Anomalously High Recruitment of the 2010 Gulf Menhaden (Brevoortia patronus) Year Class: Evidence of Indirect Effects from the Deepwater Horizon Blowout in the Gulf of Mexico
Gulf menhaden (Brevoortia patronus) exhibited unprecedented juvenile recruitment in 2010 during the year of the Deepwater Horizon well blowout, exceeding the prior 39-year mean by more than four standard deviations near the Mississippi River. Abundance of that cohort remained exceptionally high for two subsequent years as recruits moved into older age classes. Such changes in this dominant forage fish population can be most parsimoniously explained as consequences of release from predation. Contact with crude oil induced high mortality of piscivorous seabirds, bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus), waders, and other fish-eating marsh birds, all of which are substantial consumers of Gulf menhaden. Diversions of fresh water from the Mississippi River to protect coastal marshes from oiling depressed salinities, impairing access to juvenile Gulf menhaden by aquatic predators that avoid low-salinity estuarine waters. These releases from predation led to an increase of Gulf menhaden biomass in 2011 to 2.4 million t, or more than twice the average biomass of 1.1 million t for the decade prior to 2010. Biomass increases of this magnitude in a major forage fish species suggest additional trophically linked effects at the population-, trophic-level and ecosystem scales, reflecting an heretofore little appreciated indirect effect that may be associated with major oil spills in highly productive marine waters.
Any large oil spill into the ocean typically elicits serious concerns regarding effects on fish. Oil contamination reduces the economic value of harvested fish, and evidence of oil constituents in fish tissues usually indicates more widespread contamination extending to other aquatic taxa. Although the combination of low solubility in water and low mole fractions of the toxic aromatic hydrocarbons in petroleum rarely allow aquatic concentration thresholds for acute toxicity to be attained (>~1 mg/L; Malins and Hodgins 1981; DiToro and McGrath 2000), which accounts for the usual absence of widespread fish mortalities immediately following most oil spills, oil contamination can still have serious population-level effects on fish. For example, ingested oil reduced the growth rate of juvenile pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) within the trajectory of the Exxon Valdez oil spill in Prince William Sound, Alaska (Carls et al. 1996; Wertheimer and Celewycz 1996; Willette 1996), making them more vulnerable to consumption by predators, and leading to an estimated loss of nearly 28% of the 1989 wild stock year class (Geiger et al. 1996). After the 2007 Cosco Busan oil spill, Incardona et al. (2012a, b) attributed high rates of natural spawn mortality of Pacific herring (Clupea pallasii) embryos on oil-contaminated shorelines to photo-enhanced toxicity (Arfsten et al. 1996). Confirmation of these adverse effects in the field support expectations that oil contamination from large oil spills generally suppresses survival of exposed fish populations.
Oil spills may also cause adverse effects indirectly, as a result of direct population-level effects on species that have strong ecological linkages to others. For example, extensive oiling of protected rocky intertidal shorelines, often followed by aggressive beach-cleaning efforts after the Exxon Valdez oil spill, led to widespread loss of cover normally provided by the rockweed Fucus gardneri, and promoted colonization by opportunistic species including green macroalgae and the barnacle species Chthamalus dalli, which in turn inhibited and delayed recovery of the normal sheltered rocky shore community (reviewed in Peterson et al. 2003).
Contrary to expectations, evidence supporting suppressed fish populations remained largely absent after the 2010 Deepwater Horizon blowout (DWH) in the northern Gulf of Mexico (GoM; Fodrie et al. 2014). Although Gulf killifish (Fundulus granis) resident in the immediate vicinity of heavily-oiled coastal marshes displayed adverse effects of oil exposure (Dubansky et al. 2013), populations of juveniles of more than 20 fish species inhabiting seagrass meadows east of the Mississippi River were either unchanged or increased following the DWH as compared with the previous 4 years, with juvenile spotted seatrout (Cynoscion nebulosus) increasing by a factor of ~10 in Breton and Mississippi Sounds but not further east (Fodrie and Heck 2011). Schaefer et al. (2016) found that populations of most of the 109 near-coastal fish species inhabiting Mississippi Sound and captured during their sampling increased by a factor of two or more in 2011, and then returned in 2012–2014 to abundances similar to those inferred from methodologically comparable surveys conducted from 1991 to 1994 and from 2000 to 2004.
In particular, Schaefer et al. (2016) found that the abundance of Gulf menhaden (Brevoortia patronus), which included young of the year (i.e. age-0) juveniles, increased by a factor of 10 in 2011 compared with the other years considered by their study. This extraordinarily high abundance of Gulf menhaden in Mississippi Sound during 2011 confirms the record-high recruitment indexes for the 2010 year class of Gulf menhaden near the Mississippi River delta reported by the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries (LDWF 2011a), which exceeded indices for all prior years since the record began in 1970 by a wide margin. Gulf menhaden are important both economically and ecologically in coastal waters of the GoM near the Mississippi River delta, where they support the second largest commercial fishery in the United States by volume and serve as perhaps the most important forage fish in the waters they inhabit (Geers et al. 2014; Sagarese et al. 2016).
