Abstract
Seagrass meadows are hotspots of biodiversity with considerable economic and ecological value. The health of seagrass ecosystems is influenced in part by the makeup and stability of their microbiome, but microbiome composition can be sensitive to environmental change such as nutrient availability, elevated temperatures, and reduced pH. The objective of the present study was to characterize the bacterial community of the leaves, bulk samples of roots and rhizomes, and proximal sediment of the seagrass species Cymodocea nodosa along the natural pH gradient of Levante Bay, Vulcano Island, Italy. The bacterial community was determined by characterizing the 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and analyzing the operational taxonomic unit classification of bacterial DNA within samples. Statistical analyses were used to explore how life-long exposure to different pH/pCO2 conditions may be associated with significant differences in microbial communities, dominant bacterial classes, and microbial diversity within each plant section and sediment. The microbiome of C. nodosa significantly differed among all sample types and site-specific differences were detected within sediment and root/rhizome microbial communities, but not the leaves. These results show that C. nodosa leaves have a consistent microbial community even across a pH range of 8.15 to 6.05. The ability for C. nodosa to regulate and maintain microbial structure may indicate a semblance of resilience within these vital ecosystems under projected changes in environmental conditions such as ocean acidification.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Seagrass meadows cover 300,000 to 600,000 km2 of coastline worldwide [1, 2] and are considered a hotspot of biodiversity. Along with supporting vast biodiversity, seagrasses are considered economically and ecologically important. They play a critical role in recycling nutrients, providing food and shelter to a multitude of marine organisms, and stabilizing sediments [3]. The presence of healthy seagrass meadows reduces exposure of bacterial pathogens to humans, fishes, and invertebrates [4]. A vital component of seagrass meadows is the presence and health of their microbiome. How seagrass microbiomes will change under future ocean conditions and the further ecological effects of these potential changes are unknown [5]. Seagrass coverage has faced an accelerated decline under current ocean conditions [6] emphasizing the need to understand seagrass health under changing environmental scenarios before further loss occurs.
A functioning microbiome is vital to the physiology, ecology, and biogeochemistry of seagrass habitats [7], but the plant–microbe relationship is complex and not well understood under changing ocean conditions. Bacteria in the form of an epiphytic biofilm on seagrass blades are essential components that can influence the settlement of accumulating microbes and other epiphytic organisms. Conversely, these biofilms can affect light availability through physical shading and potentially pose a threat if not regulated by the competing microbial community [8, 9]. Growing research on the plant–microbe mutualistic relationship suggests that some bacteria within the seagrass leaf microbiome aid in plant growth through nitrogen fixation [10,11,12,13,14], limit growth of competitive algal epiphytes, and metabolize potentially harmful metabolic waste produced by the plant such as methanol and ethanol [15, 16]. Beneficial bacterial associations are not unique to the seagrass leaves, however, and can be found in the rhizosphere of seagrasses, providing similar functions [3, 15, 17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24].
The rhizosphere of seagrasses has a unique bacterial community that is typically important within the sulfur cycle and aids in shaping the overall health of the seagrass meadow [3, 15]. The rhizosphere is important for nutrient uptake and shifts in the microbiome could impact the conversion of organic material into essential nutrients and compounds [17,18,19,20,21]. Additionally, the roots and rhizomes self-regulate via sulfur detoxification under stressful environmental conditions [22,23,24]. The driving factors that cause variation among rhizosphere microbial communities under stable condition changes with the scale that rhizospheres are compared. At a local scale, microbial variation within the rhizosphere is due to the differences in light availability that supply organic nutrients from the leaves to the rhizosphere through photosynthesis. Conversely, at a regional scale, the variation in nutrient levels and soil toxicity becomes a greater driver of variation in the rhizosphere’s microbial community [3].
Sediments within seagrass meadows are often an extreme environment with anoxic conditions commonly produced through the mineralization of organic material throughout the benthic layer [25,26,27]. In addition, waterlogged sediment prevents oxygen diffusion to the water column further promoting anoxic conditions. This, in addition to sulfate reduction from microbes present in the sediment and rhizosphere, also results in a highly acidic environment within marine sediments [28, 29]. The unique bacterial community within the extreme environments of the sediment is partly responsible for nitrification and denitrification as well [30, 31]. Nitrification–denitrification processes are essential in seagrass ecosystems to prevent the buildup of organic matter byproducts in the sediment. For example, particular bacteria compete for ammonia and break down NH4+ into NO2− [32, 33], mitigating eutrophication prompted by nitrogen buildup [6, 34]. Seagrass can alter its environment and store valuable nutrients within the sediment [35,36,37] and as environmental conditions continue to change, these vital processes could be impacted, changing the functional dynamics and overall health of seagrass ecosystems [31].
Global oceans are changing. By 2100, the average atmospheric CO2 is anticipated to reach 985 ± 97 ppm (full-range 794–1142 ppm), which will concomitantly result in higher oceanic pCO2 conditions [38]. High pCO2, along with a rise in bicarbonate, allows for optimal photosynthesis [39]. Although this may be beneficial in the context of photosynthetic enhancement, seagrasses are complex organisms and a rise in pCO2 may not be advantageous in all aspects. A study characterizing phenol production in marine plants showed a decline in concentrations of phenolic protective substance with increasing pCO2 levels [40]. Phenol production serves as an herbivory deterrent, digestion reducer, and antifoulant [41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50]. Thus, reduction in phenol production could result in higher grazing rates within areas with high pCO2, such as near CO2 vents, and an overall negative impact on seagrasses. At extreme levels of pCO2, however, Borell et al. (2013) showed that increased pCO2 levels changed the palatability of macroalgae reducing the grazing rates of herbivory. The change in palatability was due to an increase of secondary metabolites (dimethylsulfoniopropionate) [51]. High levels of pCO2 are also associated with a disruption in the microbiome of marine organisms. For example, seagrass within naturally high pCO2 conditions near Papua New Guinea harbored more potentially pathogenic bacteria compared with those within lower pCO2 sites [39]. On the other hand, Caulerpa, an invasive macroalgae, showed a stable diversity and species richness within its microbiome under high pCO2 conditions suggesting that this species may be resistent or even potentially benefit from changing ocean conditions [52]. The presence of carbon concentrating mechanisms (CCM) within Caulerpa’s chloroplasts aids in intracellular pCO2 regulation under high pCO2 conditions, giving them a competitive advantage over macroalgae that lack a CCM [52]. The known effects of high pCO2 and, concomitantly, low pH on seagrasses and their microbial communities still require further investigation as elevated pCO2 levels potentially pose a threat to seagrass ecosystems.
