Abstract
Precocious puberty in girls is defined by the appearance of secondary sex characteristics before the age of 8 years. Precocious puberty is either peripheral or central. In most cases, the cause of central precocious puberty is unknown. Rapidly progressive forms of central precocious puberty may benefit from puberty suppression to prevent compromised final height and psychosocial problems related to the physical changes. Idiopathic central precocious puberty in girls can be a challenging diagnosis. Clinical examination, evaluation of growth charts, bone age, and hormonal tests are part of the workup. The role of pelvic ultrasound to evaluate pubertal features of the internal genitalia in this context is controversial. In this paper, we have reviewed the literature to find the scientific bases for several proposed ultrasound parameters and cutoff values for the determination of onset of puberty in girls with suspected central precocious puberty. There are no reliable cutoffs for the measurements of uterus and ovaries for the diagnosis of central precocious puberty and there is overlap in the appearance of the organs in both prepubertal and pubertal girls. The interpretation of the findings on pelvic ultrasound must be done with caution and always in close communication with the referring clinicians.
Graphical Abstract
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Concepts in precocious puberty
Puberty is the biological transition between childhood and adulthood, characterized by hormonal, physical, and psychological changes. It is a complex process involving nutritional, genetic, ethnic, environmental, and geographic factors. In girls, the normal process of puberty starts with the activation of the pulsatile release of hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). GnRH activates the pituitary gland to release follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH). Increased levels of FSH and LH stimulate the ovaries: they grow and start to produce greater quantities of estradiol. The circulating estradiol stimulates the development of the secondary sexual characteristics such as the growth of the mammary glands and the uterus and it also accelerates bone maturation. In girls, puberty usually starts with the development of breast buds (thelarche), at a mean age of 10 years (range 8–12 years). The first periods (menarche) typically occur within 2–5 years after breast budding. Growth spurt is at a maximum before menarche. There is a wide variation in the age at onset and the speed of pubertal maturation. Furthermore, over the past few decades, there have been reports of a secular trend toward earlier pubertal onset: the age at thelarche seems to have decreased by 3 months per decade between 1977 and 2013 [1].
Precocious puberty in girls is defined by the appearance of secondary sex characteristics (breast budding and/or pubic and axillary hair) before the age of 8 years. GnRH-dependent or central precocious puberty is due to a premature activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal (HPG) axis. It can be organic related to an intracranial lesion, or much more frequently idiopathic. In peripheral precocious puberty, the HPG axis is not activated. Isosexual peripheral precocious puberty is caused by the secretion of endogenous hormones from a functional follicular cyst, an ovarian tumor, in hypothyroidism, in McCune Albright syndrome, or by the exposure to exogenous hormones (Figs. 1 and 2) [2]. Prolonged peripheral precocious puberty can subsequently trigger early maturation of the HPG axis, resulting in progression from peripheral to central precocious puberty [3]. A third category encompasses forms of incomplete precocious puberty, namely isolated breast budding, i.e., premature thelarche, or isolated pubic or axillary hair development, i.e., premature adrenarche (Fig. 3).
The prevalence of idiopathic central precocious puberty in girls varies significantly in different populations from 10 to 200/100,000 girls per year [4,5,6,7,8]. This wide variation is probably due to the use of different definitions with or without inclusion of the incomplete forms. The latter group of patients requires to be identified because they may benefit from pubertal suppression. There are two peaks at which premature thelarche occurs: one around the age of 2 years, caused by a delay in inhibition of the transient physiological activation of the HPG axis also called the mini-puberty, and the second one between the ages of 6 years and 8 years. Isolated premature thelarche in 6–8-year-old girls can be seen in the context of obesity, which may cause adipomastia but also an increased peripheral estrogen production and true thelarche [9, 10]. However, in most cases, premature thelarche seems to be triggered by idiopathic mild overfunction of the HPG axis. Growth velocity is not accelerated in these girls and bone age is within normal ranges. Premature thelarche can also be a first sign of central precocious puberty. In clear-cut central precocious puberty, clinical examination shows true thelarche, accompanied by accelerated growth, advanced bone age, and a pubertal response of LH to the GnRH stimulation test.
Diagnostic tests in precocious puberty
Discriminating between the common normal pubertal variants and true central precocious puberty, especially in the early stages, can be a diagnostic challenge. It is based on physical examination and growth velocity assessment, and the additional tests that can be used are bone age determination, hormonal tests, and pelvic ultrasound (US).
Bone age is often, but not always, advanced in precocious puberty and advanced bone age can also be found in overweight children and children with constitutional tall stature [11,12,13]. Hormonal analysis consists of the measurement of gonadotrophins and estradiol. The GnRH-stimulation test (GnRHST) is considered the gold standard for determining the onset of puberty and is indicated if the basal serum levels of LH and FSH are not diagnostic. The outcomes of the GnRHST can be ambiguous and cutoffs for diagnosis of central precocious puberty are not consistent [14, 15].
