Abstract
Background
In recent years, surgical therapy has taken on an increasingly decisive role in the therapeutic armamentarium of migraine. All surgical techniques are aimed at the complete neurolysis of some extra-cranial nerves, of which the most involved (in our experience) are the greater and lesser occipital, auriculotemporal, supraorbital, and supratrochlear nerves. This paper describes our surgical approaches for the treatment of occipital, temporal, and frontal trigger sites.
Methods
A single-center, retrospective study was conducted on all patients who underwent surgical treatment of migraine between 2011 and 2022. Patients were asked to fill out a headache diary and complete a migraine questionnaire assessing parameters before surgery, after 3 months, and 1 year after surgery. Data regarding age, sex, age at onset, migraines per month (in days), associated symptoms, severity (on a scale from 1 to 10), inability to work per month (in days), health status, history of neck trauma, and family history were collected. The Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) score was also used to evaluate the degree of disability for each patient.
Results
We have operated on 612 patients: n.266 occipital, n.248 temporal, n.98 frontal. The surgical procedure elicited a positive response in 90% of the patients (69% complete recovery). Complications were mild and temporary: mainly, hypoesthesia and numbness of the undermined areas, lasting from 3 weeks to 6 months. We observed the onset of secondary trigger sites in 257 (42%) patients.
Discussion
The described procedure is minimally invasive and highly reproducible and allows to obtain a high degree of success with a negligible rate of complications. Nevertheless, given the high percentage of occurrence of secondary trigger points, it is particularly important to warn the patient of this possibility in pre-operative visits.
Level of evidence:
Level III, Therapeutic
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In recent years, surgical therapy has taken on an increasingly decisive role in the therapeutic armamentarium of migraine. Since Guyuron’s initial popularization more than two decades ago [1], an increasing number of scientific publications have described and corroborated the surgical therapy [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. The current approach is based on the neurolysis of certain extracranial nerves, called trigger points. The most common, in our experience, are at the occipital, temporal, and frontal levels. The aim of this paper is to describe the techniques we use to treat these three specific trigger points, based on clinical experience gained over the past twelve years [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36].
Patients and methods
A single-center, retrospective study was conducted on all patients who underwent surgical treatment of migraine between 2011 and 2022. Patients were asked to fill out a headache diary and complete a migraine questionnaire assessing parameters before surgery, after 3 months, and 1 year after surgery.
Surgical technique
Occipital trigger site
In this region, the nerves that may be affected are the greater (medially) and/or the lesser (laterally) occipital, mono- or bilaterally. The third occipital nerve, the most medial of all, is never affected. The patient usually indicates with great precision the point (or points) where the attacks originate, corresponding to the location of the inflamed nerve(s). The ultimate goal of the procedure is to carry out a complete neurolysis (Fig. 1) of the involved nerve(s). In most cases it is possible to notice a conflict between the nerve and branches, usually dilated or ectatic, of the occipital artery (Fig. 2). As we have recently described [37, 38], these vessels have several and specific ultrastructural anomalies: above all, tunica intima hyperplasia and internal elastic lamina fragmentation, as well as phenotypic conversion from a contractile-quiescent to “synthetic”-active state of smooth muscle cells. Surgical procedures are performed as one-day surgery under local anesthesia with sedation. There is no need to cut patients’ hair. According to the patient’s symptoms, a cutaneous incision (of about 5) cm is performed, mono- or bilaterally, horizontal above the superior nuchal line and near the trigger point(s) reported. The blade must be oriented parallel to the adjacent hair shafts, so as not to dissect the underlying bulbs and generate a more visible scar. Subcutaneous and muscular tissues are then undermined in order to identify and visualize the occipital nerves involved. The greater occipital nerve is usually about 3 cm laterally from the midline, while the lesser occipital nerve is about 5 cm more laterally. The vascular-nervous bundle is usually incorporated into abundant fibrous tissue (Fig. 3a), which is the result of chronic tissue inflammation, and which must be removed. Once the fibrous tissue has been removed, the nerve branches and the nearby branches of the occipital artery are visualized, usually ectatic and in close connection with the nerve (Fig. 3b). Complete neurolysis must therefore include coagulation of the facing, dilated vessels (Fig. 3c).
Main stages of occipital surgery: highlighting of the fibrous tissue that incorporates the neurovascular bundle (a); complete neurolysis of the nerve (white arrow), close to an ectatic occipital artery (black arrow) (b); coagulation of all the dilated vascular branches, with complete release of the nerves (white stars) (c)
Temporal trigger site
In this site, the involved nerve is the auriculotemporal one, usually compressed by aneurysmatic branches of the superficial temporal artery. In fact, this site is characterized by a typical symptomatology: a pulsating pain that, from the temporal region, radiates to the frontal, occipital, or vertex areas. The compression point is classically localized at the intersection of two perpendicular lines running parallel to the anterior and superior borders of the ipsilateral auricle. The ectatic branch of the superficial temporal artery can easily be localized by means of a handheld Doppler (Fig. 4). In many patients, this vessel is also clearly visible on the skin surface. The surgical procedure includes complete neurolysis of the nerve and coagulation of dilated vessels that are always present at this trigger point (Figs. 5 and 6).
Frontal trigger site
In this site, the involved nerves are the supraorbital and the supratrochlear ones. The emergence of the supraorbital nerve from the supraorbital foramen is classically localizable along a straight hemipupillary line. The supratrochlear nerve is located about 2 cm more medially. The nerves are mechanically compressed by the mimic muscles of the upper third of the face that they must cross to reach the skin surface: the depressor supercilii (sharper, thinner and lighter, vertically angled), the corrugator supercilii (deeper, thicker, darker and crumbly, horizontally angled), and the procerus. In addition, it is not uncommon to still visualize ectatic vessels in the vicinity of nerves (Fig. 7), which can contribute to compression. Also, in this case, the procedure involves a complete neurolysis of both nerves (which must be completely freed from adjacent muscle and fibrous tissues) and coagulation of the facing dilated vessels (Figs. 8 and 9).
Results
In the last 12 years, we have operated on 612 patients (71% females, 29% males; age range: 19–83 ys): n.266 occipital, n.248 temporal, n.98 frontal. All the patients had a diagnosis of chronic primary headache or chronic migraine confirmed by a board-certified neurologist, after failure of several attempts of different medical therapies. Patients were asked to fill out a headache diary and complete a migraine questionnaire assessing parameters before surgery, after 3 months, and 1 year after surgery. Data regarding age, sex, age at onset, migraines per month (in days), associated symptoms, severity (on a scale from 1 to 10), inability to work per month (in days), health status, history of neck trauma, and family history were collected. The Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) score was also used to evaluate the degree of disability for each patient [39].
After a 3-month post-operative period, the surgical procedure elicited a positive response in:
-
a)
Occipital surgery: remarkable improvement in 95% of patients (86% complete recovery);
-
b)
Frontal surgery: remarkable improvement in 87% of patients (32% complete recovery);
-
c)
Temporal surgery: remarkable improvement in 88% of patients (66% complete recovery).
Results were substantially confirmed at the 12-month follow-up.
Complications were mild and temporary: mainly, hypoesthesia and numbness of the undermined areas, lasting from 3 weeks to 6 months. We observed the onset of secondary trigger sites in 257 (42%) patients.
Discussion
After Guyuron’s initial, monumental pioneering work [40,41,42], the surgical treatment of migraine has experienced an exponential diffusion both in the USA and in Europe. Actually, several migraine therapy surgeries had been described in the past. Most of these procedures were based on the section or removal of extracranial vessels [9]. In more recent years, our studies have highlighted numerous abnormalities in the vessels facing the trigger points of migraine patients [37, 38]. Interestingly, according to what has been hypothesized and described by several authors in the past [9], an extracranial vascular involvement in the etiopathogenesis of migraine therefore seems to be supported by morphological evidence. In normal arteries, the tunica intima (endothelial layer) consists of a single layer of endothelial cells surrounded by a connective tissue basement membrane with elastic fibers. The middle layer, the tunica media, is primarily composed of smooth muscle and is usually the thickest layer. During migraine surgery, we routinely tunica intima hyperplasia and internal elastic lamina fragmentation, as well as cellular alterations in the tunica media. In particular, a consistent fraction of vascular smooth muscle cells shifted from contractile versus synthetic phenotype [37, 38]. Vascular smooth muscle cells are highly specialized cells that regulate vascular tone and participate in vessel remodeling in physiological and pathological conditions. Phenotypic conversion from a contractile-quiescent to “synthetic”-active state contributes to vascular pathologies. Further research is needed to highlight the therapeutic and surgical implications of these observations. In addition, over the years, numerous trigger points have been described, including the nasal (rhinogenic) and zygomaticotemporal [43,44,45]. In our experience and case studies, the three most represented trigger points were certainly those described: the occipital, the temporal, and the frontal. Regarding the treatment of the occipital trigger point, the most common approach involves (in addition to neurolysis of the occipital nerves) the exeresis of a portion of semispinalis capitis muscle and the transposition of a subcutaneous flap, while the commonly adopted surgical approach for the frontal trigger point (in addition to neurolysis of the supraorbital and the supratrochlear nerves) includes glabellar muscle group avulsion and the use of an adipose flap to cover and protect the nerves [46,47,48]. Our approach, which can be defined as somewhat minimally invasive, allowed us to obtain success rates similar to the previous ones, reducing, in small part, the complexity of the surgical procedure.
The effort to identify decisive and increasingly less invasive therapeutic approaches, such as surgery, is even more important in times of COVID. During the pandemic and lockdown, migraine patients are facing an enormous problem in getting optimum care because of difficulty in access, forced social isolation, and encountering a health system that is getting rapidly overwhelmed [49]. In this perspective, given the excellent therapeutic results expected, in our opinion, the surgical approach is one of the main therapeutic resources for optimal management of this complex disease.
Conclusions
The described procedure is minimally invasive and highly reproducible and allows to obtain a high degree of success with a negligible rate of complications. Nevertheless, given the high percentage of occurrence of secondary trigger points, it is particularly important to warn the patient of this possibility in pre-operative visits.
Data Availability
Data are not public due to privacy concerns.
References
Guyuron B, Varghai A, Michelow BJ, Thomas T, Davis J (2000) Corrugator supercilii muscle resection and migraine headaches. Plast Reconstr Surg 106(2):429–434
Peled ZM (2016) A novel surgical approach to chronic temporal headaches. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(5):1597–1600
Janis JE, Barker JC, Javadi C, Ducic I, Hagan R, Guyuron B (2014) A review of current evidence in the surgical treatment of migraine headaches. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(4 Suppl 2):131S-141S
Janis JE, Hatef DA, Hagan R, Schaub T, Liu JH, Thakar H, Bolden KM, Heller JB, Kurkjian TJ (2013) Anatomy of the supratrochlear nerve: implications for the surgical treatment of migraine headaches. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(4):743–750
Fallucco M, Janis JE, Hagan RR (2012) The anatomical morphology of the supraorbital notch: clinical relevance to the surgical treatment of migraine headaches. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(6):1227–1233
Hagan RR, Fallucco MA, Janis JE (2016) Supraorbital rim syndrome: definition, surgical treatment, and outcomes for frontal headache. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 4(7):e795
Gfrerer L, Hulsen JH, McLeod MD, Wright EJ, Austen WG Jr (2019) Migraine Surgery: An All or Nothing Phenomenon? Prospective Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes. Ann Surg 269(5):994–999
Ortiz R, Gfrerer L, Hansdorfer MA, Nealon KP, Lans J, Austen WG Jr (2020) Migraine surgery at the frontal trigger site: an analysis of intraoperative anatomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 145(2):523–530
Gfrerer L, Raposio E, Ortiz R, Austen WG Jr (2018) Surgical treatment of migraine headache: back to the future. Plast Reconstr Surg 142(4):1036–1045
Ortiz R, Gfrerer L, Panzenbeck P, Hansdorfer MA, Austen WG Jr (2021) Trigger site deactivation surgery for headaches is associated with decreased postoperative medication use. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 9(6):e3634
Janis JE, ElHawary H, Schoenbrunner A, Salimi A, Packowski K, Kavanagh K, Gfrerer L, Austen WG Jr (2022) Revisiting the role of occipital artery resection in greater occipital nerve decompression. Plast Reconstr Surg 150(5):1091–1097
Guyuron B (2015) Is migraine surgery ready for prime time? The surgical team’s view. Headache. 55(10):1464–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.12714
Kung TA, Guyuron B, Cederna PS (2011) Migraine surgery: a plastic surgery solution for refractory migraine headache. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(1):181–189
Totonchi A, Guyuron B, Ansari H (2021) Surgical options for migraine: an overview. Neurol India. 69(Supplement):S105–S109
Guyuron B (2021) The evolution of migraine surgery: two decades of continual research. My Current Thoughts. Plast Reconstr Surg 147(6):1414–1419
Long T, Ascha M, Guyuron B (2019) Efficacy of surgical treatment of migraine headaches involving the auriculotemporal nerve (site V). Plast Reconstr Surg 143(2):557–563
SeyedForootan NS, Lee M, Guyuron B (2017) Migraine headache trigger site prevalence analysis of 2590 sites in 1010 patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 70(2):152–158
Caruana G, Bertozzi N, Boschi E, PioGrieco M, Grignaffini E, Raposio E (2014) Endoscopic forehead surgery for migraine therapy Personal technique. Ann Ital Chir 85:583–586
Caruana G, Grignaffini E, Raposio E (2015) Endoscopic forehead muscle resection for nerve decompression: a modified procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 3(3):e342
Raposio E, Caruana G (2015) Frontal endoscopic myotomies for chronic headache. J Craniofac Surg 26(3):e201–e203
Polotto S, Simonacci F, Grignaffini E, Grieco MP, Raposio E. Surgical treatment of frontal and occipital migraines: a comparison of results. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016;4(3):e653.22
Raposio E, Caruana G (2017) Tips for the surgical treatment of occipital nerve-triggered headaches. Eur J Plast Surg 40(3):177–182
Bertozzi N, Simonacci F, Lago G, Bordin C, Raposio E. Surgical therapy of temporal triggered migraine headache. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018;6(12):e1980. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001980. eCollection 2018 Dec.
Raposio E, Bertozzi N (2019) Trigger site inactivation for the surgical therapy of occipital migraine and tension-type headache: our experience and review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 7:e2507
Simonacci F, Lago G, Bertozzi N, Raposio E (2020) Surgical deactivation of occipital migraine trigger site. Chirurgia. 33(3):143–9
Raposio E, Simonacci F (2020) Frontal trigger site deactivation for migraine surgical therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 8(4):e2813
Baldelli I, Mangialardi ML, Raposio E (2020) Site V surgery for temporal migraine headaches. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 8(6):e2886
Baldelli I, Mangialardi ML, Salgarello M, Raposio E (2020) Nummular headache and its surgical treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 8(7):e2989
Mangialardi ML, Baldelli I, Salgarello M, Raposio E (2020) Decompression surgery for frontal migraine treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 8(10):e3084
Baldelli I, Mangialardi ML, Salgarello M, Raposio E (2020) Peripheral occipital nerve decompression surgery in migraine headache. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 8:e3019
Raposio G, Raposio E (2022) Temporal surgery for chronic migraine treatment: a minimally-invasive perspective. Ann Med Surg 76:103578
Raposio G, Cortese K, Raposio E (2022) An easy and reliable way to preoperatively identify the auriculo-temporal nerve in migraine surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 75(7):2387–2440
Raposio G, Raposio E (2022) Surgical therapy of occipital (Arnold) neuralgia: a case series. Ann Med Surg 80:104237
Raposio G, Raposio E (2022) Principles and techniques of migraine surgery. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 26:6110–6113
Raposio E (2015) Atlas of endoscopic plastic surgery. Springer, New York, USA
Raposio E (2019) Atlas of surgical therapy for migraine and tension-type headache. Springer, New York, USA
Cortese K, Tagliatti E, Gagliani MC, Frascio M, Zarcone D, Raposio E (2022) Ultrastructural imaging reveals vascular remodeling in migraine patients. Histochem Cell Biol 157(4):459–465
Raposio E, Raposio G, Del Duchetto D, Tagliatti E, Cortese K (2022) Morphologic vascular anomalies detected during migraine surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 75(11):4069–4073
Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Dowson AJ, Sawyer J (2001) Development and testing of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire to assess headache-related disability. Neurology 56(6 Suppl 1):S20–S22
Guyuron B, Tucker T, Davis J (2002) Surgical treatment of migraine headaches. Plast Reconstr Surg 109(7):2183–2189
Guyuron B, Kriegler JS, Davis J, Amini SB (2005) Comprehensive surgical treatment of migraine headaches. Plast Reconstr Surg 115(1):1–9
Guyuron B, Kriegler JS, Davis J, Amini SB (2011) Five-year outcome of surgical treatment of migraine headaches. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(2):603–608
Chow JM (1994) Rhinologic headaches. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 111:211–218
Totonchi A, Pashmini N, Guyuron B (2005) The zygomaticotemporal branch of the trigeminal nerve: an anatomical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:273–277
Janis JE, Hatef DA, Thakar H et al (2010) The zygomaticotemporal branch of the trigeminal nerve: part II. Anatomical variations. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:435–442
Gfrerer L, Guyuron B (2017) Surgical treatment of migraine headaches. Acta Neurol Belg 117:27–32
Hatef DA, Gutowski KA, Culbertson GR, Zielinski M, Manahan MA (2020) A comprehensive review of surgical treatment of migraine surgery and safety. Plast Reconstr Surge 146:187e
Gfrerer L, Maman DY, Tessler O, Austen WG (2014) Nonendoscopic deactivation of nerve triggers in migraine headache patients: Surgical technique and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:771
Chowdhury D, Datta D (2020) Managing migraine in the times of COVID-19 pandemic. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 23(Suppl 1):S33–S39
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The competent local ethical committee has confirmed that no ethical approval is required for retrospective studies.
Conflict of interest
Edoardo Raposio and Giorgio Raposio declare no conflict of interest.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Genova within the CRUI-CARE Agreement.
Patient consent
Written informed consent was obtained by all the patients.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Presented, in part, at the 65th National Congress of the Japan Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Osaka, Japan, April 20–22, 2022; at the International Confederation of Plastic Surgery Societies (ICOPLAST) World Congress, Lima, Perù, May 19–21, 2022; at the XXIV Annual Meeting of the European Society of Surgery, Genova, Italy, May 28–29, 2022; at the Celtic Meeting of the British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (BAPRAS), Dunblane (Scotland), September 8–9, 2022; at the Fourteenth Quadrennial European Society of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Conference, Porto (Portugal), October 5–7, 2022; at the 91st Annual Meeting of the American Society of Plastic Surgery, Boston (USA), October 27–30, 2022; and at the 76th BAPRAS (British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery) Scientific Meeting, London (UK), November 30–December 2, 2022.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Raposio, E., Raposio, G. Surgical therapy of migraine: a 12-year single-center experience. Eur J Plast Surg 46, 699–705 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-023-02065-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-023-02065-1