Skip to main content

Perivascular spaces and brain waste clearance systems: relevance for neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular pathology

Abstract

Perivascular spaces (PVS) of the brain, often called Virchow-Robin spaces, comprise fluid, cells and connective tissue, and are externally limited by astrocytic endfeet. PVS are involved in clearing brain waste and belong to the “glymphatic” system and/or the “intramural periarterial drainage” pathway through the basement membranes of the arteries. Related brain waste clearance systems include the blood–brain barrier, scavenger cells, cerebrospinal fluid, perineural lymphatic drainage pathways and the newly characterised meningeal lymphatic vessels. Any functional abnormality of PVS or related clearance systems might lead to accumulation of brain waste. It has been postulated that PVS enlargement can be secondary to accumulation of β-amyloid. Lack of integrity of the vascular wall, microbleeds, cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) and enlarged PVS often occur in the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease, preceding substantial brain atrophy. PVS enlargement in the form of état criblé at the basal ganglia has also been considered to reflect focal atrophy, most probably secondary to ischaemic injury, based upon both pathological and imaging arguments. In addition, distinct topographic patterns of enlarged PVS are related to different types of microangiopathy: CAA is linked to enlarged juxtacortical PVS, whereas subjects with vascular risk factors tend to have enlarged PVS in the basal ganglia. Therefore, enlarged PVS are progressively being regarded as a marker of neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular pathology. The present review addresses the evolving concept of PVS and brain waste clearance systems, the potential relevance of their dysfunction to neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular pathology, and potential therapeutic approaches of interest.

Introduction

Perivascular spaces (PVS) of the brain, often called Virchow-Robin spaces, are generally considered to be expansions containing fluid around small vessels. PVS usually correspond to normal findings (or can be even invisible) in the neuroimaging assessment of healthy individuals, but have the tendency to increase in number and enlarge with the process of ageing [1].

PVS are implicated in the drainage (cf. clearance) of waste products from the brain. Specifically, PVS are part of the paravascular way of clearing brain waste [2] and of other recently proposed systems, such as the so-called “glymphatic” system [3], and/or the “intramural periarterial drainage” (IPAD) pathway through the basement membranes of the arteries [4]. It is also established that PVS are related to the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and contain scavenger cells, which remove brain waste. In addition, PVS are related to the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulation and the perineural lymphatic drainage, and are possibly related to the newly characterised meningeal lymphatic vessels [5,6,7].

The present review aims at describing the evolving concept of PVS and brain waste clearance systems, possible reasons for dysfunction or enlargement of PVS, and how this dysfunction or enlargement can be associated with—or might play a role in—the progress of several pathological conditions causing cognitive impairment and dementia, such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) and cerebrovascular pathology. Therapeutic approaches that potentially improve the function of PVS and brain waste clearance systems are also described.

Perivascular spaces of the brain

Although an elementary definition of “perivascular space” may be that of a space surrounding a blood vessel, this term has been credited to several distinct spaces by different authors over more than one century, leading to extensive controversy as to what PVS actually correspond to.

Historical perspective and current concepts

In 1843, Durand-Fardel observed multiple small holes within the brain, mainly located at the basal ganglia and white matter. He described this observation as the so-called état criblé in the textbook Traité du Ramollissement du Cerveau. Durand-Fardel reported the état criblé as something with a perforated sieve-like appearance, with or without associated brain tissue changes [8].

In the article Ueber die Erweiterung kleinerer Gefäfse, published in the Medical Journal Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin in 1851, Virchow described microscopic spaces between the inner/middle lamina (tunica intima and media) and the outer lamina (tunica adventitia) of the small brain vessels in direct communication with the subarachnoid space. Virchow did not report pathological findings in the corresponding laminae, nor in the adjacent perivascular tissue [9, 10].

In 1859, Robin described similar spaces to those previously proposed by Virchow, also postulating that they did not represent any pathological finding, but Robin’s description differed from the former with respect to the location of the spaces, given that this author considered them as closed channels in the outer lamina (tunica adventitia) of the vessels [9, 10].

There were other descriptions, currently regarded as having historical interest, corresponding—at least partly—to the so-called PVS. Curiously, in 1865, His used an experimental technique and introduced ink directly into the brain tissue, describing spaces surrounding perforating vessels of the brain and spinal cord, which he considered to be the “lymphatics” of the nervous system. These spaces were later assumed to be artefactual by Woollam and Millen [10].

In 1875, Key and Retzius postulated the existence of funnel-shaped spaces surrounding the perforating blood vessels into the central nervous system (CNS), enclosed between the pia mater and the arachnoid, and containing CSF. These authors denominated such spaces as piatrichter (a term combining the words pia and trichter—a German word meaning funnel). Key and Retzius assumed that these spaces communicated borderless with the subarachnoid space, in keeping with later descriptions from Weed in 1923 [11] and with the assumption that PVS were mere expansions of the subarachnoid space into the brain (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic representation of a perivascular space (PVS) according to Weed et al. (1923). The PVS is represented as communicating borderless with the subarachnoid space, in keeping with the assumption that perivascular spaces were mere expansions of the subarachnoid space into the brain. Reproduced from Weed LH. The absorption of cerebrospinal fluid into the venous system. American Journal of Anatomy. 1923; 31(3):191–221 [11]

