Abstract
Background
The Stroke Prevention Trial in Sickle Cell Anaemia (STOP) demonstrated the value of selective transfusion based on transcranial Doppler (TCD) US screening. This facilitated widespread surveillance, but due to reported differences with non-imaging TCD, imaging velocity thresholds have been reduced in some centres.
Objective
(1) Retrospectively review velocity measurements obtained by non-imaging and imaging TCD, using a standardised protocol. (2) Determine the impact on STOP classification of different velocity thresholds.
Materials and methods
TCD data from 23 children (2–19 years of age) were reviewed. The TCD protocol focused on obtaining the velocity corresponding to the highest audible Doppler frequency. STOP velocity thresholds were the recommended for non-imaging TCD and values reduced by 5–15%.
Results
Non-imaging and imaging TCD velocities were correlated closely with little overall bias. Reducing imaging TCD velocity thresholds increased the number of abnormal and conditional classifications. Abnormal TCD imaging classifications ranged from 1.9% to 37% depending on the degree of correction applied to the velocity data.
Conclusion
The current approach for applying STOP thresholds to imaging TCD data may not be required. Centres need to validate their imaging TCD practice to avoid inappropriate selection of patients for transfusion therapy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams RJ, McKie V, Brambilla DJ et al (1998) Stroke Prevention Trial in Sickle Cell Anaemia (STOP) study: design. Control Clin Trials 19:110–119
Bulas DI, Jones A, Seibert JJ et al (2000) Transcranial Doppler (TCD) screening for stroke prevention in sickle cell anaemia: pitfalls in technique variation. Pediatr Radiol 30:733–738
McCarville BM, Li C, Xiong X et al (2004) Comparison of transcranial Doppler with and without imaging in the evaluation of children with sickle cell anaemia. AJR 183:1117–1122
Bulas D (2005) Screening children for sickle cell vasculopathy: guidelines for transcranial Doppler evaluation. Pediatr Radiol 35:235–241
Jones A, Siebert JJ, Nichols FT et al (2001) Comparison of transcranial color Doppler imaging (TCDI) and transcranial Doppler (TCD) in children with sickle cell anaemia. Pediatr Radiol 31:461–469
Neish AS, Blews DE, Simms CA et al (2002) Screening for stroke in sickle cell anaemia: comparison of transcranial Doppler imaging and non-imaging US techniques. Radiology 222:709–714
Krejza J, Rudzinski W, Pawlak MA et al (2007) Angle-corrected imaging transcranial Doppler sonography versus imaging and non-imaging transcranial Doppler sonography in children with sickle cell disease. AJNR 28:1613–1618
Krejza J, Mariak Z, Walecki J et al (1998) Age dependency of blood flow velocities in basal cerebral arteries: transcranial Doppler study. Med Sci Monit 4:370–377
Adams RJ, Fenwick TN, Hess DC (1992) Normal values and physiological variables. In: Newell DW, Aaslid R (eds) Transcranial Doppler. Raven, New York
Brass LM, Pavlaskis SG, DeVivo D et al (1998) Transcranial Doppler measurements of the middle cerebral artery. Effect of hematocrit. Stroke 19:1466–1469
Bland M (1995) An introduction to medical statistics, 2nd edn. Oxford Medical Publications, Oxford
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Giselle Padmore-Penniston, Michelle Edwards and Helen Appleby for their help in this study. This work was supported by funding from Novartis Pharmaceuticals, UK Limited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Padayachee, S.T., Thomas, N., Arnold, A.J. et al. Problems with implementing a standardised transcranial Doppler screening programme: impact of instrumentation variation on STOP classification. Pediatr Radiol 42, 470–474 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2263-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2263-4