The unprecedentedly high recruitment of Gulf menhaden during the aftermath of the DWH suggests the possibility of intervention by a strong indirect effect of coastal oiling. Fodrie and Heck (2011) and Schaefer et al. (2016) suggest that fishery closures after the DWH contributed to high recruitment and abundance of near-coastal fish in 2010 or 2011. However, offshore spawning of the 2010 Gulf menhaden year class and subsequent advection to estuarine rearing habitat were virtually completed prior to the DWH incident (Shaw et al. 1985; Deegan 1986; Shaw et al. 1988), so it is unlikely that the fishery closures during summer 2010 had much effect on the initial recruiting abundance of the 2010 year class of Gulf menhaden.
Alternatively, an heretofore little recognized possibility that could also contribute to increased abundances of juvenile Gulf menhaden and other near-coastal forage fishes after the DWH is release from predation. Specifically, oil contamination may have induced substantial mortality in species that normally prey heavily on juvenile menhaden, acting in 2010 to release them from typical predatory controls. Explicitly, many of the coastal piscivorous seabird species and bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) that were killed in large numbers by oil from the DWH (Haney et al. 2014a, Schwacke et al. 2013; Venn-Watson et al. 2015) prey heavily on juvenile Gulf menhaden and other forage fishes, such that their substantially reduced consumption of these juveniles would be evident as increased juvenile survival and hence recruitment of Gulf menhaden.
Here we quantitatively evaluate the biological, environmental and oiling exposure-related factors that may have contributed to the extraordinarily high recruitment of the 2010 Gulf menhaden year class. We rely on the extensive fishery management records of Gulf menhaden recruitment and stock assessments to estimate the likely combined effects of ordinary biological and environmental factors that typically determine recruitment by the end of their first year of life. We compare this estimate to the magnitude of recruitment documented for the 2010 year class, and to estimates of numbers of juvenile Gulf menhaden that would normally have been removed by their predators, especially seabirds, had they not been killed by oil exposure.
Study Area, Data Sources, and Methods
Gulf Menhaden Life History and Stock Assessment
Estimates of Gulf menhaden consumption foregone as a consequence of coastal seabirds killed by exposure to crude oil released from the 2010 Deepwater Horizon blowout in the Gulf of Mexico
Body mass (g)
Energetic need (kJ/bird/day)
DWH bird loss (#)
Forage fish diet %
Menhaden consumption foregone (g × 106/day)
Prey length (mm)
American white pelican
Gulf menhaden mature sexually near the end of their second year as age-1 fish and participate in the offshore reproductive migration. The age-1 and age-2 fish remain in shallow (<20 m) coastal waters during spring and summer (Turner 1969). Although older adult Gulf menhaden along the Louisiana coast have a slight tendency to move towards the Mississippi River delta (Ahrenholz 1981), the river presents a substantial barrier to mixing between sub-populations to its east and west (Kroger and Pristas 1974).
A fishery-independent trawl survey conducted by the LDWF provides the basis for a recruitment index of Gulf menhaden in Louisiana waters. The ~40-station trawl survey started in 1966, with the survey results summarized as an index for each of three zones partitioning the Louisiana coast (Fig. 1), beginning with Zone 2 only in 1970 and then expanded to all three zones beginning in 1973.
The US National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) documents the annual Gulf menhaden catch size and samples the catch for length, age and weight determinations. Based on these and other data, the NMFS assesses the Gulf menhaden stock for the whole northern GoM with the Beaufort Assessment Model (BAM), a forward-projecting, age-structured, catch-at-age with additional information (i.e. CAGEAN) model. The BAM uses the Baranov catch equation to determine the effects of fishing and natural mortality on catch, and applies a Beverton-Holt spawner-recruitment relationship (Schueller et al. 2013). Estimated parameters include recruitment to age-0 juveniles, and age- and year-specific fishing mortality and abundance. These parameters are estimated by systematically varying them to match the historical size and age structure of the catch as closely as possible. The natural mortality rates Ma, representing the decline of the Gulf menhaden population resulting from losses to predators, diseases, starvation, etc., are not estimated by the BAM but are instead model inputs that have fixed assumed values for each age a (i.e. M0 = 1.62, M1 = 1.30, M2 = 1.10, etc.) that remain invariant across years. All of the effects of environmental and ecological variability on Gulf menhaden survival are represented by the age- and year-specific fishing mortality rate estimate, Fa,y, with value of F0,y, the fishing mortality term for age-0 juveniles, assumed to be zero for all years. The BAM therefore cannot represent inter-annual variability of survival for age-0 juveniles independently, because the estimated total mortality rate for age-0 is determined only by the natural mortality rate M0. Consequently the BAM recruitment estimates to age-0 are always larger than corresponding recruitment estimates to age-1 the following year by a fixed factor of 5.05 = exp(M0 = 1.62).
We computed annual average biomass of Gulf menhaden as the product of age-specific abundance reduced by exp(−Za,y/2) to adjust abundance to the middle of the year (where Za,y is the total mortality rate for age-a fish during year y, Za,y = Ma + Fa,y, Ma from Table 3.11 and Fa,y from Table 7.2 in Schueller et al. 2013, and Fa,2012 for year 2012 set to the estimate for 2011) and average mid-year weights-at-age of 69.9, 121.6, 168.1 and 205.3 g for age-1, -2, -3 and -4+ fish respectively (from Table 3.10 in Schueller et al. 2013), and 10.5 g for age-0 fish (computed as the time-averaged integral of Eq. 2 over the 274 d that age-0 juveniles grow from average lengths of 35 mm initially to 132.4 mm final length). Our biomass estimate for 2010 is computed on the assumption of actual recruitment to age-0 in 2010 of 174 billion fish instead of 270 billion fish for reasons given in the “Appendix”.
