, Coleopterans and Orthopterans. Here, the host microbial communities are predominantly composed of cellulolytic Bacteroidetes, Fibrobacteres, Clostridia and Actinobacteria, indicating significant enrichment for cellulases, xylanases and lignin-modifying enzymes [24, 41, 42]. Sap feeders, which include the Hemiptera, obligate symbionts such as Buchnera and Sulciato, provide essential amino acids absent in phloem diets, whereas carnivorous or detrivorous insects like Dipterans possess microbiomes rich in proteases and lipases, suitable for proteinaceous or decomposing materials [43]. The social Hymenopterans maintain highly stable and host-specific microbiota primarily dominated by Gilliamella, Snodgrasella and Lactobacillaceae, where enzymes are oriented towards pollen digestion (pectinases and glycosidases) as well as antimicrobial defence rather than lignocellulose degradation [44, 45].
Habitat influences gut community composition, as insects residing in the soil, aquatic ecosystems or decomposing organic matter assimilate ambient bacteria that enhance hydrolytic or detoxifying functions. Black soldier fly larvae acquire a variety of lignocellulose and pollutant-degrading bacteria from organic waste environments, hence augmenting their collection of hydrolases and oxidoreductases [46, 47].
Gut morphology and physiology have further limitations on microbial assembly, as differences in gut length, compartmentalisation, pH, oxygen gradients, and redox conditions influence the diversity of microorganisms that may colonise and the enzymes that can be produced [20]. In addition to gut morphology, the larval instars also influence the microbial diversity and the enzyme quantity [48]. Termite hindgut sustains strict anaerobes, microoxic microbial communities, while hydrogen rich microenvironment that facilitates spirochetes and fibrolytic symbionts specialised in lignocellulose degradation [49]. Lepidopteran midgut, characterised by a highly alkaline environment (pH 10–12), promotes bacteria capable of enduring extreme pH while generating detoxifying or chitinolytic enzymes [50]. These ecological filters collectively provide unique and predictable patterns in the microbial and enzymatic composition of the insect gut, fostering functional specialisation that closely corresponds with host feeding strategies, environmental exposure and physiology.
Gut Microbiome of Different Insect Orders and Different Enzymes
The main insect orders studied for exploring the gut microbiome are in the orders like Coleoptera, Orthoptera and Lepidoptera. Several enzymes have been reported in these insect orders, with major studies on cellulase and protease, with literature also on amylase, lipase, and tannase. These enzymes allow insects to utilise a variety of diets from lignocellulosic plant matter in termites and beetles to nutrient-deficient phloem sap in aphids [51]. Cellulases and xylanases break down cellulose and hemicellulose into fermentable sugars, thereby providing energy to the host. Ligninases, on the other hand, help wood-feeding insects in breaking down lignin polymers [45]. Chitinases produced by gut bacteria can break down the cell walls of fungi or the exoskeletons of insects, which helps recycle nutrients and protects against infections [52]. Proteases and lipases enhance the host’s ability to utilise proteins and lipids [53]. These enzymes are widely utilised in many different industries. Because they come from bacteria, they provide multiple advantages such as ease in production and being able to be optimised for enhanced production. Also, the raw materials for the media are cheaper, thereby increasing profits. Figure 3 shows a summary of the different enzymes that have been reported from different insect orders.
Enzymes and bioactive compounds reported from different insect orders
Coleoptera (Beetles and Weevils)
Beetles are one of the most diverse families of insects, consuming wood, foliage, grains and decomposing organic material. Their gut microbiota is predominantly composed of Enterobacteriaceae, Clostridia and Actinobacteria [54]. These microorganisms produce cellulase, xylanases and lignases that facilitate the degradation of lignocellulosic substances in wood-feeding organisms. In grain-feeding beetles, microbial lipases aid in lipid digestion [55].
The industrial potential of a protease from Bacillus subtilis AU-2, isolated from the gut of the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum, was demonstrated by its effective hydrolysis of several protein substrates such as casein and soy protein, indicating its utility in protein hydrolysate manufacturing, meat tenderisation and dairy processing. The optimized extracellular protease exhibited maximum protease activity at pH 8.0 and 37 °C, with substantial stability between pH 7–9 and temperatures up to 50 °C. This strain was further evaluated for food utility by Raut et al. (2025), confirming sustained activity under mildly alkaline conditions (optimum pH 8.0–8.5) and thermal tolerance up to 55 °C, supporting its industrial suitability [56, 57].
Yadav et al. (2022) and Yang et al. (2021) examined lignocellulose-degrading bacterial populations within wood-feeding beetle larvae. The former isolated cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic bacteria from kulsi teak borer, Stromatium barbatum larvae, identifying major taxa like Bacillus, Staphylococcus, Enterobacter, Pseudomonas, Enterococcus, Ochrobactrum, Brachybacterium, and Microbacterium. Similarly, the later study isolated cellulolytic strains from white-striped long-horned beetle, Batocera lineolata larvae, predominantly within Proteobacteria and optimised the fermentation conditions to enhance cellulase production. The optimum enzyme production was found at pH 7.0 and 35 °C, while maintaining stability across pH 6–9 [58, 59]. The gut microbiota of white grub larvae, Anamola dimidiata, was investigated, identifying bacteria exhibiting cellulolytic, lipolytic and nitrate reductase potential. The predominant genera comprised Bacillus, Pseudomonas, and Enterobacter, signifying their essential function in digestion and potential for biotechnological applications. 207 cellulolytic strains from the gut microbiome of dark black chafer, Holotrichia parallela larvae, including novel species such as Siphonobacter aquaeclarae, Paracoccus sulfuroxidans, and Pseudomonas nitroreducens. The predominant genera were Pseudomonas, Ochrobactrum, Rhizobium, Cellulosimicrobium, and Microbacterium, highlighting the diversity and uniqueness of cellulolytic bacteria in the gut of scarab beetles [60, 61].
The digestive enzymes like amylase, lipase and protease in cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus, fed with Vigna unguiculata grains fluctuated with diazotrophic bacterium treatment, indicating that plant-microbe interactions affect insect digestive physiology [62]. Two α-amylases were characterised from coleopteran insects, demonstrating variations in kinetic and structural features along with differing reactions to the inhibitor acarbose. The findings elucidated enzyme-inhibitor relationships pertaining to pest management [63]. Gaikwad & Bhavane (2015) similarly reported substantial lipase and protease activity in the dung beetle, Chironitis arrowi, highlighting their significance in organic matter degradation and potential waste bioconversion [64]. Coconut rhinoceros beetle, Oryctes rhinoceros, was also explored for several enzyme-producing bacteria mainly belonging to Bacillus, Pseudomonas, and Enterobacter, producing enzymes like amylase, cellulase, protease and lipase. Among these, Bacillus spp. had the greatest overall hydrolytic capacity. In addition, a thermostable chitinase enzyme-producing Bacillus species was also isolated, demonstrating optimal activity at 60 °C, with notable thermal stability up to 70 °C and pH 7.5, which signifies exceptional thermostability and efficacy in chitin degradation. The purified chitinase demonstrated significant activity against colloidal chitin [65, 66]. The findings underscored the crucial function of gut-associated microorganisms in organic matter decomposition and nutrient reclamation. Chitinase-producing bacteria from the gut of pleurostict scarab beetle larvae showed multiple bacterial strains, including Bacillus, Enterobacter, and Serratia families, exhibited notable chitinolytic activity on colloidal chitin substrates. Among all, Bacillus cereus and Serratia marcescens demonstrated the greatest enzyme activity. The pure chitinase was identified as extracellular, alkaline and moderately thermostable [67].
Lepidoptera (Butterflies and Moths)
The larval stages of Lepidoptera, especially caterpillars, are avid consumers of leaves and other plant materials. Their gut microbiota is abundant in Enterococcus, Bacillus, Lactococcus, and Pseudomonas [68]. Moreover, detoxifying enzymes produced by gut microbiota decompose plant secondary compounds like alkaloids and terpenes, allowing caterpillars to consume chemically protected host plants [69]. A recent review by Basit et al. (2025) highlighted the nutritional importance of gut microbiota in Lepidoptera, specifically in fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda, where symbionts, including Enterococcus, Acinetobacter, Enterobacter, Sphingobacterium, and Pseudomonas, were associated with digestion, amino acid biosynthesis and immune regulation [70]. At the same time, 21 gut bacteria isolates were identified from the same organism by Winssy et al. (2024) and evaluated for chitinase and protease activity. Five genera were reported by 16 S rRNA sequencing. Enterobacter, Enterococcus, Bacillus, Pantoea, and Kocuria were identified. Among them, two isolates, Bacillus licheniformis FGE4 and Enterobacter cloacae FGE18, exhibited the highest chitinase production. When administered topically or by feed supplementation, these isolates diminished the larvae’s consumption index, relative growth rate and food efficiencies, consequently adversely affecting survivorship [71].
Cellulose-degrading bacteria from cotton ballworm, Helicoverpa armigera, specifically Bacillus subtilis, B. methylotrophicus, B. tequilensis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and K. variicola, all demonstrated significant cellulase activity with potential use in biomass conversion and biofuel production. Cellulolytic bacteria from sugarcane borer, Diatraea saccharalis larvae, were isolated and identified, which can degrade sugarcane biomass, showcasing their lignocellulose-degrading efficacy [32, 72]. Similarly, organisms like Enterobacter cloacae, Enterococcus faecalis, and Bacillus subtilis were isolated from H. armigera, which were characterised for their proteolytic activity concerning the pathogenicity of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxin. The isolates produce alkaline serine protease, inhibited by Phenylmethane Sulfonyl Fluoride (PMSF), which promoted the activation of Bt cry toxins and augmented their insecticidal effectiveness. This also highlights the coordinated function of gut bacterial protease in influencing Bt toxicity and prospective applications [73]. Msango Soko et al. (2020) previously identified lipase-producing bacteria from the gut of eri silkworm, Samia ricini, emphasising their potential use in the food, detergent and pharmaceutical industries [74]. Significant cellulolytic and proteolytic enzyme activity in the midgut and hindgut of horse chestnut leaf miner, Cameraria ohridella larvae, was explored, validating both microbial and host roles in plant digestion [75]. Similarly, in 2018, Gandotra et al. studied the gut microbiota of Antheraea assamensis, Helicoverpa armigera, and Plutella xylostella, documenting the bacterial synthesis of cellulase, protease, amylase and lipase, highlighting their significance in digestion and biotechnology [76].
Zibaee (2012) examined digestive enzymes in Pieris brassicae, uncovering site-specific activity of protease, amylase and cellulase, which suggests a coordinated function in larval nutrition [77]. Bacterial enzymatic activity in the saturniid caterpillars, Automeris zugana and Rothschildia lebeau, revealed several strains that produce cellulase, protease, lipase and amylase, thereby offering preliminary evidence of diverse enzymatic symbionts in the Lepidopteran gut [78].
Orthoptera (Grasshoppers and Crickets)
Grasshoppers and crickets mostly consume fibrous plant matter, which is digested with the assistance of gut bacteria like Enterobacter, Klebsiella, and Serratia. These microorganisms produce cellulase and amylase that hydrolyse cellulose and starch, while protease facilitates protein digestion [79, 80].