In 1982, Krahn [12] carried out a scanning electron microscopy study in cats and rabbits demonstrating that blood vessels were covered by leptomeningeal cells in the subarachnoid space and had a reflected sheath of pia mater onto the surface of the brain at the site of the arterial entry and the venous exit (Fig. 2). It was then postulated that spaces surrounding brain vessels were not in direct continuation with the subarachnoid space. In addition, Zhang et al. [13] have shown that cortical arteries and arterioles of the human brain were surrounded by pia matter cells, but not by spaces. Additionally, in the basal ganglia, arteries were found to be surrounded by a double sheath of leptomeninges (i.e. an inner and an outer layer), whereas no outer layer was described around veins [14].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Schematic representation of perivascular spaces (PVS) indirectly communicating with the subarachnoid space (SAS), according to Zhang et al. (1990); the SAS is represented between the arachnoid (A) and pia mater (Pia mater). Please note the existence of a reflected sheath of pia mater onto the surface of the brain at the site of the arterial entry and the venous exit, as well as the existence of leptomeningeal perforations (PF). These perforations increase in size as the vessel wall thickness diminishes, which leads to almost no identifiable pia mater cells at the level of capillaries (CAPS). Reproduced with permission from the Publisher (Wiley) and the authors: Zhang ET, Inman CB, Weller RO. Interrelationships of the pia mater and the perivascular (Virchow-Robin) spaces in the human cerebrum. Journal of Anatomy. 1990 Jun; 170:111–23 [13]

Recent studies on the microscopic anatomy of the cerebral vascular arterial wall confirmed that there are no PVS around cortical arteries [15, 16]. Sporadic “fenestrations” were described in the pial sheath surrounding small arteries of the brain, as well as “pores or stomata” at the CSF-facing leptomeningeal cells, serving as communication points between PVS and the subarachnoid space [13, 17]. This somewhat revives the assumption that, at least in the basal ganglia, there is a communication between the perivascular and subarachnoid spaces indeed. The fact that leptomeningeal openings increase in size (Fig. 2), as the vessel wall thickness diminishes (i.e. as the small arteries progressively enter the brain), leads to no identifiable pia mater cells at the capillary level [13, 18].

Current notions regarding the concept of PVS take into account any compartment, within or outside the vascular wall, externally limited by astrocytic endfeet. In other words, PVS may comprise fluid, cells and connective tissue in the form of extracellular matrix (organised enough to be considered as basement membranes surrounding several cell types), and are externally limited by astrocytic endfeet. Furthermore, it is currently accepted that PVS extend deep enough to surround tiny capillary vessels, where they belong to the so-called neurovascular unit and include the following: the pericapillary fluid space between the endothelial cells and the astrocytic endfeet, basement membranes, as well as scavenger cells (Fig. 3) [18, 19].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Schematic representation of perivascular spaces (PVS) according to current notions at the level of an artery and an arteriole, and at the capillary level. The arrowheads at each side of the black lines point to the internal (endothelial basement membrane [BM]) and external (“Astrocytic endfeet”) boundaries of the PVS at each level. In general, PVS contain cell populations other than those depicted in the illustration; some are not represented (e.g. scavenger cells other than a “Pericyte”). The artery is surrounded by PVS externally covered by leptomeningeal cells (dashed lines). Fenestrations between leptomeningeal cells covering perforating arteries and arterioles gradually increase in size as the small arteries progressively enter the brain (dashed-dotted lines). At the capillary level, there is no longer an identifiable leptomeningeal covering. The current notion of PVS takes into account any compartment, within or outside the vascular wall, externally limited by the “Astrocytic endfeet” (i.e. glia limitans) represented in brown. Any substance entering (or exiting) the PVS from (or to) the brain inevitably crosses the “Astrocytic endfeet”. Likewise, any substance entering (or exiting) the PVS from (or to) the blood inevitably crosses the blood–brain barrier (not specifically represented in the illustration, but corresponding to the vascular endothelial cells, their tight junctions, and the underlying BM)

The aforementioned descriptions helped to clarify the anatomy of spaces surrounding blood vessels in the brain, but they are also on the basis of novel concept proposals underlying brain waste clearance systems described in the following two subsections.

The “paravascular pathway” and the “glymphatic” system

The so-called “paravascular pathway” was first proposed by Rennels et al. [2] based upon a study using intraventricular infusion of horseradish peroxidase as a tracer in cats and dogs. The circulation of the tracer allowed the authors to postulate the occurrence of an influx of CSF from the subarachnoid space into the PVS—surrounding small perforating arteries and arterioles—followed by influx into the interstitial space of the brain at the capillary level, and then by an efflux of the CSF plus interstitial fluid (ISF) via the perivenous spaces. In spite of not having described the precise anatomical components of this pathway, the authors raised the possibility that the periarterial and perivenous spaces might represent channels of CSF influx and CSF plus ISF efflux, respectively [2].

The concept of “paravascular pathway” was revised on the basis of real-time distribution of tracers, with different molecular weights, injected into the cisternal CSF in mice [3]. The tracers were found to move across the astrocytic endfeet—proposed to have a sieving function—from periarterial and periarteriolar spaces to the interstitial space, where a mixture of CSF with ISF occurs; then, a combination of both fluids would be cleared out at the perivenous spaces. The largest part of the influx was found to occur along small perforating arteries of the basal ganglia and thalamus, and the efflux was found to occur both along the superficial and deep cerebral venous systems. From the perivenous spaces, two terminal pathways of brain waste clearance into the venous blood were proposed: the drainage across the postcapillary vasculature through the BBB, and the clearance via the CSF through the arachnoid villi and granulations. An alternative route of brain waste clearance was also proposed along the walls of veins towards the lymphatic cervical lymph nodes. Motive forces supporting a convective bulk flow between the periarterial and perivenous spaces were proposed to be the arterial pulsation and the water transport through aquaporin 4 (AQP4) channels. In short, the combination of the aforementioned anatomical components and mechanisms led to the proposal of the so-called “glymphatic” system [3], a convective pathway of CSF plus ISF recirculation relevant for the removal of brain waste (e.g. β-amyloid) via the venous system.

