Abstract
Purpose
Endovascular therapy (EVT) of large-vessel occlusion in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) may be performed in general anesthesia (GA) or conscious sedation (CS). We intended to determine the contribution of ischemic cerebral lesion sites on the physician’s decision between GA and CS using voxel-based lesion symptom mapping (VLSM).
Methods
In a prospective local database, we sought patients with documented AIS and EVT. Age, stroke severity, lesion volume, vigilance, and aphasia scores were compared between EVT patients with GA and CS. The ischemic lesions were analyzed on CT or MRI scans and transformed into stereotaxic space. We determined the lesion overlap and assessed whether GA or CS is associated with specific cerebral lesion sites using the voxel-wise Liebermeister test.
Results
One hundred seventy-nine patients with AIS and EVT were included in the analysis. The VLSM analysis yielded associations between GA and ischemic lesions in the left hemispheric middle cerebral artery territory and posterior circulation areas. Stroke severity and lesion volume were significantly higher in the GA group. The prevalence of aphasia and aphasia severity was significantly higher and parameters of vigilance lower in the GA group.
Conclusions
The VLSM analysis showed associations between GA and ischemic lesions in the left hemispheric middle cerebral artery territory and posterior circulation areas including the thalamus that are known to cause neurologic deficits, such as aphasia or compromised vigilance, in AIS-patients with EVT. Our data suggest that higher disability, clinical impairment due to neurological deficits like aphasia, or reduced alertness of affected patients may influence the physician’s decision on using GA in EVT.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Contemporary therapeutic options for vascular recanalization in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) include systemic thrombolysis with alteplase and endovascular therapy (EVT) via catheter-based thrombectomy [1]. Whereas intravenous thrombolysis has been established as the cornerstone of medical treatment for ischemic stroke patients, EVT has evolved as standard technique for large-vessel occlusion of the anterior circulation and basilar thrombosis in the posterior circulation [1,2,3]. EVT may be performed in general anesthesia (GA) or conscious sedation (CS). Several studies have examined the effects and the benefits of GA vs. CS, but the optimal approach is still a matter of debate [4]. Both methods are considered equally safe, as long as hemodynamic stability is guaranteed and no delay in “door to groin-time” for EVT is produced [4]. The anesthetic method of choice for EVT depends on patients’ condition, preference of the treating physician, as well as on organizational and logistic aspects of the local hospital [2, 4, 5]. CS is often used as an easy first-line strategy when patients are cooperative, whereas GA is preferred in patients with excessive movements, respiratory compromise, or loss of consciousness [4, 6,7,8,9,10]. Neurologic symptoms, e.g., aphasia or compromised vigilance, are related to lesions in specific brain regions [11]. Thus, we hypothesize that ischemic lesion location in the brain might influence the physician’s decision on the anesthetic approach. So far, there is no distinct analysis of the relation of neuroimaging data of ischemic cerebral lesion sites and the preferred anesthetic approach, i.e., GA or CS, in AIS patients treated with EVT.
Therefore, we used voxel-based lesion symptom mapping (VLSM) to assess associations between the anesthetic approach (GA or CS) and the cerebral ischemic lesion location.
Materials and methods
Patients
This study was a retrospective analysis of AIS patients seen between 2006 and 2016 at the Department of Neurology of the University Hospital Erlangen of the Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (Erlangen, Germany). The study based on a prospective stroke registry that was designed until and discontinued after 2016, so no patients were included after its ending. Patients were examined and treated by qualified neurologists and neuroradiologists during their admission and stay in the hospital. Patients with acute stroke undergoing intravenous thrombolysis and/or EVT and admitted to our stroke center were entered into a prospective database containing baseline demographic variables, information regarding medical history, as well as parameters on the present stroke. Brain imaging data obtained of patients are stored in computerized databases. The indication for intravenous thrombolysis was based on clinical evaluation and imaging following the recommendations of international treatment guidelines [12]. Patients with large-vessel occlusion (internal carotid artery, proximal segment of middle cerebral artery, and basilar occlusion) were considered for endovascular treatment by experienced neurointerventionalists. The decision between GA and CS was made in an interdisciplinary consensus between the treating neurologist and the interventional neuroradiologist. This approach based on clinical experience and did not follow standardized criteria. For the following analysis, only patients undergoing EVT were selected for the study. For the study registry, ethics approval was obtained by the Ethics Committee of FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg (registration number 377_17Bc). All patients or the legally authorized representatives gave written and informed consent to the use of the data.