The objective of the present study was to characterize the bacterial communities associated with seagrass leaves, bulk samples of roots and rhizomes, and the proximal sediments found along the natural pH gradient of Levante Bay, Vulcano Island, Italy. There are few available study sites that generally mimic current and anticipated extreme conditions within one naturally occurring community. Volcanic vents contain minimal confounding variables and a natural pH gradient that allows for characterizing the present and potentially future bacterial communities of marine organisms such as seagrasses. Levante Bay located at Vulcano Island, Italy, provided a natural pH gradient to study microbial differences in a seagrass community from long-term exposure to different environmental conditions.
Methods
Site Characteristics and Sample Collection
Leaves and bulk samples of roots and rhizomes from the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa and associated sediment samples were collected on June 21, 2013, in Levante Bay, Vulcano Island (38° 25′ N, 14° 57′ E), NE of Sicily, Italy. Levante Bay contains a natural seawater pH gradient ranging from 6.05 to 8.15 due to the presence of a shallow-water submarine volcanic CO2 vent [53]. For the present study, a total of five sites were established within Levante Bay: the reference site (500 m northeast of the vent; pH 8.15), site 1 (390 m from the vent, pH 8.03), site 2 (300 m from the vent, pH 7.86), site 3 (240 m from the vent, pH 7.44), and the vent site (15 m from the vent; pH 6.05; Fig. 1). pHNBS was measured at the time of sampling using a YSI 556 handheld multimeter (YSI Inc., Yellow Springs, OH, USA). Our study did not measure other water quality information during the sampling period, but several other studies have characterized this study site. To date, there is no literature published on the trace elements along the gradient at Vulcano Island. However, two studies have published records on total alkalinity, pCO2, filamentous algae, suspended particulate organic matter, macroalgae, microbial mats, dry bulk density of sediment (g cm−3), porosity (φ), silt and clay (%), δ13C (‰), and C/N (Supplemental Table 1) [54, 55]. Although these two studies did not sample the same locations as the present study, the sites representing extreme conditions were located approximate to our study’s site 3 and their control site was approximate to our site 1 [54, 55].
Three individual clumps of C. nodosa, which contained (1) leaves, and (2) roots and rhizomes, were collected at each site (one ramet per clump). Root and rhizomes have known differences in microbial composition [56, 57]. However, for the purposes of this study, root and rhizomes were collected in bulk for analysis. In addition to the seagrass samples, three scoops, each approximately 1 g in size, of surface sediment (within ~ 1–2 cm of the surface) were taken at each site within 0.5 m of the seagrass sample. Each sample was haphazardly selected at approximately 2 m depth and approximately 2 m apart to avoid sampling clones. The samples from each of five sites (leaves, roots, and sediment n = 3 per site) were stored separately in the RNA stabilization reagent RNAlater (Qiagen®) and then flash-frozen using liquid nitrogen. Enough RNA later was used to completely submerge all sample types. Although sediments were stored in separate sterile centrifuge tubes, the leaves and roots and rhizomes of the seagrasses of each ramet were not separated until sample processing occurred. Samples were transported back to Mote Marine Laboratory (Sarasota, FL, USA) via a liquid nitrogen dry shipper and stored at − 80 °C until further analysis.
DNA Extraction and Sequencing
Nucleic acid extraction for all samples was carried out using the commercially available PowerSoil® DNA isolation kit (Qiagen®). Sediment samples were processed as per the manufacturer’s instructions. A modified protocol was used for seagrass tissues. Specific tissues (i.e., leaves and the combination of roots and rhizomes) were separated under a sterile hood using sterile scalpels. The initial lysing step for the isolation kit required both a lysing solution and mechanical bead beating for 10 min, which was extended to 1 h in order to maximize DNA yields. The initial bead beating time of 10 min, resulted in an average DNA yield of 5.4 ng/µL and a range of 0–29 ng/µL with 5 samples < 1 ng/µL. The elongated bead beating increased the average DNA yield to 8.2 ng/µL and improved the range to 2.4–29 ng/µL. Samples were not periodically cooled on ice during the elongated vortexing period; however, the average DNA strand length of our sequences (~ 450 bp) showed formidable quality even after the extended bead beating time. Extracted DNA was stored at − 20 °C until 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Bacterial communities of each sample were analyzed using 454 pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. Samples were sequenced by MRDNA (www.mrdnalab.com, MRDNA, Shallowater, TX, USA) with a single-step 30 cycle PCR, using primers specific for the 16S gene (27F and 519R). Samples were then sequenced using a Roche 454 FLX titanium sequencer as per the manufacturer’s guidelines.
Sequence Analysis
Amplicon reads were analyzed by the MRDNA lab (www.mrdnalab.com, MR DNA, Shallowater, TX, USA). MR DNA trimming was completed after an FLX sequencing run followed by a quality filtering of any reads less than 150 bp. From the amplicon reads, quality sequences were binned into OTUs (operational taxonomic units) based on sequence similarity with a 97% similarity cutoff. OTUs were classified at all taxonomic levels using the curated NCBI database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) [52]. Classification of OTUs was determined using percent homology and identified to the lowest possible taxonomic level based on Supplemental Table 2. The 16S rRNA sequences analyzed in this study were deposited to NCBI PRJNA623005.
Statistical Analyses
Only sequence reads identified as bacteria were processed through the statistical analyses. Bacterial community data were rarefied to 3036 reads per sample prior to analysis. Rarefication was chosen based on the lowest number of reads per sample within the data set (3036 reads). Community analyses were then conducted at the operational taxonomic unit (OTU) level. A permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) with 9999 permutations [58] was used to determine whether there were differences in microbial communities among sample types (i.e., leaves, roots and rhizomes, and sediment samples). PERMANOVA was conducted using the vegan package in R [59]. Community profiles among sites were then visualized using non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) using the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity index [60] with the metaMDS function from the vegan package in R [59]. PERMANOVA was also used to compare the bacterial community counts among sites within each sample type. When significant PERMANOVAs were detected, a pairwise PERMANOVA with a Bonferroni correction was conducted.