Although the classical view of the “paravascular pathway” and the “glymphatic” system suggests a size-independent bulk flow of solutes (and water) secondary to arterial pulsation [2, 3, 20, 21], more recent studies have questioned the bulk flow in the interstitial space as well as the facilitating role of water transport by AQP4 channels. As a matter of fact, despite the high hydraulic permeability of PVS [22], it has been claimed that high hydraulic resistance in the interstitial space actually leads to implausibility of any appreciable bulk flow under normal physiological conditions during wakefulness. In other words, such hydraulic resistance of the brain interstitial space might restrict the bulk flow from periarterial to perivenous spaces [18, 22,23,24,25]. Therefore, several amendments to the “glymphatic” hypothesis have been proposed in the past few years. The amendments include the role of diffusion [18] and the periarterial pulsation-driven solute transport through dispersion [24]. Diffusion corresponds to a passive process secondary to stochastic Brownian movements [22], whereas dispersion refers to a combined effect of local mixing and diffusion at the periarterial space [24].

Finally, a major criticism of the “glymphatic” system includes the reported absence of PVS around cortical arteries [15, 16]. On theoretical grounds, it seems however plausible that the “glymphatic” system might combine bulk flow and dispersion of solutes at the subcortical periarterial spaces, as well as diffusion at the capillary level and throughout the interstitial space [18].

The “intramural periarterial drainage” pathway

Following previous proposals since the early-1990s and extensive experimental work on the pattern of β-amyloid deposition in the setting of CAA and AD [26, 27], Weller and Nicoll [28] suggested the periarterial interstitial fluid drainage pathway as being the “lymphatics of the brain”. Later, Carare et al. [29] corroborated this hypothesis and proposed that the brain waste drainage, especially of β-amyloid, would be specifically made via the basement membranes of the capillaries and the basement membranes within the tunica media of the arterioles and arteries. This led to a more detailed proposal that such basement membranes could effectively act as the abovementioned “lymphatics of the brain”. Recently, the nomenclature for this brain waste clearance system changed to “intramural periarterial drainage” (IPAD) pathway [4], which is believed to conduct ISF and solutes, but not cells, along the basement membranes of the capillaries, arterioles and arteries towards the cervical lymph nodes via major cerebral arteries in the neck (cf. internal carotid arteries) [30].

Mechanistic insights for this pathway, which is believed to occur in the opposite direction to the arterial blood flow, were proposed also on the basis of a bulk movement of fluid and solutes reaching the basement membranes. Specifically, a so-called contrary (reflection) wave has been proposed to be the underlying motive force. In addition, a valve-like effect—possibly relying upon physical changes in the conformation of basement membranes and biochemical interactions allowing attachment of solutes—was proposed to prevent reflux [31]. A more recently proposed mechanism is vasomotion: a rhythmic variation in the tonus of the vascular wall, unrelated to arterial pulsation, which results from spontaneous smooth muscle contraction and relaxation. Actually, vasomotion—a notion first proposed by Jones in 1853—can be the major driving force for IPAD rather than a reflection wave [32].

Further arguments in favour of the IPAD pathway rest upon recent experimental work that did not find unequivocal evidence supporting drainage of brain waste through the veins, as well as on the assumption that tracers injected in the CSF can enter the brain across pial-glial basement membranes, but are then cleared out via distinct pericapillary and periarterial basement membranes [33].

Basement membranes

Basement membranes are specialised, laminar, sheaths of extracellular matrix that underlie or surround several cell types, including the vascular endothelium and muscular cells. Basement membranes are mostly formed by the glycoprotein laminin and by collagen type IV. Laminin is believed to initiate the formation of basement membranes, whereas collagen type IV seems to play a role in the corresponding stabilisation and protection from mechanical stresses [34].

Five minutes after injecting fluorescent β-amyloid into the subarachnoid space of mice, Albargothy et al. [33] demonstrated a co-localisation of β-amyloid with α-2 laminin at the pial-glial basement membranes. Twenty-five minutes later (i.e. 30 min after injection), the authors found a co-localisation of β-amyloid with collagen type IV at the basement membranes of smooth muscle cells (cf. tunica media) of cortical arteries. This fits comfortably with the interpretation that the IPAD pathway can actually play a role in the elimination of β-amyloid from the brain via the arterial wall [33].

Related or concomitant brain waste clearance systems

The CNS needs an efficient way of clearing its waste, given that just the brain—although representing 2% of the entire body mass—is responsible for approximately 25% of the global metabolism [35].

Formerly, we have mostly explored how PVS can play a role in clearing brain waste. There are, however, several related or concomitant systems involved in the process, such as the BBB, scavenger cells (e.g. within PVS) and the CSF circulation. Moreover, despite the absence of classical lymphatic vessels in the brain, a sort of lymphatic drainage has been previously subsumed on the basis of a communication between CSF, ISF, brain tissue and the cervical lymph nodes. Furthermore, there are perineural and meningeal lymphatic drainage pathways from the brain to the cervical lymph nodes. These processes play a very significant role to maintain homeostasis, and ultimately contribute to the immune surveillance of the brain [7].

Table 1 summarises the currently proposed brain waste clearance systems. The relative contribution of each of these systems remains unknown. It is, however, suspected that their role might be complementary, because any functional abnormality of a given system may lead to accumulation of brain waste (e.g. β-amyloid) and, therefore, can contribute to the progress of neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular pathology (e.g. AD and CAA).

Table 1 Currently proposed brain waste clearance systems

Blood–brain barrier

The BBB is a very efficient barrier formed by the vascular endothelial cells, their (tight) junctions, and the underlying basement membrane. Put simply, the BBB can ultimately be considered the internal boundary of PVS at the capillary level.

Crucially, it was found that approximately ¾ of the extracellular β-amyloid is directly cleared out of the brain by direct vascular transport across the BBB, mostly via the low-density cholesterol receptor-related protein-1 (LRP1), a process believed to be dependent on the apolipoprotein E (APOE) isoforms [36, 37].