Recent studies have highlighted the enzymatic diversity of Orthopteran gut microbiota and their significance in biomass degradation and commercial enzyme synthesis. The gut microbiome of mole cricket, Gryllotalpa orientalis, contributes to protease-producing bacteria, including strains like Priestia aryabhattai (DBM-1, DX-4), P. megaterium (DX-3), and Serratia surfactantfaciens (DBM-5), with DBM-5 found to be the highest protease-producing strain [81]. Cellulolytic bacteria were isolated from the rice grasshopper, Oxya chinensis, with Bacillus, Pseudomonas and Enterobacter species exhibiting significant cellulose-degrading activity. Similarly, Bacillus species like B. subtilis and B. cereus were isolated from desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria, indicating their ecological function in the digestion of fibrous plant material and prospective application in industrial cellulose hydrolysis. In addition, a potential cellulase-producing strain, Acinetobacter junii GAC 16.2, was isolated from African mole cricket, Gryllotalpa africana, which can degrade cellulose and lignocellulosic substrates such as sawdust, demonstrating its potential for biomass conversion and waste valorisation. The optimisation study revealed an optimum activity for the cellulase at pH 6.8 and 38 °C, with over 80% residual activity retained between pH 6–8 and temperatures up to 45 °C [82,83,84]. Previously, Banerjee et al. (2016) found the amylase-producing bacterium Rhodococcus opacus GAA 31.1 from the same insect, with improved culture conditions to enhance enzyme production [85]. Tannase-producing Bacillus species from Gryllotalpa krishnani, emphasising their potential applications in food processing, feed detoxification and bioremediation [86]. A variety of gut bacteria, including Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus vulgaris, and Escherichia coli from the variegated grasshopper, Zonocerus variegatus, were reported, which were capable of producing several enzymes like amylase, cellulase, lipase and protease, which collectively facilitate the digestion of plant-derived macromolecules in this polyphagous pest [87].
Diptera (Flies and Mosquitoes)
Flies and mosquitoes inhabit various environments, subsisting on decomposing organic material, nectar or blood. Their gut microbiota frequently comprises Acetobacter, Asaia, Enterobacter and Pseudomonas [88]. Enzymatic contributions comprise lipases, proteases and chitinases. In mosquitoes, gut symbionts facilitate blood meal digestion via proteolytic enzymes, but in saprophagous flies, microbial enzymes enhance the decomposition of organic materials [89, 90].
Recent studies emphasise the exceptional biodegradation and therapeutic potential of Dipteran larval microbiota. Klüber et al. [91] investigated the microbiome of black soldier fly, Hermetia illucens, in the context of industrial waste biodegradation, identifying significant bacterial genera, including Klebsiella, Enterococcus, and Sphingobacterium, that facilitate the degradation of resistant compounds and promote sustainable bioprocessing and bioremediation [91]. Metatranscriptomic analysis was done to identify lignocellulolytic enzymes like cellulases, hemicellulases, and ligninases in H. illucens larvae consuming fibre-rich diets, thereby illustrating their function in plant polymer degradation and waste valorisation [92]. Exploration of the gut microbiome of black soldier fly larvae showed cellulose-degrading bacteria that enhanced the co-digestion of dairy and poultry manure, highlighting the role of gut microbiota in waste-to-value conversion [93].
In addition to waste bioconversion, some Dipteran species exhibit significant biological promise. Antiparasitic efficacy of excretory-secretory (ES) products derived from green bottle fly, Lucilia sericata larvae against Leishmania major, markedly suppressing parasite multiplication and regulating immune responses in infected murine models [94]. A new serine protease was characterised from L. sericata that increased plasminogen-mediated fibrinolysis, thereby affirming its therapeutic significance in wound healing and thrombosis [95].
Reports are also there from the gut microbiome of housefly, Musca domestica larvae, for producing industrial enzymes. Species from Enterobacter, Klebsiella, Providencia, Proteus, and Bacillus have been isolated, indicating considerable potential for enzyme-based biotechnological applications and microbial transfer via feeding behaviour [96].
Isoptera (Termites)
Termites exhibit one of the most complex gut microbiomes among insects, consisting of a varied diversity. Symbiotic taxa such as Treponema, Clostridium and Fibrobacter are pivotal in lignocellulose degradation, with their enzymes promoting the effective decomposition of wood and plant waste. Metagenomic analyses indicated that their gut communities are predominantly composed of Fibrobacter, Spirochaetes and Firmicutes, which possess genes that encode cellulases, xylanases and lignin-modifying enzymes. This complex metabolic collaboration renders termites an important model for investigating lignocellulose conversion and its implications for biofuel production [97, 98].
The microbial community in the termite gut, primarily composed of Clostridia and Bacteroidetes, promoted lignocellulose breakdown in anaerobic environments, resulting in the release of sugars and volatile fatty acids [99]. Numerous studies have emphasised the enzymatic diversity among termite gut microbiota. Chitinolytic strains, including Bacillus cereus, Serratia marcescens, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, isolated from Microcerotermes sp., demonstrated significant antifungal efficacy against Fusarium oxysporum and Rhizoctonia solani, suggesting their potential as biocontrol agents in agriculture [100].
Amylase-producing bacteria such as Bacillus, Enterobacter, and Pseudomonas isolated from Coptotermes sp. exhibited effective starch hydrolysis, indicating their potential utility in the food and fermentation sectors [101]. Proteolytic enzymes in Formosan termite, Coptotermes formosanus, were derived from both host and microbial origins, with symbiotic bacteria contributing supplementary proteolytic activity to improve protein digestion [102].
Hymenoptera (Ants, Bees, Wasps)
The gut microbiota of Hymenoptera, particularly in social insects such as bees and ants, exhibits relative stability and specialisation. The primary members comprise Gilliamella, Snodgrassella, Lactobacillus, and Bifidobacterium [103, 104]. These microorganisms produce pectinases and glycosidases that facilitate the digestion of pollen walls and nectar sugars. Moreover, numerous organisms produce antimicrobial compounds, including bacteriocins and lipopeptides, which bolster colony defence against pathogens. The gut microbiota in honey bees is crucial for the degradation of complex polysaccharides derived from pollen, hence enhancing nutrition and immunity [105].
Hemiptera (Bugs)
Hemipterans frequently consume nutritionally deficient plant sap or phloem, which is devoid of vital amino acids. Their gut microbiota, along with some intracellular symbionts such as Buchnera and Wolbachia, provide essential metabolic assistance [106]. These microorganisms provide vital amino acids and vitamins lacking in the phloem diet. Furthermore, detoxifying enzymes generated by symbionts neutralise phytochemical defences [107, 108]. The enzyme-positive repertoire of these orders is less documented and studied. The complete overview of reported enzymes and respective enzyme orders discussed is shown in Table 2.
Symbiotic Categories of Insect Gut Microbes and their Relevance to Enzyme Discovery
Insect gut microorganisms encompass a spectrum of commensal, facultative and obligate symbionts, each providing unique benefits for enzyme discovery. Commensals like Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Enterobacter and Serratia are environmentally sourced and more prevalent in Coleoptera, Orthoptera, Diptera and Lepidoptera, rendering them highly culturable and scalable sources of cellulases, proteases, amylases and lipases, although their prevalence varies with diet and developmental stages. In contrast, several specialized fibrolytic or detoxifying taxa, including certain Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria, isolated from wood-feeding beetles, termites or caterpillars often occur as low abundance but high impact members, detectable only under specific diets or gut conditions [35, 82, 109, 110].
Facultative symbionts such as Enterococcus, Acinetobacter, Lactococcus and Microbacterium inhibit both the interior and exterior of the host and frequently synthesise resilient, stress-resistant enzymes tailored to diverge gut environments, including the alkaline Lepidopteran midgut and microoxic beetle hindgut, rendering them especially advantageous for industrial applications necessitating stability and reproducibility [111,112,113]. On the contrary, obligate symbionts like Buchnera, Portiera, Sulcia and the termite-associated Candidatus Endomicrobium demonstrate significant genome reduction and strict vertical transmission, providing vital nutrients while remaining unculturable [114, 115]. Despite their limited suitability for direct industrial purposes, their diminished genomes serve as valuable resources for enzyme mining, synthetic biology and heterologous expression.
Phylogenetic Conservation and Evolutionary Dynamics of Gut Symbionts
Host-microbe interactions in insects exhibit significant variability in their evolutionary stability, influencing both the richness and dependability of enzyme repertoires. In several clades, gut symbionts exhibit significant phylogenetic conservation and prolonged co-diversification with their hosts. Notable instances encompass the obligate endosymbionts of Hemiptera like Buchnera, Portiera, and Sulcia, which are characterised by strict vertical transmission, genomic reduction and phylogenetic similarity with their hosts. However, the core gut microbiota of social Hymenopterans like Gilliamella, Snodgrassella, and Lactobacillaceae, maintains stability across bee lineages and delivers essential metabolic functions, including carbohydrate processing and immune modulations [116,117,118]. These systems show lineage-specific coevolution and generate highly specialised enzymes that are functionally predictable yet challenging to cultivate for commercial applications.
Conversely, numerous digestive and detoxification processes, particularly lignocellulose degradation result from recurrent ecological acquisition of functionally analogous yet taxonomically diverse microorganisms. Termites, beetles and Lepidoptera frequently acquire cellulolytic or toxin-degrading bacteria from their surroundings, resulting in functional convergence and absence of taxonomic conservation. Recent metagenomics and phylogenomic investigations reveal frequent horizontal gene transfers, host-switching and turnover within these communities, suggesting that enzyme activities are predominantly niche-driven rather than lineage specific [22, 119,120,121,122,123]. This indicate that obligatory symbionts offer stable yet unculturable genomic reservoirs, whereas facultative and environmentally acquired taxa represent the most scalable sources for enzyme extraction and commercial utilisation. The existing literature indicates that insect enzyme repertoires include an array of coevolved, phylogenetically preserved systems and recurrent ecological recruitment, each providing unique benefits for bioprospecting.
Transmission Modes of Enzyme-Producing Gut Symbionts
The pathways of insect gut microorganisms significantly influence their stability, evolutionary longevity and potential for industrial enzyme discovery. Vertical transmission is a characteristic feature of several Hemipterans and certain termites, wherein symbionts are transmitted via eggs, ovarian tissues, and trophallaxis. These systems yield highly stable yet host-specific metabolic partners possessing specialized enzymes but exhibiting limited culturability. On the other hand, the majority of enzyme-producing bacteria in Coleoptera, Lepidoptera, Orthoptera and Diptera are acquired from the environment each generation, entering through diet, soil, frass or feeding activity. The cellulolytic bacterial taxa like Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Enterobacter and Klebsiella demonstrate rapid turnover and exceptional scalability, thereby rendering them ideal candidates for industrial enzyme extraction [9, 20, 124]. Social Hymenopterans demonstrate a hybrid system, wherein primary gut lineages like Gilliamella and Snodgrassella are sustained through social interactions, while supplementary carbohydrate-degrading or detoxifying microorganisms are sourced from nectar, pollen or the surrounding environment [125,126,127]. These patterns suggest that vertically transmitted symbionts confer evolutionary stability but exhibit limited cultivability, whereas environmentally acquired and facultatively maintained microbes present the most viable source for industrial enzymes, owing to their accessibility, wider host range and adaptability to laboratory and bioreactor environments.
