Skip to main content
Log in

Reference Values of Aortic Flow Velocity Integral in 1193 Healthy Infants, Children, and Adolescents to Quickly Estimate Cardiac Stroke Volume

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aortic velocity time integral (VTI) is an echocardiographic tool used to estimate cardiac output (CO) by multiplying it with the aortic valve (AV) area and heart rate (HR). Inaccurate measurement of AV diameter will lead to squared miscalculation of CO. The aortic VTI itself can serve as a left-ventricular (LV) output parameter. The normal range of aortic VTI in adulthood is relatively stable, compared with childhood, but reference data are lacking. The aim of this study was to establish reference values of VTI in infants, children, and adolescents. A retrospective analysis of 1223 echocardiographic examinations of healthy children (age 0–20 years, body surface area [BSA] 0.11–2.23 m2) was performed. Data were correlated with age, BSA, and HR, and age subgroups with normal distribution were determined. Interobserver and intraobserver variability was calculated. Aortic VTI ranged from mean 13.8 cm (10.0–18.4 cm 5–95th percentile) in neonates to 25.1 cm (19.6–32.8 cm 5–95th percentile) in children >17 years of age and had a positive correlation with age (r = 0.685, p < 0.001), BSA (r = 0.645, p < 0.001) and a negative correlation with HR (r = −0.710, p < 0.001). Interobserver and intraobserver variability were excellent (3.9 ± 3.1 and 4.6 ± 3.7 %, respectively). Calculated mean values and percentile charts for the different age groups can serve as reference data to easily judge LV output in patients with or without congenital heart disease without enlargement or dysfunction of the AV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alverson DC, Eldridge M, Dillon T, Yabek SM, Berman W (1982) Noninvasive pulsed Doppler determination of cardiac output in neonates and children. J Pediatr 101:46–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Alverson DC, Aldrich M, Angelus P, Backstrom C, Werner S (1987) Longitudinal trends in left ventricular cardiac output in healthy infants in the first year of life. J Ultrasound Med 6:519–524

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonakdar HR, Jorat MV, Fazelifar AF, Alizadeh A, Givtaj N, Sameie N et al (2009) Prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy using simple electrocardiographic and echocardiographic tool. Europace 11:1330–1337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chew MS, Poelaert J (2003) Accuracy and repeatability of pediatric cardiac output measurement using Doppler: 20-year review of the literature. Intens Care Med 29:1889–1994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Evangelista A, García del Castillo H, González-Alujas T, Brotons C, García-Dorado D, Soler–Soler J (1996) Normal values of valvular flow velocities determined by Doppler echocardiography: relations with heart rate and age. Rev Esp Cardiol 49:189–195

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fast JH, van den Merkhof L, Blans W, van Leeuwen K, Uijen G (1988) Determination of cardiac output by single gated pulsed Doppler echocardiography. Int J Cardiol 21:33–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gardin JM, Dabestani A, Matin K, Allfie A, Russell D, Henry WL (1984) Reproducibility of Doppler aortic blood flow measurements: studies on intraobserver, interobserver and day-to-day variability in normal subjects. Am J Cardiol 54:1092–1098

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gardin JM, Davidson DM, Rohan MK, Butman S, Knoll M, García R et al (1987) Relationship between age, body size, gender, and blood pressure and Doppler flow measurements in the aorta and pulmonary artery. Am Heart J 113:101–109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Haites NE, McLennan FM, Mowat DHR, Rawles JM (1984) How far is the cardiac output? Lancet 3:1025–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Harada K, Shiota T, Takahashi Y, Tamura M, Toyono M, Takada G (1994) Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular output and left ventricular diastolic filling changes in the first day of life. Pediatr Res 35:506–509

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hauser J, Michel-Behnke I, Zervan K, Pees C (2011) Noninvasive measurement of atrial contribution to the cardiac output in children and adolescents with congenital complete atrioventricular block treated with dual-chamber pacemakers. Am J Cardiol 107:92–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Light LH (1978) Implications of aortic blood velocity measurements in children [proceedings]. J Physiol 285:17P–18P