A Kruskal–Wallis (KW) test was used to determine whether there were differences within dominant bacterial classes (i.e., > 3% relative abundance within at least one sample) among sites within each sample type. If a significant difference was determined using the KW test, the analysis was proceeded with a Bonferroni-corrected Dunn’s test for post hoc comparison within the dunn. test package in R [61] to determine significant differences among sites. When significant differences were determined within the dominant classes, a custom R function was created to conduct iterative KW tests on each OTU to determine whether differences detected in class abundance among sites were driven by particular OTUs. Dunn’s post hoc tests with Bonferroni corrections were again used to determine pairwise differences among sites for significant KW tests. Specific OTUs are discussed if their relative abundance explained the results of the bacterial class comparisons.
Alpha diversity was calculated using the Shannon Index to compare the bacterial OTU diversity among sites within each community type (i.e., leaves, roots and rhizomes, and sediment). A KW test with a Bonferroni-corrected Dunn’s test was used for post hoc comparison to determine significant differences in bacterial diversity between sites.
Results
Summary of 16S rRNA Data
Amplicon DNA sequencing for seagrass leaves (243,198 total sequence reads), roots and rhizomes (191,817 total sequence reads), and sediment (94,328 total sequence reads) resulted in a total of 529,343 total sequence reads. These sequences were binned into 7759 distinct OTUs. The shortest sequence obtained was 150 bp and the longest was 670 bp with an average length of each sequence read being 435 ± 1.37 bp (Table 1).
Comparison Between Samples and Sites
There was a significant difference in bacterial communities detected among sample types (F = 14.061; R2 = 0.374; p < 0.001), with little to no overlap of sample types within the NMDS plot (Fig. 2a). A pairwise PERMANOVA showed that bacterial communities from each sample type were significantly different from the others (leaves vs. roots and rhizomes: F = 3.675, R2 = 0.100, p < 0.001; leaves vs sediment: F = 22.820, R2 = 0.449, p < 0.001; roots and rhizomes vs. sediment: F = 16.062, R2 = 0.327, p < 0.001).
When the bacterial communities were compared within sample types, there were no differences among sites for seagrass leaves (F = 1.395; R2 = 0.358; p = 0.092, Fig. 2b). Results of the PERMANOVA indicated that the bacterial community of the roots and rhizomes significantly differed among sites (F = 1.895; R2 = 0.336; p = 0.002) with some overlap within the NMDS ordination plot (Fig. 2c). Pairwise PERMANOVAs indicated that the bacterial community within roots and rhizomes were significantly different between the “reference” and “vent” sites (F = 2.348; R2 = 0.281; p = 0.048), “vent” and “site 2” (F = 2.209; R2 = 0.269; p = 0.042), “vent” and “site 3” (F = 2.825; R2 = 0.320; p = 0.019), and “site 2” and “site 3” (F = 1.551; R2 = 0.205; p = 0.032). When comparing the bacterial community of sediments among sites, bacterial OTUs found within the “vent” site were so specific to that location (F = 3.571; R2 = 0.588; p = < 0.001) it prevented NMDS plot interpretation (Supplementary Fig. 1). Subsequent analyses removed the “vent” site (Fig. 2d) and still showed that the bacterial communities within the sediments significantly differed among the remaining sites (F = 1.683; R2 = 0.387; p = 0.004). The pairwise PERMANOVA of the bacterial community within the sediments, however, showed no significant differences among sites. Detailed pairwise PERMANOVA comparison results can be found in Supplemental Table 3.
Bacterial OTU Diversity Indices
Diversity, measured using the Shannon index, showed significant differences among sites for sediments only (X2 = 10.167, df = 4, p = 0.037; Fig. 3). No differences in alpha diversity were detected within the leaf or root bacterial communities (Fig. 3a,b). The post hoc analyses showed that the diversity of seagrass sediments was significantly lower in the “vent” site compared with that in “site 1” (X2 = 2.921; p = 0.017) (Fig. 3c).
Bacterial Class Comparison
Six different bacterial classes dominated the leaf samples (Fig. 4a). Betaproteobacteria was the most abundant bacterial class at each site throughout the leaf community. The bacterial community of leaves at “site 1” had two dominant bacterial classes, Betaproteobacteria (85.77% SE ± 3.67) and Gammaproteobacteria (8.87% SE ± 0.98). Alphaproteobacteria and Deltaproteobacteria were major contributors to the bacterial communities of leaves at “site 2”, “site 3,” and “vent,” but not at the “reference” site nor at “site 1.” Out of the six dominant classes within the leaf community, two classes were dominant in only one site location. Oscillatoriophycideae was specific to the Reference site and an unknown Cyanobacterium was specific to “site 2.”
Only one of the dominant classes within the leaf community showed significant differences among sites that explained the pattern observed at the class level (Supplemental Fig. 2). Oscillatoriophycideae (X2 = 11.95, df = 4, p = 0.02) was significantly higher at the “reference” site compared to that at both “site 1” (p = 0.02) and “site 3” (p = 0.02). These significant differences were driven primarily by OTU 2 (o. Oscillatoriales) (X2 = 13.80, df = 4, p = 0.01), which showed significantly higher abundances at the “reference” site compared with all other sites (p = 0.02; Table 2). The average relative abundance of each significant bacterium within the leaf community can be found in Supplemental Fig. 2.
The bacterial community of the roots and rhizomes was dominated by nine different classes. Three of those classes were specific to the root samples: Bacteroidia, Clostridia, and Subsection II Cyanobacteria. Similar to seagrass leaves, Betaproteobacteria was heavily abundant in the roots and rhizomes (Fig. 4b). Betaproteobacteria was highest in abundance at all sites within the root community except at the “vent”, where Gammaproteobacteria was the most abundant (32.45% SE ± 13.09). Bacterial classes Bacteroidia (3.18% SE ± 0.59) and Clostridia (3.82% SE ± 1.34) were only dominant within “site 3” of the root community. Subsection II Cyanobacteria was only dominant within the root samples from the “vent” site. Oscillatoriophycideae was present within the “reference” site of the root community (21.49% SE ± 6.74).