Screening Techniques Employed for Isolation of Enzyme-Positive Strains
Screening methods are crucial for selecting the right bacteria and enzymes. It helps to focus on the possible superior strains and eliminate other bacterial colonies. The screening technique followed will change depending on the type of enzyme. There are two main types of screening viz.; primary screening, which is a qualitative method and secondary screening, which is mostly about estimating and measuring. The present review focus on the screening methodologies for significant enzymes such as cellulose, protease, amylase, and lipase. An outline of the isolation of microorganism from the insect gut followed by screening is depicted in Fig. 4.
General overview of the isolation of the gut microbiome from insects
Screening Techniques for Cellulase Enzyme
-
(a)
Primary Screening Techniques
The primary screening techniques mainly include the CMC agar plate technique and the Filter paper method [128, 129].
-
(i)
CMC agar plate technique
The primary screening for cellulase-producing bacteria often focuses on finding possible positive strains by assessing their capacity to hydrolyse cellulose. A prevalent technique entails culturing isolates on agar supplemented with carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) as the sole carbon source. After incubation, the plates are flooded with congo red dye, which adheres to cellulose and is further rinsed with sodium chloride (NaCl) to elucidate hydrolysis zones. Colonies that produce cellulase create halo zones surrounding themselves, serving as a qualitative indicator of enzymatic activity.
-
(ii)
Filter paper method
Another qualitative method is the filter paper assay, wherein small segments of Whatman filter paper are positioned in contact with microbial cultures; the degradation of the cellulose paper signifies cellulase activity. This is less commonly employed.
-
(i)
-
(b)
Secondary Screening
It is mainly conducted to quantitatively evaluate the cellulolytic capabilities of the strains identified in primary screening. The technique uses the 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) assay, which quantifies the quantity of reducing sugars liberated. Reducing sugars interact with the DNS reagent to form a colored complex, and the absorbance is quantified spectrophotometrically at 540 nm. This test facilitates the quantification of enzyme activity in units per millilitre [130, 131].
Screening Techniques for Protease Enzyme
To screen for protease activity, the skim milk agar, casein agar, or gelatin agar technique is predominantly done, and the azo casein assay is a secondary technique [132,133,134].
-
(a)
Primary Screening by Skim Milk Agar/Casein Agar
Microbial isolates are introduced into agar plates enriched with a protein substrate, either skim milk, casein or gelatin. Casein or skim milk are widely employed. Protease-producing bacteria degrade the surrounding protein, resulting in a clear halo zone post-incubation. In casein agar, the protease enzyme degrades casein into soluble peptides, resulting in a clear zone contrasting with the opaque white backdrop of agar.
-
(b)
Secondary Screening by Azo casein or Casein Protein
This technique often entails incubating crude enzyme extract with protein substrate like casein or azo casein. The process concludes with the introduction of trichloroacetic acid (TCA), which precipitates unhydrolysed protein and the quantity of soluble peptides released is quantified spectrophotometrically at 660 nm.
Screening Techniques for Amylase Enzyme
The iodine technique and DNS assay are the widely used primary and secondary techniques, respectively, for screening amylase activity [135, 136].
-
(a)
Primary Screening Using Iodine
The common substrate used for primary screening is starch agar plates, onto which microbial isolates are inoculated, followed by the addition of iodine solution post-incubation. The iodine colours unhydrolysed starch in blue-black, whereas hydrolysed starch regions remain transparent, signifying amylase activity.
-
(b)
Secondary Screening Using DNS
The 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) assay is a commonly employed technique that quantifies the reducing sugars liberated during the hydrolysis of starch by amylase, a similar approach to that of cellulose. The DNS reagent interacts with reducing sugars to produce a colored complex, and the absorbance of which is quantified spectrophotometrically at 540 nm.
Screening Techniques for Lipase Enzyme
The primary screening for lipase enzyme can be done mainly by three methods, viz., tributyrin agar method, spirit blue-agar-olive oil method and Rhodomine-B method. The secondary screening technique employs p-nitrophenyl palmitate (pNPP) assay and titrimetric assay [74, 137, 138].
-
(a)
Primary Screening by tributyrin agar method, spirit blue-agar-olive oil method and Rhodomine-B methods
-
(i)
The initial assessment of lipase activity often employs a plate-based experiment using medium enriched with lipid substrates. It uses tributyrin agar, where microbial isolates are plated, and lipase activity is assessed by the formation of a distinct halo surrounding colonies due to the hydrolysis of tributyrin.
-
(ii)
Spirit blue agar infused with olive oil and a dye is employed, where the hydrolysis of triglycerides produces a visible colour change or clear zone signifying lipolytic activity.
-
(iii)
Rhodamine B-olive oil agar facilitates detection under UV light, generating orange fluorescence in areas of lipase activity, hence identifying lipolytic microbes.
-
(i)
-
(b)
Secondary Evaluation for Quantitative Measurement of Lipase
The predominant assay employed for secondary screening of lipase assay is the p-nitrophenyl palmitate (pNPP) assay, wherein lipase catalyses the hydrolysis of pNPP to liberate p-nitrophenol, which is quantified spectrophotometrically at 410 nm. An alternate method is the titrimetric assay, where fatty acids liberated from the breakdown of olive oil are titrated with NaOH, providing a quantitative assessment of activity.
High-Throughput Omics Approaches for Mining Gut Microbiomes
Recent advancements in high-throughput sequencing techniques have transformed the identification of microbial enzymes within insect gut environments. Conventional culture-dependent techniques recover only 1–5% of microbial diversity, thereby missing the vast majority of enzymatic functions possessed by uncultivable or slow-growing microorganisms [139, 140]. Omics-driven methodologies like metagenomics, metatranscriptomics and functional metagenomics facilitate extensive investigation of microbial functional capabilities, uncover novel enzyme families and disclose context-dependent gene expression patterns that classical screening techniques mentioned above fail to capture.
Metagenomics Analysis for Comprehensive Profiling of Microbial Enzymatic Potential
Metagenomics offer a DNA-level overview of the entire genetic composition within the insect gut, facilitating the reconstruction of microbial genomics (MAGs) and the annotation of carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes), proteases, chitinases, esterases, and detoxification pathways [141,142,143,144]. Shotgun sequencing of wood- feeding beetles and termites has identified various putative cellulose, β-glucosidases and xylanases with CAZy families like GH5, GH9, GH45 and GH48, including enzymes exhibiting minimal sequence similarities to existing proteins, suggesting significant innovation potential [145, 146]. Metagenomics addresses culture bias by capturing taxa at all abundance levels, including rare biosphere members that frequently encode stress-tolerant or substrate-specific enzymes, thereby offering insights into the metabolic division of labour between hosts and symbionts [21]. Comparative metagenomics facilitates the identification of ecological determinants influencing the enzymatic repertoire, viz., cellulose-rich versus protein-rich diets, hence enabling the prediction of functional guilds among insect taxa [10]. The notable advantages of metagenomics analysis include access to comprehensive microbial diversity, detailed enzyme annotation utilising Cazy, MEROPS and KEGG databases, as well as facilitating inter-host comparison of metabolic pathways.
Metatranscriptomic Analysis for Identification of Actively Expressed Genes
When metagenomics reveals genomic potential, metatranscriptomics determines which genes are actively expressed in natural dietary conditions. It makes the identification of messenger RNAs (mRNAs) possible, thereby quantifying gene expression levels and active biological pathways. Enzyme expression in insects is critically associated with nutrition, developmental stage, feeding guild and gut redox conditions [147, 148].
Metatranscriptomic analysis of insect gut communities demonstrates active gene expression essential for resource utilisation and detoxification, underscoring the metabolic division of labour between the host and its symbionts. In Black Soldier Fly, Hermetia illucens, larval analysis revealed the expression of crucial cellulolytic enzyme families such as GH51 and GH43_16 when larvae ingested lignocellulose-rich diets [148], whereas exposure to chemical stress prompted the expression of deacetylases and other significant detoxification enzymes [149]. Metatranscriptomics in wood-feeding termites such as Reticulitermes flavipes revealed unique gene expression profiles for both host and symbionts, with the host actively expressing genes related to lignases and detoxification enzymes like cytochrome P450 and carboxylesterases, thereby affirming their roles in managing complex or chemically defended diet [150].
These datasets demonstrate inducible enzyme systems that activate solely in the presence of certain substrates like flavonoids, cellulose, lignin, etc., providing a more ecologically relevant representation of microbial function than metagenomics. It is considered more reliable for functional analysis because it focuses on functionally active microbes and genes, differentiating live and dead microbiota [151]. The major advantages include discerning enzyme expression specific to food and developmental stages, differentiating between active and inactive microbial community members, discloseing regulatory patterns and environmental stimuli.
Functional Metagenomics for Direct Identification of Novel Biocatalysts
Functional metagenomics connects sequence-based predictions with actual biochemical activity by cloning environmental DNA into heterologous hosts like E. coli, B. subtilis, etc. and screening for enzymatic function [152]. Libraries obtained from termites, scarab beetles and Lepidopteran larvae have produced thermostable cellulases and xylanases exhibiting activity at 60–70 °C. Alkaline proteases maintaining activity at pH 9–10, chitinases exhibiting elevated catalytic efficiency on colloidal chitin, solvent and surfactant-tolerant lipases, esterases and oxidoreductases that can degrade plant phenolics and contaminants [150, 153,154,155]. Functional metagenomics screening, which does not depend on sequence similarity, is particularly effective for identifying novel enzyme families and catalytic motifs, especially from evolutionarily diverse or inadequately characterised insect gut microorganisms. The notable applications include acquiring active enzymes despite the absence of known homologs, appropriate for identifying enzymes with industrially significant characteristics, facilitating screening based on phenotype rather than anticipated annotation.
Challenges in Harnessing Insect Gut-Derived Enzymes and Comparison with Traditional Enzyme Sources
The practical application of microorganisms and enzymes produced from insects encounters various limitations that restrict their direct industrial use. A significant challenge is that a substantial fraction of gut symbionts remains unculturable due to their stringent dependence on host-specific factors, including microaerophilic conditions, diet-derived cofactors and gut-specific pH and redox gradients, leading to the recovery of merely 1–5% of the native microbiome via culture-based methods [21]. Many enzymes, even when identified, demonstrate inadequate heterologous expression in traditional hosts such as E. coli or B. subtilis due to factors like codon bias, misfolding, chaperone dependence or incompatible secretion pathways, which considerably reduce yield and stability outside their native gut environment [156, 157].