Scavenger cells

PVS contain resident and migratory scavenger cells [38]. Apart from being involved in the immune surveillance of the CNS, scavenger cells contribute to the degradation of extracellular and intracellular waste. Resident scavenger cells mostly include microglia—native, long-living, macrophages derived from the yolk sac [38, 39]. Migratory scavenger cells have a peripheral origin (i.e. from the blood), correspond to monocyte-derived macrophages, include perivascular macrophages and act as assistant cells when microglia becomes activated but is no longer able to contribute to homeostasis and CNS protection [38, 40].

Pericytes (a specific cell population surrounding microvessels) have also been proposed to be relevant in the process of uptake of soluble β-amyloid [36]. In fact, the LRP1 contributing for such an uptake process is expressed both at the abluminal side of the BBB and at the surface of pericytes, as recently demonstrated in one experimental study in rats [41]. Therefore, pericytes can be considered as resident scavenger cells within PVS at the capillary level. In the past decade, it also became apparent that pericytes are particularly important for the maintenance of BBB integrity [36, 37].

In 1981, Mato and Ookawara [42] described a population of fluorescent granular perithelial cells in rats, formerly assumed to be macrophages, located within cerebral PVS. These cells were found to be capable of scavenging waste products from the brain and bloodstream. Recently, such a cell population was found to be similar to a novel one discovered in the zebrafish brain and is currently regarded as a sort of mural lymphatic endothelial cell [35, 43, 44]. Although these cells are present individually and do not form vessels in the zebrafish brain, they were found to express lymphatic endothelial markers. Therefore, it is conceivable that such cells have a lymphatic origin indeed, but it is currently uncertain whether their counterpart actually exists in humans [35].

Finally, both intracellular and extracellular waste degradation processes can also be carried out by astrocytes externally limiting PVS at the microvascular level [45].

Cerebrospinal fluid

It is generally considered that CSF functions as a sink for metabolic brain waste products. In addition, CSF may work in combination with the remainder brain waste clearance systems (e.g. along PVS) as a way of clearing interstitium-derived antigens and immune cells out of the brain [7].

According to the traditional view, CSF is produced in the choroid plexuses, circulates throughout the ventricles, exits across the foramina of Magendie and Luschka to reach the subarachnoid space, and then is absorbed through the arachnoid villi and granulations into the blood of the venous sinuses. However, there has been debate regarding the main site of CSF reabsorption [46]. In fact, the blood-CSF barrier at the choroid plexuses and the perineural and meningeal lymphatic pathways are now regarded as relevant exit routes for the CSF [45]. This speaks to the notion that CSF and the lymphatic system have a close functional association.

Furthermore, the so-called Bulat-Klarica-Orešković hypothesis postulates that ISF and CSF are predominately formed by water filtration throughout the walls of the capillaries in the CNS. According to this hypothesis, the formation and absorption of ISF and CSF occur at the capillary level, across the BBB, as a result of osmotic and hydrostatic pressures. In other words, when the capillary hydrostatic pressure is higher than the osmotic counter-pressure, filtration of water occurs, whereas when the capillary osmotic counter-pressure is higher than the hydrostatic pressure, there is reabsorption of water at the capillary wall. Contrary to the traditional view, the Bulat-Klarica-Orešković hypothesis postulates that the choroid plexuses mostly contribute to CSF absorption (not to secretion), although it is acknowledged that a bidirectional exchange of fluid occurs at this level. A permanent exchange of water and solutes between the CSF and brain tissue is also postulated by this hypothesis [47,48,49], for which PVS certainly play a crucial role.

Perineural lymphatic drainage

It has long been established that CSF and cerebral ISF drain to deep cervical lymph nodes [50, 51]. In fact, the perineural pathways along the optic and olfactory nerves are regarded as relevant lymphatic routes. The peri-olfactory lymphatic drainage route (i.e. around the olfactory nerve sheath) has been particularly well described in mammals, through the cribiform plate and nasal submucosa, before reaching the lymphatic system [7, 46]. This route allows the passage of T cells and antigen-presenting cells into nasal lymphatics and cervical lymph nodes [52].

Meningeal lymphatic vessels

In 2015, meningeal lymphatic vessels lining the transverse and the superior sagittal sinuses were described [6], as well as at the skull base and along the middle meningeal arteries in mice [5]. This stunning discovery was also replicated in living humans using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [53]. The precise anatomical location of the meningeal lymphatic vessels relative to the meningeal layers is yet to be clarified [54], as well as the anatomical connection between such vessels and the subarachnoid space. Nevertheless, studies in mice demonstrated that meningeal lymphatics are capable of modulating both the influx of CSF and solutes into the brain and the efflux of solutes, CSF and ISF. Therefore, there is a potential connection between meningeal lymphatic vessels and the “glymphatic” system, the impairment of which implicating cognitive decline secondary to β-amyloid accumulation and AD pathology [55].

Perivascular spaces dysfunction or enlargement: relevance for neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular pathology

The precise pathophysiological mechanisms underlying dysfunction or enlargement of PVS are currently uncertain. Age-related factors leading to microvascular changes in the brain, including atherosclerosis, arteriolosclerosis and elastin dysfunction, reduce the compliance of arteries and arterioles, as well as the amplitude of their pulsations, compromising the role of PVS in clearing brain waste [56,57,58]. Therefore, a reduction or absence of a strong arterial pulsatile flow may delay the transport of β-amyloid, which is kept for a longer time in PVS, facilitating its attachment and deposition in the corresponding basement membranes. Actually, it has been postulated that PVS dysfunction or enlargement can be secondary to accumulation of β-amyloid [29].

Vascular basement membranes increase in thickness with age due to accumulation of collagen fibres [59]. It is also conceivable that the eventual inability of collagen type IV to repair damage secondary to mechanical stresses might lead to PVS dysfunction or enlargement. As a matter of fact, collagen type IV mutations were found to be associated both with PVS enlargement and a specific type of microangiopathy [60, 61].

Loss of perivascular AQP4 polarisation, which occurs in the ageing brain or as a result of reactive astrogliosis, is also believed to compromise brain waste clearance through the “glymphatic” system [62].

Exposure to high-fat diet or hypercholesterolaemia leads to downregulation of collagen type IV, fibronectin and apolipoprotein E, as well as to upregulation of astrocytic and perivascular macrophage markers. Furthermore, it decreases the number of pericytes and the corresponding ability to clear β-amyloid [63]. Additional vascular risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes, as well as cardiovascular disease, pollution and sedentary lifestyle, can initiate a cascade of events culminating in BBB breakdown and dysfunction [64].

Crucially, BBB breakdown as a result of loss of tight junctions, pericytes and endothelial degeneration leads to accumulation of blood-derived components in the vascular wall and PVS. This promotes PVS dysfunction or enlargement, which leads to lack of removal and subsequent accumulation of β-amyloid in the vascular wall and the brain. BBB breakdown is indeed associated with the progress of cognitive decline [65]. It has also been demonstrated that perivascular clearance dysfunction—essentially secondary to age-related changes in the vascular wall or BBB breakdown—leads to a vicious feed-forward cycle, further driving PVS dysfunction and β-amyloid accumulation both in the vascular wall and in the brain [66]. This contributes to neuronal loss, for which the intracellular accumulation of abnormally phosphorylated tau protein plays a role. Lack of integrity of the vascular wall in association with the occurrence of microbleeds, CAA and enlarged PVS often occurs in the preclinical stages of AD, preceding substantial brain volume loss [37].

Neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular pathology, which often coexist, are the most common causes of cognitive impairment. AD is the most frequent neurodegenerative disease causing dementia. The main histopathological findings of AD include intracellular accumulation of abnormally phosphorylated tau protein (both in the form of neurofibrillary tangles and neuropil threads), extracellular accumulation of β-amyloid (e.g. neuritic plaques), and neuronal loss. AD is the most common cause of cognitive impairment, mostly secondary to grey matter loss. The second most common cause of cognitive impairment is cerebrovascular pathology, which can involve the small or the large vessels, can involve the grey or the white matter, and may have a local or systemic cause [67].

Neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular pathology have a close interrelationship. It is plausible that the latter can contribute to the development of AD. Actually, it is well established that cerebrovascular pathology and late-onset AD share common risk factors. Likewise, cerebrovascular abnormalities can lower the threshold for cognitive impairment or increase its severity in the setting of AD. Moreover, there is a significant proportion of patients with cerebrovascular abnormalities and neuroimaging features of neurodegeneration [68, 69]. Furthermore, CAA typically reflects a specific combination of neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular pathology, as it refers to the deposition of β-amyloid in the vascular wall [67].

There is an increasing body of knowledge supporting that enlarged PVS are associated with dysfunctional brain waste clearance systems. Moreover, enlarged PVS are progressively being regarded as a marker of neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular pathology, such as AD and CAA [1, 70, 71]. Furthermore, enlarged PVS were also proposed to be a marker of BBB dysfunction [72].

Neuroimaging

One of the first MRI-pathological correlation studies published by Braffman et al. [8] described PVS as isointense foci relative to the CSF on all MRI sequences. In other words, PVS are hypointense on T1-weighted images and T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images, isointense on proton density (PD)-weighted images and hyperintense on T2-weighted images. They were also described as small round or linear, sharply demarcated, structures enlarged enough to be seen on MRI.

Most of the PVS visible on MRI measure < 2–3 mm in cross-sectional diameter [73, 74] and are often found (even in young subjects) surrounding perforating arteries entering the striatum through the anterior perforated substance. PVS are also frequently found in elderly subjects at the centrum semiovale or at the cortical-subcortical transition [1, 75]. Another usual location of PVS is the midbrain [75], near the posterior perforated substance.

The distinction between abnormally enlarged and non-abnormally enlarged PVS can be made on the basis of the corresponding shape rather than size. Abnormally enlarged PVS appear to be ectatic and less regular than those non-abnormally enlarged, especially on images representing PVS in a longitudinal view. In addition, a strategy for the neuroradiologist to correctly recognise enlarged PVS in the setting of a pathological condition can be made by taking into account the appearance of adjacent tissue [9]. A key example here is the observation of “radiating stripes with a signal intensity closer” to the cerebral normal-appearing white matter in metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD) both on T1- and T2-weighted MRI. This is a crucial imaging finding with diagnostic significance, secondary to the occurrence of metachromatic deposits in macrophages within PVS [76]. MLD is a metabolic and genetic condition (with possible late-onset) that can cause cognitive impairment and psychosis [67]. Likewise, abnormally enlarged PVS occur in several other lysosomal storage diseases (e.g. mucopolysaccharidoses), as well as in the setting of infectious and inflammatory disorders [9, 76].