The KW test revealed four bacterial classes significantly differed among sites within the root and rhizome community. These four groups were Bacteroidia (X2 = 13.67, df = 4, p = 0.01), Clostridia (X2 = 14.17, df = 4, p = 0.01), Oscillatoriophycideae (X2 = 12.86, df = 4, p = 0.01), and an unknown Cyanobacterium (X2 = 11.72, df = 4, p = 0.02). Bacteroidia showed a significantly higher abundance at “site 3” compared to the “reference” site (p = 0.02) and “vent” site (p = 0.01). Clostridia was significantly higher at “site 3” than at both the “reference” site (p = 0.02) and the “vent” site (p = 0.02). Oscillatoriophycideae was significantly higher at the “reference” site compared to “site 1” (p = 0.04), “site 2” (p = 0.01), and “site 3” (p = 0.04). Similar to leaves, OTU 2 (o. Oscillatoriales) showed significantly higher abundance at the “reference” site compared to all other sites (p < 0.01; Table 2), which explained the difference in Oscillatoriophycideaea detected at the class level (Supplemental Fig. 3). The unknown Cyanobacterium found at the “vent” site was significantly higher when compared with “site 3” (p = 0.01). Bacteroidia, Clostridia, and the unknown Cyanobacterium had no significant OTUs that differed among sites, which could have explained the differences detected at the class level. However, several other OTUs significantly differed among sites (detailed in Supplemental Fig. 3).
The bacterial community of the sediments was dominated by eleven different bacterial classes (Fig. 4c). Classes specific to the sediment community were Acidimicrobiia, Candidatus Thiobios, Cytophagia, Planctomycetacia, Sphingobacteria, and Zetaproteobacteria. Gammaproteobacteria was the most abundant at every sample location except “site 2” (20.73% SE ± 1.48), where Alphaproteobacteria was the most abundant (21.71% SE ± 1.55). Bacterial classes that were only detected at specific sites included Acidimicrobiia at the “reference” site (3.50% SE ± 0.37), Cytophagia at both “reference” (3.10% SE ± 0.13) and “site 2” (5.36% SE ± 3.90), Candidatus Thiobios at the “vent” site (6.92% SE ± 0.77), and both Sphingobacteria (3.75% SE ± 0.36) and Zetaproteobacteria at “site 2” (5.78% SE ± 0.64). Planctomycetacia was present in all sites except for the “vent” site and Deltaproteobacteria was present in all sites.
Seven of the eleven dominant classes showed significant differences among sites. Acidimicrobiia (X2 = 11.03, df = 4, p = 0.03) was significantly higher at the “reference” site when compared to that at the “vent” site (p = 0.01), primarily driven by a single OTU, Acidimicrobiia’s OTU 157 (o. Acidimicrobiales) (p = 0.02). Phylum Proteobacteria’s, Candidatus Thiobios (OTU 46) (X2 = 10.57, df = 4, p = 0.03) was significantly higher at the “vent” site compared with the “reference” site (p = 0.007). Gammaproteobacteria (X2 = 10.83, df = 4, p = 0.03) was significantly higher in abundance at the “vent” site when compared with that in the “reference” site (p = 0.04) and “site 2” (p = 0.01). Gammaproteobacteria had 3 OTUs within its classification that differed significantly among sites: OTU 16 (g. Thiothrix) (X2 = 13.80; df = 4; p = 0.01), OTU 40 (sp. Balneatrix balneatrix) (X2 = 10.22; df = 4; p = 0.04), and OTU 1368 (g. Balneatrix) (X2 = 11.07; df = 4; p = 0.03). OTU 16 was significantly higher at the “vent” site compared to that at all other locations (p = 0.02). OTU 40 was only significantly higher at the “vent” site compared to that at “site 2” (p = 0.02). OTU 1368 was also significantly higher at the “vent” site compared with that at “site 2” (p = 0.01; Table 2). The bacterial class Planctomycetacia (X2 = 10.83, df = 4, p = 0.03) was significantly different among sites, but the post hoc analysis failed to determine any significant differences among the sites. Sphingobacteria (X2 = 9.83, df = 4, p = 0.04) was significantly higher at “site 2” when compared with that at the “vent” site (p = 0.01). Zetaproteobacteria (X2 = 12.56, df = 4, p = 0.01) was significantly higher at “site 3” compared to that at the “vent” site (p = 0.01). Planctomycetacia, Sphingobacteria, and Zetaproteobacteria had no significant OTUs that differed among sites. The average relative abundance of each bacterial OTU within the sediment community that differed significantly among sites can be found in Supplemental Fig. 4.
Discussion
In the present study, bacterial communities of C. nodosa leaves, roots rhizomes, and associated sediments were significantly different from each other. The bacterial community within the rhizosphere is influenced by plant metabolites [3] and may explain the slight overlap between the leaf and root samples in Fig. 1. However, environmental conditions specific to the site likely also influenced the below-ground microbiota of the seagrass roots and rhizomes. Indeed, there was a clear separation of these two communities, which were statistically different from each other, suggesting independent factors influence these two sample types. The bacterial community of the proximal sediment samples differed significantly from both of the seagrass sample types, had higher levels of diversity, and showed greater differences among sites. Interestingly, a similar pattern was apparent in a comparative study that took place in Bodega Bay, CA [35], suggesting these patterns may have a large geographical reach.