Biosafety considerations complicate direct application, as various insect gut-associated genera viz., Serratia, Klebsiella, and Enterobacter contain opportunistic pathogens and may possess antibiotic resistance determinants, necessitating the use of GRAS (Generally Recognised as Safe) hosts for safe enzyme production [150, 158]. The industrial scaling of these enzymes is further impeded by low native expression levels, restricted thermostability and vulnerability to shear stress or chemical inhibitors during fermentation, as numerous gut-derived cellulases exhibit significant activity loss above 50 °C, thus limiting their applicability for high-temperature processing [159, 160]. In addition, metatranscriptomic research reveals that many enzymes are either diet-induced or produced solely in response to particular ecological stimuli within the host, rendering their consistent production outside the insect gut difficult without precise replication of natural cues [161]. These limitations highlight the necessity for integrative solutions, including enzyme engineering, codon optimisation, synthetic biology chassis and bioreactor designs that more accurately simulate gut conditions to facilitate the scalable and safe industrial application of insect gut-derived enzymes.
Conventional industrial enzymes are generally derived from soil bacteria (Bacillus, Streptomyces), filamentous fungi (Aspergillus, Trichoderma) and marine microorganisms, which are esteemed for their efficient enzyme production and known fermentation methodologies. Insect gut-derived microorganisms provide a supplementary and frequently superior source of enzymes tailored to highly specialised ecological niches. In contrast to soil or marine microbes that evolve under diverse environmental pressure, insect gut symbionts function within strictly controlled microenvironments having severe pH gradients, significant redox fluctuations, rapid substrate turnover and the presence of resistant polymers such as lignocellulose, chitin and plant allelochemicals. Because of these potential advantages, the insect gut-bacteria-derived enzymes often display inherent characteristics, including improved catalytic effectiveness towards complex plant polymers, resistance to inhibitory compounds and synergistic interactions with other enzymes, attributing to prolonged coevolution with host digestive systems [162,163,164,165,166,167]. For instance, Fibrobacter and Treponema from the termite gut produce highly effective lignocellulases that surpass numerous fungal cellulases in low oxygen, high viscosity conditions [150, 168]. Similarly, Enterococcus and Bacillus from Lepidopteran gut produce chitinases and detoxifying enzymes that effectively digest chemically protected plant tissues, where several fungal enzymes are ineffective [113, 169]. Marine bacteria exhibit exceptional extremophilic adaptations, while insect gut bacterial enzymes have shown comparable stability but pose limited substrate specificity, rendering them appealing for focused biocatalysis [170]. Insect gut microorganisms collectively constitute an underexplored yet functionally diverse alternative to traditional enzyme sources, producing innovative biocatalysis.
Applications of Insect Gut-Derived Enzymes
The enzymes found in the gut microbiota of insects can be used in bioenergy, food and drink processing, textiles, agriculture, medicine, and environmental biotechnology (refer to Fig. 5). This wide range of functions shows how insects have adapted to digesting chemically complex foods and reveals how their gut symbionts can be used as a source of enzymes for industry. Cellulases and hemicellulases are two of the most important enzymes. They are especially common in insects that eat wood and fibre, which includes termites, beetles, moths, grasshoppers, and others. These enzymes are very important in the biofuel industry because they help break down lignocellulosic biomass into sugars that can be fermented. In addition, they are also widely employed in the generation of second-generation bioethanol, biobutanol and biogas plants [171,172,173]. They are utilised in the pulp and paper sector to reduce chlorine-based chemicals in bleaching effluents and to improve paper softness as well as drainage. Additionally, the breakdown of paper waste enables the production of value-added products, animal feed and supports zero-waste biorefineries for volatile fatty acids, agricultural composting and other environmentally sustainable alternatives to chemical processing [174,175,176]. Cellulase is an appealing option for disintegrating biofilm. Cellulase can break down the Extracellular Polymeric Substance (EPS) layer, which is made up of cellulose and hemicellulose. This opens up a multitude of possibilities in the pharmaceutical industry. When treated with cellulase, the EPS layer of E. coli, Pseudomonas, etc., will be degraded so that the resistant structure can be damaged for activation of the action of drugs [177, 178]. Furthermore, cellulases are a major constituent in the detergent industry for removing cellulose-based stains and improving the brightness of fabric material, along with in the textile-based industries for replacing stone washing and removal of microfibrils in cotton fabrics [179, 180].
Applications of different enzymes
Gut microbes of Coleoptera, Lepidoptera, Diptera and Orthoptera create proteases that facilitate protein digestion in the host and have several industrial applications. Microbial proteases are extensively utilised in detergents for stain elimination, in the food industry for cheese production, meat tenderisation, protein hydrolysate for nutrient supplements and baking, as well as in medicines as fibrinolytic or anti-inflammatory drugs, and wound debridement enzymes. They can also be used in leather and textile industries for dehairing, bating as well as an alternative for lime-sulphide process [160, 166, 181, 182]. Amylases, identified in the gut microbiota of beetles, caterpillars and crickets, are essentially used in food industries for starch hydrolysis, baking, production of glucose and maltose syrups as well as in clarification of fruit juices and inbioethanol manufacturing [183,184,185]. Amylase also has significant applications in the detergent industry since it has the activity to remove starch-based stains, and it is active and stable under alkaline conditions. In addition to that, they improve the digestibility of starch in monogastric animals and are hence used in animal feeds [186, 187].
A further extensively researched group is lipase, which is recorded in Coleoptera, Lepidoptera and Diptera. These enzymes derived from insect gut microbiota are utilised in detergent formulations, flavour enhancement in the food sector, biodiesel synthesis and the creation of chiral pharmaceutical intermediates. They can transesterify vegetable oils, waste cooking oils and can be used in biodiesel production. Their potential in modifying fats and oils to improve melting point and texture makes them potential in food industries, as well as they can synthesise flavoured esters [76, 188]. They are applied in the detergent industries as they can remove oil and grease stains, functioning under harsh detergent conditions. This major application directs them in the waste water treatment as well. Furthermore, they can also be used in the pharmaceutical sectors for the production of enantiopure chiral intermediates [189, 190]. Additionally, the enzyme chitinases identified in Coleoptera, Diptera, Orthoptera and Isoptera play a crucial role in biocontrol measures against fungal infections like Fusarium, Rhizoctonia and insect pests, and are also significant for the recycling of shellfish waste into chitosan, chitin and other derivatives [46, 191, 192]. They can also be used in agriculture as seed coating and soil amendment with chitin derivatives to promote plant immunity. The production of medical-grade chitosan for wound dressing, drug delivery makes them significant candidate in medicine and pharmaceutical industries [193, 194]. Lepidopterans and Hemipterans have symbionts that make tannases and detoxifying enzymes that help insects break down plant secondary metabolites like tannins and alkaloids. Tannases are used in biotechnology to make gallic acid, which is a precursor for antimicrobial drugs, antioxidant formulations, propyl gallate (a food preservative), process tea, coffee, beer and wine, and in the textile and leather industries. They are capable of removing tannins from hides to soften materials [195,196,197]. Along with these wide applications, they can be essentially used in environmental bioremediation for degrading tannin-rich effluents from tanneries, paper mills and food processing industries as well as in the degradation of anti-nutritional tannins in feed, thereby improving digestibility [198, 199]. Table 3 explains the overall idea about the applications reported for each enzyme discussed above. These works collectively provide a framework from microbe isolation to application testing, a complete translational level approach from lab-scale to application-based results, highlighting insects as an unexplored source of industrially significant enzymes. Future research should expand beyond Coleoptera to include other insect orders such as Lepidoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, Hemiptera, and Isoptera, and should explore additional enzyme classes, including proteases and amylases, to fully harness their potential in sustainable bioprocessing, pest management, and green biotechnological applications.
Conclusion
The insect gut opens for the scope of exploring different industrially important enzymes. Their gut microbiota is not much investigated, but the literature suggests a promising idea of the existence of potential industrially important strains from the gut of insects. The gut-associated bacteria play a crucial role in vital insect processes, including food absorption, digestion of resistant polymers, detoxification and defence mechanisms. Research spanning various insect orders, including Coleoptera, Lepidoptera, Diptera, Orthoptera and Isoptera, has identified microbial strains that generate cellulases, proteases, lipases, chitinases, amylases, tannases, as well as antimicrobial metabolites and detoxifying enzymes. These microbial products possess significant potential for use in biofuel production, waste valorisation, agriculture, food processing, medicines, etc. Despite increasing research interest, numerous insect-microbe connections remain unexamined, particularly with new enzymes, new bacterial strains, secondary metabolites, etc. The gut microbiome of several insect species from Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera, and Hemiptera is yet to unfold, and the successful exploration of their gut microbiome can open an extensive scope for identifying novel and potential enzyme-producing strains that can be successfully exploited in the industrial sectors. Future research that combines multi-omics methodologies, synthetic biology and large-scale bioprocessing will be essential to fully exploit insect gut microbiomes as sustainable sources of next-generation bioactive compounds and industrial enzymes.
