Skip to main content
Log in

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: keeping the bridge for one night

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Urological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was conducted to compare nephrostomy-free percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with early nephrostomy tube removal (after 1 day). A prospective study started from January 2008 through December 2009 and included patients who underwent non-complicated PCNL through a single tract without intra-operative residual stones. Nephrostomy-free technique was performed during 2008 (nephrostomy-free group). During 2009, a nephrostomy tube was placed for 1 day (1-day nephrostomy group). Both groups were compared for post-operative events, dose of analgesia, hemoglobin deficit and hospital stay. The study included 55 patients (27 in nephrostomy-free group and 28 in 1-day nephrostomy group). There were no statistically significant differences between patients, renal and stone characteristics of both groups. Post-operative events were significantly more in nephrostomy-free group (26 vs. 14.3%, p = 0.039). They include hematuria in three (11.1%) of nephrostomy-free patients and one (3.6%) of 1-day nephrostomy patient, severe renal colic in four patients of nephrostomy-free group (14.8%), and temporary urinary leakage via the nephrostomy site in three patients of 1-day nephrostomy group (10.7%). Mean dose of post-operative analgesia, mean hemoglobin deficit and hospital days were comparable for both groups (p = 0.946, 0.541, 0.807, respectively). A second look PCNL was performed through the already present tract to retrieve residual stones in two patients with nephrostomy. In conclusion, 1-day nephrostomy technique after PCNL showed significantly better post-operative course. It was comparable to nephrostomy-free technique in analgesic requirements and hospital stay. The nephrostomy tube provided a bridge for second look nephroscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fernstrom I, Johansson B (1976) Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 10:257–259

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. El-Kenawy MR, El-Kappany HA, El-Diasty TA, Ghoneim MA (1992) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones in over 1,000 patients. BJU 69:470–475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Duvdevani M, Razvi H, Sofer M et al (2007) Third prize: contemporary percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: 1,585 procedures in 1,338 consecutive patients. J Endourol 21:824–829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE, Nakada SY, Pearle MS, Wolf JS Jr (2005) (AUA nephrolithiasis guideline panel chapter 1): AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis, treatment recommendations. J Urol 173:1991–2000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chan DY, Jarrett TW (2000) Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 14:269–273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Maheshwari PN, Andankar MG, Bansal M (2000) Nephrostomy tube after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: larger bore or pigtail catheter? J Endourol 14:735–737

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bellman GC, Davidoff R, Candela J, Gerspach J, Kurtz S, Stout L (1997) Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol 57:1578–1582

    Google Scholar 

  8. Feng MI, Tamaddon K, Mikhail A, Kaptein JS, Bellman GC (2001) Prospective randomized study of various techniques of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 58:345–350

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Agrawal MS, Agrawal M, Gupta A, Bansal S, Yadav A, Goyal J (2008) A randomized comparison of tubeless and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 22:439–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Desai MR, Kukreja RA, Desai MM, Mhaskar SS, Wani KA, Patel SH et al (2004) A prospective randomized comparison of type of nephrostomy drainage following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: large bore versus small bore versus tubeless. J Urol 172:565–567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Crook TJ, Lockyer CR, Keoghane SR, Walmsley BH (2008) A randomized controlled trial of nephrostomy placement versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 180:612–614

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tefekli A, Altunrende F, Tepeler K, Tas A, Aydin S, Muslumanoglu AY (2007) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients: a prospective randomized comparison. Int Urol Nephrol 39:57–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Singh I, Singh A, Mittal G (2008) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: is it really less morbid? J Endourol 22:427–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shah HN, Sodha HS, Khandkar AA, Kharodawala S, Hegde SS, Bansal MB (2008) A randomized trial evaluating type of nephrostomy drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: small bore versus tubeless. J Endourol 22:1433–1439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. EL-Nahas AR, Eraky I, Shokeir AA et al (2011) Long-term results of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of staghorn stones. BJU Int 108:750–754

    Google Scholar 

  16. Winfield HN, Weyman P, Clayman RV (1986) Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: complications of premature nephrostomy tube removal. J Urol 136:77–79

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mouracade P, Spie R, Lang H, Jacqmin D, Saussine C (2008) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what about replacing the double-J stent with a ureteral catheter? J Endourol 22:273–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Crook TJ, Lockyer CR, Keoghane SR, Walmsley BH (2008) Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 22:267–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mishra S, Sabnis RB, Kurien A, Ganpule A, Muthu V, Desai M (2010) Questioning the wisdom of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): a prospective randomized controlled study of early tube removal versus tubeless PCNL. BJU Int 106:1045–1049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Falahatkar S, Khosropanah I, Roshani A et al (2008) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stones. J Endourol 22:1447–1451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang RM, Bellman GC (2004) Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery in obese patients. Urology 63:1036–1040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shah HN, Kausik VB, Hegde SS, Shah JN, Bansal MB (2005) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective feasibility study and review of previous reports. BJU Int 96:879–883

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sofikerim M, Demirci D, Huri E, Erşekerci E, Karacagil M (2007) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: safe even in supracostal access. J Endourol 21:967–972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zilberman DE, Lipkin ME, De la Rosette JJ et al (2010) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy—the new standard of care? J Urol 184:1261–1266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed R. El-Nahas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

El-Nahas, A.R., Shokeir, A.A. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: keeping the bridge for one night. Urol Res 40, 389–393 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-011-0432-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-011-0432-4

Keywords

Navigation