There were site-specific differences in bacterial communities of roots and rhizomes and sediments, but not in the leaf community, which remained consistent along the gradient. These results suggest that leaves may provide a more stable environment than roots, rhizomes, and sediment under changing levels of pCO2. However, our study did not incorporate water samples for microbiome analysis so this apparent stability may be a reflection of local bacterial communities within the aqueous environment. These results, however, do suggest that below-ground ecology might be influenced more by environmental change compared to above-ground ecology. Ettinger et al. (2017) showed a similar site-to-site difference in the sediment bacterial community, but not within the seagrass roots and rhizomes. Their study, however, characterized the microbial community in proximity to the seagrass patch and did not focus on changing environmental factors [35]. The addition of a strong environmental gradient and the lack of stability within the root microbiome found in our study compared to Ettinger et al. (2017) may suggest that under changing ocean conditions, the ability that seagrass leaves have to self regulate the root bacterial community might be restricted. It should be noted that our study, however, differed from Ettinger et al. (2017) in number of samples, sample processing (extraction kit and vortex period), primer selection (“universal” 515F and 806R), and sequencing depth. Mishra (2018) found an increase in the above to below-ground biomass ratio with increased pCO2 levels for C. nodosa at volcanic seeps in Greece and Italy, suggesting a greater impact of environmental factors on the below-ground ecology for this species of seagrass. The altered below-ground ecology in Mishra (2018) was also associated with a decline in C. nodosa survivability with increasing pCO2 due to reduced nutrient availability and soil toxicity [62]. However, differences in microbial communities among sites may not always be detrimental and may simply be a result of local adaptation to environmental conditions. Threats, like high pCO2, appear to have the greatest influence on the bacterial community of sediments, followed by the roots, and eventually the leaves if conditions become extreme [63, 64]. Seagrass leaves provide a niche for a specific bacterial community, dependant on chemical composition (sugars and secondary metabolites) [65], which did not change with pCO2. Duarte et al. (2018) showed marine macrophytes contain the ability to acclimate their hologenome under typically stressful ocean conditions [5]. Indeed, some marine macrophytes can regulate their bacterial community and its function under anthropogenic stressors as long as there is adequate nutrient availability [66, 67]. In the present study, the environmental pH gradient did not influence the diversity or composition of the bacterial community within the C. nodosa leaves as the bacterial communities associated with the C. nodosa leaves were most similar among sites. Currently, seagrass species that can regulate their microbiome under different environmental conditions appear to be limited to the leaves and, to a lesser extent, roots and rhizomes. Further investigation into the algal exudates potentially responsible for selecting bacteria should be considered to determine the degree of influence on the microbial community of the proximal sediment.
The present study showed that overall Betaproteobacteria (37.88%), Gammaproteobacteria (18.59%), and Alphaproteobacteria (14.05%) were the most abundant classes of bacteria among all samples at Levante Bay. Another study, which also quantified the bacterial communities of sediments within Levante Bay, showed the same dominant classes of bacteria to be the most abundant [68]. However, Kerfahi et al. (2014) also showed Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Actinobacteria to be dominant as well. Alternatively, the present study detected several other taxa that were relatively common within the sediments that were not found in Kerfahi et al. (2014) including Zetaproteobacteria, Sphingobacteria, Planctomycetecia, Flavobacteria, Cytophagia, Candidatus Thiobios, and Acidimicrobia. Differences in the bacterial classes detected between these two studies could be ecologically or methodologically driven. Further longitudinal studies that utilize the same methods through time would better characterize the potential temporal changes of the sediment microbial structure within Levante Bay. Additionally, changes occur at different taxonomic scales. Analyzing bacteria at multiple taxonomic resolutions through time may elucidate further influences of environmental conditions on sediment microbiota.
The bacterial community of the leaves was heavily dominated by Betaproteobacteria regardless of the site, but this bacteria taxon was significantly lower within site 2 (pH 7.86) compared with the other sites. Similarly, a drop in Betaproteobacteria at site 2 was also recorded in the sediment. Betaproteobacteria plays an essential role in stabilizing the microbial community through the regulation of harmful algae [67]. Betaproteobacteria also is an ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) that plays an important role in nitrification. AOB abundance and nitrification rates have shown seasonal variability due to changing salinities [69]. However, the influence of pH on nitrification rates has not been studied for C. nodosa. The unique microbial community of the leaves and sediment sample types within site 2 suggests a concomitantly unique environmental condition within this location that warrants further exploration. Additionally, there was a decline in Betaproteobacteria at the vent site for all sample types, further indicating that this bacterium, a part of the C. nodosa core microbiome, may be susceptible to extreme pCO2 conditions.
Both the leaf and root microbial community showed significantly higher Oscillatoriophycideae — phylum Cyanobacteria — abundance within the “reference” site compared with the other sites with lower pH conditions. In addition, the biofilm on seagrasses within another naturally occurring CO2 vent in Papua New Guinea showed a significant reduction in the relative abundances and diversity of cyanobacteria closer to the vent compared with control sites [39]. Interestingly, cyanobacteria as part of a consortium of bacteria responsible for the coral disease black band, have significantly reduced abundance when under low pH conditions [70]. The results of the present study again suggest cyanobacterial abundances may be reduced under low pH conditions, although nutrient availability may also influence the presence of cyanobacteria [71], which was not accounted for in this study. Cyanobacteria are more common in oligotrophic conditions [72, 73], which could explain why we found a significantly higher abundance at the “reference” site compare to sites closer to the CO2 vents. Nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria are prevalent on seagrass leaves. However, they are also found to inhabit other sections of the plant, which includes the rhizomes that do not receive light [13]. The ability of cyanobacteria to inhabit areas with low light could explain why there was a similar pattern between the leaves and roots and rhizomes for Oscillatoriales (Table 2). Further studies could identify whether the reduction in cyanobacteria under low pH conditions is a result of changing absolute abundances, increased abundance of other taxa, or more oligotrophic conditions further away from the CO2 vents.
The present study documented site-specific responses at both the bacterial class and OTU level, suggesting that small-scale environmental variations not captured within the study could be influencing the bacterial microbiome. There were several OTUs that significantly differed among sites (Supplemental Figs. 2, 3, 4) sites. However, only one OTU significantly contributed to differences at the bacterial class level within the leaf and root samples (Oscillatoriales). Differences among classes in sediment samples were driven by just five OTUs, o. Acidimicrobiales, o. Candidatus Thiobios, g. Thiothrix, sp. Balneatrix balneatrix, and g. Balneatrix. This suggests that a more detailed analysis at the OTU level could either reveal additional meaningful nuances within the data or lead to large levels of variation that mask trends at greater taxonomic levels. For instance, two OTUs belonging to o. Candidatus Thiobios and g. Thiothrix were significantly higher at the vent site. The higher abundance of these two OTUs is likely due to their sulfur oxidative properties, which are important for carbon fixation in pCO rich environments and are common bacteria surrounding hydrothermal vents [74, 75]. As a freshwater genus of bacteria, the higher abundance of g. Balneatrix at vent sites may be due to groundwater discharge from the Vulcano Porto Aquifer [76]. However, the association between the natural pH gradient and variability in each of these OTUs along a small geographical has not been well documented. The present study, as well as others [35], suggests that small geographic ranges can lead to significant changes within the bacterial communities of both seagrasses and their proximal sediments.