Deepwater Horizon Blowout
The DWH produced widely transported sub-surface plumes of oil and gas that also included applied chemical dispersants (e.g. Camilli et al. 2010), caused oil contamination of shorelines over a wide span of coastline (Michel et al. 2013; Boufadel et al. 2014), and achieved a cumulative sea surface oil cover of ~120,000 km2, as estimated by satellite (e.g. Garcia-Pineda et al. 2012). About 3.3 × 105 m3 of South Louisiana crude oil reached the sea surface from the DWH over the course of 86 days (McNutt et al. 2012). Of this amount, an estimated 2.2 × 104 m3 of oil (or about 6.7% of the oil that surfaced initially) reached shore, with more than 90% of this deposited on Louisiana shores (Boufadel et al. 2014). The persistence of surface oil slicks was estimated using methods and data sources presented in the supplement to Haney et al. (2014b).
Several thousand water samples were collected by government agencies and analyzed for polycyclic aromatic compounds (PAC), including naphthalene, fluorene, dibenzothiophene, phenanthrene, anthracene, pyrene, fluoranthene, and chrysene, and including alkyl-substituted homologues bearing up to 3 (for fluorene and dibenzothiophene) or 4 (for the others) alkyl carbon atoms, and unsubstituted acenaphthylene, acenaphthene, benz[a]anthracene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[k]fluoranthene, benzo[a]pyrene, benzo[e]pyrene, perylene, indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene, dibenz[a,h]anthracene, and benzo[g,h,i]perylene. Final results for these compounds were downloaded from http://dwhdiver.orr.noaa.gov, along with the latitude, longitude, depth and date of sample collection. The sum of the concentrations of the PAC listed above are denoted herein as “total PAC”, and are presented as concentration ranges in Fig. 6 for samples collected from the upper 50 m of the water column during the months of May, June and July, 2010.
Estimation of Seabird Mortality and Foregone Consumption of Gulf Menhaden
Estimates of the numbers of coastal piscivorous seabirds killed are based on those presented in Haney et al. (2014a). Lower estimates presented by the State and Federal trustee agencies for the Natural Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA) of the Deepwater Horizon blowout were not used, mainly because the studies on which the NRDA estimates were based prioritized confidence (i.e. low type I error) at the expense of accuracy, which resulted in estimating minimum numbers of seabirds killed instead of the most likely number. The numbers killed for each species of piscivorous seabirds were computed by Haney et al. (2014a) as the number of oiled, dead carcasses of that species recovered from northern GoM shorelines during spring and summer 2010, multiplied by the inverse of the estimated probability that a bird killed by oil would be collected from a shoreline.
We computed the daily consumption of Gulf menhaden separately for each species or species group of piscivorous seabirds. The daily consumption of Gulf menhaden by a species or species group was computed as the ratio of: (1) the product of daily energy requirement for adults of that species or species group, the estimated number of birds of the species or species group that were killed by the DWH, and one half of the dietary proportion of forage fish consumed by the species or species group considered in the numerator; to (2) the product of the energy content of 5.0 kJ/g menhaden wet weight and an assumed assimilation efficiency of 75% (Roby et al. 2003; Brooke 2004) in the denominator. We assumed that Gulf menhaden furnish about half the dietary proportion of forage fish consumed by piscivorous seabirds in the region contaminated by oil from the DWH to allow for consumption of other forage fish species by these seabirds (see below).
The daily energy requirement was computed as log10 (daily energy requirement) = C + 0.726 log10 (kg bird body mass) for the field metabolic requirement of seabirds using C = 3.00 for non-flapping flight (loons, black skimmer (Rynchops niger), grebes and cormorants), or C = 3.19 for flapping flight (all the other seabirds listed in Table 1). This equation is taken from Birt-Friesen et al. (1989), and values for C are from Table 4 therein. Bird body masses are from Sibley (2014), and proportions of forage fish and observed prey lengths in seabird diets were inferred from species accounts in The Birds of North America Online (http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna) and references therein.
The average energy content of 5.0 kJ/g wet weight for juvenile menhaden was computed as [(23.64 kJ/g) × (% protein) + (40.16 kJ/g) × (% fat)]/100 from Table 1 in Deegan (1986), which gives percentages of protein and of fat of 16.6 and 2.7% respectively on a wet weight basis for juvenile menhaden averaging 55 mm in length (i.e. about 9 months post fertilization of an age-0 juvenile).
We assumed Gulf menhaden account for about one half of the forage fish consumed by the piscivorous seabirds based on consideration of: (1) the usually turbid waters that limit visual detection of forage fish by avian predators to the uppermost 1 m or less of the water column in Louisiana estuaries, which schools of juvenile Gulf menhaden frequently inhabit (e.g. Deegan 1990); and (2) lower detectability of other abundant forage fish in Louisiana estuaries to avian predators, including bay anchovy (Anchoa mitchilli), juvenile Atlantic croaker (Micropogonias undulatus), juvenile sand seatrout (Cynoscion arenarius), darter goby (Gobionellus boleosoma), naked goby (Gobiosoma bosc), and other demersal species, either because their peak abundance is achieved during fall or winter, or they do not form schools near the sea surface that would be visible from the air, or they have size ranges that are mostly below 40 mm in length, or they prefer waters farther offshore and at deeper depths, or a combination of these factors, in comparison with juvenile Gulf menhaden (Jones et al. 2002; Baltz and Jones 2003). The diet composition of the one piscivorous seabird species in the region for which detailed studies are available (brown pelican) indicate heavy (up to 95%) dependence on Gulf menhaden (reviewed in Fogarty et al. 1981), suggesting that diets of the other piscivorous species listed in this table may be similarly dominated by Gulf menhaden in response to high detectability of this forage fish when present schooling in the upper 1 m of the water column.
