Skip to main content
Log in

Long-term effects of percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal morphology and arterial vascular resistance as evaluated by color Doppler ultrasonography: preliminary report

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Urological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We evaluated the long-term effects of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) on renal morphology and vascular resistance. Parenchyma thickness, echogenicity and resistive index (RI) of upper, middle and lower poles of operated and contralateral kidneys of 41 patients with 82 renal units who underwent unilateral PNL with single pole access between 2000 and 2002 were examined separately by color Doppler ultrasonography. Mean patient age and duration between PNL and evaluation time were 38.29±11.53 years and 46.44±10.9 months, respectively. In operated kidney, mean RI, parenchyma thickness and echogenicity of the access pole were not statistically different than those of the adjacent two poles (0.608±0.053 vs. 0.608±0.052 for RI, P=0.895; 11.46±2.58 vs. 11.41±2.68 mm for parenchyma thickness, P=0.838; 0.049±0.31 vs. 0.073±0.33 for parenchyma echogenicity, P=0.160, respectively). Although mean RI and parenchyma thickness of access pole were statistically significantly different than the mean values of contralateral kidney (0.562±0.032 and 14.31±1.37 mm, respectively), no statistical difference was found between mean parenchyma echogenicities of both of them (echogenicity of contralateral kidney was 0, P=0.317). No significant difference was found between the average echogenicities of the three poles of the operated and contralateral kidneys (0.063±0.32 vs. 0, P=0.080). In 14 patients RI decreased from 0.694±0.058 to 0.602±0.056 in operated kidney (P=0.001) and from 0.604±0.06 to 0.559±0.031 in contralateral kidney (P=0.018) following PNL. It seems that PNL does not cause renal scarring, renal parenchymal loss or increase in renal vascular resistance in the long term. However, prospective studies must be performed for more definitive conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Menon M, Parulkar BG, Drach GW (1998) Urinary lithiasis: etiology, diagnosis and medical management. In Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED Jr, Wein AJ (eds) Campbell’s urology, 7th edn, vol 3, chap 91. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 2661–2733

  2. Sutherland J, Parks J, Coe F (1985) Recurrence after a single renal stone in a community practice. Miner Electrolyte Metab 11:267–269

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Şahin A, Tekgül S, Erdem E et al (2000) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in older children. J Pediatr Surg 35:1336–1338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fernstrom I, Johansson B (1976) Percutaneous pyelolithotomy: a new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 10:257–259

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chatham JR, Dykes TE, Kennon WG et al (2002) Effect of percutaneous nephrolithotomy on differential renal function as measured by mercaptoacetyl triglycine nuclear renography. Urology 59:522–525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Papanicolaou N (1998) Urinary tract imaging and intervention: basic principles. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED Jr, Wein AJ (eds) Campbell’s urology, 7th edn, vol 1, chap 6. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 170–260

  7. Moghazi S, Jones E, Schroepple J, Arya K, McClellan W, Hennigar RA, O’Neill C (2005) Correlation of renal histopathology with sonographic findings. Kidney Int 67:1515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Özçelik G, Polat TB, Aktaş S, Çetinkaya F (2004) Resistive index in febrile urinary tract infections: predictive value of renal outcome. Pediatr Nephrol 19(2):148–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shokeir AA, Nijman RJM, El-Azab M et al (1996) Partial ureteric obstruction: a study of Doppler ultrasonography and diuretic renography in different grades and durations of obstruction. Br J Urol 78:829–835

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rawashdeh YF, Djurhuus JC, Mortensen J et al (2001) The intrarenal resistive index as a pathophysiological marker of obstructive uropathy. J Urol 165:1397–1404

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mostbeck GH, Gossinger HD, Mallek R et al (1990) Effect of heart rate on Doppler measurements of resistive index in renal arteries. Radiology 175:511–513

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kublickas M, Randmaa I, Lunell NO et al (1993) Effect of variations of heart rate within the normal range on renal artery Doppler indices in nonpregnant and pregnant women. J Clin Ultrasound 21:507–510

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Trovato GM, Catalano D, Sciacchitano G et al (2002) Resistive index of renal artery and blood pressure in postmenopausal women. Maturitas 41:223–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rushton HG, Majd M (1992) Dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scintigraphy for the evaluation of pyelonephritis and scarring: a review of experimental and clinical studies. J Urol 148:1726–1732

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Smellie JM, Shaw PJ, Prescod NP, Bantock HM (1988) 99mTc dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scan in patients with established radiological renal scarring. Arch Dis Child 63:1315–1319

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Halevy R, Smolkin V, Bykov S, Chervinsky L, Sakran W, Koren A (2004) Power Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute childhood pyelonephritis. Pediatr Nephrol 19:987–991

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Desai MR, Kukreja RA, Patel SH et al (2004) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex pediatric renal calculus disease. J Endourol 18:23–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mor Y, Elmasry YE, Kellet MJ (1997) The role of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of pediatric renal calculi. J Urol 158:1319–1321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lechevallier E, Siles S, Ortega JC et al (1993) Comparison by SPECT of renal scars after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 7:465–467

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Traxer O, Smith TG 3rd, Pearle MS et al (2001) Renal parenchymal injury after standard and mini percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol 165:1693–1695

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Arima M, Ishibashi M, Usami M et al (1979) Analysis of the arterial blood flow patterns of normal and allografted kidneys by the directional ultrasonic Doppler technique. J Urol 122:587–591

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Aoki Y, Ishitoya S, Okubo K et al (1999) Changes in resistive index following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Int J Urol 6:483–492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kilic S, Altinok MT, Ipek D et al (2005) Color Doppler sonography examination of partially obstructed kidneys associated with ureteropelvic junction stone before and after percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: preliminary report. Int J Urol 12:429–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Webb DR, Fitzpatrick JM (1985) Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: a functional and morphological study. J Urol 134:587–591

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Süleyman Kiliç.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kiliç, S., Altinok, T., Altunoluk, B. et al. Long-term effects of percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal morphology and arterial vascular resistance as evaluated by color Doppler ultrasonography: preliminary report. Urol Res 34, 178–183 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-006-0038-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-006-0038-4

Keywords

Navigation