The species richness of the microbial community was not significantly different among sample types or sites, but previous studies showed that epibiont communities increase in species richness with declining pH levels creating a more complex microbial community [77]. Previous studies also showed that changes in pH can significantly affect the diversity of the microbial community within marine sediments [67, 78, 79]. In the present study, sediment samples were the most diverse compared to the other community types, although diversity significantly decreased within the low pH conditions of the vent site. The dominant bacteria Gammaproteobacteria nearly doubled in relative abundance under the extreme conditions at the vent site. The increase of Gammaproteobacteria could be due to the loss of rare and competing taxa. Similar to the present study, Kerfahi (2014) demonstrated a shift in the sediment bacterial community under low pH conditions at Levante Bay, Italy [68]. However, they found that the dominant bacteria Gammaproteobacteria remained stable in abundance, despite the shift in more rare taxa within the bacterial community with reduced pH. Site location must be considered, nevertheless, as there were differences in both site location and pH levels within the study sites. Despite these differences, our study and that of Kerfahi (2014) show stability within the sediment microbial community for dominant bacteria such as Gammaproteobacteria before extreme conditions are reached. Both studies also highlight the potential for disruption within the community of rare taxa [68]. Alternatively, Krause et al. (2012) suggest sediment microbial communities were less stable in the North Sea with moderate changes in pH resulting in significant alterations to the microbial assemblage [79]. Despite these differences, data suggest the sediment microbiome is less regulated than the leaves, roots, and rhizomes of seagrasses, perhaps because of the sediment’s separation from a biological host [2, 35].
Characterizing the different microbiome structures under natural environmental gradients, such as that in Levante Bay, is critical to providing insight into how a major component of organismal physiology, the host microbiome, will change under future ocean conditions. The results of the present study suggest C. nodosa may regulate its microbial community in the face of extreme pH conditions. The results also suggest that the surrounding environment may disrupt the microbiome of the seagrass root structures as well as the sediments themselves more so than the leaves. However, to date, there is no complementary study that assesses the bacterial turnover rates for C. nodosa with associated water samples through time. A study such as this could further elucidate the spatial and temporal variations of the microbiome within seagrass habitats. Characterizing the potential shifts in the microbial community of seagrasses under varying environmental conditions will be vital to determine the physiological ramifications of global change on this foundational taxonomic group.
Data and Materials Availability
Data on the 16S rRNA sequences analyzed in this study is available within the NCBI SRA database under BioProject ID: PRJNA623005.
Code Availability
Code will not be made publicly available.
Change history
27 October 2021
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-021-01903-8
References
Duarte CM, Holmer M, Marbà N (2005) Plant-Microbe Interactions in Seagrass Meadows. In: Kristensen E, Haese R, Kostka J (eds) Interactions Between Macro- and Microorganisms in Marine Sediments. American Geophysical Union, New York, NY, pp 31–60. https://doi.org/10.1029/CE060p0031
Charpy-Roubaud C, Sournia A (1990) The comparative estimation of phytoplanktonic, microphytobenthic and macrophytobenthic primary production in the oceans. Mar Microb Food Webs 4(1):31–57
Cúcio C, Engelen AH, Costa R, Muyzer G (2016) Rhizosphere microbiomes of European seagrasses are selected by the plant, but are not species specific. Front Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00440
Lamb JB, van de Water JAJM, Bourne DG et al (2017) Seagrass ecosystems reduce exposure to bacterial pathogens of humans, fishes, and invertebrates. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal1956
Duarte B, Martins I, Rosa R et al (2018) Climate change impacts on seagrass meadows and macroalgal forests: an integrative perspective on acclimation and adaptation potential. Front Mar Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00190
Waycott M, Duarte CM, Carruthers TJB et al (2009) Accelerating loss of seagrasses across the globe threatens coastal ecosystems. PNAS 106:12377–12381. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905620106
Hurtado-McCormick V, Kahlke T, Petrou K et al (2019) Regional and microenvironmental scale characterization of the Zostera muelleri seagrass microbiome. Front Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01011
Sand-Jensen K (1977) Effect of epiphytes on eelgrass photosynthesis. Aquat Bot. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3770(77)90004-3
Wahl M (1989) Marine epibiosis. I. Fouling and antifouling: some basic aspects. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps058175
Capone DG, Penhale PA, Oremland RS, Taylor BF (1979) Relationship between productivity and N2 (C2H2) fixation in a Thalassia testudinum community. Limnol Oceanogr. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1979.24.1.0117
Lipschultz F, Cunningham JJ, Court Stevenson J (1979) Nitrogen fixation associated with four species of submerged angiosperms in the central Chesapeake Bay. Estuar Coast Mar Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0302-3524(79)80014-6
Capone DG, Budin JM (1982) Nitrogen fixation associated with rinsed roots and rhizomes of the eelgrass Zostera marina. Plant Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.70.6.1601
Pereg LL, Lipkin Y, Sar N (1994) Different niches of the Halophila stipulacea seagrass bed harbor distinct populations of nitrogen fixing bacteria. Mar Biol. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00347529
Lehnen N, Marchant HK, Schwedt A et al (2016) High rates of microbial dinitrogen fixation and sulfate reduction associated with the Mediterranean seagrass Posidonia oceanica. Syst Appl Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2016.08.004
Crump BC, Wojahn JM, Tomas F, Mueller RS (2018) Metatranscriptomics and amplicon sequencing reveal mutualisms in seagrass microbiomes. Front Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00388
Donnelly AP, Herbert RA (1998) Bacterial interactions in the rhizosphere of seagrass communities in shallow coastal lagoons. J Appl Microbiol 85:151–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1365-2672.1998.TB05294.X
Hemminga MA, Duarte CM (2000) Seagrass Ecology, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Badri DV, Vivanco JM (2009) Regulation and function of root exudates. Plant Cell Environ. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01926.x
Hogarth PJ (2015) The Biology of Mangroves and Seagrasses. Oxford University Press, New York
Koren K, Brodersen KE, Jakobsen SL, Kühl M (2015) Optical sensor nanoparticles in artificial sediments-a new tool to visualize O2 dynamics around the rhizome and roots of seagrasses. Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1021/es505734b