Results and Discussion
Recruitment of the 2010 Gulf Menhaden Recruitment Year Class
As integrated by the BAM stock assessment, the monitoring data led to a recruitment estimate of 270 billion Gulf menhaden to the initial age-0 juvenile stage in 2010 (Fig. 5). This is 6.2 standard deviations (1 standard deviation = 26.8 billion fish) above the 105.9 billion average of previous yearly recruitments to the initial age-0 juvenile stage from 1977 through 2009. It is also 3.6 standard deviations, or nearly 100 billion fish, more than the previous record-high recruitment to age-0 of 174 billion fish in 1984 (Fig. 5). The corresponding BAM estimate of age-1 fish in 2011 from the 2010 year class is 53.5 billion fish [=2.7 × 1010 exp(M0 = −1.62)], or 19 billion more fish than the 34.5 billion age-1 fish from the 1984 year class in 1985. Thus, the increase of the age-1 population from the 2010 year class over the age-1 population from the 1984 year class, the largest year class prior to 2010 since the record began in 1977, is nearly as large as the entire cohort population at age-1 for a typical year (21 billion age-1 fish; Fig. 5).
Surface Oiling from the Deepwater Horizon Blowout
The severity of coastal oiling also reflects the likely spatial distribution of seabirds killed by contact with surface oil slicks. Nearly all of the hundreds of thousands of coastal seabirds estimated to have been killed by contact with oil slicks from the DWH (Haney et al. 2014a) were piscivorous, and the population densities of such seabirds decrease rapidly with distance offshore (Mills 1998; Amorim et al. 2008; Zakkak et al. 2013). Seabird mortalities are thereby predicted to be greatest where the heaviest and most persistent oil slicks intersected with the highest seabird population densities, which occurred along the western side of the Mississippi River delta and shoreward of the coastal barrier island immediately further west, hence especially in Barataria Bay (i.e. LDWF Zone 2; Figs. 1, 6), and immediately east of the Mississippi River delta shoreward of the coastal barrier islands in Breton and Mississippi Sounds (i.e. LDWF Zone 1). In Barataria Bay, heavy oil slicks persisted for weeks (Fig. 6), which may have nearly extirpated seabird populations there given the great sensitivity of seabirds to contact with even small amounts of crude oil (Leighton 1993). More generally, comparison of the spatial variation of seabird mortality inferred from the distribution of coastal oiling intensity and persistence (Fig. 6) with Gulf menhaden recruitment strength in 2010 (Figs. 1, 3) indicates that the two may be closely related.
Indirect Effects of the Deepwater Horizon Blowout on Gulf Menhaden Recruitment
Removal of seabirds that prey on juvenile Gulf menhaden necessarily increased survival of the juvenile Gulf menhaden. We address the question of how much impact the losses of piscivorous seabirds had on numbers of juvenile Gulf menhaden that would have been consumed had the oiled seabirds remained unaffected by the DWH. Haney et al. (2014a) computed a total of 535,000 (with 95% certainty within about 160,000–1,200,000) dead seabirds that, when alive, prey substantively on forage fish. About half of this total was laughing gulls (Leucophaeus atricilla). Other contributing species and species groups include other gulls, pelicans, terns, northern gannets, loons, cormorants, grebes and black skimmers (Table 1).
Based on our computations of the daily energetic requirements of seabirds satisfied through consumption of Gulf menhaden (see Methods), we estimate consumption of about 5 × 107 g wet weight of juvenile Gulf menhaden per day by 535,000 dead seabirds distributed among species according to estimated numbers killed (Table 1). Northern gannets (Morus bassanus), laughing gulls, brown pelicans (Pelecanus occidentalus) and assorted tern species account for 93% of this consumption, and typically target forage fish ranging from 30 to 100 mm in length.
The estimated numbers of juveniles equivalent to the wet weight of un-consumed Gulf menhaden is sensitive to the assumed size selectivity of the seabird predators for their forage fish prey, and the vulnerability of fish within the preferred size ranges. Juvenile Gulf menhaden spend about 3 months from the time they begin forming schools in open estuarine waters at about 40 mm in length (Deegan 1986) to reach 62 mm in length (Eq. 1). The range of the Gulf menhaden spawning season and the subsequent developmental time ranges leads to metamorphosis to juveniles from about mid-April through mid-August, with the bulk of schooling 40–62 mm juveniles present from about mid-May through mid-September (Fig. 2). Juvenile Gulf menhaden schools are probably most vulnerable to avian predation during the initial 2 or 3 months after forming schools in the more open estuarine waters, when their schools are most readily visible from the air in the shallow estuarine waters. Note that the initial formation of these juvenile Gulf menhaden schools in large numbers coincided closely with the onset of widespread seabird mortalities from coastal oiling in 2010 (Fig. 2), so that the piscivorous seabirds that would have heavily targeted these fish schools were rapidly diminished just as the schools became widely exposed to avian predation.
