Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The stability of lidocaine and epinephrine solutions exposed to electric current and comparative administration rates of the two drugs into pig bladder wall

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Urological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intravesical electromotive administration of local anesthetics is clinically successful but electrochemistry, cost and effectiveness limit the choice of drugs to diluted lidocaine HCl 4% mixed with epinephrine. These studies address the stability of lidocaine and epinephrine both over time and when exposed to electric current, i.e. transport rates with passive diffusion and electromotive administration. The drug mixture used was 50 ml lidocaine 4%, 50 ml H2O and 1 ml epinephrine 1/1000. For stability, the solution was placed either in bowls for 7 days or in a two chamber cell with the donor compartment (drugs) separated from the receptor compartment (NaCl solution) by a viable pig bladder wall. This was subjected to 30 mA for 45 min. Stability was measured with mass spectrometry. The cell was also used to determine transport rates with passive diffusion and currents of 20 mA and 30 mA, over 20, 30 and 45 min. Drug measurements in both compartments and bladder were made with HPLC. Lidocaine remained stable throughout the 7 days, epinephrine on day 1 only and both drugs were stable with 30 mA for 45 min. Comparing 20 mA and 30 mA with passive diffusion, there were significant differences in 6/6 donor compartment lidocaine levels, 4/6 receptor compartment levels and 6/6 bladder tissue levels and also in 6/6 epinephrine donor levels and 6/6 tissue levels. The combination lidocaine and epinephrine remains stable for 1 day and when exposed to 30 mA for 45 min. Electric current accelerates the transport of lidocaine and epinephrine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Banga AK, Chien YW (1988) Iontophoretic delivery of drugs: fundamentals, developments and biomedical applications. J Contr Release 7: 1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Di Stasi SM, Giannantoni A, Massoud R, Cortese C, Vespasiani G, Micali F (1997) Electromotive administration of oxybutynin into the human bladder wall. J Urol 158: 228

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Di Stasi SM, Giannantoni A, Massoud R, Dolci S, Navarra P, Vespasiani G, Stephen RL (1999) Electromotive versus passive diffusion of mitomycin C into human bladder wall: concentration-depth profiles studies. Cancer Res 59: 4912

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fontanella UA, Rossi CA, Stephen RL (1997) Bladder and urethral anaesthesia with electromotive drug administration (EMDA): a technique for invasive endoscopic procedures. Br J Urol 79: 414

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gürpinar T, Wong HY, Griffith DP (1996) Electromotive administration of intravesical lidocaine in patients with interstitial cystitis. J Endourol 10: 443

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Henry R, Patterson L, Avery N, Tanzola R, Tod D, Hunter D, Nickel JC, Morales A (2001) Absorption of alkalized intravesical lidocaine in normal and inflamed bladders: a simple method for improving bladder anesthesia. J Urol 165: 1900

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hicks RM, Kettener B, Warren RC (1974) The ultrastructure and chemistry of the luminal plasma membrane of the mammalian urinary bladder: a structure with low permeability to water and ions. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268: 23

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jewett MAS, Valiquette L, Sampson HA, Katz J, Fradet Y, Redelmeier DA (1999) Electromotive drug administration of lidocaine as an alternative anesthesia for transurethral surgery. J Urol 161: 482

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lugnani F, Mazza G, Cerulli N, Rossi C, Stephen R (1993) Iontophoresis of drugs in the bladder wall: equipment and preliminary studies. Artif Organs 17: 8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Phipps JB, Padmanbhan RV, Lattin GA (1989) Iontophoretic delivery of model inorganic and drug ions. J Pharm Sci 78: 365

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pode D, Zylber-Katz E, Shapiro A (1992) Intravesical lidocaine: topical anesthesia for bladder mucosal biopsies. J Urol 148: 795

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Prausnitz MR, Bose VG, Langer R, Weaver JC (1993) Electroporation of mammalian skin: a mechanism to enhance transdermal drug delivery. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 90: 10504

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Riedl CR, Knoll M, Plas E, Pfluger H (1998) Electromotive drug administration and hydrodistension for the treatment of interstitial cystitis. J Endourol 12: 269

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ritchie JM, Greene NM (1990) Local anesthetics. In: Gilman AG, Rall TW, Nies AS (eds) The pharmacological basis of therapeutics. Pergamon Press, New York, p 311

  15. Seeman P (1972) The membrane action of anesthetics and tranquilizers. Pharmacol Rev 24: 583

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thrasher JB, Kreder KJ, Peterson NE, Donatucci CF (1993) Lidocaine as topical anesthesia for bladder mappings and cold-cup biopsies. J Urol 150: 335

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Supported by grant "Progetti di Ricerca di Ateneo ex 60% 2001–2002" from Tor Vergata University of Rome. Physion Srl (Medolla, MO, Italy) donated the electromotive equipment for the studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Savino M. Di Stasi.

Appendix

Appendix

The following table describes the iontophoresis of lidocaine hydrochloride.

\( Ji(mol/\sec ) = {I \over {\left| z \right| \cdot F}} \)

(1) Ji is the flux of all ions; I is current in amperes; |z| is absolute valency; F=96,486 C/mol (Faraday's Constant)

\( Ji({\rm{mmol/min}}) = I(6.2)x10^{ - 4} /z \)

(2) I is current in mA

\( Ji({\rm{mg/mA}} \cdot \min ) = M \cdot 6.2x10^{ - 1} /z \)

(3) M is molecular weight (Da)

For any solution of lidocaine hydrochloride (L+, Cl-):

\( dL/dt({\rm{mg/mA}} \cdot \min ) = 235\left( {6.2x10^{ - 1} } \right) \cdot tr_L \)

(4) trL is the transference # lidocaine. (z=unity)

\( tr_L = {{C_L \cdot \mu _L \cdot z_L } \over {\mathop \Sigma \limits_{i = 0}^n \left( {C_i \cdot \mu _i \cdot z_i } \right)}} \)

(5) C is concentration; µ is mobility; i is the summation index of all ions in solution

For a pure solution of lidocaine hydrochloride:

\( tr_L = {{C_L \cdot \mu _L \cdot z_L } \over {\left( {C_{Cl} \cdot \mu _{Cl} \cdot z_{Cl} } \right) + \left( {C_L \cdot \mu _L \cdot z_L } \right)}} \)

(6)

And as CCl·zCl=CL·zL (charge neutrality):

\( tr_L = {1 \over {{{\mu _{Cl} } \over {\mu _L }} + 1}} \)

7)

\( dL/dt = 235\left( {6.2x10^{ - 1} } \right)\left( {{1 \over {{{\mu _{Cl} } \over {\mu _L }} + 1}}} \right)\mu g/mA \cdot \min \)

(8)

\( \mu _{Cl} /\mu _L = 2/1 \)

(9) Estimated

\( dL/dt = 48.7\;{\rm{\mu g/mA}} \cdot \min \)

(10)

Note: Eq. 5 in the table above states that significant quantities of small, highly mobile ions (H+, Na+, Cl-) in the drug solution will cause a precipitous decline in dL/dt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Di Stasi, S.M., Giannantoni, A., Navarra, P. et al. The stability of lidocaine and epinephrine solutions exposed to electric current and comparative administration rates of the two drugs into pig bladder wall. Urol Res 31, 169–176 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-003-0310-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-003-0310-9

Keywords

Navigation