For the study, we retrospectively included patients of the databases who fulfilled the following criteria: (1) patients with AIS receiving EVT, (2) age of at least 18 years, and (3) available medical reports containing details of the medical history. We excluded patients with the following conditions: (1) MRI or CT sequences of poor quality or not available and (2) other structural diseases than stroke.
The degree of stroke disability was determined using the National Institute of Health (NIHSS) score [13]. To compare the imaging characteristics of patients with GA and with CS in patients with EVT in AIS, we established a cohort with patients with GA and a control group of patients with CS out of the databases.
CT/MRI examination and lesion mapping
All patients underwent MRI with a multimodal protocol (3 T Magnetom Trio or 1.5 T Magnetom Sonata; Siemens Healthineers AG, Erlangen, Germany) or CT (Sensation 64 or Somatom Definition AS + ; Siemens Healthineers AG, Erlangen, Germany) of the brain with a slice thickness of 5-mm maximum. In patients who received both MRI and CT, the lesion was determined using the MRI scan. Patients who received CT but no MRI were only included when a CT scan was acquired > 24 h after stroke onset, and the infarction was demarcated. Imaging modality was a decision of the treating clinician. Patients not eligible for MRI received CT. Lesions were assessed on anonymized diffusion-weighted MRI sequences or non-enhanced CT scans by two experienced raters (KF and MK). Lesions were manually delineated on imaging scans using MRIcron software [14, 15]. The MRI scan and the lesion shape were transferred into stereotaxic space using the normalization algorithm of SPM12 and the Clinical Toolbox for SPM [16,17,18]. Finally, using the CT or MR-segment-normalize algorithm of the Clinical Toolbox, the CT or MR images were transformed to the T1 template based on younger individuals with a resampled voxel size of 1 × 1 × 1 mm3 [16].
Statistical analysis
Because EVT in patients with posterior circulation infarcts was almost always performed in GA (93.5%), we conducted two separate imaging analysis steps to isolate the effect of anterior circulation infarcts on the decision of the preferred anesthetic method: one for all patients with anterior and posterior circulation and another for anterior circulation infarcts only. For each of both subgroups, we determined the lesion overlap, i.e., the prevalence of identical lesion sites among all patients with AIS and EVT. Dichotomous overlap values of lesion sites identified in the VLSM analysis were correlated with the dichotomous behavioral variable, that is, whether the patient had received GA or CS using the Liebermeister test with 4000 permutations [19, 20]. To control for multiple comparisons, we applied a family-wise error (FWE) correction of p < 0.05. Lesion volumes were calculated using the nonparametric mapping (NPM) software implemented in the MRIcron software package [15]. To determine damaged brain regions, affected voxels were overlaid on the Automated Anatomic Labeling (AAL) atlas. The peak coordinates of the involved regions are presented in the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space.
Demographic and clinical data were tested for normal distribution using the Shapiro–Wilk test and are presented as mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile ranges. Data were compared between GA and CS groups using the Chi-square test or Mann–Whitney U-test, as appropriate. Two-tailed p values were calculated; statistical significance was assumed for p < 0.05. For statistical calculations, we used commercially available statistic software (SPSS 20.0; IBM, Armonk, NY).
Results
Patient characteristics
Of 1209 individuals with AIS and systemic thrombolysis, 201 patients (16.6%) underwent EVT. Of these 201 stroke patients with EVT, 22 patients did not meet the inclusion criteria; 16 patients had no demarcation of infarction; 6 patients had no imaging, imaging of poor quality, or inappropriate imaging sequences. Thus, 179 stroke patients with EVT fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were eligible for the VLSM analysis. In 99 patients, EVT was performed in GA and in 80 patients in CS. Of the 179 patients with EVT, 148 had anterior circulation, and 31 patients had posterior circulation infarcts. Of the 31 patients with posterior circulation infarcts, 29 patients (93.5%) had EVT in GA.
