Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of Trisomy 21 on Postoperative Length of Stay and Non-cardiac Surgery After Complete Repair of Tetralogy of Fallot

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Trisomy 21 (T21) is the most common chromosomal abnormality, and is frequently associated with congenital heart disease. Results of previous studies evaluating the effect of T21 on postoperative outcomes and complications following heart surgery have been mixed. Our goal was to determine if T21 is associated with higher frequency of adverse postoperative outcomes following repair of tetralogy of Fallot (TOF). A query of the Pediatric Health Information System was performed for patients who underwent complete repair of TOF from 2004 to 2015. Patients with a genetic syndrome other than T21 and tracheostomy and/or gastrostomy prior to heart surgery were excluded. Two groups were created on the basis of whether patients received a diagnostic code for T21. The adverse outcomes of interest were postoperative mortality, postoperative length of stay (LOS), postoperative gastrostomy, and postoperative tracheostomy. Univariate and Kaplan–Meier analysis were performed to evaluate outcomes. There were a total of 4790 patients; 430 (9%) patients had T21, and 4360 (91%) patients without a genetic diagnosis. There was no significant difference in mortality before discharge between those with and without T21 (2.3% vs 1.4%; p = 0.155). Patients with T21 had longer postoperative LOS (mean of 19.8 days vs 12.4 days; p < 0.001), and higher rates of postoperative gastrostomy (13.3% vs 5.3%; p < 0.02). There was no significant difference between groups for rates of postoperative tracheostomy (1.9% vs 1.2%; p = 0.276). Kaplan–Meier analysis confirmed that patients with T21 had longer postoperative LOS and greater incidence of gastrostomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shin M, Besser LM, Kucik JE, Lu C, Siffel C, Correa A (2009) Prevalence of Down syndrome among children and adolescents in 10 regions of the United States. Pediatrics 124(6):1565–1571. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-0745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ergaz-Shaltiel Z, Engel O, Erlichman I, Naveh Y, Schimmel MS, Tenenbaum A (2017) Neonatal characteristics and perinatal complications in neonates with Down syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 173(5):1279–1286. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.38165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stoll C, Dott B, Alembik Y, Roth MP (2015) Associated congenital anomalies among cases with Down syndrome. Eur J Med Genet 58(12):674–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2015.11.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pfitzer C, Helm PC, Rosenthal LM, Berger F, Bauer UMM, Schmitt KR (2018) Dynamics in prevalence of Down syndrome in children with congenital heart disease. Eur J Pediatr 177(1):107–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-017-3041-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lillehei CW, Cohen M, Warden HE, Read RC, Aust JB, Dewall RA, Varco RL (1955) Direct vision intracardiac surgical correction of the tetralogy of Fallot, pentalogy of Fallot, and pulmonary atresia defects; report of first ten cases. Ann Surg 142(3):418–442. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-195509000-00010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kirklin JW, Dushane JW, Patrick RT, Donald DE, Hetzel PS, Harshbarger HG, Wood EH (1955) Intracardiac surgery with the aid of a mechanical pump-oxygenator system (gibbon type): report of eight cases. Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clin 30(10):201–206

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jacobs JP, Mayer JE Jr, Pasquali SK, Hill KD, Overman DM, St Louis JD, Kumar SR, Backer CL, Fraser CD, Tweddell JS, Jacobs ML (2018) The Society of thoracic surgeons congenital heart surgery database: 2018 update on outcomes and quality. Ann Thorac Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.01.001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Jacobs JP (2017) The Society of Thoracic surgeons congenital heart surgery database public reporting initiative. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu 20:43–48. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.pcsu.2016.09.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoashi T, Hirahara N, Murakami A, Hirata Y, Ichikawa H, Kobayashi J, Takamoto S (2018) Current surgical outcomes of congenital heart surgery for patients with Down syndrome in Japan. Circ J 82(2):403–408. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Formigari R, Di Donato RM, Gargiulo G, Di Carlo D, Feltri C, Picchio FM, Marino B (2004) Better surgical prognosis for patients with complete atrioventricular septal defect and Down's syndrome. Ann Thorac Surg 78(2):666–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.12.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fudge JC Jr, Li S, Jaggers J, O'Brien SM, Peterson ED, Jacobs JP, Welke KF, Jacobs ML, Li JS, Pasquali SK (2010) Congenital heart surgery outcomes in Down syndrome: analysis of a national clinical database. Pediatrics 126(2):315–322. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-3245

