Skip to main content
Log in

Is the gravity effect of radiographic anatomic features enough to justify stone clearance or fragments retention following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Urological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We determined whether the gravity effect of radiographic anatomic features on the preoperative urography (IVP) are enough to predict fragments clearance after shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). A Total of 282 patients with mean age 45.8 ± 13.2 years (189 male, 93 female), who underwent SWL due to renal calculi between October 2005 and August 2009 were enrolled. The mean calculi load was 155.72 ± 127.66 mm². The patients were stratified into three groups: patients with pelvis calculi (group 1); patients with upper or middle pole calculi (group 2) and patients with lower pole calculi (group 3). Three angles on the pretreatment IVP were measured: the inner angle between the axis of the lower pole infundibular and ureteropelvic axis (angle I); the inner angle between the lower pole infundibular axis and main axis of pelvis-ureteropelvic (UP) junction point (angle II) and the inner angle between the lower pole infundibular axis and perpendicular line (angle III). Multivariate analysis was used to define the significant predictors of stone clearance. The overall success rate was 85.81%. All angles, sessions number, shock waves number and stone burden were significant predictors of success in patients in group 1. However, in group 2 only angle II and in group 3 angles I and II had significant effect on stone clearance. Radiographic anatomic features have significant role in determining the stone-free rate following satisfactory fragmentation of renal stones with SWL. The measurement of infundibulopelvic angle in different manner helps to predict the stone-free status in patients with renal calculi located not only in lower pole, but also in renal pelvis and upper or middle pole. Gravity effect is not enough to justify the significant influence of the radiographic anatomic features on the stone clearance and fragments retention after SWL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Preminger GM (1995) Medical management of urinary calculus disease: pathogenesis and evaluation. AUA Update Series 14:1

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tiselius H, Alken P, Buck C, Galluci M, Gallucci M, Knoll T, Sarica K et al (2008) Guidelines on urolithiasis: active removal of stones in kidney. EUA Guidelines 7(6):47

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sampaio F, Aragao A (1992) Inferior pole collectiong system anatomy : its probable role in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 147:322–324

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sampaio FJB, Aragao AHM (1994) Limitations of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower caliceal Stones: anatomic insight. J Endourol 8:241–247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Elbahnasy AM, Shalhav AL, Hoenig DM, Maxwell KL, McDougall EM, Clayman RV (1998) Lower caliciel stone clearence after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy. J Urol 159:676–682

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chaussy C, Schmiedt E, Jocham D, Brendel W, Forssmann B, Walther V (1982) First clinical experience with extra corporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. J Urol 127:417–420

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gupta NP, Singh DV, Hemal AK, Mandal S (2000) Infundibulopelvic anatomy and clearance of inferior caliceal calculi with shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 163:24–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Keeley FX Jr, Moussa SA, Smith G, Tolley DA (1996) Clearance of lower-pole Stones following shock wave lithotripsy: effect of the infundibulopelvic angle. Eur Urol 36:371–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Abdel-Khalek M, Sheir KZ, Mokhtar AA, Eraky I, Kenawy M, Bazeed M (2004) Prediction of success rate after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of renal stones–a multivariate analysis model. Scand J Urol Nephrol 38(2):161–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sampaio FJ (2001) Renal collecting system anatomy: its possible role in the effectiveness of renal stone treatment. Curr Opin Urol 11(4):359–366

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sabnis RB, Naik PatelSH, Desai MR, Bapat SD (1997) Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower calyceal Stones: can clearance be predicted? Br J Urol 80:853–857

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lingeman JE, Siegel YI, Steele B, Nyhuis AW, Woods JR (1994) Management of lower pole nephrolithiasis: a critical analysis. J Urol 151:663–667

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Al-Ansari A, As-Sadiq K, Al-Said S, Younis N, Jaleel OA, Shokeir AA (2006) Prognostic factors of success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the treatment of renal stones Int. Urol Nephrol 38(1):63–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tan MO, Kirac M, Onaran M, Karaoglan U, Deniz N, Bozkirli I (2006) Factors affecting the success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi in children. Urol Res 34(3):215–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. El-Assmy, El-Nahas AR, Abo-Elghar ME, Eraky I, El-Kenawy MR, Sheir KZ (2006) Predictors of success after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for renal calculi between 20–30 mm: a multivariate analysis model. ScientificWorldJournal 23(6):2388–2395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sameh WM (2007) Value of intravenous urography before shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of renal calculi: a randomized study. J End Urol 21(6):574–577

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahmoud Mustafa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mustafa, M. Is the gravity effect of radiographic anatomic features enough to justify stone clearance or fragments retention following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). Urol Res 40, 339–344 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-011-0412-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-011-0412-8

Keywords

Navigation