The first VLSM analysis included all 179 patients with infarcts of the anterior and posterior circulation. Demographic, clinical parameters and imaging characteristics of stroke patients with GA and CS are demonstrated in Table 1. Glasgow coma scale score and vigilance were significantly lower and the presence of aphasia and aphasia severity significantly higher in the GA group. NIHSS scores and total ischemic lesion volume were significantly higher in the GA compared to the CS group. Age, modified ranking scale (mRS) prior to admission, and rate of systemic thrombolysis with alteplase did not differ between stroke patients with GA and CS. Infarction was more often located in the left hemisphere or in the infratentorial brain regions in the GA group. Figure 1 shows the lesion distribution and lesion overlap of all patients with GA and CS patients with EVT and AIS of the anterior and posterior circulation.
The second VLSM analysis included only the 148 patients with infarcts of the anterior circulation. Demographic, clinical parameters and imaging characteristics of patients with anterior circulation strokes are demonstrated in Table 2. Levels of vigilance were significantly lower in GA patients. Aphasia was more frequent and more severe in the GA group. NIHSS scores and total lesion volume were significantly higher in the GA group compared to CS. Age, modified ranking scale (mRS) prior to admission, rate of systemic thrombolysis with alteplase, and Glasgow coma scales scores did not differ between both groups. Localization of infarction territory did not differ between both groups. Figure 2 shows the lesion distribution and lesion overlap of all patients with GA and CS in the subgroup of patients with EVT and AIS of the anterior circulation only.
Voxel-based lesion symptom mapping
The first VLSM analysis including all ischemic infarcts, i.e., anterior and posterior circulation, showed associations between GA as the preferred anesthetic method and ischemic stroke lesion location in a total of 54,671 voxels. Table 3 illustrates affected brain areas of the anterior and posterior circulation associated with GA according to the Automated Anatomical Labeling (AAL) atlas, the corresponding voxel count, and the peak coordinates in MNI space. Figure 3 demonstrates the results of the Liebermeister test of AIS of the anterior and posterior circulation. GA in patients with AIS of the anterior and posterior circulation treated with EVT correlated significantly with brain regions mainly located in the left thalamus, basal ganglia, the left temporal lobe, and brain regions of the posterior circulation.
In the second VLSM analysis of anterior circulation infarcts only, the nonparametric voxel-wise analysis using Liebermeister statistics showed associations between AIS and GA in a total of 104,214 lesioned voxels. Table 4 lists the brain areas with the lesioned voxels resulting from the Liebermeister analysis of AIS of the anterior circulation only according to the AAL atlas, the corresponding voxel count, and the peak coordinates in MNI space. Figure 4 demonstrates the results of the Liebermeister test of AIS of the anterior circulation. GA in patients with AIS of the anterior circulation treated with EVT correlated significantly with brain regions of the left hemisphere, the thalamus, basal ganglia, and the temporal lobe.
Discussion
The VLSM analysis showed associations between GA as the preferred anesthetic method and left hemispheric as well as posterior circulation ischemic infarcts in AIS patients treated with EVT. Left hemispheric lesion clusters were located in the middle cerebral artery territory and included mainly the basal ganglia and temporal lobe (Figs. 3 and 4). In addition, stroke patients with EVT and GA had significantly higher stroke severity, lesion volumes, aphasia scores, and more compromised vigilance scores compared to stroke patients with CS (Tables 1 and 2).
Neurological deficits are related to lesions of distinct brain areas [21, 22]. The influence of neurological deficits and cerebral ischemic lesion location on the decision of GA vs. CS for EVT in AIS has not been studied yet. Therefore, in the current study, we applied a voxel-wise lesion mapping approach to identify lesion clusters in the brain associated with GA or CS. The advantage of VLSM is that it does not predefine lesion sites that assumed to be associated with clinical variables but has the advantage of determining associations between the voxel-wise lesion overlap in any brain area [19].