Kuzhiumparambil U, Kumar M, Ralph P (2017) Gas and Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolic Profiling of Marine Angiosperm Zostera muelleri (Alismatales, Zosteraceae). In: Kumar M, Ralph P (eds) Syst Biol Marine Ecosystems, 1st ed. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 189–203
Martin BC, Bougoure J, Ryan MH, Bennett WW, Colmer TD, Joyce NK, Olsen YS, Kendrick GA (2019) Oxygen loss from seagrass roots coincides with colonisation of sulphide-oxidising cable bacteria and reduces sulphide stress. ISME J. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-018-0308-5
Jensen SI, Kühl M, Priemé A (2007) Different bacterial communities associated with the roots and bulk sediment of the seagrass Zostera marina. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00373.x
Hasler-Sheetal H, Holmer M (2015) Sulfide intrusion and detoxification in the seagrass Zostera marina. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129136
Armstrong E, Yan L, Boyd KG, et al (2001) The symbiotic role of marine microbes on living surfaces. Hydrobiologia 461:37–40. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012756913566
Capone DG, Kiene RP (1988) Comparison of microbial dynamics in marine and freshwater sediments: contrasts in anaerobic carbon catabolism. Limnol Oceanogr. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1988.33.4part2.0725
Koch MS, Erskine JM (2001) Sulfide as a phytotoxin to the tropical seagrass Thalassia testudinum: interactions with light, salinity, and temperature. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(01)00339-2
Rasmussen H, Jørgensen BB (1992) Microelectrode studies of seasonal oxygen uptake in a coastal sediment: role of molecular diffusion. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps081289
Brodersen KE, Trevathan-Tackett SM, Nielsen DA, Connolly RM, Lovelock CE, Atwood TB, Macreadie PI (2019) Oxygen consumption and sulfate reduction in vegetated coastal habitats: effects of physical disturbance. Front Mar Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00014
Beman JM, Chow CE, King AL et al (2011) Global declines in oceanic nitrification rates as a consequence of ocean acidification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1011053108
Raulf FF, Fabricius K, Uthicke S et al (2015) Changes in microbial communities in coastal sediments along natural CO2 gradients at a volcanic vent in Papua New Guinea. Environ Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12729
Zarnoch CB, Hoellein TJ, Furman BT, Peterson BJ (2017) Eelgrass meadows, Zostera marina (L.), facilitate the ecosystem service of nitrogen removal during simulated nutrient pulses in Shinnecock Bay, New York, USA. Mar Pollut Bull 124:376–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.07.061
Aoki LR, McGlathery KJ, Oreska MPJ (2020) Seagrass restoration reestablishes the coastal nitrogen filter through enhanced burial. Limnol Oceanogr 65:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11241
Hauxwell J, Cebrian J, Valiela I (2003) Eelgrass Zostera marina loss in temperate estuaries: relationship to land-derived nitrogen loads and effect of light limitation imposed by algae. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 247:59–73. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps247059
Ettinger CL, Voerman SE, Lang JM et al (2017) Microbial communities in sediment from Zostera marina patches, but not the Z. marina leaf or root microbiomes, vary in relation to distance from patch edge. PeerJ. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3246
Gacia E, Duarte CM, Middelburg JJ (2002) Carbon and nutrient deposition in a Mediterranean seagrass (Posidonia oceanica) meadow. Limnol Oceanogr. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2002.47.1.0023
Duarte CM, Cebrián J (1996) The fate of marine autotrophic production. Limnol Oceanogr. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1996.41.8.1758
Collins M, Knutti R, Arblaster J, et al (2013) Long-term climate change: projections, commitments and irreversibility. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, et al (eds) Climate Change 2013 - The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 1029–1136
Hassenrück C, Hofmann LC, Bischof K, Ramette A (2015) Seagrass biofilm communities at a naturally CO2-rich vent. Environ Microbiol Rep. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.12282
Arnold T, Mealey C, Leahey H et al (2012) Ocean acidification and the loss of phenolic substances in marine plants. PLoS ONE 7:e35107. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035107
Valiela I, Koumjian L, Swain T et al (1979) Cinnamic acid inhibition of detritus feeding. Nature 280:55–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/280055a0
Harrison PG (1982) Control of microbial growth and of amphipod grazing by water-soluble compounds from leaves of Zostera marina. Mar Biol 67:225–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401288
Arnold TM, Targett NM (2002) Marine tannins: the importance of a mechanistic framework for predicting ecological roles. J Chem Ecol 28:1919–1934. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020737609151
Harrison PG, Chan AT (1980) Inhibition of the growth of micro-algae and bacteria by extracts of eelgrass (Zostera marina) leaves. Mar Biol 61:21–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00410338
Harrison PG, Durance CD (1985) Reductions in photosynthetic carbon uptake in epiphytic diatoms by water-soluble extracts of leaves of Zostera marina. Mar Biol 90:117–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00428222
Ravn H, Andary C, Kovács G, Mølgaard P (1989) Caffeic acid esters as in vitro inhibitors of plant pathogenic bacteria and fungi. Biochem Syst Ecol 17:175–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-1978(89)90076-8
Vergeer LHT, Aarts TL, de Groot JD (1995) The “wasting disease” and the effect of abiotic factors (light intensity, temperature, salinity) and infection with Labyrinthula zosterae on the phenolic content of Zostera marina shoots. Aquat Bot 52:35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3770(95)00480-N
McMillan C (1984) The condensed tannins (proanthocyanidins) in seagrasses. Aquat Bot 20:351–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3770(84)90099-8
Quackenbush RC, Bunn D, Lingren W (1986) HPLC determination of phenolic acids in the water-soluble extract of Zostera marina L. (eelgrass). Aquat Bot 24:83–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3770(86)90119-1
Ravn H, Pedersen MF, Borum J et al (1994) Seasonal variation and distribution of two phenolic compounds, rosmarinic acid and caffeic acid, in leaves and roots-rhizomes of eelgrass (Zostera marina L.). Ophelia 40:51–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00785326.1994.10429550
Borell EM, Steinke M, Fine M (2013) Direct and indirect effects of high pCO2 on algal grazing by coral reef herbivores from the Gulf of Aqaba (Red Sea). Coral Reefs 32:937–947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-013-1066-5
Roth-Schulze AJ, Thomas T, Steinberg P, Deveney MR, Tanner JE, Wiltshire KH, Papantoniou S, Runcie JW, Gurgel CFD (2018) The effects of warming and ocean acidification on growth, photosynthesis, and bacterial communities for the marine invasive macroalga Caulerpa taxifolia. Limnol Oceanogr 63:459–471. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10739