If consumption of Gulf menhaden were mainly satisfied by juveniles 40–62 mm in length when they are initially exposed to predation by coastal seabirds, an average weight of 2 g for this size range of Gulf menhaden (computed as the time-averaged integral of Eq. 2 over the time required for length to increase from 40 to 62 mm) implies a daily consumption of about 2.5 × 107 fish [=(5 × 107 g)/(2 g/fish)]. This suggests that oil-caused mortality of 535,000 seabirds may have increased survival of juvenile Gulf menhaden by ~2.5 × 107 fish/day, or by a total of ~5 billion fish [=(2.5 × 107 fish/day)(200 days)] over the course of 6+ months from the onset of bird mortalities in mid-May through late November of 2010 (Fig. 2).
Foregone consumption of ~5 billion juvenile Gulf menhaden in the coastal area by the estimated 535,000 seabirds killed by the DWH is ecologically feasible given the abundance of age-0 juveniles during a typical year. The assumed natural mortality rate M0 = 1.62 implies that, for an average year, the initial recruitment of 105.9 billion fish at metamorphosis to the age-0 juvenile life stage (Fig. 5) declines to 21 billion juveniles [=105.9 billion fish × exp(−1.62)] at the beginning of age-1 the following year, indicating that 85 billion age-0 juvenile Gulf menhaden (i.e. 105.9 billion–21 billion) are either consumed by predators, or die from diseases, exposure to hypoxic conditions, or other factors that contribute to the natural mortality rate. This suggests that consumption of age-0 Gulf menhaden by all avian predators combined, including those not accounted for in Table 1 and those that survived the DWH, could range into the tens of billions during a typical year and still only account for a modest fraction of the ~85 billion age-0 Gulf menhaden that are removed in total. Such a substantive role played by seabird predation on a forage fish population is not unique, as it has been noted previously for the anchoveta (Engraulis ringens) fishery off Peru (Schaefer 1970).
We underestimate enhanced survival of juvenile Gulf menhaden in the coastal area by excluding (1) avian predation on fish smaller than 40 mm in length, (2) the increase in energy demands to provision seabird chicks, and (3) predation foregone by bottlenose dolphins and other piscivorous marine mammals killed by exposure to oil (Schwacke et al. 2013; Venn-Watson et al. 2015). Perhaps more importantly, we did not consider reduced predation associated with un-quantified yet evident, oil-induced mortality among the piscivorous birds inhabiting the extensive marshes and estuarine shorelines associated with the Mississippi River delta. Marsh-dwelling birds, such as herons, egrets, rails, bitterns, and cormorants, may prey heavily on small juvenile menhaden, but their population losses from oil contact were not well quantified. The combined additional consumption of juvenile Gulf menhaden by seabirds to meet demands to provision chicks, by bottlenose dolphins and other piscivorous marine mammals that were killed, and by marsh-dwelling birds could increase substantially the actual survival of age-0 Gulf menhaden to well above the ~5 billion fish we estimate on the basis of the oiled seabird carcasses retrieved from shorelines.
Depressed salinities that resulted from diversion of Mississippi River water to coastal marshes to reduce oiling from the DWH may have been another source of indirect effects that decreased predation mortality of juvenile Gulf menhaden. The State of Louisiana dramatically increased the flow rates out of Mississippi River freshwater diversions into Barataria Bay and Breton Sound to impede the flow of oil into upper estuary marshes. Freshwater flow to these marshes increased by a factor of ~5 from late April through late July for eastern marshes or through early-September 2010 for western marshes (O’connor 2013; Fig. 2). The salinities of marshes east of the Mississippi River remained below 10‰ out to the open waters of Breton Sound during May and June 2010 (LDWF 2010), and below 6‰ west of the Mississippi River to western Barataria Bay from June through early September 2010 (LDWF 2011b). These diversions also correspond with the period of greatest abundance of 40–62 mm age-0 Gulf menhaden (Fig. 2). These abnormally low salinities provided enlarged areas of effective shelter for juvenile Gulf menhaden from predation by marine fishes and invertebrate predators that usually consume juvenile Gulf menhaden but prefer higher salinities (Das et al. 2012) contributing to increased survival and hence recruitment of Gulf menhaden to age 1.
Our estimate of increased survival on the order of 5 billion or more juvenile Gulf menhaden serves primarily to demonstrate that the deaths of hundreds of thousands of coastal seabirds would certainly have increased survival of age-0 Gulf menhaden substantially, feasibly by several billions of fish. Greater precision in such estimates is unwarranted given the considerable uncertainties associated with the numbers of coastal seabirds killed, their actual daily energy requirements, their dietary dependence on Gulf menhaden, prey size selectivity, and dates of onset of mortality of birds that regularly prey on juvenile Gulf menhaden. In any case a survival increase of even ~5 billion age-0 juveniles in the coastal area, based only on the oiled seabird carcasses retrieved from shorelines, is sufficiently large to be considered as substantive in comparison with recruitment of 21 billion juveniles to age-1 during a typical year (Fig. 5).
Other Factors Affecting Gulf Menhaden Recruitment in 2010
Compared with many other forage fish species, the population of Gulf menhaden had been extraordinarily stable prior to the DWH, varying in abundance by less than a factor of 3 from 1977 to 2009 (Fig. 5). Population fecundity determines the initial abundance of Gulf menhaden larvae, while marine feeding conditions and speed of physically driven transport to estuarine rearing habitat determine initial survival. Subsequent survival in estuaries as larvae grow and metamorph to juveniles varies with availability of food supplies and oxygen, and with losses to predation. In 2010, direct interactions arising from the toxic effects of crude oil and dispersants following the DWH must also be considered as factors potentially affecting recruitment.