As a first major finding, the VLSM analysis yielded associations between GA and lesions of the posterior circulation, notably the cerebellum, thalamus, and the pons. In strokes of the posterior circulation, especially basilar occlusion, patients are often compromised in respiratory function, state of vigilance, and cooperation due to acute brainstem disorder or thalamic involvement [3, 23, 24]. Therefore, EVT in patients with strokes in the posterior circulation is mostly performed in GA [3, 23, 24]. In accordance, in our study, 93.5% of patients with EVT due to posterior circulation infarcts had GA. Moreover, our patients with GA had significantly lower levels of vigilance. Although data comparing the use of GA and CS in acute stroke of the posterior circulation is scarce, stroke severity and compromised vigilance may be responsible for the use of GA in posterior circulation strokes [23, 24]. Patient condition is an essential factor for the choice of anesthetic strategy during EVT [4]. While GA constitutes the preferred anesthetic method in stroke patients with higher disability, unstable vital parameters, hypoventilation, loss of consciousness, and excessive movements, CS is often conducted in cooperative patients and is sometimes the preferred first-line strategy to avoid a delay of EVT [6,7,8,9,10, 25, 26].
Moreover, our analysis of infarcts of the anterior circulation showed associations between GA and large lesion clusters in the left basal ganglia, the cerebral white matter including the corticospinal tract, and the left temporal lobe. Lesions of the capsula interna and the corticospinal tract result in a contralateral hemiparesis [27].
Neurologic deficits, e.g., the presence of aphasia, might also influence the decision of the preferred anesthetic method, i.e., GA or CS, since they have a significant impact on stroke severity and patients’ compliance [2, 4, 5, 8, 27].
Our study revealed a lateralization of anterior circulation ischemic infarcts to the left hemisphere in patients with GA. The left hemisphere is the dominant hemisphere for language production and comprehension in the majority of right-handed people [28, 29]. Lesions of the left temporal lobe may result in speech impairment, especially aphasia, and consecutively impaired compliance [22]. In our study, stroke patients who underwent GA had significantly higher aphasia severity scores and were more often affected by aphasia. More precisely, our VLSM analysis revealed that temporal lesions associated with GA were located in the left temporal subcortex of the middle temporal gyrus (MTG) including the hippocampal region, areas contributing to speech recognition and lexical storage [28, 30]. The MTG seems to play a major role in the development of speech comprehension deficits of Wernicke’s aphasia [22]. The results indicate that speech deficits like sensory aphasia that compromise the cooperation of patients may influence the physician’s decision for GA in patients with AIS needing EVT.
Limitations
Several limitations of this study have to be considered in the interpretation of the results. Although we were able to recruit a large cohort of individuals, a higher sample size may have produced clearer results. However, for a VLSM study, the analysis was adequately powered [20]. Performing a multivariate regression analysis with lesion volume or the level of vigilance as regressors in the Liebermeister test did not produce significant results. After 2016 and the end of our study, EVT became treatment of choice, and major advances in thrombectomy have been made. Although we cannot rule out this may have influenced our results, we do not think that these technological advances have a major impact on the decision on the anesthetic approach and effect on the statistical VLSM comparison of cerebral lesion patterns between the GA and CS groups. Physicians were not questioned about the reasons for their decision between GA and CS, which would have been a valuable additional information. We used imaging protocols with both CT and MRI scans, which could have affected the analysis. Unfortunately, CT perfusion imaging is not validated for the VLSM analysis, so we used CT scans > 24 h after admission to ensure that the infarction was well demarcated. However, using this approach that has been applied in previous studies, “tissue at risk” that contributed to the clinical symptoms prior to EVT may not be included [21, 31]. The sole use of MRI scans would have been preferable, as tissue damage in stroke may be diffuse and not detectable in CT, but also play a role in the development of neurologic deficits [32].