Data Availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Yasika Y, Shivakumar MS (2025) A comprehensive account of functional role of insect gut microbiome in insect orders. Journal of Natural Pesticide Research 11:100110
Salcedo-Porras N, Umaña-Diaz C, de Oliveira Barbosa Bitencourt R, Lowenberger C (2020) The role of bacterial symbionts in triatomines: an evolutionary perspective. Microorganisms 8(9):1438
Rosenberg E, Zilber-Rosenberg I (2018) The hologenome concept of evolution after 10 years. Microbiome 6(1):78
Jiang Q, Lin L, Xie F, Jin W, Zhu W, Wang M, Mao S (2022) Metagenomic insights into the microbe-mediated B and K2 vitamin biosynthesis in the gastrointestinal microbiome of ruminants. Microbiome 10(1):109
Khan I, Bai Y, Zha L, Ullah N, Ullah H, Shah SRH, Sun H, Zhang C (2021) Mechanism of the gut microbiota colonization resistance and enteric pathogen infection. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 11:716299. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.716299
Lemke T, Stingl U, Egert M, Friedrich MW, Brune A (2003) Physicochemical conditions and microbial activities in the highly alkaline gut of the humus-feeding larva of Pachnoda ephippiata (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Appl Environ Microbiol 69(11):6650–6658. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.11.6650-6658.2003
Schroeder BG, Logroño W, Rocha UND, Harms H, Nikolausz M (2022) Enrichment of anaerobic microbial communities from midgut and hindgut of sun beetle larvae (Pachnoda marginata) on wheat straw: effect of inoculum preparation. Microorganisms 10(4):761
Bonelli M, Bruno D, Caccia S, Sgambetterra G, Cappellozza S, Jucker C, Tettamanti G, Casartelli M (2019) Structural and functional characterization of Hermetia illucens larval midgut. Front Physiol 10:204. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00204
Khan KA, Ganeshprasad DN, Sachin HR, Shouche YS, Ghramh HA, Sneharani AH (2023) Gut microbial diversity in Apis cerana indica and Apis florea colonies: a comparative study. Front Vet Sci 10:1149876
Yun JH, Roh SW, Whon TW, Jung MJ, Kim MS, Park DS, Bae JW (2014) Insect gut bacterial diversity determined by environmental habitat, diet, developmental stage, and phylogeny of host. Appl Environ Microbiol 80(17):5254–5264
Lazuka A, Auer L, O’Donohue M, Hernandez-Raquet G (2018) Anaerobic lignocellulolytic microbial consortium derived from termite gut: enrichment, lignocellulose degradation and community dynamics. Biotechnol Biofuels 11(1):284
Schauer C, Thompson CL, Brune A (2012) The bacterial community in the gut of the cockroach Shelfordella lateralis reflects the close evolutionary relatedness of cockroaches and termites. Appl Environ Microbiol 78(8):2758–2767
Mamtimin T, Han H, Khan A, Feng P, Zhang Q, Ma X, Li X (2023) Gut microbiome of mealworms (Tenebrio molitor Larvae) show similar responses to polystyrene and corn straw diets. Microbiome 11(1):98
Tang X, Freitak D, Vogel H, Ping L, Shao Y, Cordero EA, Andersen G, Westermann M, Heckel DG, Boland W (2012) Complexity and variability of gut commensal microbiota in polyphagous lepidopteran larvae. PLoS One 7(7):e36978. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036978
Banerjee S, Maiti TK, Roy RN (2022) Enzyme producing insect gut microbes: an unexplored biotechnological aspect. Crit Rev Biotechnol 42(3):384–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2021.1942777
Grundmann CO, Guzman J, Vilcinskas A, Pupo MT (2024) The insect microbiome is a vast source of bioactive small molecules. Nat Prod Rep 41(6):935–967
Zhou LF, Wu J, Li S, Li Q, Jin LP, Yin CP, Zhang YL (2021) Antibacterial potential of termite-associated Streptomyces spp. ACS Omega 6(6):4329–4334
Liu L, Yang H, Shin HD, Chen RR, Li J, Du G, Chen J (2013) How to achieve high-level expression of microbial enzymes: strategies and perspectives. Bioengineered 4(4):212–223
Sonawane MS, Chaudhary RD, Shouche YS, Sayyed RZ (2018) Insect gut bacteria: a novel source for siderophore production. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect B Biol Sci 88(2):567–572
Pant R, Ramana D (1989) Cellulolytic activity in a phytophagous lepidopteran insect Philosamia ricini: the origin of the enzymes. Insect Biochem 19(3):269–276
Engel P, Moran NA (2013) The gut microbiota of insects–diversity in structure and function. FEMS Microbiol Rev 37(5):699–735
Gu J, Yao Z, Lemaitre B, Cai Z, Zhang H, Li X (2024) Intestinal commensal bacteria promote Bactrocera dorsalis larval development through the vitamin B6 synthesis pathway. Microbiome 12(1):227
Ren X, Cao S, Akami M, Mansour A, Yang Y, Jiang N, Niu C (2022) Gut symbiotic bacteria are involved in nitrogen recycling in the tephritid fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis. BMC Biol 20(1):201
Marynowska M, Sillam-Dussès D, Untereiner B, Klimek D, Goux X, Gawron P, Calusinska M (2023) A holobiont approach towards polysaccharide degradation by the highly compartmentalised gut system of the soil-feeding higher termite Labiotermes labralis. BMC Genomics 24(1):115
Salgado JFM, Hervé V, Vera MA, Tokuda G, Brune A (2024) Unveiling lignocellulolytic potential: a genomic exploration of bacterial lineages within the termite gut. Microbiome 12(1):201
Wang Y, Wang L, Li D, Chen Z, Luo Y, Zhou J, Wang L (2024) Advancements in the impact of insect gut microbiota on host feeding behaviors. Genes 15(10):1320
Siddiqui JA, Khan MM, Bamisile BS, Hafeez M, Qasim M, Rasheed MT, Rasheed MA, Ahmad S, Shahid MI, Xu Y (2022) Role of insect gut microbiota in pesticide degradation: a review. Front Microbiol 13:870462. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.870462
Holt JR, de Cavichiolli Oliveira N, Medina RF, Malacrinò A, Lindsey ARI (2024) Insect-microbe interactions and their influence on organisms and ecosystems. Ecol Evol 14(7):e11699. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.11699
Poria V, Rana A, Kumari A, Grewal J, Pranaw K, Singh S (2021) Current perspectives on chitinolytic enzymes and their agro-industrial applications. Biology 10(12):1319
Rajeswari G, Jacob S, Chandel AK, Kumar V (2021) Unlocking the potential of insect and ruminant host symbionts for recycling of lignocellulosic carbon with a biorefinery approach: a review. Microb Cell Fact 20(1):107. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-021-01597-0
Masi C, Gemechu G, Tafesse M (2021) Isolation, screening, characterization, and identification of alkaline protease-producing bacteria from leather industry effluent. Ann Microbiol 71(1):24
Dar MA, Shaikh AF, Pawar KD, Xie R, Sun J, Kandasamy S, Pandit RS (2021) Evaluation of cellulose-degrading bacteria isolated from the gut system of cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera and their potential values in biomass conversion. PeerJ 9:e11254
Meena KR, Kanwar SS (2015) Lipopeptides as the antifungal and antibacterial agents: applications in food safety and therapeutics. BioMed Res Int 2015:473050. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/473050
Yaraguppi DA, Bagewadi ZK, Patil NR, Mantri N (2023) Iturin: a promising cyclic lipopeptide with diverse applications. Biomolecules 13(10):1515. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13101515
Maji P, Maji M, Ghosh P, Shukla P (2025) Cellulase-producing microorganisms from diverse ecosystem: a review. Uttar Pradesh J Zool 46(2):25–38
Liu T, Guo X, Bu Y, Zhou Y, Duan Y, Yang Q (2020) Structural and biochemical insights into an insect gut-specific chitinase with antifungal activity. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 119:103326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2020.103326
Fukuda TTH (2022) Ferramentas químicas e genéticas aplicadas ao estudo de bactérias simbiontes de formigas (Doctoral dissertation, Universidade de São Paulo)
Heise P, Liu Y, Degenkolb T, Vogel H, Schäberle TF, Vilcinskas A (2019) Antibiotic-producing beneficial bacteria in the gut of the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides. Front Microbiol 10:1178
Ayayee PA, Petersen N, Riusch J, Rauter C, Larsen T (2024) Enhanced gut microbiome supplementation of essential amino acids in Diploptera punctata fed low-protein plant-based diet. Frontiers in Insect Science 4:1396984
Zhao M, Lin X, Guo X (2022) The role of insect symbiotic bacteria in metabolizing phytochemicals and agrochemicals. Insects 13(7):583
Xie R, Danso B, Sun J, Al-Tohamy R, Khalil MA, Schagerl M, Ali SS (2024) Metagenomics analysis of bacterial community structure from wood-and soil-feeding termites: metabolic pathways and functional structures toward the degradation of lignocellulose and recalcitrant compounds. Frontiers in Microbiology 15:1424982
Zhang Z, Wang K, Zou C, Zhao T, Wu W, Wang C, Hua Y (2024) Comparison of microbial diversity and carbohydrate-active enzymes in the hindgut of two wood-feeding termites, Globitermes sulphureus (Blattaria: Termitidae) and Coptotermes formosanus (Blattaria: Rhinotermitidae). BMC microbiology 24(1):470
Shan HW, Xia XJ, Feng YL, Wu W, Li HJ, Sun ZT, Li J-M, Chen JP (2024) The plant-sucking insect selects assembly of the gut microbiota from environment to enhance host reproduction. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 10(1):64
Wu Y, Zheng Y, Chen Y, Wang S, Chen Y, Hu F, Zheng H (2020) Honey bee (Apis mellifera) gut microbiota promotes host endogenous detoxification capability via regulation of P450 gene expression in the digestive tract. Microb Biotechnol 13(4):1201–1212
Zumkhawala-Cook A, Gallagher P, Raymann K (2024) Diet affects reproductive development and microbiota composition in honey bees. Anim Microbiome 6(1):64
Ment D, Mishra S (2025) The integral role of the Black Soldier fly, Hermetia illucens L., microbiota in its life history. Front Microbiol 4:1517715
Xiang F, Zhang Q, Xu X, Zhang Z (2024) Black soldier fly larvae recruit functional microbiota into the intestines and residues to promote lignocellulosic degradation in domestic biodegradable waste. Environ Pollut 340:122676
Chen L, He Z, Zhang D, Zhao F, Zhang Y, Ding R (2025) The role of gut microbiota at different developmental stages in the adaptation of the Etiella zinckenella to a plant host. Sci Rep 15(1):4971
Rossmassler K, Dietrich C, Thompson CL, Mikaelyan A, Brune A (2024) Comparative metagenomic analyses reveal bacterial functional profiles in the hindgut compartments of higher termites. Ecol Evolutionary Drivers Microb Community Struct Termite gut 139:139–161
Zhang X, Zhang F, Lu X (2022) Diversity and functional roles of the gut microbiota in lepidopteran insects. Microorganisms 10(6):1234. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061234
Calusinska M, Marynowska M, Bertucci M, Untereiner B, Klimek D, Goux X, Sillam-Dussès D, Gawron P, Halder R, Wilmes P, Ferrer P, Gerin P, Roisin Y, Delfosse P (2020) Integrative omics analysis of the termite gut system adaptation to Miscanthus diet identifies lignocellulose degradation enzymes. Commun Biol 3(1):275
Majengbasan OS, Unuofin JO, Daramola MO, Iwarere SA, Semenya K, Odeniyi OA (2025) Chitinous waste depolymerization and biocontrol potential of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia 3E chitinase against mycophytopathogens and Anopheles gambiae instar 3. Bioresour Technol Rep 30:102095
Grčić A, Ilijin L, Filipović A, Matić D, Mrdaković M, Todorović D, Perić-Mataruga V (2023) Digestive enzyme activity and macromolecule content in the hemolymph of differentially adapted Lymantria dispar L. populations after short-term increases in ambient temperature. Environ Res 236:116461
Chakraborty A, Ashraf MZ, Modlinger R, Synek J, Schlyter F, Roy A (2020) Unravelling the gut bacteriome of Ips (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae): identifying core bacterial assemblage and their ecological relevance. Sci Rep 10(1):18572
Wang L, Li C, Wang X, Wang G, Shang S, Dou Z, Luo Y (2022) Gut lignocellulose activity and microbiota in Asian longhorned beetle and their predicted contribution to larval nutrition. Front Microbiol 13:899865
Patel AR, Mokashe NU, Chaudhari DS, Jadhav AG, Patil UK (2019) Production optimisation and characterisation of extracellular protease secreted by newly isolated Bacillus subtilis AU-2 strain obtained from Tribolium castaneum gut. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 19:101122
Raut SD, Bharuka VA, Patel AR, Patil UK (2025) Food utility potential of protease obtained from insect-commensal Bacillus subtilis AU‐2. J Sci Food Agric 105(6):3335–3342
Yadav DS, Ranade Y, Sawant I, Ghule S, Mhaske S (2022) Isolation, identification and functional characterisation of bacteria associated with gut of wood feeding Stromatium barbatum (Fabr.)(Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) larvae. Int J Trop Insect Sci 42(3):2603–2616
Yang ZD, Fang XY, Duan HJ, Zhu LH, Feng SY (2021) Isolation and identification of cellulolytic bacteria and optimization of enzymatic production conditions in the intestinal tract of the larva of Batocera lineolate (Chaevroat). Bioresour Technol 43(02):153–159
Soko KM, Bhattacharya RC, Ramakrishnan B, Sharma K, Subramanian S (2020) Functional characterization of bacteria isolated from different gut compartments of white grub, Anamola dimidiata, larvae. J Environ Biol 41(6):1526–1535
Huang S, Sheng P, Zhang H (2012) Isolation and identification of cellulolytic bacteria from the gut of Holotrichia parallela larvae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Int J Mol Sci 13(3):2563–2577
Silva LB, Torres ÉB, Nóbrega RAS, Lopes GN, Vogado RF, Pavan BE, Fernandes-Junior PI (2017) Biochemical studies of amylase, lipase and protease in Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) populations fed with Vigna unguiculata grain cultivated with diazotrophic bacteria strains. Bull Entomol Res 107(6):820–827
Channale, S. M., Bhide, A. J., Yadav, Y., Kashyap, G., Pawar, P. K., Maheshwari, V.L., … Giri, A. P. (2016). Characterization of two coleopteran α-amylases and molecular insights into their differential inhibition by synthetic α-amylase inhibitor, acarbose. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 74, 1–11.
Gaikwad AR, Bhavane GP (2015) The digestive lipase and protease in the dung beetle, Chironitis arrowi (Janssens). Int J Sci Res 4:1778–1782
Sari, K., Jannah, M., Trikurniadewi, N., Abidin, A. Z., Wahyuni, N., Zain, R. A.,… Diyan, B. N. (2023). Hydrolytic enzyme producing bacteria from the gut of oryctes rhinoceros larvae inhabiting household waste composer. Journal of Bio-Molecule Research and Engineering, 2(2), 32–43.
Idris AN, Tang SS, Mohd Adnan AF (2021) Study of thermostable chitinase isolated and purified from Oryctes rhinoceros larvae gut. Sains Malays 50(2):339–349
Karki N, Paschapur AU, Subbanna AR, Stanley J, Singh AK, Bisht I, Gupta JP (2023) Identification and characterization of chitinase-producing bacteria from gut of pleurostict scarab beetle grubs (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Int J Trop Insect Sci 43(5):1539–1551
Paniagua Voirol LR, Frago E, Kaltenpoth M, Hilker M, Fatouros NE (2018) Bacterial symbionts in Lepidoptera: their diversity, transmission, and impact on the host. Front Microbiol 9:556
Zhang X, Zhang F, Lu X (2022) Diversity and functional roles of the gut microbiota in Lepidopteran insects. Microorganisms 10(6):1234
Basit, A., Haq, I. U., Hyder, M., Humza, M., Younas, M., Akhtar, M. R., … Hou, Y.(2025). Microbial symbiosis in Lepidoptera: Analyzing the gut microbiota for sustainable pest management. Biology, 14(8), 937.
Winssy TD, Gopal NO, Indiragandhi P, Balasubramani V, Anandham R (2024) Chitinase producing gut-associated bacteria affected the survivability of the insect Spodoptera frugiperda. Front Biosci Elite 16(2):15. https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbe1602015
Dantur KI, Enrique R, Welin B, Castagnaro AP (2015) Isolation of cellulolytic bacteria from the intestine of Diatraea saccharalis larvae and evaluation of their capacity to degrade sugarcane biomass. Amb Express 5(1):15
Regode V, Kuruba S, Mohammad AS, Sharma HC (2016) Isolation and characterization of gut bacterial proteases involved in inducing pathogenicity of Bacillus thuringiensis toxin in cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera. Front Microbiol 7:1567
MsangoSoko K, Gandotra S, Bhattacharya R, Ramakrishnan B, Sharma K, Subramanian S (2022) Screening and characterization of lipase producing bacteria isolated from the gut of a lepidopteran larvae, Samia ricini. J Asia-Pac Entomol 25(1):101856
Stygar D, Dolezych B, Nakonieczny M, Migula P, Michalczyk K, Zaak M (2010) Digestive enzymes activity in larvae of Cameraria ohridella (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae). C R Biol 333(10):725–735
Gandotra S, Bhuyan PM, Gogoi DK, Kumar A, Subramanian S (2018) Screening of nutritionally important gut bacteria from the lepidopteran insects through qualitative enzyme assays. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect B Biol Sci 88(1):329–337
Zibaee A (2012) Digestive enzymes of large cabbage white butterfly, Pieris brassicae L. (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) from developmental and site of activity perspectives. Ital J Zool 79(1):13–26
Pinto-Tomas, A., Uribe-Lorío, L., Blanco, J., Fontecha, G., Rodriguez, C., Mora, M.,… Sittenfeld, A. (2007). Enzymatic activities of bacteria isolated from the digestive tract of caterpillars and the pupal content of Automeris zugana and Rothschildia lebeau (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae). Revista de Biología Tropical, 55(2), 401–415.
Li WJ, Li FF, Bai J, Liang K, Li K, Qin GQ, Zhang YL, Li XJ (2023) Isolation and characterization of intestinal bacteria associated with cellulose degradation in grasshoppers (Orthoptera). Journal of Insect Science (Online) 23(6):7. https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iead101
Wang JM, Bai J, Zheng FY, Ling Y, Li X, Wang J, Zhi YC, Li XJ (2020) Diversity of the gut microbiome in three grasshopper species using 16S rRNA and determination of cellulose digestibility. PeerJ 8:e10194. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10194
Zheng X, Zhao L, Wu F, Zhou H, Shi F (2024) Screening and identification of protease-producing microorganisms in the gut of Gryllotalpa orientalis (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae). Insects 15(8):629
Munir E, Sitinjak IV, Nasution AF (2024) Grasshopper (Oxya chinensis) gut bacteria and their cellulolytic activity. J Pure Appl Microbiol 18:9101
Nelson K, Muge E, Wamalwa B (2021) Cellulolytic Bacillus species isolated from the gut of the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria. Sci Afr 11:e00665
Banerjee S, Maiti TK, Roy RN (2020) Production, purification, and characterization of cellulase from Acinetobacter junii GAC 16.2, a novel cellulolytic gut isolate of Gryllotalpa africana, and its effects on cotton fiber and sawdust. Ann Microbiol 70(1):28
Banerjee S, Maiti TK, Roy RN (2016) Identification and product optimization of amylolytic Rhodococcus opacus GAA 31.1 isolated from gut of Gryllotalpa africana. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 14(1):133–141
Govindarajan RK, Seemaisamy R, Neelamegam R, Muthukalingan K, Nagarajan K (2016) Isolation and characterization of tannase producing bacteria from the gut of Gryllotalpa krishnani. The Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences 6(2):813
Idowu AB, Edema MO, Oyedepo MT (2009) Extracellular enzyme production by microflora from the gut region of the variegated grasshopper Zonocerus variegatus (Orthoptera: Pyrgomorphidae). Int J Trop Insect Sci 29(4):229–235
Liu H, Yin J, Huang X, Zang C, Zhang Y, Cao J, Gong M (2024) Mosquito gut microbiota: a review. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) 13(8):691. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13080691
Gaio ADO, Gusmão DS, Santos AV, Berbert-Molina MA, Pimenta PF, Lemos FJ (2011) Contribution of midgut bacteria to blood digestion and egg production in Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) (L.). Parasit Vectors 4(1):105
O’Donoghue AJ, Liu C, Simington CJ, Montermoso S, Moreno-Galvez E, Serafim MSM, Burata OE, Lucero RM, Nguyen JT, Fong D, Tran K, Millan N, Gallimore JM, Parungao K, Fong J, Suzuki BM, Jiang Z, Isoe J, Rascón AA Jr (2025) Comprehensive proteolytic profiling of Aedes aegypti mosquito midgut extracts: unraveling the blood meal protein digestion system. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 19(2):e0012555. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012555
Klüber P, Gurusinga FF, Hurka S, Vilcinskas A, Tegtmeier D (2024) Turning trash into treasure: Hermetia illucens microbiome and biodegradation of industrial side streams. Appl Environ Microbiol 90(11):e0099124. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00991-24
Kariuki EG, Kibet C, Paredes JC, Mboowa G, Mwaura O, Njogu J, Masiga D, Bugg TDH, Tanga CM (2023) Metatranscriptomic analysis of the gut microbiome of black soldier fly larvae reared on lignocellulose-rich fiber diets unveils key lignocellulolytic enzymes. Front Microbiol 14:1120224
Zhang J, Luo Z, Li N, Yu Y, Cai M, Zheng L, Zhang J (2023) Cellulose-degrading bacteria improve conversion efficiency in the co-digestion of dairy and chicken manure by black soldier fly larvae. J Environ Manage 348:119156
Sherafati J, Dayer MS, Ghaffarifar F (2022) Therapeutic effects of Lucilia sericata larval excretion/secretion products on Leishmania major under in vitro and in vivo conditions. Parasit Vectors 15(1):212
Van der Plas MJ, Andersen AS, Nazir S, van Tilburg NH, Oestergaard PR, Krogfelt KA, van Dissel JT, Hensbergen PJ, Bertina RM, Nibbering PH (2014) A novel serine protease secreted by medicinal maggots enhances plasminogen activator-induced fibrinolysis. PLoS One 9(3):e92096. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092096
Zhao Y, Wang W, Zhu F, Wang X, Wang X, Lei C (2017) The gut microbiota in larvae of the housefly Musca domestica and their horizontal transfer through feeding. AMB Express 7(1):147. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-017-0445-7
Salgado JFM, Hervé V, Vera MA, Tokuda G, Brune A (2024) Unveiling lignocellulolytic potential: a genomic exploration of bacterial lineages within the termite gut. Microbiome 12(1):201
Tokuda G, Mikaelyan A, Fukui C, Matsuura Y, Watanabe H, Fujishima M, Brune A (2018) Fiber-associated spirochetes are major agents of hemicellulose degradation in the hindgut of wood-feeding higher termites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115(51):E11996–E12004
Auer L, Lazuka A, Sillam-Dussès D, Miambi E, O’Donohue M, Hernandez-Raquet G (2017) Uncovering the potential of termite gut microbiome for lignocellulose bioconversion in anaerobic batch bioreactors. Front Microbiol 8:2623
Chanworawit K, Wangsoonthorn P, Deevong P (2023) Characterization of chitinolytic bacteria newly isolated from the termite Microcerotermes sp. and their biocontrol potential against plant pathogenic fungi. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 87(9):1077–1091
Mulyani PD, Hamid RM, Janatunaim RZ, Purwestri YA (2018) Amylolytic ability of bacteria isolated from termite (Coptotermes sp.) gut. Indones J Biotechnol 23(1):14–20
Sethi A, Xue QG, La Peyre JF, Delatte J, Husseneder C (2011) Dual origin of gut proteases in Formosan subterranean termites (Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki) (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology 159(3):261–267
Callegari M, Crotti E, Fusi M, Marasco R, Gonella E, De Noni I, Daffonchio D (2021) Compartmentalization of bacterial and fungal microbiomes in the gut of adult honeybees. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 7(1):42
Motta EVS, Moran NA (2024) The honeybee microbiota and its impact on health and disease. Nat Rev Microbiol 22(3):122–137. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-023-00990-3
Iorizzo M, Letizia F, Ganassi S, Testa B, Petrarca S, Albanese G, De Cristofaro A (2022) Functional properties and antimicrobial activity from lactic acid bacteria as resources to improve the health and welfare of honey bees. Insects 13(3):308
Hosokawa T, Koga R, Kikuchi Y, Meng XY, Fukatsu T (2010) Wolbachia as a bacteriocyte-associated nutritional mutualist. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(2):769–774. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911476107
Jaffar S, Ahmad S, Lu Y (2022) Contribution of insect gut microbiota and their associated enzymes in insect physiology and biodegradation of pesticides. Front Microbiol 13:979383. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.979383
Shan H, Wu W, Sun Z, Chen J, Li H (2021) The gut microbiota of the insect infraorder Pentatomomorpha (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) for the light of ecology and evolution. Microorganisms 9(2):464
Xu X, De Mandal S, Wu H, Zhu S, Kong J, Lin S, Jin F (2022) Effect of diet on the midgut microbial composition and host immunity of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda. Biology 11(11):1602. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11111602
Zheng X, Wu F, Zhao L, Zhou H, Zhou Z, Jia Z, Shi F (2024) Exploration of protease resources in the gut of omnivorous Gryllotalpa orientalis (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae). Biology 13(9):650. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13090650
Wu LH, Hu CX, Liu TX (2024) Metagenomic profiling of gut microbiota in fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) larvae fed on different host plants. BMC Microbiol 24(1):337
López-Hernández MG, Rincón-Rosales R, Rincón-Molina CI, Manzano-Gómez LA, Gen-Jiménez A, Maldonado-Gómez JC, Rincón-Molina FA (2025) Diversity and functional potential of gut bacteria associated with the insect Arsenura armida (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae). Insects 16(7):711
Todorov SD, Alves MV, Bueno GCA, Alves VF, Ivanova IV (2024) Bee-associated beneficial microbes—importance for bees and for humans. Insects 15(6):430
Mies US, Hervé V, Kropp T, Platt K, Sillam-Dussès D, Šobotník J, Brune A (2024) Genome reduction and horizontal gene transfer in the evolution of Endomicrobia—rise and fall of an intracellular symbiosis with termite gut flagellates. MBio 15(6):e00826-24
Kaltenpoth M, Florez LV, Vigneron A, Dirksen P, Engl T (2025) Origin and function of beneficial bacterial symbioses in insects. Nat Rev Microbio 23(9):551–567. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-025-01164-z
Jousselin E, Desdevises Y, Coeur d’acier A (2009) Fine-scale cospeciation between Brachycaudus and Buchnera aphidicola: bacterial genome helps define species and evolutionary relationships in aphids. Proc Biol Sci 276(1654):187–196. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0679
Cornet L, Cleenwerck I, Praet J, Leonard RR, Vereecken NJ, Michez D, Vandamme P (2022) Phylogenomic analyses of Snodgrassella isolates from honeybees and bumblebees reveal taxonomic and functional diversity. mSystems 7(3):e01500-21
Liang Y, Dikow RB, Su X, Wen J, Ren Z (2024) Comparative genomics of the primary endosymbiont Buchnera aphidicola in aphid hosts and their coevolutionary relationships. BMC Biol 22(1):137
Chen R, Wang Z, Chen J, Jiang L-Y, Qiao G-X (2017) Insect–bacteria parallel evolution in multiple-co-obligate-aphid association: a case in Lachninae (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Sci Rep 7:10204. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10761-9
Arora J, Kinjo Y, Šobotník J, Buček A, Clitheroe C, Stiblik P, Roisin Y, Žifčáková L, Park YC, Kim KY, Sillam-Dussès D, Hervé V, Lo N, Tokuda G, Brune A, Bourguignon T (2022) The functional evolution of termite gut microbiota. Microbiome 10(1):78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-022-01258-3
Uppal S, Waterworth SC, Nick A, Vogel H, Flórez LV, Kaltenpoth M, Kwan JC (2024) Repeated horizontal acquisition of lagriamide-producing symbionts in Lagriinae beetles. ISME J 18(1):wrae211. https://doi.org/10.1093/ismejo/wrae211
Radek R, Platt K, Öztas D, Šobotník J, Sillam-Dussès D, Hanus R, Brune A (2023) New insights into the coevolutionary history of termites and their gut flagellates: description of Retractinympha glossotermitis gen. nov. sp. nov. (Retractinymphidae fam. nov.). Front Ecol Evol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2023.1111484
Kirsch R, Okamura Y, García-Lozano M, Weiss B, Keller J, Vogel H, Pauchet Y (2025) Symbiosis and horizontal gene transfer promote herbivory in the megadiverse leaf beetles. Curr Biol 35(3):640–654
Hammer TJ, Moran NA (2019) Links between metamorphosis and symbiosis in holometabolous insects. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 374(1783):20190068
Moran NA, Hansen AK, Powell JE, Sabree ZL (2012) Distinctive gut microbiota of honey bees assessed using deep sampling from individual worker bees. PLoS One 7(4):e36393
Powell JE, Martinson VG, Urban-Mead K, Moran NA (2014) Routes of acquisition of the gut microbiota of the honey bee Apis mellifera. Appl Environ Microbiol 80(23):7378–7387
Kwong WK, Moran NA (2016) Gut microbial communities of social bees. Nat Rev Microbiol 14(6):374–384
Al Talebi ZA, Al-Kawaz HS, Mahdi RK, Al-Hassnawi AT, Alta’ee AH, Hadwan AM, Hadwan MH (2022) An optimized protocol for estimating cellulase activity in biological samples. Anal Biochem 655:114860
Demissie MS, Legesse NH, Tesema AA (2024) Isolation and characterization of cellulase producing bacteria from forest, cow dung, Dashen brewery and agro-industrial waste. PLoS One 19(4):e0301607. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301607
Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem 31(3):426–428
Teather RM, Wood PJ (1982) Use of Congo red-polysaccharide interactions in enumeration and characterization of cellulolytic bacteria from the bovine rumen. Appl Environ Microbiol 43(4):777–780
Aftab S, Ahmed S, Saeed S, Rasool SA (2006) Screening, isolation and characterization of alkaline protease producing bacteria from soil. Pak J Biol Sci 9(11):2122–2126
Shafique T, Shafique J, Zahid S, Kazi M, Alnemer O, Ahmad A (2021) Screening, selection and development of Bacillus subtilis apr-IBL04 for hyper production of macromolecule alkaline protease. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 28(2):1494–1501
Tsado AN, Egwim EC, Oyeleke SB, Shittu OK (2021) Screening, production and partial characterization of proteases from microbial isolates obtained from waste dumpsites. BIOMED Nat Appl Sci 1(2):45–53
Klinfoong R, Thummakasorn C, Ungwiwatkul S, Boontanom P, Chantarasiri A (2022) Diversity and activity of amylase-producing bacteria isolated from mangrove soil in Thailand. Biodiversitas J Biol Divers 23(10): 5519–5531. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d231064
Pranay K, Padma A, Srinivas N (2019) Screening and identification of amylase-producing strains of Bacillus species. Journal of Applied Biology & Biotechnology 7(5):38–44. https://doi.org/10.7324/JABB.2019.70507
Noormohamadi R, Tabandeh F, Shariati P, Otadi M (2013) Characterization of a lipase from a newly isolated Pseudomonas sp. Iran J Microbiol 5(4):422–427
Rajak S, Ali SR, Pal B, Chakraborty SS (2025) A statistical insight to exploration of medicinal wastewater as a source of thermostable lipase-producing microorganisms. PLoS One 20(2):e0319023. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319023
Li Y, Chang L, Xu K, Zhang S, Gao F, Fan Y (2023) Research progresses on the function and detection methods of insect gut microbes. Microorganisms 11(5):1208
Wang S, Wang L, Fan X, Yu C, Feng L, Yi L (2020) An insight into diversity and functionalities of gut microbiota in insects. Curr Microbiol 77(9):1976–1986
López-Sánchez R, Rebollar EA, Gutiérrez-Ríos RM, Garciarrubio A, Juarez K, Segovia L (2024) Metagenomic analysis of carbohydrate-active enzymes and their contribution to marine sediment biodiversity. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 40(3):95
Sime AM, Kifle BA, Woldesemayat AA, Gemeda MT (2024) Microbial carbohydrate active enzyme (CAZyme) genes and diversity from Menagesha Suba natural forest soils of Ethiopia as revealed by shotgun metagenomic sequencing. BMC Microbiol 24(1):285
Verma SK, Kaur S, Tevetia A, Chatterjee S, Sharma PC (2021) Structural characterization and functional annotation of microbial proteases mined from solid tannery waste metagenome. Biologia 76(6):1829–1842
Dumond L (2021) Lignin degradation by microbial consortia from termite: Enrichment and characterization of bacterial communities by (bio-) chemical and metagenomics approaches (Doctoral dissertation, INSA de Toulouse)
Warnecke F, Luginbühl P, Ivanova N, Ghassemian M, Richardson TH, Stege JT, Leadbetter JR (2007) Metagenomic and functional analysis of hindgut microbiota of a wood-feeding higher termite. Nature 450(7169):560–565
Scully ED, Geib SM, Hoover K, Tien M, Tringe SG, Barry KW, Carlson JE (2013) Metagenomic profiling reveals lignocellulose degrading system in a microbial community associated with a wood-feeding beetle. PLoS One 8(9):e73827
Han X, Lu C, Geib SM, Zheng J, Wu S, Zhang F, Liang G (2019) Characterization of Dendrolimus houi lajonquiere (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) transcriptome across all life stages. Insects 10(12):442
Kariuki EG, Kibet C, Paredes JC, Mboowa G, Mwaura O, Njogu J, Masiga D, Bugg TDH, Tanga CM (2023) Metatranscriptomic analysis of the gut microbiome of black soldier fly larvae reared on lignocellulose-rich fiber diets unveils key lignocellulolytic enzymes. Front Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1120224
Pei Y, Sun M, Zhang J, Lei A, Chen H, Kang X, Yang S (2023) Comparative metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analyses reveal the response of black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae intestinal microbes and reduction mechanisms to high concentrations of tetracycline. Toxics 11(7):611
Tartar A, Wheeler MM, Zhou X, Coy MR, Boucias DG, Scharf ME (2009) Parallel metatranscriptome analyses of host and symbiont gene expression in the gut of the termite Reticulitermes flavipes. Biotechnol Biofuels 2(1):25
Terrón-Camero LC, Gordillo-González F, Salas-Espejo E, Andrés-León E (2022) Comparison of metagenomics and metatranscriptomics tools: a guide to making the right choice. Genes 13(12):2280
Ngara TR, Zhang H (2018) Recent advances in function-based metagenomic screening. Genom Proteom Bioinform 16(6):405–415
Chen B, Yu T, Xie S, Du K, Liang X, Lan Y, Shao Y (2018) Comparative shotgun metagenomic data of the silkworm Bombyx mori gut microbiome. Sci Data 5(1):1–10
Joshi N, Sharma M, Singh SP (2020) Characterization of a novel xylanase from an extreme temperature hot spring metagenome for xylooligosaccharide production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 104(11):4889–4901
Prasanna M, Sarangi S, Narwade DK, Thanuja A, Chandak S, Mohapatra R, Adhikari B (2024) Potential of insect gut microbes in advancing renewable energy production: a review. Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology 27(12):997–1010
Al-Hawash AB, Zhang X, Ma F (2017) Strategies of codon optimization for high-level heterologous protein expression in microbial expression systems. Gene Rep 9:46–53
Watts A, Sankaranarayanan S, Watts A, Raipuria RK (2021) Optimizing protein expression in heterologous system: Strategies and tools. Meta Gene 29:100899
Indiragandhi P, Anandham R, Sa TM (2011) Functional significance of insect gut bacteria and their role in host insect processes, development, and crop production. Bacteria in Agrobiology: Plant growth responses. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 309–334
Mukherjee P, Mondal I, Dey D, Dan E, Khatun F, Tewari S (2023) An overview on microbial enzymes and their industrial applications. J Survev Fisheries Sci 10:6154–6160
Raveendran S, Parameswaran B, Ummalyma SB, Abraham A, Mathew AK, Madhavan A, Pandey A (2018) Applications of microbial enzymes in food industry. Food Technol Biotechnol 56(1):16
Shi W, Syrenne R, Sun JZ, Yuan JS (2010) Molecular approaches to study the insect gut symbiotic microbiota at the ‘omics’ age. Insect Sci 17(3):199–219
Avşar C, Koyuncu H, Aras ES (2017) Isolation and molecular characterization of Bacillus spp. isolated from soil for production of industrial enzymes. Biol Chem Res 3(9):72–86
Cheng TH, Ismail N, Kamaruding N, Saidin J, Danish-Daniel MJBR (2020) Industrial enzymes-producing marine bacteria from marine resources. Biotechnol Rep (Amst) 27:e00482
Hasan F, Shah AA, Hameed A (2006) Industrial applications of microbial lipases. Enzym Microb Technol 39(2):235–251
Toppo P, Jangir P, Mehra N, Kapoor R, Mathur P (2024) Bioprospecting of endophytic fungi from medicinal plant Anisomeles indica L. for their diverse role in agricultural and industrial sectors. Sci Rep 14(1):588
Viswan A, Anjana HM, Hermon AJ, Suresh KN, Nair SR, Ganesh SK, Devi CS (2025) Exploring the bioactivity of Bacillus siamensis isolated from marine sediments. Discover Applied Sciences 7(7):662
Zainuddin NI, Makhtar MMZ, Gunny AAN, Gopinath SCB, Ahmad AA, Pusphanathan K, Zainuddin N’I, Siddiqui MR, Alam M, Rafatullah M (2024) Isolation, screening and optimization of alkaliphilic cellulolytic fungi for production of cellulase. Green Process Synth 13(1):20230153
Ahamad S (2024) The role of microbiota in insect digestion: a deep dive into the gut ecosystem of Termites. Indian J Appl Pure Biol 39(1):298–306
Li J, Ni B, Wu Y, Yang Y, Mu D, Wu K, Zhang A, Du Y, Li Q (2024) The cultivable gut bacteria Enterococcus mundtii promotes early-instar larval growth of Conogethes punctiferalis via enhancing digestive enzyme activity. Pest Manag Sci 80(12):6179–6188
Shamjana U, Vasu DA, Hembrom PS, Nayak K, Grace T (2024) The role of insect gut microbiota in host fitness, detoxification and nutrient supplementation. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 117(1):71
Brune A (2014) Symbiotic digestion of lignocellulose in termite guts. Nat Rev Microbiol 12(3):168–180
Kuhad RC, Gupta R, Singh A (2011) Microbial cellulases and their industrial applications. Enzyme Res 2011(1):280696
Woźniak A, Kuligowski K, Świerczek L, Cenian A (2025) Review of lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment using physical, thermal and chemical methods for higher yields in bioethanol production. Sustainability 17(1):287
Bischof RH, Ramoni J, Seiboth B (2016) Cellulases and beyond: the first 70 years of the enzyme producer Trichoderma reesei. Microb Cell Fact 15(1):106
Chandel AK, Garlapati VK, Singh AK, Antunes FAF, da Silva SS (2018) The path forward for lignocellulose biorefineries: bottlenecks, solutions, and perspective on commercialization. Bioresource Technol 264:370–381
Singh R, Shukla A, Tiwari S, Srivastava M (2014) A review on delignification of lignocellulosic biomass for enhancement of ethanol production potential. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 32:713–728
Gunathilake KMD, Ratnayake RR, Kulasooriya SA, Karunaratne DN (2013) Evaluation of cellulose degrading efficiency of some fungi and bacteria and their biofilms. J Natl Sci Found Sri Lanka. https://doi.org/10.4038/jnsfsr.v41i2.5710
Kamali E, Jamali A, Izanloo A, Ardebili A (2021) In vitro activities of cellulase and ceftazidime, alone and in combination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. BMC Microbiol 21(1):347
Khan MF (2025) Recent advances in microbial enzyme applications for sustainable textile processing and waste management. Science 7(2):46
Maurer KH (2024) Enzymes in detergents and cleaning agents. Introduction to enzyme technology. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 361–383
Gupta R, Beg Q, Lorenz P (2002) Bacterial alkaline proteases: molecular approaches and industrial applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 59(1):15–32
Akhtar MA, Butt MQS, Afroz A, Rasul F, Irfan M, Sajjad M, Zeeshan N (2024) Approach towards sustainable leather: characterization and effective industrial application of proteases from Bacillus sps. for ecofriendly dehairing of leather hide. Int J Biol Macromol 266:131154
Darvishzadeh A (2014) Enzymatic activity of alpha-amylase in alimentary tract Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): characterization and compartmentalization. Arthropods 3(3):138
Kouadio EJP, Dué EA, Dabonné S, Etchian OA, Kouamé LP (2010) Amylolytic enzymes from the digestive tract of the giant cricket Brachytrupes membranaceus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae): enzymatic profiles and biochemical characteristics of activities. Int J Trop Insect Sci 30(3):154–162
Shabarari M, Naseri B, Zibaee A, Hajizadeh J (2025) Characterization of digestive α-amylase in the midgut of willow leaf beetle Plagiodera versicolora (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J Crop Prot 3(2):245–254
Tauseef S, Ali EA, Ajaz M, Tauseef F, Siddiqui K, Kiran T (2025) Bacterial amylase production and its application as a detergent additive: significance of industrial enzyme. Biol Sciences-PJSIR 68(1):71–77
den Van Bossche T, Goossens K, Ampe B, Tamassia LFM, De Boever JL, Vandaele L (2024) Effect of supplementing an α-amylase enzyme or a blend of essential oil components on the performance, nutrient digestibility, and nitrogen balance of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 107(7):4509–4523
Chandra P, Enespa, Singh R, Arora PK (2020) Microbial lipases and their industrial applications: a comprehensive review. Microb Cell Fact 19(1):169
Katiyar S, Lal N (2025) Microbial lipases in modern detergency: sources, production, and application. Microb Enzymes: Prod Purif Industrial Appl 2:593–611
Abdelaziz AA, Abo-Kamar AM, Elkotb ES, Al-Madboly LA (2025) Microbial lipases: advances in production, purification, biochemical characterization, and multifaceted applications in industry and medicine. Microb Cell Fact 24(1):40
Arakane Y, Muthukrishnan S, Arakane Y, Muthukrishnan S (2010) Insect chitinase and chitinase-like proteins. Cell Mol Life Sci 67(2):201–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-009-0161-9
Rossi GD, Zucchi TD, Guidolin AS, Peruchi A, Cônsoli FL (2015) Chitin-degrading enzymes from an actinomycete ectosymbiont of Acromyrmex subterraneus brunneus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann Microbiol 65(1):565–574
Rai S, Pokhrel P, Udash P, Chemjong M, Bhattarai N, Thuanthong A, Nirmal N (2025) Chitin and chitosan from shellfish waste and their applications in agriculture and biotechnology industries. Crit Rev Biotechnol, pp 1–19
Isa MT, Abdulkarim AY, Bello A, Bello TK, Adamu Y (2024) Synthesis and characterization of chitosan for medical applications: a review. J Biomater Appl 38(10):1036–1057
Aharwar A, Parihar DK (2018) Tannases: production, properties, applications. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 15:322–334
Ahmed AI, Abou-Taleb KA, Abd-Elhalim T (2023) Characterization and application of tannase and gallic acid produced by co-fungi of Aspergillus niger and Trichoderma viride utilizing agro-residues substrates. Sci Rep 13(1):16755
Yuan Y, Li L, Zhao J, Chen M (2020) Effect of Tannic Acid on Nutrition and Activities of Detoxification Enzymes and Acetylcholinesterase of the Fall Webworm (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). J Insect Sscience 20(1):8. https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieaa001
Pandiarajan J, Krishnan M, Suganya T (2025) Recent trends on mining of microbial tannase from waste water recycling units of tannery. Microbial niche nexus sustaining environmental biological wastewater and water-energy-environment nexus. Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, pp 489–510
Zayed A, Abdelkareem S, Talaat N, Dayem DA, Farag MA (2025) Tannin in foods: Classification, dietary sources, and processing strategies to minimize anti-nutrient effects. Food and Bioprocess Technology, pp 1–29
Prasad RK, Chatterjee S, Mazumder PB, Sharma S, Datta S, Vairale MG, Dwivedi SK (2019) Study on cellulase (Β–1, 4-endoglucanase) activity of gut bacteria of Sitophilus oryzae in cellulosic waste biodegradation. Bioresource Technol Rep 7:100274
Luo C, Li Y, Chen Y, Fu C, Long W, Xiao X, Yang Y (2019) Bamboo lignocellulose degradation by gut symbiotic microbiota of the bamboo snout beetle Cyrtotrachelus buqueti. Biotechnol Biofuels 12(1):70
Karaman F, Incekara U, Arslan NP, Albayrak S, Ortucu S, Taskin M (2024) A New Enzyme for Biodiesel Production and Food Applications: Lipase of Bacillus megaterium F25 Isolated From an Aquatic Insect Rhantus suturalis. GCB Bioenergy 16(12):e70009
Bahar AA, Sezen K, Demirbağ Z, Nalçacioğlu R (2012) The relationship between insecticidal effects and chitinase activities of Coleopteran-originated entomopathogens and their chitinolytic profile. Ann Microbiol 62(2):647–653
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the management of Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India for the valuable support.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Vellore Institute of Technology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Data collection and preparation of the manuscript were done by Aswin Viswan. Validation and critical revision of the manuscript were done by Neenu Augustine. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Viswan, A., Augustine, N. Insect Gut Microbiota as a Reservoir of Industrially Relevant Enzymes: A Comprehensive Review. Microb Ecol 89, 107 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-026-02726-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-026-02726-1