Enlarged PVS can be assessed either using visual rating scales [71, 77,78,79], or more sophisticated quantitative neuroimaging approaches on MRI acquired at field strengths up to 3 T. Whereas visual rating is observer-dependent and involves ordinary scales constrained by floor and ceiling effects [80], automatic segmentation approaches might be more precise to detect longitudinal changes. Segmentation-based imaging methods can provide an automatic measure of number, volume, and enlargement of PVS [81, 82]. One study using a deep learning algorithm based on a convolutional neural network regression model to automatically quantify PVS scores on T2-weighted images of the brain found the automatic scores to be more “objective” and “less time consuming” than visual rating scores, but no further image contrasts (other than T2) were used as input images, which might have led to misclassification of lacunar infarcts as PVS [83]. By optimising parameters for multi-modal (multispectral) segmentation using both T1- and T2-weighted MRI as source images, and by combining the ensuing segmented images, estimates of PVS “burden” were found to be strongly correlated with neuroradiological assessments. This enabled both longitudinally and transversally oriented PVS in the centrum semiovale to be represented. Although fully automatic methods of the sort are not prone to inter- or intra-rater variability, more work is needed to ascertain PVS classification in subjects with concomitant cerebrovascular abnormalities. In addition, visual editing is likely to be necessary in complex cases, but an accurate segmentation of PVS may facilitate the analysis of their spatial distribution, orientation and density [84]. The combination of T1- and T2-weighted images also serves to enhance PVS contrast by using a dedicated filtering algorithm to remove “non-structured high frequency spatial noise”, which enables to intensify the visibility of PVS, both for visual rating and for automatic quantification [85]. Another multispectral segmentation algorithm combining bias-corrected T1-weighted images with T2-weighted FLAIR images, as well as an approach to correct misclassification of white matter hyperintensities (WMH) and a combination of signal intensity- and morphology-based steps, ensured accurate classification of enlarged PVS. In particular, the morphology-based step of this algorithm, which took into account both length and width, seems to be particularly useful to provide additional insights into the clinical significance of enlarged PVS [86]. Other combinations of image contrasts, including T1- and T2-weighted, PD-weighted, and T2-weighted FLAIR images for multispectral segmentation of enlarged PVS, in association with morphology-based characterisation (i.e. width, volume and linearity), were successfully used as well [87]. It is, however, noteworthy to point out that automatic segmentation of PVS might still not be completely accurate and that the corresponding results should be interpreted with caution. Recommendations for future studies include the acquisition of isotropic images, as well as further harmonisation of imaging protocols and analyses [80].

Although the majority of MRI studies using intrathecal administration of gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA)—as a tracer—were carried out in animals, there is some information from human subjects in the setting of concomitant pathological conditions (e.g. aqueduct stenosis, CSF leakage, idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and evaluation of ventriculostomy), but this method may cause gadolinium encephalopathy and has yet to be approved for clinical practice. Therefore, available data is insufficient to enlighten mechanisms of brain waste clearance in the setting of usual or pathological ageing [88, 89]. Human studies using intravenous administration of GBCA to study the “glymphatic” system were also attempted. It was postulated that gadolinium deposition in the basal ganglia might occur via the CSF [89]. In addition, non-invasive MRI tracer studies using inversion pulses (i.e. spatial modulation of magnetisation and arterial spin labelling) and phase-contrast methods were investigated, but it is currently difficult to evaluate ISF dynamics, within the brain, using these methods [89].

Diffusion tensor imaging was applied to analyse diffusivity along the PVS, and a significant correlation was found between higher diffusivity and mini-mental state examination scores, indicating an association between lower water diffusivity (along PVS) and increased severity of neurodegenerative pathology presumably of the Alzheimer type [90].

Additional novel approaches include ultra-high-field MRI, acquired at ≥ 7 T, to characterise PVS at the millimetre scale [91,92,93]. T2-weighted images acquired at 7 T offer an isotropic spatial resolution (voxel size = 0.4 × 0.4 × 0.4 mm) and an entire brain coverage at a scanning time of approximately 8 min. They enable to increase detectability of PVS, especially in patients with AD, both using a visual rating scale and an automatic segmentation method [92]. Diffusion-weighted imaging at ultra-high field takes advantage of PVS fluid to increase their conspicuity, especially using relatively low b-values (i.e. < 1000 s/mm2). Nevertheless, there are limitations of ultra-high-field MRI secondary to an increased sensitivity to motion, which causes artefacts (e.g. secondary to physiologic involuntary and/or spontaneous movements, such as heartbeat and respiration). There is also increased magnetic field inhomogeneity causing decrease in the signal-to-noise ratio, especially at the peripheral part of the brain. This limits the ability to detect juxtacortical PVS. In addition, there are safety issues related both to an increased radiofrequency specific absorption rate (SAR) and to a much more limited range of compatible biomedical implants and devices. The use of appropriate coils and parallel imaging may overcome part of these limitations [93].

Finally, magnetic resonance encephalography can also be used to assess the so-called “glymphatic” clearance, using optical flow estimation analysis aimed at quantifying the cardiovascular pulse propagation in the human brain [94].

État criblé, lacunar infarcts, white matter hyperintensities and microbleeds

Numerous enlarged PVS in the basal ganglia—a condition also referred to as état criblé—is a pathological finding [1]. In addition, PVS enlargement in the form of état criblé has been considered to reflect focal atrophy based upon both pathological and imaging arguments [95, 96]. It is entirely plausible that such a pattern of focal volume loss, around deep small vessels, may be secondary to ischaemic injury. As a matter of fact, in patients with état criblé, it can be difficult to rule out associated focal ischaemic lesions, such as lacunar infarcts (Fig. 4). In 1901, Pierre Marie proposed état lacunaire as a distinct entity corresponding to multiple deep lacunar infarcts. Meanwhile, the term état lacunaire has been incorporated within the so-called subcortical ischaemic vascular dementia [97]. Although lacunar infarcts are also hypointense on T1-weighted images, they usually have a more irregular shape than PVS and a peripheral rim of gliosis (Fig. 4) hyperintense on T2-weighted FLAIR images [1].

