Advertisement

Assessment of Geochemical Mobility of Metals in Surface Sediments of the Santa Rosalia Mining Region, Western Gulf of California

  • Evgueni Shumilin
  • Vyacheslav Gordeev
  • Griselda Rodríguez Figueroa
  • Liudmila Demina
  • Konstantin Choumiline
Article

Abstract

To asses the geomobility of cadmium, copper, iron, manganese, nickel, lead, and zinc in marine sediments near the Santa Rosalía copper smelter, which is located on the eastern coast of the Baja California Peninsula, sequential leaching was applied to sediment samples containing different levels of Cu: (1) uncontaminated or slightly contaminated (<55 mg kg−1 Cu); (2) moderately contaminated (55–500 mg kg−1 Cu); and (3) heavily contaminated (>500 mg kg−1 Cu). Concentrations of Cd, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, and Zn in four fractions of the leachate (mobile fraction F1, relatively mobile fraction F2, associated with organic matter/sulphides fraction F3, and residual fraction F4) were measured by atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS). The sediments with Cu concentration <500 mg kg−1 displayed prevalence of mobile acid-leachable fraction F1 and reducible fraction F2 for Cd, Cu, Mn, and Pb, whereas the relative contribution of fraction F3 was relatively low for all of the examined metals. Residual fraction F4 was highest (>65%) for Fe and Ni because both metals are associated with the crystalline matrix of natural sediments. The sediments heavily contaminated with Cu (>500 mg kg−1) had dramatically increased percentages of Cu, Mn, Pb, and Zn, ranging on average from 63 to 81%, in the residual fraction. In the case of Cu, for example, the relative abundances of this element in the different fractions of such sediments followed this sequence: residual fraction F4 (76 ± 5%) >absorbed form and carbonates fraction F1 (15 ± 5%) >Fe and Mn oxyhydroxides fraction F2 (5 ± 2%) >fraction associated with organic matter and sulphides F3 (4.5 ± 3.9%). Copper, Pb, and Zn contents in each geochemical fraction of all samples were compared with sediment-quality guideline values (“effects range low” [ERL] and “effects range medium” [ERM]) to assess their possible negative effects on biota. Copper contents in mobile fractions F1 and F2, which were moderately contaminated with Cu, were higher than ERL but lower than ERM guideline values. For heavily contaminated sediments, Zn contents of mobile fractions F1 and F2 were higher than ERL but lower than ERM guideline values. The Cu content of fraction F1 was higher than ERM guideline values, whereas for fractions F2 and F3 copper content was higher than ERL guidelines but still lower than ERM guideline values.

Keywords

Marine Sediment Residual Fraction Cathodic Protection Mobile Fraction Baja California Peninsula 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work received financial support (Grant No. 50421) from the Mixed Fund of Secretaría de Educación Pública and Consejo Nacional de Tecnología of Mexico for the project “The evaluation of the role of zooplankton and particulate material in the biogeochemistry of the trace element in the central region of the Gulf of California.” We are also thankful to the technical personnel of Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas for invaluable assistance during fieldwork.