Weak correlation between fecundity and recruitment, as estimated by the BAM from 1977 through 2009 (r = −0.251, df = 31, P = 0.159; from data presented in Tables 7.4 and 7.5 in Schueller et al. 2013; plotted in Fig. 5), indicate that Gulf menhaden recruitment is mainly determined by factors other than fecundity. Estimated Gulf menhaden fecundity for the 2010 year class was 36.4 trillion eggs, about 81% of the average fecundity of 45.1 trillion eggs for 1977–2009, which should have led to near-average recruitment in 2010 if recruitment were determined mainly by fecundity.
Schools of juvenile Gulf menhaden experience large fish kills in shallow estuarine waters during exceptionally hot weather, which contribute to natural mortality (VanderKooy and Smith 2002). Cool summers may therefore be expected to promote the recruitment of age-1 juveniles. However, as measured by the number of days when the maximum air temperature at New Orleans exceeded 35 °C, 2010 was the 4th hottest summer since 1977, thereby increasing the likelihood of large fish kills caused by estuarine hypoxia and hence reducing recruitment.
The seasonal succession of habitats occupied by the 2010 year class of Gulf menhaden ensured that direct effects of exposure to crude oil released during the DWH or to dispersants released subsequently were virtually negligible. By the time the blowout occurred on 20 April, the offshore spawning of the 2010 year class was complete and nearly all of the larvae had been transported to brackish upper-estuarine rearing habitat, removing larvae away from possible exposure to crude oil or dispersants (Fig. 2). Juvenile Gulf menhaden from the earliest spawning of the 2010 year class in fall 2009 would have begun forming schools and occupying more open and saline estuarine waters by March or April, where they did not encounter oil until these habitats became oiled initially in mid-May. Similarly, juveniles from later spawns would have first encountered oil in the open estuarine waters for a few weeks at most during June and early July. Exposure to contaminants derived from dispersants or from crude oil from the DWH was therefore limited to intermittent or transient occupancy of waters beneath surface oil slicks for a few days or weeks by a small part of the 2010 year class of Gulf menhaden, even in heavily oiled embayments such as Barataria Bay, because surface slicks were widespread in these embayments for less than about 2 of the 6+ months of outmigration of juveniles from their brackish upper-estuarine rearing habitat.
Direct toxicity of crude oil or dispersants that were associated with the DWH to age-0 juvenile Gulf menhaden, or to the piscivorous fishes that consume them was also probably negligible, because of the low aqueous solubility of toxic components in crude oil or dispersants and the great dilution capacity of the receiving surface waters. Toxicity thresholds depend on mode of toxic action, ranging from narcosis induced mainly by mono- and dicyclic aromatic compounds at concentrations near one part per million (Malins and Hodgins 1981; DiToro and McGrath 2000), to embryotoxic and photo-enhanced toxicity induced by certain PAC at less than one part per billion (Carls et al. 2002; Duesterloh et al. 2002; Mager et al. 2014). However, contaminant monitoring after the DWH provides little support for inferring toxic effects of oil to aquatic organisms present in the nearshore water column, except in the immediate vicinity of shorelines that were heavily and persistently oiled. The overwhelming majority of surface seawater samples taken from the uppermost 50 m near shore during 2010 failed even to detect PAC at detection limits in the low parts per trillion (Fig. 6). Deployment of polyethylene membrane passive sampling devices along the coast of the northern GoM before and after shoreline oiling from the DWH confirm these results (Allan et al. 2012). Total PAC concentrations inferred from these deployments were consistently less than 0.03 µg/L at all but one station (Grand Terre, LA), where concentrations approached 0.2 µg/L during early summer 2010 but declined to <0.03 µg/L by August.
Comparison of Ordinary Factors that Typically Affect Gulf Menhaden Recruitment with Indirect Effects of the Deepwater Horizon Blowout
Ordinary biological and environmental factors that typically affect Gulf menhaden recruitment, such as changes in population fecundity, early life stage feeding conditions, speed of transport to estuarine rearing habitat, etc., alone or in combination, fail to adequately account for the extraordinarily high recruitment of juvenile Gulf menhaden documented in 2010. Prior to 2010, the highest recruitment of age-0 Gulf menhaden estimated by the BAM in 1984 led to an estimate of 34 billion age-1 Gulf menhaden at the beginning of 1985 (Fig. 5). The 2.5 standard deviation increase of age-0 recruitment observed in the 2010 LDWF trawl surveys west of the Atchafalaya River (Fig. 3), which was much less affected by oiling from the DWH, suggests the magnitude of the increased recruitment in 2010 that may be attributed to the combined effects of the ordinary biological and environmental factors that typically affect recruitment. Given that average recruitment to age 1 from 1977 through 2009 was 21 billion fish with a standard deviation of 5.3 billion (Fig. 5), 2.5 standard deviations above the mean amounts to a population size at age-1 of 34 billion fish, similar to the previous record set by the 1984 year class. Recruitment of age-0 Gulf menhaden in 1998, when larval feeding conditions offshore were nearly as favorable as in 2010 (Fig. 8), led to 24 billion age-1 Gulf menhaden in 1999. Given that favorable larval feeding conditions offshore in 2010 were at least partially offset by unfavorable conditions for larval transport onshore to estuarine nursery habitat, it seems unlikely that even an unusually favorable combination of ordinary biological and environmental factors that typically affect recruitment would have led to an age-1 population much greater than 34 billion fish from the 2010 year class.