Fig. 4
figure 4

État criblé, lacunar infarct, and white matter hyperintensities. A 77-year-old man with vascular risk factors and cognitive impairment (clinically expressed as lack of executive functioning and apathy) underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). T2-weighted MRI (left column) shows multiple enlarged perivascular spaces (PVS) in the form of état criblé at the basal ganglia. Both arrows indicate the concomitance of a small right putaminal lacunar infarct. Please note the irregularly shaped peripheral rim of gliosis hyperintense on T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) image (right arrow) helping to differentiate the lacunar infarct from adjacent PVS. In addition, please note the associated white matter hyperintensities (e.g. asterisk on the bottom right T2-weighted FLAIR image)

État criblé is frequently associated with white matter changes (Fig. 4). In fact, Maclullich et al. [79] postulated an association among enlarged PVS, diffuse confluent WMH and cognitive impairment. Diffuse confluent WMH on T2-weighted images are generally considered to be a neuroimaging marker of ischaemic small vessel disease in elderly subjects associated with considerable hypoperfusion [98].

Microbleeds, also known as haemorrhagic lacunes, are hypointense foci (< 5 mm) on gradient-echo T2*-weighted images. Susceptibility-weighted imaging is currently the preferred MRI sequence for their detection [99]. Microbleeds secondary to vascular risk factors, such as hypertension, are usually found in the basal ganglia, the thalamus and the posterior fossa. Peripheral microbleeds at the cortical-subcortical transition occur in CAA [100] and in other specific types of microangiopathy. In any of those circumstances, the existence of microbleeds is associated with loss of integrity of the vascular wall [101].

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy

Neuroimaging evidence of CAA occurs in a substantial proportion of patients with AD, even in familial cases without vascular risk factors [102]. Enlargement of juxtacortical PVS has been linked to CAA (Fig. 5). This was attributed to accumulation of β-amyloid and to impairment in the corresponding process of drainage [91], secondary to neurodegenerative pathology of the Alzheimer type. Furthermore, distinct topographic patterns of enlarged PVS are related to different types of microangiopathy. Patients with CAA have enlarged juxtacortical PVS along with peripheral haemorrhages, microbleeds or siderosis. Subjects with vascular risk factors (e.g. hypertension) tend to have enlarged PVS in the basal ganglia, as well as a more severe degree of WMH [103].

Fig. 5
figure 5

Enlarged juxtacortical perivascular spaces (PVS). Post-mortem T2-weighted magnetic resonance image acquired at 7 T (top) showing sharply demarcated juxtacortical hyperintensities corresponding to “many severely enlarged PVS” (arrow) in a patient with pathologically confirmed cerebral amyloid angiopathy (bottom). Please note the absence of PVS at the cortical level. Modified and reproduced with permission from the Publisher (SAGE) and the authors: van Veluw SJ, Biessels GJ, Bouvy WH, Spliet WG, Zwanenburg JJ, Luijten PR, Macklin EA, Rozemuller AJ, Gurol ME, Greenberg SM, Viswanathan A, Martinez-Ramirez S. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy severity is linked to dilation of juxtacortical perivascular spaces. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 2016; 36(3):576–580 [91]

Potential therapeutic approaches of interest

Preventing or minimising the impact of modifiable vascular risk factors (e.g. hypertension, diabetes and hypercholesterolaemia) can help to preserve the integrity and robustness of the vascular wall, and promote an efficient perivascular clearance of brain waste. Accordingly, vasoactive drugs (e.g. inhibitors of phosphodiesterases) can improve perivascular drainage. For instance, the positive chronotropic, elasticity-promoting, arterial pulse duration time increase and vasodilatory effects of cilostazol have been proposed to promote the efficiency of perivascular drainage [104]. Likewise, other inhibitors of phosphodiesterases (e.g. caffeine and sildenafil) were found to have similar effects, but further experimental studies are needed to confirm their efficiency [7]. These therapeutic approaches have the potential to enhance both the “glymphatic” system and/or the IPAD pathway.

Certain therapeutic approaches were specifically devised to enhance the efficiency of the “glymphatic” system by increasing the production of ISF or expanding the brain extracellular space. The increase in ISF production can be attained at the BBB level (e.g. secondary to brain-derived arginine vasopressin at the abluminal secretory surface of the endothelium) [105]. Natural sleep (or anaesthesia) was found to be associated with a 60% increase in the brain interstitial space of mice. Considering the aforementioned high hydraulic resistance in the brain interstitial space during wakefulness, sleep might increase the convective flow of CSF plus ISF and, therefore, the efficiency of the “glymphatic” system [106]. Sleep is also known to be associated with increased CSF production. After administration of adrenergic antagonists in mice during wakefulness, CSF influx and the extracellular space were found to increase to levels comparable to those observed during sleep or anaesthesia. Therefore, a decrease in adrenergic signalling results in expansion (and decreased resistance) of the brain extracellular space. Actually, sleep—a state of decreased adrenergic tone—is associated with an increased rate of β-amyloid clearance [106]. Curiously, a single night of sleep deprivation results in accumulation of β-amyloid in the human hippocampus and thalamus [107]. Sleep quality improvement has been proposed to reduce the risk of AD [108], and a lateral position of the head during sleep seems to promote the efficiency of the “glymphatic” system, according to results of one study carried out in anesthetised rats [109]. In general, an adequate sleep time, a consolidated sleep pattern, the avoidance of sleep fragmentation, and treatment of sleep disorders may constitute general future recommendations to avoid neurodegeneration [108].

Studies using a rat model of traumatic brain injury found that statins reduce reactive astrogliosis [110] and, possibly, the accumulation of tau protein leading to neurodegeneration. This assumption led to the speculation that statins could improve the “glymphatic” system efficiency by preserving the perivascular polarisation of AQP4 channels [111]. Physical exercise has also been shown to promote “glymphatic” clearance of β-amyloid in aged mice, secondary to improved AQP4 expression and polarisation, as well as to reduced microglia activation and astrogliosis [112].