Conclusions
In conclusion, we postulate that the clinical presentation and severity of symptoms due to the location of lesions may be crucial for physicians to favor GA over CS in EVT of AIS. The analysis revealed lesions of the middle cerebral artery territory, basal ganglia, the left temporal lobe, and of brain regions of the posterior cerebral circulation, especially the left thalamus, to be associated with GA. Additionally, patients with GA were more often affected by aphasia and had higher aphasia severity and lower vigilance scores. Following our results, the higher disability, poorer clinical presentation, and lower cooperation due to aphasia of patients with those lesion locations may influence the treating physicians to favor GA in EVT treatment.
Availability of data and material
Authors will review requests for access to the data that support the findings of this study, and access will be granted upon reasonable request.
References
Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A et al (2015) Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med 372:2285–2295. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1415061
Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH et al (2016) Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet 387:1723–1731. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X
Rentzos A, Karlsson JE, Lundqvist C, Rosengren L, Hellstrom M, Wikholm G (2018) Endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke in the posterior circulation. Interv Neuroradiol 24:405–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1591019918762320
Rasmussen LK, Simonsen CZ, Rasmussen M (2019) Anesthesia practice for endovascular therapy of acute ischemic stroke in Europe. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 32:523–530. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000746
Ilyas A, Chen CJ, Ding D, Foreman PM, Buell TJ, Ironside N, Taylor DG, Kalani MY, Park MS, Southerland AM, Worrall BB (2018) Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke under general anesthesia versus conscious sedation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 112:e355–e367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.049
Shan W, Yang D, Wang H, Xu L, Zhang M, Liu W, Zi W, Hao Y, Xiong Y, Xu G, Liu X (2018) General anesthesia may have similar outcomes with conscious sedation in thrombectomy patients with acute ischemic stroke: a real-world registry in China. Eur Neurol 80:7–13. https://doi.org/10.1159/000490901
Powers CJ, Dornbos D 3rd, Mlynash M, Gulati D, Torbey M, Nimjee SM, Lansberg MG, Albers GW, Marks MP (2019) Thrombectomy with conscious sedation compared with general anesthesia: a DEFUSE 3 analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 40:1001–1005. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6059
Lowhagen Henden P, Rentzos A, Karlsson JE, Rosengren L, Leiram B, Sundeman H, Dunker D, Schnabel K, Wikholm G, Hellstrom M, Ricksten SE (2017) General anesthesia versus conscious sedation for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke: the AnStroke trial (anesthesia during stroke). Stroke 48:1601–1607. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016554
Schonenberger S, Henden PL, Simonsen CZ et al (2019) Association of general anesthesia vs procedural sedation with functional outcome among patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing thrombectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 322:1283–1293. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.11455
Simonsen CZ, Yoo AJ, Sorensen LH, Juul N, Johnsen SP, Andersen G, Rasmussen M (2018) Effect of general anesthesia and conscious sedation during endovascular therapy on infarct growth and clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol 75:470–477. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.4474
Charil A, Zijdenbos AP, Taylor J, Boelman C, Worsley KJ, Evans AC, Dagher A (2003) Statistical mapping analysis of lesion location and neurological disability in multiple sclerosis: application to 452 patient data sets. Neuroimage 19:532–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00117-4
Ringleb P, Veltkamp R Akuttherapie des Ischämischen Schlaganfalls - Rekanalisierende Therapie (Ergänzung 2015). https://www.DGN.Org/leitlinien/3198-030-140-rekanalisierende-therapie-ergaenzung-akuttherapie-schlaganfall. Accessed 10 April 2020
Brott T, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, Spilker J, Holleran R, Eberle R, Hertzberg V (1989) Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke 20:864–870. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.20.7.864
Rorden C, Karnath HO, Bonilha L (2007) Improving lesion-symptom mapping. J Cogn Neurosci 19:1081–1088. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.7.1081
McCausland Center for Brain Imaging (2007) MRIcron software. http://www.mccauslandcenter.sc.edu/mricro/mricron. Accessed 2017