The development of the uterus and ovaries during childhood and adolescence has been extensively studied with US [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33].
The role of abdominal imaging to look for the underlying cause of peripheral precocious puberty is well established. However, the value and meaning of abdominal imaging in determining onset of puberty is unclear. Since rapidly progressing central precocious puberty may cause psychological stress and early epiphyseal closure and hence a compromised final height, early diagnosis is essential for timely treatment with puberty blockers. Therefore, differentiating incomplete precocious puberty and slowly progressing central precocious puberty from the rapidly progressing form is essential. This topic has been researched extensively for decades but there is no consensus on US-based parameters and cutoffs.
In this paper, we present an overview of the physiological development of the internal genitalia and ovaries as a background to comprehend the findings in pelvic US. Thereafter, we present the results of an extensive literature review performed to find the scientific bases for several proposed US parameters and cutoff values for the determination of onset of puberty in girls with suspected central precocious puberty.
Physiological development of the pelvic organs
The uterus
At birth, the uterus is prominent with a length of about 3.5–4 cm secondary to the effect of maternal and placental sex hormones. It appears tubular or spade shaped with the anteroposterior diameter of the cervix being equal to or larger than that of the fundus (Fig. 4). As maternal and placental hormones decrease, the uterus becomes smaller and tubular with the anteroposterior diameter of the fundus equaling the cervical anteroposterior diameter and having a length of around 1–3 cm (Fig. 5) [30, 34, 35]. Somatic growth continues throughout childhood under the influence of growth hormone until the combination of pubertal sex steroids and growth hormone stimulates the uterus to grow both in length and volume [32]. The shape of the uterus then gradually changes from tubular to the adult pear-shape secondary to the increase of fundal anteroposterior diameter, leading to an increased fundus-cervix-ratio (Fig. 6).
The endometrium
The fetal endometrium starts showing secretory changes after 33 weeks of gestation and this peaks at birth. After birth, regressional changes set in. Following a transitional phase lasting a few months, the endometrium becomes thin and remains inactive until the first signs of ovarian activity, i.e., secretion of estrogen [36].
The ovaries
Maternal and placental hormones stimulate the ovaries. Neonatal ovaries have volumes of at least 1 ml and bear large follicles (Fig. 7). Ovaries have a stromal component that increases discreetly from birth to maturity and a follicular component dependent on FSH. Follicular activity is present in utero, during lactation and in both prepuberty and puberty when higher levels of FSH are present. Both immature and mature ovaries bear follicles in different stages of development or in atresia (Figs. 8 and 9) [37]. Both types of follicles may appear cystic [29].
Uterine and ovarian arteries
During pubertal maturation, the vascular flow within the uterine arteries undergoes changes as the uterus grows and there is a reduction in vascular resistance concurrent with the onset of puberty. Elevated levels of LH in the bloodstream could potentially enhance vascularization [38]. Estradiol seems to reduce vascular resistance by directly affecting smooth muscle cells in the uterine artery vessel wall, or indirectly by mitigating calcium-mediated vessel constriction and/or periarterial sympathetic vasoconstrictor nerve activity [38,39,40]. There appears to be a notable rise in impedance towards the end of puberty, likely attributable to the culmination of uterine angiogenesis [38].
Results of the literature review
Study design and populations (gray-scale ultrasound)
We searched PubMed for studies on gray-scale pelvic US in central precocious puberty in girls. We selected only research papers that compared US findings in girls with central precocious puberty to US findings in girls with normal pubertal variants (premature thelarche or premature adrenarche or pubarche) and/or controls. We included 21 studies of which 12 were prospective, eight retrospective, and one cross-sectional (Table 1) [15, 24, 38, 41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58]. The age of the included children varied from 11 months to 12 years. Most studies defined precocious puberty as the development of secondary sexual characteristics before the age of 8 years. One paper defined precocious puberty as regular menses before the age of 10 years or breast budding before 8 years [47]. In all papers, the reference standard for central precocious puberty was based on the presence of premature thelarche. Additional criteria varied between the papers but all included at least one of the following criteria: increased height velocity, advanced bone age (usually by 2 years or >2 SDS but not always specified), or the pubertal response to GnRH testing.
Study design and populations (Doppler ultrasound)
We searched PubMed for studies on Doppler US of uterine and/or ovarian arteries in puberty. We included only original research papers, of which seven were cross-sectional, one prospective longitudinal and one retrospective (Table 2) [38, 40, 59,60,61,62,63,64,65]. The populations in the studies consisted of healthy girls before, during, and after onset of puberty or patients with premature adrenarche and/or premature thelarche or patients with central precocious puberty compared to controls. The age of the included girls/women varied from 2 years to 25 years. Reference standards for precocious puberty diagnosis were Tanner breast and/or pubic hair score and/or pubertal response to GnRH testing. In one study, uterine length > 35 mm was considered one of the reference criteria for diagnosing precocious puberty [64].
Gray-scale ultrasound technique
Pelvic US studies were performed or reviewed by one or more operators, (pediatric) radiologists, gynecologists, or was not specified. Scanning approach was transabdominal except for one study where the scanning approach was transrectal [56]. The transducers used were convex or linear and the frequency varied from 3 to 13.5 MHz. In all studies, scanning was obtained with a full bladder.
Color-Doppler ultrasound technique
Doppler flow measurements of the uterine arteries were conducted transabdominally using probes with varying frequencies (3.5 MHz, 2–5 MHz, 5–8 MHz), in most cases with patients in recumbent position and employing a 50-Hz filter to eliminate low-frequency signals originating from vessel wall movements [38, 40, 59,60,61,62,63,64,65]. Color flow images of the ascending branches of the uterine arteries were captured laterally to the cervix in a longitudinal plane, with angle of insonation adjustment to maximize color intensity [38, 61]. Some authors performed the examinations between 08:00 and 11:00 am to mitigate the effects of circadian rhythmicity on utero-ovarian blood flow, along with a 15-min rest in a waiting room before scanning to minimize external influences on the pelvic blood flow [38, 61]. All studies were conducted using the full bladder technique [40, 59,60,61,62,63, 65], except for one study in which pulsatility index measurements were taken with both a full and an empty bladder [64].
Measurements and appearance of uterus and ovaries
Uterine measurements reported included length, width, transverse area, and volume; the latter was always calculated by using the ellipsoid formula V = length × anteroposterior diameter × transverse diameter × 0.5233. In 1 study, measurements were reported separately for cervix and uterus; in the other studies, it was not reported if the cervix was included in the uterine measurements. In 13 studies, the visibility and/or thickness of the endometrium were evaluated. Only one study described the method and the location of the measurement: at its maximum anteroposterior thickness in the sagittal plane [47]. Reported ovarian measurements included height, width, and length, transverse circumference, and volume as well as appearance of the ovaries, i.e., description of solid or cystic and classification with regard to number and size of follicles: homogeneous pattern in the absence of visible follicles; microcystic: ≥1 follicle of <4 mm in diameter; paucicystic: <6 follicles with a diameter ranging from 4 mm to 9 mm; multicystic: >6 follicles with a diameter ranging from 4 to 9 mm; macrocystic: >1 follicle with a diameter larger than 9 mm; and major isolated cyst: diameter larger than 2 cm.
Reproducibility of measurements was addressed and tested in only one study [15].
Uterine and ovarian measurement cutoff values for onset of puberty proposed by the different studies can be found in Table 3. The most frequently reported uterine cutoffs are for length, volume, transverse diameter, and fundus-cervix ratio. Cutoffs for uterine volume varied from 1.07 ml to 4 ml, those for the uterine length from 22 mm to 40.9 mm, and for the uterine area from 4 cm2 to 4.5 cm2. Wen et al. reported that the cervical thickness was the best parameter for discriminating central precocious puberty from normal girls in girls between 6 years and 8 years of age [53]. Fundus-cervix ratio varied from 0.98 to 1.45. The reported ovarian volume cutoff values for the onset of puberty ranged from 1 ml to 3.5 ml.
The visibility of the endometrium was reported to be a discriminator for the onset of puberty in several studies. Calcaterra et al. reported that the presence of an endometrial echo is a sign of rapid progressive central precocious puberty [55]. De Vries et al. found an endometrial echo in 53% of girls with precocious puberty and in none of the girls with premature thelarche [15]. Eksioglu et al. saw the endometrial lining more frequently and with a mean thickness that was significantly higher in girls with central precocious puberty compared to premature thelarche and controls in girls between 0 years and 8 years of age [47]. Zarei et al. reported a high specificity for endometrial thickness and echogenicity for central precocious puberty [58]. In contrast, a thin endometrium was reported in some prepubertal girls by Bridges et al. [23]. Battaglia et al. reported a visible endometrial echo in girls with central precocious puberty but also less frequently in girls with premature thelarche and premature adrenarche [38]. In a recent study, Gilligan et al. reported the visibility of an endometrial stripe in all ages, with a varying thickness with age and pubertal status and Villalobos et al. detected an endometrial stripe in all healthy girls between 6 years and 12 years [28, 31]. Hagen et al. reported a considerable overlap in endometrium thickness in prepubertal and pubertal girls [66].
