Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Early results and initial experience of reconstructing defects with NovoSorb® Biodegradable Temporising Matrix (BTM): a UK case series

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

NovoSorb® BTM is a synthetic dermal substitute that allows closure and staged reconstruction of a complex wound. This study aims to share our experience of using Novosorb to treat challenging defects and establish the indications for its use.

Methods

A retrospective case series review of patients treated with Novosorb at Queen Victoria Hospital NHS Foundation Trust from October 2020 to June 2022 was performed. Data collected included patient demographics, defect aetiology, wound features, surgical treatment, complications and postoperative outcomes.

Results

Novosorb was used to treat 40 wounds, commonly on the foot and ankle (32%), lower limb (20%), scalp (18%) and hand (16%). Mean size of defects was 1.29% TBSA. Aetiologies were mostly skin cancer (47%) and acute burn injury (29%). Complex wound features were mostly exposed tendon or paratenon (61%) and exposed bone or periosteum (53%). Seventy-four percent treated defects required secondary skin grafting. Mean time to skin grafting was 5.2 weeks after Novosorb application. Mean graft take was 89%. Twenty-one percent defects did not undergo secondary reconstruction but showed adequate epithelialisation with Novosorb alone, 9.2 weeks after application. Complications included infection (13%) and Novosorb non-adherence (13%). Satisfactory cosmetic and functional outcomes were observed.

Conclusions

Novosorb can develop a healthy vascularised tissue bed for secondary skin grafting or spontaneous epithelialisation of a complex wound. It offers a safe and reliable reconstructive option in patients with complex wounds who are unfit for more complex surgery, prefer to avoid reconstruction, have had a failed reconstruction or have a non-graftable wound bed.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Available on request.

References

  1. PolyNovo Biomaterials Pty Ltd (2022) Novosorb BTM—biodegradable synthetic dermal substitute. https://polynovo.com/novosorb-btm. Accessed 31 Sept 2022

  2. Greenwood JE, Dearman BL (2012) Split skin graft application over an integrating, biodegradable temporizing polymer matrix: immediate and delayed. J Burn Care Res 33(1):7–19. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182372be9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dearman BL, Li A, Greenwood JE (2014) Optimization of a polyurethane dermal matrix and experience with a polymer-based cultured composite skin. J Burn Care Res 35(5):437–448. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0000000000000061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Greenwood JE, Schmitt BJ, Wagstaff MJD (2018) Experience with a synthetic bilayer Biodegradable Temporising Matrix in significant burn injury. Burns Open 2(1):17–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burnso.2017.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Solanki NS, York B, Gao Y, Baker P, Wong She RB (2020) A consecutive case series of defects reconstructed using NovoSorb Biodegradable Temporising Matrix: Initial experience and early results. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 73(10):1845–1853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2020.05.067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Li H, Lim P, Stanley E, Lee G, Lin S, Neoh D, Liew J, Ng SK (2021) Experience with NovoSorb® Biodegradable Temporising Matrix in reconstruction of complex wounds. ANZ J Surg 91(9):1744–1750. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.16936

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Wagstaff MJD, Salna IM, Caplash Y, Greenwood JE (2019) Biodegradable Temporising Matrix (BTM) for the reconstruction of defects following serial debridement for necrotising fasciitis: A case series. Burns Open 3(1):12–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burnso.2018.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kogan S, Halsey J, Agag RL (2019) Biologics in acute burn injury. Ann Plast Surg 83(1):26–33. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001915

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Halim AS, Khoo TL, Mohd Yussof SJ (2010) Biologic and synthetic skin substitutes: an overview. Indian J Plast Surg 43(Suppl):S23–S28. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.70712

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hughes OB, Rakosi A, Macquhae F, Herskovitz I, Fox JD, Kirsner RS (2016) A review of cellular and acellular matrix products: indications, techniques, and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 138(3 Suppl):138S-147S. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002643

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu-Fienberg Y, Wu SS, Gatherwright J, Chepla KJ (2021) an alternative dermal template for reconstruction of complex upper extremity wounds. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 9(7):e3674. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003674

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Lo CH, Brown JN, Dantzer EJG, Maitz PKM, Vandervord JG, Wagstaff MJD, Barker TM, Cleland H (2022) Wound healing and dermal regeneration in severe burn patients treated with NovoSorb® Biodegradable Temporising Matrix: a prospective clinical study. Burns 48(3):529–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2021.07.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank our patients and colleagues who shared their experience of using this dermal matrix on challenging defects.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Nicholas Cereceda-Monteoliva, Mariam Rela and Ana Borges. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Nicholas Cereceda-Monteoliva and revised for important intellectual content by Baljit Dheansa. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas Cereceda-Monteoliva.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This is an observational study. The local Research & Ethics Committee has confirmed that no ethical approval is required.

Consent to participate and for publication

The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication of the images in Figs. 5 and 6. Informed consent was obtained from all other individual participants included in the study, and any other identifiable patient data were removed.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cereceda-Monteoliva, N., Rela, M., Borges, A. et al. Early results and initial experience of reconstructing defects with NovoSorb® Biodegradable Temporising Matrix (BTM): a UK case series. Eur J Plast Surg 46, 1331–1338 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-023-02105-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-023-02105-w

Keywords

Navigation