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Lange R, Guenther T, Busch R, Hess J, Schreiber C (2007) The presence of Down syndrome is not a risk factor in complete atrioventricular septal defect repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 134(2):304–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.01.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stanley MA, Shepherd N, Duvall N, Jenkinson SB, Jalou HE, Givan DC, Steele GH, Davis C, Bull MJ, Watkins DU, Roper RJ (2019) Clinical identification of feeding and swallowing disorders in 0–6 month old infants with Down syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 179(2):177–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Srinivasan R, Irvine T, Dalzell M (2009) Indications for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and procedure-related outcome. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 49(5):584–588. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0b013e31819a4e8c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cairo SB, Zeinali LI, Berkelhamer SK, Harmon CM, Rao SO, Rothstein DH (2018) Down syndrome and postoperative complications in children undergoing intestinal operations. J Pediatr Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.11.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Alsoufi B, Gillespie S, Mahle WT, Deshpande S, Kogon B, Maher K, Kanter K (2016) The effect of noncardiac and genetic abnormalities on outcomes following neonatal congenital heart surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 28(1):105–114. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semtcvs.2015.10.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Azhar AS, Aljefri HM (2018) Predictors of extended length of hospital stay following surgical repair of congenital heart diseases. Pediatr Cardiol 39(8):1688–1699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-018-1953-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Michielon G, Marino B, Formigari R, Gargiulo G, Picchio F, Digilio MC, Anaclerio S, Oricchio G, Sanders SP, Di Donato RM (2006) Genetic syndromes and outcome after surgical correction of tetralogy of Fallot. Ann Thorac Surg 81(3):968–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.09.033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cotts T, Hirsch J, Thorne M, Gajarski R (2011) Tracheostomy after pediatric cardiac surgery: frequency, indications, and outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 141(2):413–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.06.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bertrand P, Navarro H, Caussade S, Holmgren N, Sanchez I (2003) Airway anomalies in children with Down syndrome: endoscopic findings. Pediatr Pulmonol 36(2):137–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.10332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Landis BJ, Cooper DS, Hinton RB (2016) CHD associated with syndromic diagnoses: peri-operative risk factors and early outcomes. Cardiol Young 26(1):30–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1047951115001389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Parker SE, Mai CT, Canfield MA, Rickard R, Wang Y, Meyer RE, Anderson P, Mason CA, Collins JS, Kirby RS, Correa A (2010) Updated national birth prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004–2006. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 88(12):1008–1016. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.20735

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Patel A, Costello JM, Backer CL, Pasquali SK, Hill KD, Wallace AS, Jacobs JP, Jacobs ML (2016) Prevalence of noncardiac and genetic abnormalities in neonates undergoing cardiac operations: analysis of the society of thoracic surgeons congenital heart surgery database. Ann Thorac Surg 102(5):1607–1614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.04.008

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Loomba RS, Buelow MW, Woods RK (2017) Complete repair of tetralogy of fallot in the neonatal versus non-neonatal period: A meta-analysis. Pediatr Cardiol 38(5):893–901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-017-1579-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Steiner MB, Tang X, Gossett JM, Malik S, Prodhan P (2014) Timing of complete repair of non-ductal-dependent tetralogy of Fallot and short-term postoperative outcomes, a multicenter analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 147(4):1299–1305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.06.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mercer-Rosa L, Elci OU, DeCost G, Woyciechowski S, Edman SM, Ravishankar C, Mascio CE, Kawut SM, Goldmuntz E (2018) Predictors of length of hospital stay after complete repair for tetralogy of Fallot: A prospective cohort study. J Am Heart Assoc. https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.118.008719

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric T. Purifoy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors of this study have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

This was a retrospective national database study with de-identified information. Research did not involve human participants and did not require informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Inclusions

ICD9 codes

ICD 10 codes

Trisomy 21

758.0

Q90.0, Q90.1, Q90.2, Q90.9

Tetralogy of Fallot

745.2

Q21.3

Repair of tetralogy of Fallot

35.81

 

VSD closure

 

02UM07Z, 02UM08Z, 02QM0ZZ, 02UM0KZ

Relief of right ventricular outflow tract obstruction

 

02NK0ZZ, 02NH0ZZ, 02BK0ZZ, 02UP07Z, 02RH08Z, 027H0ZZ, 02UK07Z, 02UK08Z, 021K0KP, 02UP08Z, 02UK0JZ, 02UP0JZ, 02RH0JZ, 02UH08Z, 02QH0ZZ, 02UP0KZ

Exclusions

ICD9 codes

ICD 10 codes

Congenital heart disease

745, 746, 747, related codes

Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26 related codes

Genetic syndromes other than trisomy 21

757.39,758.1–759.89, 279.11, 783.43, 271.8–288.01

Q91.1-Q99.0, Q87.0, Q87.1, Q03.1, Q85.0, Q87.2, G60.0, Q89.8, Q77.6, Q44.7, Q81.9, Q87.40, H49.819, E88.40-E88.49, E71.310-E71.548, E76.01-E76.29, E72.52, E72.53, E74.4, E74.8, E77.1, D70.0, E80.0, E84, E79.1, E79.8, E85, E80.4, E80.7

Procedure codes

Diagnostic codes

Procedure codes

Tracheostomy

V440, Z930

31.1, 31.21, 31.29, 0B110F4, 0B113F4, 0B114F4, 0B110D-0B114Z4

Gastrostomy

V441, Z931, Z431

43.0, 43.19, 0DH68UZ, 0DH60UZ, 499,440,49,441, 43,246, 44,372, 44,373

  1. For codes listed above without a trailing decimal, all codes within that category were included.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Purifoy, E.T., Spray, B.J., Riley, J.S. et al. Effect of Trisomy 21 on Postoperative Length of Stay and Non-cardiac Surgery After Complete Repair of Tetralogy of Fallot. Pediatr Cardiol 40, 1627–1632 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-019-02196-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-019-02196-y

Keywords

Navigation