The 2010 Gulf menhaden year class had an estimated 53.5 billion age-1 fish, or ~19 billion more than the ~34 billion age-1 fish we consider near the maximum that could result from the combined effects of ordinary biological and environmental factors. This additional ~19 billion age-1 fish above the highest previously-estimated recruitment on record (in 1984, see Fig. 5), is nearly equivalent to the median recruitment of 21 billion age-1 fish from 1977 to 2009, and hence is, by itself, nearly as large as the entire recruitment of Gulf menhaden during a typical prior year. Of this ~19 billion increase of age-1 fish, decreased predation caused indirectly by the DWH may well have been the major contributing cause. This increased survival of several billions from decreased predation does not imply unreasonably high numbers of seabirds killed, of juvenile Gulf menhaden that would ordinarily be consumed by them, or unfeasibly large proportions of natural mortality losses implied by the foregone consumption. Although our assumptions led to an estimated additional survival of ~5 billion juvenile Gulf menhaden in the coastal area because of the piscivorous seabirds killed by the DWH, overall survivals could have been considerably higher if more seabirds were killed, or the seabirds killed preferred to consume smaller sizes of juveniles or smaller sizes were more available to them, or juvenile Gulf menhaden account for substantially more than 50% of forage fish consumed by these seabirds during summer and fall. Recognizing the additional numbers of juvenile Gulf menhaden that were not consumed to provision the chicks of the seabirds killed, or that would have been consumed by the bottlenose dolphins or piscivorous birds inhabiting marshes that were killed by exposure to oil, along with possibly reduced predation by aquatic predators that avoid low-salinity estuarine waters, suggests to us that most or even all of the ~19 billion additional surviving age-1 juvenile Gulf menhaden may have been an indirect consequence of direct effects of the DWH on predators of juvenile Gulf menhaden.
Conversely, ordinary biological and environmental factors that typically affect Gulf menhaden recruitment, alone or in combination, fail to provide an obvious explanation for the strong variation of Gulf menhaden recruitment along the Louisiana coast in 2010, where recruitment was strongest where coastal oiling was heaviest and most persistent (Fig. 6), whereas oil-caused mortalities of coastal seabirds and marine mammals account for this variation readily. While it is always possible that some unknown combination of factors may in fact be responsible for the extraordinary recruitment of juvenile Gulf menhaden, we could find no evidence that substantively contradicts the effects we have ascribed to release from predation caused by the DWH, and we do find considerable circumstantial evidence in support. We therefore conclude that mortalities of seabirds, marsh birds and marine mammals, perhaps augmented by habitat exclusion of aquatic predators intolerant of low salinities, was a major factor explaining the anomalously large recruitment of the 2010 year class of Gulf menhaden.
Our evaluation of the potential causes of spatially explicit increases in recruitment of Gulf menhaden following the DWH provides compelling evidence for a little appreciated environmental effect that may be generally induced by large oil spills. Actually, this effect of increased fishery recruitment may have been observed but not recognized many times before in fishery populations after major oil spills, with the analysts looking at the affected populations failing to observe this signal when mixed in with large process errors in computing recruitment. Following the DWH, the increases of numerous fish species reported by Fodrie and Heck (2011) and by Schaefer et al. (2016) may also have resulted mainly from reduced predation from piscivorous seabirds killed by exposure to DWH oil. We arbitrarily assumed that juvenile Gulf menhaden furnished 50% of the forage fish diet of the piscivorous seabirds listed in Table 1, the other 50% being furnished by other species of forage fishes. Hence, our estimate of increased survival on the order of ~5 billion age-0 Gulf menhaden in the coastal area implies a survival increase of comparable magnitude for the other forage fish species that would have been consumed by piscivorous seabirds had they not been killed by oil from the DWH.
This process whereby recruitment of Gulf menhaden and of other forage fish species is enhanced in nearshore nursery habitats may have had consequences at the ecosystem scale in the northern Gulf of Mexico. The increased recruitment of the 2010 year class of Gulf menhaden led to an increase of population biomass of nearly 1.3 million t, or more than twice the average biomass of 1.1 million t for the decade prior to 2010. An increase of this magnitude in a forage fish species that is already a major component of the neritic ecosystem of the northern GoM (Geers et al. 2014; Sagarese et al. 2016) raises the possibility of additional effects associated with trophic linkages to Gulf menhaden at population-, trophic-level and ecosystem scales. Substantially greater biomass of Gulf menhaden would increase predation on their planktonic prey, which could conceivably affect recruitment of other aquatic species that co-inhabit waters occupied by Gulf menhaden. Greater biomass of Gulf menhaden in 2011 (Fig. 5) also increased their availability to their surviving predators, presumably benefiting their recovery. Analyses of the dynamics of interacting species in this study suggest that indirect effects of large oil spills may be much more important, more subtle and wide-reaching than has been previously appreciated.
This study was in part funded jointly by the Murray Law Firm and by Cossich, Sumich, Parsiola & Taylor LLC. Findings in this manuscript reflect those of the authors only. The authors thank J. Allen, C. Brodersen, and B. Mecum for figure preparation, and R. Heintz, G. Kruse, A. Schueller and D. Vaughan for helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest pertaining to this manuscript.
