Skip to main content
Log in

Feasibility of P wave Centric Ambulatory Electrocardiogram Monitoring in Infants and Young Children

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

P wave centric ambulatory electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring has emerged as an important tool aiding the diagnosis of arrhythmias. However, their efficacy and user experience in infants and young children are not well established. A retrospective study was performed to detail clinical and user experience of ECG monitoring using the Carnation Ambulatory Monitor (CAM) patch (Bardy Diagnostics Inc., Seattle, WA) in patients less than 10 kg. Additionally, 2 different monitor locations (over the sternum and horizontal over the left axilla) were assessed to address the optimal placement in these patients. A total of 33 CAM reports from 25 patients, aged 0 to15 months were included in the study. Mean patient age was 4.2 months ± 5.0 and mean weight was 5.3 kg ± 2.4. Thirty-six percent of patients (9/25) had known congenital heart disease. Indications for monitoring included: tachyarrhythmia (15/33, 45%), bradyarrhythmia (6/33, 18%), ectopic rhythm (9/33, 27%), cardiac tumor (1/33, 1%), and prolonged QT interval (1/33, 1%). All CAM reports showed clear, identifiable P waves which were diagnostic and lead to changes in medical management for 30% of patients (e.g., medication adjustments or discharge from cardiology care). We found the upright placement over the sternum performed better than the horizontal placement over the left axilla for small infants and children less than 10 kg. A P wave centric single-lead ECG monitor is helpful in providing accurate diagnostics tracings in infants and small children aiding in their clinical management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CAM:

Carnation ambulatory monitor

ECG:

Electrocardiogram

BPM:

Beats per minute

SVT:

Supraventricular tachycardia

References

  1. Salerno JC, Seslar SP (2009) Supraventricular tachycardia. Arch PediatrAdolesc Med 163(3):268–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Garson A, Gillette PC (1981) Electrophysiologic studies of supraventricular tachycardia in children. I. Clinical-electrophysiologic correlations. Am Heart J 102(2):233–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chu PY, Hill KD, Clark RH, Smith PB, Hornik CP (2015) Treatment of supraventricular tachycardia in infants: analysis of a large multicenter database. Early Human Dev 91(6):345–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith WM, Riddell F, Madon M, Gleva MJ (2017) Comparison of diagnostic value using a small, single channel, P-wave centric sternal ECG monitoring patch with a standard 3-lead Holter system over 24 hours. Am Heart J 185:67–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nguyen HH, Van Hare GF, Rudokas M, Bowman T, Silva JNA (2015) SPEAR trial: smartphone pediatric electrocardiogram trial. PLoS ONE 10(8):e0136256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Macinnes M, Martin N, Fulton H, McLeod KA (2019) Comparison of a smartphone-based ECG recording system with a standard cardiac event monitor in the investigation of palpitations in children. Arch Dis Child 104:43–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bolourchi M, Silver E, Muwanga D, Mendez E, Liberman L (2019) Comparison of Holter with Zio patch electrocardiography monitoring in children. Am J Cardiol 125:767–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rho R, Vossler M, Blancher S, Poole J (2018) Comparison of 2 ambulatory patch ECG monitors: the benefit of the P-wave and signal clarity. Am Heart J 203:109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Petrenas A, Marozas V, Jarusevicius G, Sornmo L (2015) A modified Lewis ECG lead system for ambulatory monitoring of atrial arrhythmias. J Electrocardiol 48(2):157–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Frazier A, Hunt EA, Holmes K (2011) Pediatric cardiac emergencies: children are not small adults. J Emerg Trauma Shock 4(1):89–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bolourchi M, Batra A (2015) Diagnostic yield of patch ambulatory electrocardiogram monitoring in children (from a national registry). Am J Cardiol 115(5):630–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Higgins SL (2013) A novel patch for heart rhythm monitoring: is the Holter monitor obsolete? Future Cardiol 9(3):325–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Romme A, Nguyen H (2020) P-wave centric ambulatory ECG monitoring in infants and young children. MedRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.18.20134999 (Preprint)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A previous, not peer reviewed version of this manuscript was deposited on the preprint server medRxiv [13].

Funding

All authors have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose. No funding was secured for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hoang H. Nguyen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Romme, A., Umapathi, K. & Nguyen, H. Feasibility of P wave Centric Ambulatory Electrocardiogram Monitoring in Infants and Young Children. Pediatr Cardiol 42, 1126–1132 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-021-02590-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-021-02590-5

Keywords

Navigation