References

  1. Alagarsamy R, Wolff GA, Chester R (2005) Partitioning and speciation of trace metal diagenesis in different depositional environments in the sediments of the Oman margin. Appl Geochem 11:195–213Google Scholar
  2. Audry S, Blanc G, Schafer J (2006) Solid-state partitioning of trace metals in suspended particulate matter from a river system affected by smelting-waste drainage. Sci Tot Environ 363:216–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bacon JR, Davidson CM (2007) Is there a future for sequential chemical extraction? Analyst 133:25–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldi F, Bargagli R (1984) Mercury pollution in marine sediments near a chloralkali plant: Distribution and availability of the metals. Sci Tot Environ 39:15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Billon G, Ouddane B, Laureyns J, Boughriet A (2001) Chemistry of metal sulfides in anoxic sediments. Phys Chem Chem Phys 3:3586–3592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bird G, Brewer PA, Macklin MG, Balteanu D, Driga B, Serban M, Zaharia S (2003) The solid-state partitioning of contaminant metals and As in river channel sediments of the mining-affected Tisa drainage basin, northwestern Romania and eastern Hungary. Appl Geochem 18:1583–1595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boughriet A, Proix N, Billon G, Recourt P, Ouddane B (2006) Environmental impacts of heavy-metal discharges from a smelter in Deûle-canal sediments (northern France): Concentration levels and chemical fractionation. Water Air Soil Pollut 180:83–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boughriet A, Recourt P, Proix N, Billon G, Leermakers M, Fischer J-C, Ouddane B (2007) Fractionation of anthropogenic lead and zinc in Deûle River sediments. Environ Chem 4:114–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chester R (2003) Marine geochemistry. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  10. Chester R, Hughes MJ (1967) A chemical technique for the separation of ferromanganese minerals and adsorbed trace metals from pelagic sediments. Chem Geol 2:249–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Choi S, Wao O, Coi T, Li X, Tsang C (2006) Distribution of cadmium, chromium, copper, lead and zinc in marine sediments in Hong Kong waters. Environ Geol 51:455–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Choumiline E, Mendez Rodriguez L, Morton Bermea O, Rodríguez Meza G, Rodríguez Figueroa G, Sanchez Rodriguez I, Vargas Acosta B (2006) Biogeochemical evaluation of the heavy metals in the marine environment of the Santa Rosalía mining district (B.C.S.) [in Spanish]. Final technical report of the SEMARNAT-CONACYT Project C01-1425Google Scholar
  13. Conly AG, Brenan JM, Bellon H, Scott SD (2005) Arc to rift transitional volcanism in Santa Rosalía region, Baja California Sur, Mexico. J Volcanol Geothermal Res 142:303–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Conly AG, Beaudoin G, Scott SD (2006) Isotopic constraints on fluid evolution and precipitation mechanisms for the Boléo Cu-Co-Zn district. Miner Deposit 41:127–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davidson CM, Thomas RP, McVey SL, Perala R, Littlejohn D, Ure AM (1994) Evaluation of a sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of heavy metals in sediments. Analyt Chim Acta 291:277–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Demina LL, Shumilin Ye N, Tambiev SB (1985) Forms taken by metals in the suspensate of Indian Ocean surface waters. Geochem Int 21:123–134Google Scholar
  17. Demina LL, Levitan MA, Politova NV (2006) Speciation of some heavy metals in bottom sediments of the Ob and Yenisei estuarine zones. Geochem Int 44:182–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Folk RL (1974) Petrology of sedimentary rocks. Hemphill, Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
  19. Gibbs RJ (1973) Mechanisms of trace metal transport in rivers. Science 180:71–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gibbs RJ (1977) Transport phases of transition metals in the Amazon and Yukon rivers. Bull Geol Soc Am 88:829–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Horowitz AJ (1991) A primer on sediment-trace element chemistry. Lewis, Chelsea, MIGoogle Scholar
  22. Huerta-Diaz MA, Morse JW (1992) Pyritization of trace metals in anoxic marine sediments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 56:2681–2702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Imperato M, Adamo P, Naimo D, Stanzione D, Violante P (2003) Spatial distribution of heavy metals in urban soils of Naples city (Italy). Environ Pollut 124:247–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. International Atomic Energy Agency (1985) Intercomparison of trace element measurements in sediment sample SDN-1/2. Report No. 24. IAEA, MonacoGoogle Scholar
  25. Jonathan MP, Ram Mohan V (2003) Heavy metals in sediments of the inner shelf off the Gulf of Mannar, South East Coast of India. Mar Pollut Bull 46:263–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kartal S, Ayudin Z, Tokahoglu S (2006) Fractionation of metals in street sediment samples by using the BCR sequential extraction procedure and multivariate statistical elucidation of data. J Hazard Mater 132:80–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kitano Y, Fujiyoshi R (1980) Selective chemical leaching of cadmium, copper, manganese and iron in marine sediments. Geochem J 14:122–123Google Scholar
  28. Lee MR, Correa JA, Seed R (2006) A sediment quality triad assessment of the impact of copper mine tailings disposal on the littoral sedimentary environment in the Atacama region of northern Chile. Mar Pollut Bull 52:1389–1395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ljutsarev AV (1987) Determination of organic carbon in sea-bottom sediments by dry combustion. Oceanology 26:533–536Google Scholar