Boatta F, D’Alessandro W, Gagliano AL, Liotta M, Milazzo M, Rodolfo-Metalpa R, Hall-Spencer JM, Parello F (2013) Geochemical survey of Levante Bay, Vulcano Island (Italy), a natural laboratory for the study of ocean acidification. Mar Pollut Bull 73:485–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.01.029
Milazzo M, Cattano C, Alonzo SH, Foggo A, Gristina M, Rodolfo-Metalpa R, Sinopoli M, Spatafora D, Stiver KA, Hall-Spencer JM (2016) Ocean acidification affects fish spawning but not paternity at CO2 seeps. Proc Royal Soc B Biol Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.1021
Vizzini S, Apostolakic ET, Ricevutoa R, Polymenakoud P, Mazzola A (2019) Plant and sediment properties in seagrass meadows from two Mediterranean CO2 vents: implications for carbon storage capacity of acidified oceans. Mar Environ Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2019.03.001
Liu Y, Ludewig U (2019) Nitrogen-dependent bacterial community shifts in root, rhizome and rhizosphere of nutrient-efficient Miscanthus x giganteus from long-term field trials. Global Change Biol Bioenergy. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12634
DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N et al (2006) Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03006-05
Anderson MJ (2001) Permutation tests for univariate or multivariate analysis of variance and regression. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. https://doi.org/10.1139/f01-004
Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, et al (2020) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5–7. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
Kruskal JB (1964) Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289565
Dinno, A (2017) dunn.test: Dunn's Test of Multiple Comparisons Using Rank Sums. R package version 1.3.5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dunn.test
Mishra AK (2018) Population dynamics of Cymodocea nodosa under future ocean scenarios. bioRxiv 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1101/484634
Sánchez-Cañizares C, Jorrín B, Poole PS, Tkacz A (2017) Understanding the holobiont: the interdependence of plants and their microbiome. Curr Opin Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2017.07.001
Ugarelli K, Chakrabarti S, Laas P, Stingl U (2017) The seagrass holobiont and its microbiome. Microorganisms. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms5040081
Sogin E, Michellod D, Gruber-Vodicka H et al (2019) Seagrass excretes sugars to their rhizosphere 1 making them the sweet spots in the sea. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/797522
Kalscheur KN, Rojas M, Peterson CG et al (2012) Algal exudates and stream organic matter influence the structure and function of denitrifying bacterial communities. Microb Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-012-0091-1
Inaba N, Watanabe T, Sakami T et al (2014) Temporal and spatial distribution of algicidal and growth-inhibiting bacteria in the coastal sea of southwest Japan. J Plankton Res. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbt119
Kerfahi D, Hall-Spencer JM, Tripathi BM et al (2014) Shallow water marine sediment bacterial community shifts along a natural CO2 gradient in the Mediterranean Sea off Vulcano, Italy. Microb Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-014-0368-7
Bernhard AE, Tucker J, Giblin AE, Stahl DA (2007) Functionally distinct communities of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria along an estuarine salinity gradient. Environ Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01260.x
Muller EM, Leporacci NM, Macartney KJ et al (2017) Low pH reduces the virulence of black band disease on Orbicella faveolata. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178869
Jiang Y-F, Ling J, Dong JD et al (2015) Illumina-based analysis the microbial diversity associated with Thalassia hemprichii in Xincun Bay, South China Sea. Ecotoxicology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-015-1511-z
Uku J, Björk M, Bergman B, Díez B (2007) Characterization and comparison of prokaryotic epiphytes associated with three East African seagrasses. J Phycol. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2007.00371.x
Hamisi M, Díez B, Lyimo T et al (2013) Epiphytic cyanobacteria of the seagrass Cymodocea rotundata: diversity, diel nifH expression and nitrogenase activity. Environ Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.12031
Gugliandolo C, Italiano F, Maugeri TL et al (1999) Amend submarine hydrothermal vents of the Aeolian Islands: relationship between microbial communities and thermal fluids. Geomicrobiol J 16:105–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/014904599270794
Gugliandolo C, Italiano F, Maugeri TL (2006) The submarine hydrothermal system of Panarea (Southern Italy): biogeochemical processes at the thermal fluids–sea bottom interface. Ann Geophys 49:783–792
Aiuppa A, Dongarrà G, Capasso G, Allard P (2000) Trace elements in the thermal groundwaters of Vulcano Island (Sicily). J Volcanol Geoth Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0273(99)00156-0
Rousk J, Bååth E, Brookes PC et al (2010) Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil. ISME J. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2010.58
Ridl J, Kolar M, Strejcek M et al (2016) Plants rather than mineral fertilization shape microbial community structure and functional potential in legacy contaminated soil. Front Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00995
Krause E, Wichels A, Giménez L et al (2012) Small changes in pH have direct effects on marine bacterial community composition: a microcosm approach. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047035
Acknowledgements
A thank you to Marco Milazzo for technical assistance and for introducing us to the amazing seep site of Vulcano Island.
Funding
The authors would like to acknowledge the Mote Postdoctoral Fellowship, the Dart Foundation, and the EU FP7 MedSea Project for their funding and support of this project. The research for this study for E. Muller was provided by the Mote Marine Laboratory Postdoctoral Fellowship and K. Ritchie was supported by the Dart Foundation. The study was partially supported by the EU FP7 MedSea Project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Drs. Maoz Fine, Erinn M. Muller, and Kim B. Ritchie designed the study. Drs. Maoz Fine, Erinn M. Muller, and Kim B. Ritchie performed sample collections and processing. Dr. Melbert Schwarz performed laboratory extractions and analyses. Raymond B. Banister conducted all statistical analyses and figures. Dr. Erinn M. Muller supervised all data processing and analysis. All authors contributed to writing the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
The original online version of this article was revised: the affiliation IDs were not changed in sequential order which resulted to mismatch of the authors institutions.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Banister, R.B., Schwarz, M.T., Fine, M. et al. Instability and Stasis Among the Microbiome of Seagrass Leaves, Roots and Rhizomes, and Nearby Sediments Within a Natural pH Gradient. Microb Ecol 84, 703–716 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-021-01867-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-021-01867-9