Measurements from color Doppler studies of uterine and ovarian arteries
Doppler US enables the evaluation of blood flow in the utero-ovarian region, including the measurement of flow impedance through the calculation of the pulsatile index (Table 2) [40, 59,60,61,62,63,64,65]. The pulsatile index is defined as the difference between peak systolic flow and end-diastolic flow, divided by the mean flow velocity, and it is indicative of arterial constriction or changes in resistance to blood flow within the vascular network [67].
There have been no significant differences observed in the measured pulsatile indices of the left and right uterine arteries, leading to the utilization of the average value from both arteries or the use of data from the most easily accessible side [38, 61].
In the one study in which pulsatile index measurements were taken with both a full and an empty bladder, no differences were found [64].
Ziereisen and colleagues have categorized Doppler flow waves of the uterine arteries into three types: type 1 displayed narrow systolic flow waves without diastolic flow in the majority of prepubertal girls; type 2 exhibited systolic flow waves with interrupted signal during diastole in Tanner stage 1 and at the onset of puberty; and type 3 demonstrated broad systolic flow waves with uninterrupted diastolic flow in post-menarchal girls and in girls with Tanner breast stages 2 or 3 [60].
The threshold for uterine artery pulsatile index to detect the initiation of puberty ranged from 2.5 to 5.05 with a reported sensitivity of 77–94%, specificity of 85–100%, and accuracy of 79–97% according to various studies in the literature [67].
Recently, Paesano and colleagues reported that a combination of a pulsatile index higher than 4.6 and a longitudinal uterine diameter less than 35 mm showed an accuracy of 91% for excluding puberty onset, whereas Cheuiche et al. reported that the combination of a pulsatile index below 5.05 and a uterine volume above 3.75 cm3 had the highest positive predictive value (97%) for puberty onset [65].
Only one study, which assessed both ovarian and uterine Doppler US in precocious puberty, reported no correlation with pubertal stage [63].
Discussion
Since the late 1970s, pelvic US has been explored and utilized as a tool in pediatric gynecology. The first publications on the contribution of pelvic US in the detection of idiopathic central precocious puberty appeared in the 1980s [41, 42]. Since then, both the ovarian and uterine morphology as well as different types of measurements have been evaluated as markers for onset of puberty.
We reviewed a large series of studies researching the value of pelvic US in the diagnosis of central precocious puberty. In these studies, a series of individual parameters or a combination of parameters have been evaluated. For the uterus, this included the shape or fundus-cervix ratio, the visibility of the endometrial stripe and its thickness, the length, width, area, and volume. For the ovaries, this included the volume, the transverse circumference, the visibility of follicles, the number of follicles, and the diameter of the largest follicle. What we found in this literature review is a wide variety in parameters or combinations of parameters reported as the most sensitive markers for precocious puberty as well as a wide diversity in the defined cutoff values but also four studies that concluded that pelvic US does not provide cutoffs to differentiate girls with central precocious puberty from pseudo-precocious puberty or controls [24, 46,47,48].
Populations
The main populations consisted of girls with central precocious puberty; however, the reference standards for central precocious puberty that were used to compare to premature thelarche were not uniform. Moreover, none of the studies provided the duration of symptoms before being tested. Since puberty is a dynamic process, the time from onset of hormonal stimulation to the US examination should influence the measurements. It is conceivable that the “gray-zone” in the clinical presentation and the hormonal testing is reflected in the heterogeneous population and also in the heterogeneity of the results provided by pelvic US.
Influence on measurements related to technique
There is variety in the types of transducers and frequencies used. In the most recent literature, higher frequency probes are being used, although not consistently.
All authors mention the scanning examinations being performed with a full bladder. However, overfilling may alter the measurement of the anteroposterior diameters of fundus and cervix and affect the fundus-cervix ratio [68]. In none of the studies was there any mention of this.
The repeatability of the measurements was addressed in only one study [15]. However, the precision of certain proposed cutoff values is remarkable.
Only a few studies have reported on the intra- and inter-rater reliability of arterial Doppler evaluation, with intraobserver agreement ranging between 82% and 96.7%, and a variation coefficient evaluated in only one study at 12% [64, 65].
Uterus
We noticed a wide variety in cutoffs for the different uterine measurements. Uterine length was the most cited with a maximum cutoff of 40 mm. However, Buzi et al. found that normal prepubertal girls can have uterine lengths of 4 cm or more [24]. This is in agreement with Griffin et al. and Bridges et al. [21, 23]. In none of the studies, there was a description of how the uterine length was measured, if the cervix was included in the measurement nor if the measurement was performed with a curved or linear measurement. Volume measurement with the ellipsoid formula can be questioned since the uterus does not have an ellipsoid shape like most ovaries and because the shape of the uterus changes through puberty [21].