  30. Long ER, Macdonald DD, Smith SL, Calder FD (1995) Incidence of adverse biological effects within ranges of chemical concentrations in marine and estuarine sediments. Environ Manag 19:81–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moore JW, Ramamoorthy S (1984) Heavy metals in natural waters. Applied monitoring and impact assessment. Springer Verlag, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  32. Morillo J, Usero J, Gracia I (2002) Partitioning of metals in sediments from the Odiel River (Spain). Environ Int 28:263–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morillo J, Usero J, Gracia I (2004) Heavy metal distributions in marine sediments from the south western coast of Spain. Chemosphere 55:431–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morillo J, Usero J, Gracia I (2007) Potential mobility of metals in polluted coastal sediments of two bays of southern Spain. J Coast Res 23:352–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Navarro A, Collado D, Carbonell M, Sánchez J (2004) Impact of mining activities on soils in a semi-arid environment: Sierra Almagrera district, SE Spain. Environ Geochem Health 26:383–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ngiam L-S, Lim P-E (2001) Speciation patterns of heavy metals in tropical estuarine anoxic and oxidized sediments by different sequential extraction schemes. Sci Total Environ 275:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ochoa-Landín L, Ruiz J, Calmus T, Pérez-Segura E, Escandón F (2000) Sedimentology and stratigraphy of the Upper Miocene El Boleo Formation, Santa Rosalía, Baja California, Mexico. Rev Mex Cienc Geol 17:83–96Google Scholar
  38. Otero XL, Huerta-Diaz MA, Macías F (2003) Influence of a turbidite deposit on the extent of pyritization of iron, manganese, and trace metals in sediments from the Guaymas Basin, Gulf of California (Mexico). Appl Geochem 18:1149–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Páez-Osuna F, Osuna-López JI (1990) Heavy-metal distribution in geochemical fractions of surface sediments from the Lower Gulf of California. An Inst Cienc del Mar Limnol 17:287–298Google Scholar
  40. Pöykiö R, Perämäki P, Välimäki I, Kuokkanen T (2002) Estimation of environmental mobility of heavy metals using a sequential leaching of particulate material emitted from an open cast chromium mine complex. Anal Bioanal Chem 373:190–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rodríguez Figueroa G (2004) Geoquímica de los oligoelementos, elementos mayores y elementos de las tierras raras, en los sedimentos marinos del distrito minero de Santa Rosalía BCS., México [in Spanish]. Masters dissertation, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas–Instituto Politécnico Nacional, La Paz, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  42. Rodríguez-Figueroa G, Shumilin E, Sánchez-Rodríguez I (2009) Heavy-metal pollution monitoring using brown seaweed Padina Durviaelli in the coastal zone of Santa Rosalía mining region, Peninsula of Baja California. J Appl Phycol 21:19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rousseau C, Baraud F, Leleyter L, Gil O (2009) Cathodic protection by zinc sacrificial anodes: Impact on marine sediment metallic contamination. J Hazard Mater 167:953–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Salomons W, Förstner U (1984) Metals in Hydrocycle. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  45. Sedykh EM, Starshinova NP, Bannykh LN (2000) Determination of heavy metals and their speciation in water and bottom sediments of water reservoirs using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry and electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry. J Anal Chem (Zhurnal Analyticheskoi Khimii) 55:34–349Google Scholar
  46. Shulkin VM (1998) Pollution of the coastal bottom sediments at the Middle Primorie (Russia) due to mining activity. Environ Pollut 101:401–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shumilin EN, Rodríguez Figueroa G, Morton Bermea O, Lounejeva Baturina E, Hernández E, Durga Rodríguez Meza G (2000) Anomalous trace element composition of coastal sediments near the copper mining district of Santa Rosalía, Peninsula of Baja California, Mexico. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 65:261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shumilin E, Páez-Osuna F, Green-Ruiz C, Sapozhnikov D, Rodríguez-Meza G, Godínez-Orta L (2001) Arsenic, antimony, selenium and other trace elements in sediments of the La Paz Lagoon, Peninsula of Baja California, Mexico. Mar Pollut Bull 42:174–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stephens SR, Alloway BJ, Parker A, Carter JE, Hodson ME (2001) Changes in the leachability of metals from dredged canal sediments during drying and oxidation. Environ Pollut 114:407–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Taylor SR (1964) Abundance of chemical elements in the continental crust: A new table. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 28:1273–1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tessier A, Campbell PGC, Bisson M (1979) Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals. Anal Chem 51:844–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thomas RP, Ure AM, Davidson CM, Littlejohn D, Rauret G, Rubio R, López-Sànchez JF (1994) Three-stage sequential extraction procedure for the determination of metals in river sediments. Anal Chim Acta 286:423–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vreca P, Dolenec T (2005) Geochemical estimation of copper contamination in the healing mud from Makirina Bay, central Adriatic. Environ Int 31:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ward TJ, Young PC (1981) Trace metal contamination of shallow marine sediments near a lead smelter, Spencer Gulf, South Australia. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 32:45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wedepohl KH (1995) The composition of the continental crust. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 59:1217–1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wilson IF, Rocha VS (1955) Geology and mineral deposits of the El Boleo copper district, Baja California, Mexico. Geological Survey Professional Paper No. 273. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  57. Xie X, Yan M, Li L, Shen H (1985a) Geochemical reference samples, drainage sediment GSD 1-8 from China. Geostandards Newsl 9:83–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Xie X, Yan M, Li L, Shen H (1985b) Usable values for Chinese standard reference samples of stream sediments, soils, and rocks: GSD 9-12, GSS 1-8 and GSR1-6. Geostandards Newsl 9:277–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Evgueni Shumilin
    • 1
  • Vyacheslav Gordeev
    • 2
  • Griselda Rodríguez Figueroa
    • 1
  • Liudmila Demina
    • 2
  • Konstantin Choumiline
    • 1
  1. 1.Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias MarinasInstituto Politécnico NacionalLa PazMexico
  2. 2.P.P. Shirshov Institute of OceanologyRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations