Abstract
The objective of the study is to investigate associations between research topics, level of evidence, conflict of interest, and declared sources of funding in articles published in major plastic surgery journals. All articles published in four major plastic surgery journals from September 2008 to September 2010 (Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery, Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, and Aesthetic Surgery) were reviewed. Published articles were assessed with regards to funding sources, level of evidence (I–V), research topics, and conflicts of interest. The association between these variables was described using contingency tables and compared using chi-square tests. The 1,706 articles were reviewed from four major plastic surgery journals. Level III studies comprised the majority of studies (634, 37%). The level of evidence least frequently observed in the plastic surgery journals was level I (25, 1.4%). Studies not reporting funding sources were significantly associated with a lower level of evidence (p = 0.002). There was no significant association between source of funding and level of evidence (p = 0.219) or between the source of funding and the type of study (p = 0.075). Finally, the source of funding is significantly associated with the presence of a conflict of interest (p < 0.005). While the level of evidence was related to publication of funding, further analysis of public and private funding revealed that the level of evidence of the research conducted is independent of the source of funding. Privately funded studies are more likely to present a conflict of interest.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lalonde DH, Rohrich RJ (2010) A first for plastic surgery, the American Board of Plastic Surgery, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: 20 evidence-based maintenance of certification articles, beginning with this issue. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(6):2265–2267
Noordin S, Wright JG, Howard A (2010) Relationship between declared funding support and level of evidence. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(7):1647–1651
Moses H 3rd, Martin JB (2001) Academic relationships with industry: a new model for biomedical research. JAMA 285(7):933–935
Loiselle F, Mahabir RC, Harrop AR (2008) Levels of evidence in plastic surgery research over 20 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(4):207e–211e
Brown A et al (2006) Association of industry sponsorship to published outcomes in gastrointestinal clinical research. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4(12):1445–1451
Chung KC et al (2009) Introducing evidence-based medicine to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 123(4):1385–1389
Freshwater DM, Freshwater MF (2011) Failure by deans of academic medical centers to disclose outside income. Arch Intern Med 171(6):586–587
Chimonas S, Frosch Z, Rothman DJ (2011) From disclosure to transparency: the use of company payment data. Arch Intern Med 171(1):81–86
Abramson J, Starfield B (2005) The effect of conflict of interest on biomedical research and clinical practice guidelines: can we trust the evidence in evidence-based medicine? J Am Board Fam Pract 18(5):414–418
Friedman LS, Richter ED (2004) Relationship between conflicts of interest and research results. J Gen Intern Med 19(1):51–56
McCarthy CM, Collins ED, Pusic AL (2008) Where do we find the best evidence? Plast Reconstr Surg 122(6):1942–1947, discussion 1948–1951
Okike K et al (2011) Level of evidence and conflict of interest disclosure associated with higher citation rates in orthopedics. J Clin Epidemiol 64(3):331–338
Patel AA et al (2011) Pitfalls in the publication of scientific literature: a road map to manage conflict of interest and other ethical challenges. J Neurosurg 114(1):21–26
Conflict of interest
The authors have no financial interests/conflict of interests to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tahiri, Y., Kanevsky, J., Vorstenbosch, J. et al. Disclosure of funding source and conflict of interest: exposure of biases affecting evidence and clinical utility of plastic surgery publications. Eur J Plast Surg 35, 457–462 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-011-0672-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-011-0672-0