Endometrium
Historically, the visibility of the endometrial stripe has been used by some to discriminate between pubertal and prepubertal state [15]. Now, several papers have reported visibility of the endometrial stripe at all ages and also a large overlap of the appearance of the endometrium between girls with central precocious puberty and healthy controls [28, 31, 61, 66]. It is imaginable that when lower frequency probes were used, the resolution might not have been adequate to visualize a thin endometrium nor small follicles in prepubertal girls. But even Bridges et al. in a study done in 1996 reported a thin endometrium in some prepubertal girls, and related it to the very low concentrations of estrogen that circulate in prepubertal girls [23]. Reina-Alzate et al. correlated imaging findings and hormonal markers at the onset of puberty in girls and found that the endometrial echo is a strong indicator of precocious puberty in girls 8 years or younger [69]. According to Wen et al., endometrial thickness of 2.6 mm is a cutoff in girls with central precocious puberty in the age group 8 years to 10 years. This is however an age at which normal puberty may set in and is not defined as central precocious puberty [53]. Moreover, no repeatability exercises were performed to justify this measurement precision.
Ovaries
It is technically more difficult to measure the ovaries than the uterus. Angulation of the transducer through the filled bladder is often necessary, which might also affect the measurements. Some authors report that the right ovary is often easier to visualize and measure and it is often larger than the left. This could also be related to the fact that the left ovary can be (partly) obscured by gas in the sigmoid. This certainly has an impact on the reported cutoff value since many authors calculated the ovarian volume by the mean value of right and left ovary. Sathasivam et al. reported overlap in ovarian volume between girls with prepubertal and pubertal GnRH responses, regardless of the ovarian size calculation used (average, smallest, or largest) [46].
Although ovarian circumference in the transverse position rather than volume may more accurately reflect ovarian size, as ovaries, particularly in prepubertal girls, do not have a symmetrical ovoid shape, this parameter investigated by De Vries et al. and YU et al. was not a discriminator between precocious puberty and premature thelarche [15, 50, 70].
Microcysts or ovarian follicles have been reported as a normal finding in approximately 40% of prepubertal girls and De Vries et al. found no difference in number of ovarian follicles or size of the largest follicle between girls with precocious puberty and premature thelarche [15]. Millar et al. reported that observations of small, unilocular ovarian cysts of less than 1 cm in diameter in prepubertal girls are clinically unimportant but that ovarian cysts associated with precocious puberty are generally larger than 2 cm in diameter [71]. The presence of six or more follicles (multicystic ovaries) has been reported to correlate with pubertal stimuli both in premature thelarche and precocious puberty [44]. Buzi et al. found multicystic ovaries more frequently in girls with central precocious puberty than premature thelarche and controls but not exclusively [24].
Color Doppler of uterine and ovarian arteries
Discrepancies in the reported values can be attributed to variations in the selection criteria among studies, such as whether they exclusively involve healthy girls or include those experiencing normal physiological puberty or precocious puberty. Additionally, genetic and socioeconomic differences might influence pubertal development, and variations in the reference tests used to define the onset of puberty contribute to this variability. Moreover, the outcome of US examinations is subject to operator proficiency, with the experience of the radiologist exerting a notable influence, and measuring uterine artery velocity becomes increasingly difficult with decreasing age [59, 67].
Existing guidelines
The European Society of Paediatric Radiology has not published guidelines regarding the role of imaging in the workup of precocious puberty, and to our knowledge, there are no other unifying international guidelines. National guidelines differ from each other. For example, in the Netherlands, there are no strict guidelines regarding workup for central precocious puberty and pelvic US is not included as a mandatory test in the recommendations. Some national guidelines recommend pelvic US in the workup of precocious puberty, both to detect possible underlying causes of precocious puberty but also to evaluate the internal genitalia to aid in the diagnosis of central precocious puberty but indicate no cutoff for the measurements (e.g., Norway). Yet, other national guidelines provide cutoff values for uterine size and/or endometrium and/or ovaries; however, the cutoff values vary somewhat between guidelines (e.g., Italian, Greek). A review paper from 2023 on the diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes in central precocious puberty, published in Lancet Child Adolescent Health, states that US cannot diagnose onset of puberty due to the overlap of size measurements in girls with central precocious puberty and normal girls, that US may have a role in equivocal cases, and that uterine length over 3.5–4 cm and a volume over 3 mL support the diagnosis. However, neither the sensitivity and specificity of these values nor their positive and negative predictive values when applied to this specific population are mentioned [72].
There is a striking lack of consistent guidelines for US imaging in the workup of central precocious puberty despite the noninvasive, accessible nature of this technique. We believe this reflects the inhomogeneity of the literature in the field as described in this paper.
Ideally, future studies should be harmonized in terms of populations included, definitions of central precocious puberty, and technique applied. In addition, repeatability exercises should be performed to determine the reasonable precision of the various measures. However, central precocious puberty is a dynamic condition and the precise onset of symptoms, hence also disease duration, is difficult to determine. Further, genetic and environmental factors may influence both time of onset and course of the puberty process. A single US examination only represents a “snapshot” in this variable and individual process. Therefore, it might be difficult to harmonize the populations to find exact cutoff values for onset of puberty with US.