- Ahrenholz DW (1981) Recruitment and exploitation of Gulf menhaden, Brevoortia patronus. Fish Bull 79:325–335Google Scholar
- Carls MG, Wertheimer AC, Short JW, Smolowitz RM, Stegeman JJ (1996) Contamination of the juvenile pink and chum salmon by hydrocarbons in Prince William Sound after the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Am Fish Soc Symp 18:593–607Google Scholar
- Christmas JY, McBee JT, Waller RS, Sutter FC III (1982) Habitat suitability index models: gulf menhaden. Report FWS/OBS-82/10.23, U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife ServiceGoogle Scholar
- Fogarty MJ, Nesbitt SA, Gilbert CR (1981) Diet of nestling brown pelicans in Florida. Fla Field Nat 9:38–40Google Scholar
- Geiger H, Bue BG, Sharr S, Wertheimer AC, Willett TM (1996) A life history approach to estimating damage to Prince William Sound pink salmon caused by the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Am Fish Soc Symp 18:487–498Google Scholar
- Guillory V, Geaghan J, Roussel J (1983) Influence of environmental factors on Gulf menhaden recruitment. Tech Bullet 37, Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, New Orleans, LAGoogle Scholar
- Hettler WF Jr (1984) Description of eggs, larvae and early juveniles of gulf menhaden, Brevoortia patronus, and comparisons with Atlantic menhaden, B. tyrannus, and yellowfin menhaden, B. smithi. Fish Bull 82:85–95Google Scholar
- Karnauskas M, Schirripa MJ, Kelble CR, Cook GS, Craig JK (2013) Ecosystem status report for the Gulf of Mexico. NOAA technical memorandum, NMFS-SEFSC-653. US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Miami, FLGoogle Scholar
- Kroger RL, Pristas PJ (1974) Movements of tagged juvenile menhaden (Brevoortia patronus) in the Gulf of Mexico. Tex J Sci 26:473–477Google Scholar
- Lewis RM, Roithmayr CM (1981) Spawning and sexual maturity of gulf menhaden, Brevoortia patronus. Fish Bull 78:947–951Google Scholar
- Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries (2010) Oyster stock assessment report of the public oyster areas in Louisiana seed grounds and seed reservations. Oyster data report series no. 16, Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Baton Rouge, LAGoogle Scholar
- Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries (2011a) 2011 Louisiana menhaden forecast. Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Baton RougeGoogle Scholar
- Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries (2011b) Oyster stock assessment report of the public oyster areas in Louisiana seed grounds and seed reservations. Oyster data report series no. 17, Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Baton Rouge, LAGoogle Scholar
- O’connor B (2013) Impacts of the anomalous Mississippi River discharge and diversions on phytoplankton blooming in northeastern Gulf of Mexico. MS thesis, University of South Florida, Tampa, FLGoogle Scholar
- Reintjes JW, June FC (1961) A challenge to the fish meal and oil industry in the Gulf of Mexico. Proc Gulf Caribb Fish Inst 13:62–66Google Scholar
- Schueller A, Smith J, VanderKooy S (2013) Southeast data, assessment, and review 32A gulf of Mexico menhaden assessment report. Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission, Ocean SpringsGoogle Scholar
- Schwacke LH, Smith CR, Townsend FI, Wells RS, Hart LB, Balmer BC, Collier TK, De Guise S, Fry MM, Guillette LJ Jr, Lamb SV (2013) Health of common bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in Barataria Bay, Louisiana, following the “Deepwater Horizon” oil spill. Environ Sci Technol 48:93–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shaw RF, Cowan JA Jr, Tilman TL (1985) Distribution and density of Brevoortia patronus (gulf menhaden) eggs and larvae in the continental shelf waters of Western Louisiana. Bull Mar Sci 36:96–103Google Scholar
- Shaw RF, Rogers BD, Cowan JH Jr, Herke WH (1988) Ocean-estuary coupling of ichthyoplankton and nekton in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Am Fish Soc Symp 3:77–89Google Scholar
- Sibley DA (2014) The sibley field guide to birds of Eastern North America. Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- VanderKooy SJ, Smith JW (eds) (2002) The menhaden fishery of the Gulf of Mexico, United States: a regional management plan. Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission, Ocean SpringsGoogle Scholar
- Venn-Watson S, Colegrove KM, Litz J, Kinsel M, Terio K, Saliki J, Fire S, Carmichael R, Chevis C, Hatchett W, Pitchford J (2015) Adrenal gland and lung lesions in Gulf of Mexico common bottle-nose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) found dead following the “Deepwater Horizon” oil spill. PLoS ONE 10:e0126538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wertheimer AC, Celewycz AG (1996) Abundance and growth of juvenile pink salmon in oiled and non-oiled locations of Prince William Sound after the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Am Fish Soc Symp 18:518–532Google Scholar
- Willette M (1996) Impacts of the Exxon Valdez oil spill on the migration, growth and survival of juvenile pink salmon in Prince William Sound. Am Fish Soc Symp 18:533–550Google Scholar
- Zakkak S, Panagiotopoulou M, Halley JM (2013) Estimating the abundance of shearwaters and gulls in the north Aegean Sea. Mar Ornithol 41:141–148Google Scholar
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.