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lindner W, Seidel M, Versmold HT, Döhlemann C, Riegel KP (1990) Stroke volume and left ventricular output in preterm infants with patent ductus arteriosus. Pediatr Res 27:278–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Loeppky JA, Hoekenga DE, Greene ER, Luft UC (1984) Comparison of noninvasive pulsed Doppler and Fick measurements of stroke volume in cardiac patients. Am Heart J 107:339–346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Marcelino P, Germano N, Maurum S, Fernandes AP, Ribeiro P, Lopes MG (2006) Haemodynamic parameters obtained by transthoracic echocardiography and Swan-Ganz catheter: a comparative study in liver transplant patients. Acta Med Port 19:197–205

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nguyen HB, Banta DP, Stewart G, Kim T, Bansal R, Anholm J et al (2010) Cardiac index measurements by transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound and transthoracic echocardiography in adults and pediatric emergency patients. J Clin Monit Comput 24:237–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nicolosi GL, Pungercic E, Cervesato E, Pavan D, Modena L, Moro E et al (1988) Feasibility and variability of six methods for the echocardiographic and Doppler determination of cardiac output. Br Heart J 59:299–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Poutanen T, Tikanoja T, Sairanen H, Jokinen E (2003) Normal aortic dimensions and flow in 168 children and young adults. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 23:224–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Richardson JR, Ferguson J, Hiscox J, Rawles J (1998) Non-invasive assessment of cardiac output in children. J Accid Emerg Med 15:304–307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Kramer-Fox R, O’Loughlin J (1989) Two-dimensional echocardiographic aortic root dimensions in normal children and adults. Am J Cardiol 64:507–512

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sahn DJ (1985) Determination of cardiac output by echocardiographic Doppler methods: relative accuracy of various sites of measurement. J Am Coll Cardiol 6:663–664

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schubert S, Schmitz T, Weiss M, Nagdyman N, Huebler M, Alexis-Meskishvilli V et al (2008) Continuous, non-invasive techniques to determine cardiac output in children after cardiac surgery: evaluation of transoesophageal Doppler and electric velocimetry. J Clin Monit Comput 22:299–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Seear MD, D’Orsogna L, Sandor GGS, de Souza E, Popov R (1991) Doppler-derived mean aortic flow velocity in children: an alternative to cardiac index. Pediatr Cardiol 12:197–200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Slama M, Masson H, Teboul J-L, Arnout M-L, Susic D, Frohlich E et al (2002) Respiratory variations of aortic VTI: a new index of hypovolemia and fluid responsiveness. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 283:H1729–H1733

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sohn S, Soon Kim H, Han JJ (2002) Doppler flow velocity measurement to assess changes in inotropy and afterload: a study in healthy dogs. Echocardiography 19:207–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tomaske M, Knirsch W, Kretschmar O, Woitzek K, Balmer C, Schmitz A et al (2008) Cardiac output measurement in children: comparison of Aesculon® cardiac output monitor and thermodilution. Br J Anaesth 100:517–520

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tomaske M, Knirsch W, Kretschmar O, Balmer C, Woitzek K, Schmitz A et al (2009) Evaluation of the Aesculon cardiac output monitor by subxiphoidal Doppler flow measurement in children with congenital heart defects. Eur J Anaesthesiol 26:412–415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Walther FJ, Siassi B, Ramadan NA, Ananda AK, Wu PYK (1985) Pulsed Doppler determinations of cardiac output in neonates: normal standards for clinical use. Pediatrics 76:829–832

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for editorial assistance by Lisa Lennkh.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christiane Pees.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pees, C., Glagau, E., Hauser, J. et al. Reference Values of Aortic Flow Velocity Integral in 1193 Healthy Infants, Children, and Adolescents to Quickly Estimate Cardiac Stroke Volume. Pediatr Cardiol 34, 1194–1200 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-012-0628-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-012-0628-6

Keywords

Navigation