Conclusions
A wide variety of thresholds have been reported regarding measurements of uterus and ovaries. The endometrium can be seen as an echogenic stripe and ovarian follicles and cysts can be seen in both prepubertal and pubertal girls.
Although there is a clear role for abdominal US in peripheral precocious puberty, we have to be aware of the limitations of pelvic US in the diagnosis of central precocious puberty. Interpretation of the findings must be done with caution, particularly in equivocal cases, and close communication with the referring clinicians is crucial. No reliable cutoffs exist to determine onset of puberty in girls. This should be reflected in relevant guidelines.
References
Eckert-Lind C, Busch AS, Petersen JH et al (2020) Worldwide secular trends in age at pubertal onset assessed by breast development among girls: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr 174:e195881
Papanikolaou A, Michala L (2015) Autonomous ovarian cysts in prepubertal girls. How aggressive should we be? A review of the literature. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 28:292–296
Heo S, Shim YS, Lee HS, Hwang JS (2024) Clinical course of peripheral precocious puberty in girls due to autonomous ovarian cysts. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 100:29–35
Soriano-Guillén L, Corripio R, Labarta JI et al (2010) Central precocious puberty in children living in Spain: incidence, prevalence, and influence of adoption and immigration. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95:4305–4313
Le Moal J, Rigou A, Le Tertre A et al (2018) Marked geographic patterns in the incidence of idiopathic central precocious puberty: a nationwide study in france. Eur J Endocrinol 178:33–41
Bräuner EV, Busch AS, Eckert-Lind C et al (2020) Trends in the incidence of central precocious puberty and normal variant puberty among children in Denmark, 1998 to 2017. JAMA Netw Open 3:e2015665
Kim YJ, Kwon A, Jung MK et al (2019) Incidence and prevalence of central precocious puberty in Korea: an epidemiologic study based on a national database. J Pediatr 208:221–228
Teilmann G, Pedersen CB, Jensen TK et al (2005) Prevalence and incidence of precocious pubertal development in Denmark: an epidemiologic study based on national registries. Pediatrics 116:1323–1328
Mauras N, Santen RJ, Colón-Otero G et al (2015) Estrogens and their genotoxic metabolites are increased in obese prepubertal girls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 100:2322–2328
Reinehr T, Roth CL (2019) Is there a causal relationship between obesity and puberty? Lancet Child Adolesc Health 3:44–54
Cheuiche AV, da Silveira LG, de Paula LCP et al (2021) Diagnosis and management of precocious sexual maturation: an updated review. Eur J Pediatr 180:3073–3087
Lazar L, Phillip M (2012) Pubertal disorders and bone maturation. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 41:805–825
Buckler JM (1984) Skeletal age changes in puberty. Arch Dis Child 59:115–119
Talarico V, Rodio MB, Viscomi A et al (2021) The role of pelvic ultrasound for the diagnosis and management of central precocious puberty: an update. Acta Biomed 92:e2021480
de Vries L, Horev G, Schwartz M, Phillip M (2006) Ultrasonographic and clinical parameters for early differentiation between precocious puberty and premature thelarche. Eur J Endocrinol 154:891–898
Orsini LF, Salardi S, Pilu G et al (1984) Pelvic organs in premenarcheal girls: real-time ultrasonography. Radiology 153:113–116
Salardi S, Orsini LF, Cacciari E et al (1985) Pelvic ultrasonography in premenarcheal girls: relation to puberty and sex hormone concentrations. Arch Dis Child 60:120–125
Nussbaum AR, Sanders RC, Jones MD (1986) Neonatal uterine morphology as seen on real-time us. Radiology 160:641–643
Bridges NA, Cooke A, Healy MJ et al (1993) Standards for ovarian volume in childhood and puberty. Fertil Steril 60:456–460
Haber HP, Mayer EI (1994) Ultrasound evaluation of uterine and ovarian size from birth to puberty. Pediatr Radiol 24:11–13
Griffin IJ, Cole TJ, Duncan KA et al (1995) Pelvic ultrasound measurements in normal girls. Acta Paediatr 84:536–543
Holm K, Laursen EM, Brocks V, Müller J (1995) Pubertal maturation of the internal genitalia: an ultrasound evaluation of 166 healthy girls. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 6:175–181
Bridges NA, Cooke A, Healy MJ et al (1996) Growth of the uterus. Arch Dis Child 75:330–331
Buzi F, Pilotta A, Dordoni D et al (1998) Pelvic ultrasonography in normal girls and in girls with pubertal precocity. Acta Paediatr 87:1138–1145
Khadilkar VV, Khadilkar AV, Kinare AS et al (2006) Ovarian and uterine ultrasonography in healthy girls between birth to 18 years. Indian Pediatr 43:625–630
Dixit M, Jaiswal V, Usmani Y, Chaudhary R (2021) Uterine and ovarian parameters in healthy North Indian girls from 5 to 16 years by ultrasonography. Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab 27:37–41