Rorden C, Bonilha L, Fridriksson J, Bender B, Karnath HO (2012) Age-specific CT and MRI templates for spatial normalization. Neuroimage 61:957–965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.020
McCausland Center for Brain Imaging (2014) Clinical Toolbox for SPM8. http://www.nitrc.org/frs/?group_id=881. Accessed 11 April 2017
Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neuroscience (2012) Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM). http://www.filo.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/. Accessed 11 April 2017
Bates E, Wilson SM, Saygin AP, Dick F, Sereno MI, Knight RT, Dronkers NF (2003) Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. Nat Neurosci 6:448–450. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1050
Rorden C, Karnath HO, Leonardo B (2007) Improving lesion-symptom mapping. J Cogn Neurosci 19:1081–1088. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.7.1081
Frohlich K, Macha K, Gerner ST, Bobinger T, Schmidt M, Dorfler A, Hilz MJ, Schwab S, Seifert F, Kallmunzer B, Winder K (2019) Angioedema in stroke patients with thrombolysis. Stroke 50:1682–1687. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025260
Pillay SB, Binder JR, Humphries C, Gross WL, Book DS (2017) Lesion localization of speech comprehension deficits in chronic aphasia. Neurology 88:970–975. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000003683
Singer OC, Berkefeld J, Nolte CH et al (2015) Mechanical recanalization in basilar artery occlusion: the ENDOSTROKE study. Ann Neurol 77:415–424. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24336
Mattle HP, Arnold M, Lindsberg PJ, Schonewille WJ, Schroth G (2011) Basilar artery occlusion. Lancet Neurol 10:1002–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70229-0
McDonagh DL, Olson DM, Kalia JS, Gupta R, Abou-Chebl A, Zaidat OO (2010) Anesthesia and sedation practices among neurointerventionalists during acute ischemic stroke endovascular therapy. Front Neurol 1:118. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2010.00118
Rasmussen M, Simonsen CZ, Sorensen LH, Dyrskog S, Rusy DA, Sharma D, Juul N (2017) Anaesthesia practices for endovascular therapy of acute ischaemic stroke: a Nordic survey. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 61:885–894. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.12934
Kim YB, Moon HS, Suh BC, Park KY, Lee YT, Chung PW (2011) Topographic patterns and stroke subtypes according to progressive motor deficits in lacunar syndrome. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 20:352–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2010.02.006
Binder JR (2015) The Wernicke area: modern evidence and a reinterpretation. Neurology 85:2170–2175. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002219
Bajada CJ, Haroon HA, Azadbakht H, Parker GJM, Lambon Ralph MA, Cloutman LL (2017) The tract terminations in the temporal lobe: their location and associated functions. Cortex 97:277–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.03.013
Bakker-Marshall I, Takashima A, Schoffelen JM, van Hell JG, Janzen G, McQueen JM (2018) Theta-band oscillations in the middle temporal gyrus reflect novel word consolidation. J Cogn Neurosci 30:621–633. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01240
Winder K, Seifert F, Ohnemus T, Sauer EM, Kloska S, Dorfler A, Hilz MJ, Schwab S, Kohrmann M (2015) Neuroanatomic correlates of poststroke hyperglycemia. Ann Neurol 77:262–268. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24322
Campbell BCV, Majoie C, Albers GW et al (2019) Penumbral imaging and functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy versus medical therapy: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data. Lancet Neurol 18:46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30314-4
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
GS, SS, KM, TMK, AD, FE, TE, PH, SL, IM, MS, and SS collected the data.
KF, KW, BK, FS, and MK designed the study and analyzed the data.
KF and KW wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval
Ethics approval was obtained by the Ethics Committee of FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg (registration number 377_17Bc). The authors certify that the study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Consent to participate
All patients or the legally authorized representatives gave written and informed consent to participate in the study.
Consent for publication
All patients or the legally authorized representatives gave written and informed consent to the use of the data for publication.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Fröhlich, K., Siedler, G., Stoll, S. et al. The anesthetic approach for endovascular recanalization therapy depends on the lesion site in acute ischemic stroke. Neuroradiology 63, 2121–2129 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-021-02762-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-021-02762-3