Soliman SA, Algatheradi MA, Alqahtani AM et al (2023) Ovarian volume of Saudi children and adolescents in the southern region based on ultrasound imaging. Cureus 15:e40147
Gilligan LA, Trout AT, Schuster JG et al (2019) Normative values for ultrasound measurements of the female pelvic organs throughout childhood and adolescence. Pediatr Radiol 49:1042–1050
Herter LD, Golendziner E, Flores JA et al (2002) Ovarian and uterine sonography in healthy girls between 1 and 13 years old: correlation of findings with age and pubertal status. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:1531–1536
Langer JE, Oliver ER, Lev-Toaff AS, Coleman BG (2012) Imaging of the female pelvis through the life cycle. Radiographics 32:1575–1597
Villalobos Gálvez M, Beltrán Salazar VP, Pérez Adell M et al (2021) Updated reference values in pelvic ultrasonography for a Spanish population of healthy girls between 6 and 12 years old. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab 4:e00233
Kelsey TW, Ginbey E, Chowdhury MM et al (2016) A validated normative model for human uterine volume from birth to age 40 years. PLoS ONE 11:e0157375
Kelsey TW, Dodwell SK, Wilkinson AG et al (2013) Ovarian volume throughout life: a validated normative model. PLoS ONE 8:e71465
Habiba M, Heyn R, Bianchi P et al (2021) The development of the human uterus: morphogenesis to menarche. Hum Reprod Update 27:1–26
Colvin CW, Abdullatif H (2013) Anatomy of female puberty: the clinical relevance of developmental changes in the reproductive system. Clin Anat 26:115–129
Huber A, Michael S, Feik K (1971) functional changes in the fetal and infantile endometrium. Arch Gynakol 211:583–594
Peters H, Himelstein-Braw R, Faber M (1976) The normal development of the ovary in childhood. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 82:617–630
Battaglia C, Mancini F, Regnani G et al (2003) Pelvic ultrasound and color Doppler findings in different isosexual precocities. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22:277–283
Horwitz KB, Horwitz LD (1982) Canine vascular tissues are targets for androgens, estrogens, progestins, and glucocorticoids. J Clin Invest 69:750–758
Battaglia C, Regnani G, Mancini F et al (2002) Isolated premature pubarche: ultrasonographic and color Doppler analysis–a longitudinal study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:3148–3154
Stanhope R, Adams J, Jacobs HS et al. (1985) Ovarian ultrasound assessment in normal children, idiopathic precocious puberty, and during low dose pulsatile gonadotrophin releasing hormone treatment of hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism. Arch Dis Child 60:116–119
Stanhope R, Abdulwahid NA, Adams J, et al. (1986) Studies of gonadotrophin pulsatility and pelvic ultrasound examinations distinguish between isolated premature thelarche and central precocious puberty. Eur J Pediatr 145:190–194
Haber HP, Wollmann HA, Ranke MB (1995) Pelvic ultrasonography: early differentiation between isolated premature thelarche and central precocious puberty. Eur J Pediatr 154:182–186
Herter LD, Golendziner E, Flores JA et al (2002) Ovarian and uterine findings in pelvic sonography: comparison between prepubertal girls, girls with isolated thelarche, and girls with central precocious puberty. J Ultrasound Med 21:1237–1246; quiz 1247–1238
Badouraki M, Christoforidis A, Economou I et al (2008) Evaluation of pelvic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and differentiation of various forms of sexual precocity in girls. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 32:819–827
Sathasivam A, Rosenberg HK, Shapiro S et al (2011) Pelvic ultrasonography in the evaluation of central precocious puberty: comparison with leuprolide stimulation test. J Pediatr 159:490–495
Eksioglu AS, Yilmaz S, Cetinkaya S et al (2013) Value of pelvic sonography in the diagnosis of various forms of precocious puberty in girls. J Clin Ultrasound 41:84–93
Bizzarri C, Spadoni GL, Bottaro G et al (2014) The response to gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulation test does not predict the progression to true precocious puberty in girls with onset of premature thelarche in the first three years of life. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99:433–439
Binay C, Simsek E, Bal C (2014) The correlation between gnrh stimulation testing and obstetric ultrasonographic parameters in precocious puberty. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 27:1193–1199
Yu J, Shin HY, Lee SH et al (2015) Usefulness of pelvic ultrasonography for the diagnosis of central precocious puberty in girls. Korean J Pediatr 58:294–300
Lee SH, Joo EY, Lee JE et al (2016) The diagnostic value of pelvic ultrasound in girls with central precocious puberty. Chonnam Med J 52:70–74
Karaoglan M, KM, Kul S, Ozkur A (2018) A diagnostic scoring system to distinguish precocious puberty from premature thelarche based on clinical and laboratory findings. Iran J Pediatr 28(3):e64118. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijp.64118
Wen X, Wen D, Zhang H et al (2018) Observational study pelvic ultrasound a useful tool in the diagnosis and differentiation of precocious puberty in chinese girls. Medicine (Baltimore) 97:e0092
Yu HK, Liu X, Chen JK et al (2019) Pelvic ultrasound in diagnosing and evaluating the efficacy of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy in girls with idiopathic central precocious puberty. Front Pharmacol 10:104
Calcaterra V, Klersy C, Vinci F et al (2020) Rapid progressive central precocious puberty: diagnostic and predictive value of basal sex hormone levels and pelvic ultrasound. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 33:785–791
Yuan B, Pi YL, Zhang YN et al (2020) A diagnostic model of idiopathic central precocious puberty based on transrectal pelvic ultrasound and basal gonadotropin levels. J Int Med Res 48:300060520935278
Kongmanas HB, Trinavarat P, Wacharasindhu S (2021) Sensitivity and specificity of using pelvic ultrasonographic parameters combined with basal gonadotropin levels to diagnose central precocious puberty in Thai girls. Asian Biomed (Res Rev News) 15:27–34
Zarei E, RN, Khodadost M, Abouie A et al (2022) Effectiveness of pelvic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of central precocious puberty and its differentiation from similar conditions. Iran J Radiol 19(4):e129295. https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol-129295
Laursen EM, Holm K, Brocks V et al (1996) Doppler assessment of flow velocity in the uterine artery during pubertal maturation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 8:341–345
Ziereisen F, Heinrichs C, Dufour D et al (2001) The role of Doppler evaluation of the uterine artery in girls around puberty. Pediatr Radiol 31:712–719
Battaglia C, Regnani G, Mancini F et al (2002) Pelvic sonography and uterine artery color Doppler analysis in the diagnosis of female precocious puberty. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19:386–391
Battaglia C, De Iaco P, Iughetti L et al (2005) Female precocious puberty, obesity and polycystic-like ovaries. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 26:651–657
Golestani R, Sheikhvatan M, Behpour AM et al (2008) Relationship between uterine and ovarian arterial blood flow measured by Doppler sonography at different stages of puberty. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 47:62–65
Paesano PL, Colantoni C, Mora S et al (2019) Validation of an accurate and noninvasive tool to exclude female precocious puberty: pelvic ultrasound with uterine artery pulsatility index. AJR Am J Roentgenol 213:451–457
Cheuiche AV, da Silveira LG, Escott GM et al (2022) Accuracy of Doppler assessment of the uterine arteries in healthy girls for the diagnosis of pubertal onset. Endocrine 76:172–178
Hagen CP, Mouritsen A, Mieritz MG et al (2015) Uterine volume and endometrial thickness in healthy girls evaluated by ultrasound (3-dimensional) and magnetic resonance imaging. Fertil Steril 104:452-459.e452
Cheuiche AV, Moro C, Lucena IRS et al (2023) Accuracy of Doppler assessment of the uterine arteries for the diagnosis of pubertal onset in girls: a scoping review. Sci Rep 13:5791
Garel L, Dubois J, Grignon A et al (2001) Us of the pediatric female pelvis: A clinical perspective. Radiographics 21:1393–1407
Reina-Alzate J, Saldarriaga MF, Londoño MA et al (2023) Correlation between imaging findings and hormonal markers at the onset of puberty in girls. Radiologia (Engl Ed) 65:3–11
de Vries L, Phillip M (2011) Pelvic ultrasound examination in girls with precocious puberty is a useful adjunct in gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue therapy monitoring. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 75:372–377
Millar DM, Blake JM, Stringer DA et al (1993) Prepubertal ovarian cyst formation: 5 years’ experience. Obstet Gynecol 81:434–438
Zevin EL, Eugster EA (2023) Central precocious puberty: a review of diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 7:886–896
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
• Study conception: L-S.O.M
• Literature search and data analysis: A.M.S. and C.S.
• Data curation and primary in-depth data discussion: A.M.S., C.S., and L-S.O.M.
• Data discussion: all authors.
• First draft: A.M.S.
• Second draft: A.M.S., C.S., and L-S.O.M.
• Second draft discussion for first submission: all authors.
• Critical revision: A.M.S., C.S., and L-S.O.M.
• Final revised draft approval: all authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Smets, A.M., Sofia, C., Bruno, C. et al. Abdominal imaging in precocious puberty in girls: can imaging determine onset of puberty?. Pediatr Radiol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-024-05992-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-024-05992-8