Therapeutic approaches aimed at eliminating β-amyloid deposits in the vascular wall and facilitating the function of PVS may be achieved by targeting brain waste clearance systems other than the “glymphatic” one. Studies in mouse models have shown the possibility to enhance β-amyloid clearance, using focused ultrasound, via the BBB. Such enhanced β-amyloid clearance was found to be associated with improvement of memory and behavioural measures [113, 114]. Targeting scavenger cells also revealed promising results. For instance, the activation of perivascular macrophages might constitute a valid therapeutic strategy to clear vascular amyloid and enable further brain waste clearance through the PVS [115]. Likewise, targeting other scavenger cells, such as the pericytes, by increasing the activity of the LRP1/APOE clearance system, has potential therapeutic effects. Specifically, injecting pericytes derived from stem cells of APOE ε3 carriers (i.e. subjects at low risk of developing neurodegeneration) or using genome-editing technologies in pericytes of APOE ε4 carriers (i.e. subjects at high risk of developing neurodegeneration) is an approach to consider, so that pericytes with enhanced ability of clearing β-amyloid can be generated [41].

Strategies to facilitate perivascular clearance of soluble β-amyloid in combination with novel anti-β-amyloid immunotherapies yield a potential therapeutic avenue for both AD and CAA, but the major challenge will be to promote successful removal of insoluble β-amyloid plaques from the brain—as demonstrated in transgenic mouse models after immunisation [116] and in subsequent clinical trials—without substantial entrapment of β-amyloid in the vascular wall or the PVS, so that CAA-related inflammation or other ominous side effects attributable to autoimmune responses (e.g. T-lymphocyte meningoencephalitis) can be avoided [117,118,119].

Finally, computational models simulating biological and pathophysiological processes not only represent a way of understanding how brain waste clearance systems normally work or how they fail under neurodegeneration but also serve to understand how effective novel therapeutic approaches can be to counteract their failure [120, 121].

Conclusion

The anatomical concept and terminology of PVS have evolved over more than one century. Although a certain degree of PVS enlargement is often considered to be indicative of normal ageing, dysfunctional and/or enlarged PVS are progressively being regarded as a marker of both neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular pathology.

Dysfunctional and enlarged PVS can be associated with impaired efficiency in removing β-amyloid from the brain. The accumulation of β-amyloid is currently believed to have a major role in the progress of AD and CAA. Therefore, a better understanding of factors involved in the perivascular transport of solutes from the brain is crucial, given that novel therapeutic approaches improving β-amyloid elimination might prevent the development of AD and CAA. This is important, as the pre-symptomatic neuropathological changes start in individuals years or even decades before the clinical manifestation of AD [122].

Insights into PVS function and dysfunction have themselves raised the interest in novel therapeutic approaches aimed at modifying the natural history of neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular pathology. Although the understanding of brain waste clearance systems is improving, current knowledge about their interaction is still insufficient. A key example here is the assumption that the “glymphatic” system and the IPAD pathway correspond to two different (or independent) proposals to explain brain waste clearance. It is, however, relevant to point out that each of the proposals resulted from distinct research methodologies. Specifically, the location of tracer injection and the timing of the corresponding movement evaluation differed among several experiments leading to each of the proposals [3, 4, 29]. Therefore, more work is needed to clarify to what extent both proposals can correspond to a common underlying brain waste clearance system or represent “two faces of the same coin”. An alternative possibility is to explore whether the role of each of these two systems can be the transport and distribution (along PVS) of solutes (e.g. β-amyloid) cleared out through further concomitant ways.

References

  1. Barkhof F, Fox NC, Bastos-Leite AJ, Scheltens P (2011) Normal ageing. In: Neuroimaging in dementia. Springer, pp 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00818-4_4

  2. Rennels ML, Gregory TF, Blaumanis OR, Fujimoto K, Grady PA (1985) Evidence for a ‘paravascular’ fluid circulation in the mammalian central nervous system, provided by the rapid distribution of tracer protein throughout the brain from the subarachnoid space. Brain Res 326(1):47–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(85)91383-6

  3. Iliff JJ, Wang M, Liao Y, Plogg BA, Peng W, Gundersen GA, Benveniste H, Vates GE, Deane R, Goldman SA, Nagelhus EA, Nedergaard M (2012) A paravascular pathway facilitates CSF flow through the brain parenchyma and the clearance of interstitial solutes, including amyloid beta. Sci Transl Med 4 (147):147ra111. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3003748

  4. Diem AK, MacGregor Sharp M, Gatherer M, Bressloff NW, Carare RO, Richardson G (2017) Arterial pulsations cannot drive intramural periarterial drainage: significance for Abeta drainage. Front Neurosci 11:475. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00475

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Aspelund A, Antila S, Proulx ST, Karlsen TV, Karaman S, Detmar M, Wiig H, Alitalo K (2015) A dural lymphatic vascular system that drains brain interstitial fluid and macromolecules. J Exp Med 212(7):991–999. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20142290

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Louveau A, Smirnov I, Keyes TJ, Eccles JD, Rouhani SJ, Peske JD, Derecki NC, Castle D, Mandell JW, Lee KS, Harris TH, Kipnis J (2015) Structural and functional features of central nervous system lymphatic vessels. Nature 523(7560):337–341. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14432

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Sun BL, Wang LH, Yang T, Sun JY, Mao LL, Yang MF, Yuan H, Colvin RA, Yang XY (2018) Lymphatic drainage system of the brain: a novel target for intervention of neurological diseases. Prog Neurobiol 163–164:118–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2017.08.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Braffman BH, Zimmerman RA, Trojanowski JQ, Gonatas NK, Hickey WF, Schlaepfer WW (1988) Brain MR: pathologic correlation with gross and histopathology. 1. Lacunar infarction and Virchow-Robin spaces. AJR Am J Roentgenol 151 (3):551–558. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.151.3.551

  9. Groeschel S, Chong WK, Surtees R, Hanefeld F (2006) Virchow-Robin spaces on magnetic resonance images: normative data, their dilatation, and a review of the literature. Neuroradiology 48(10):745–754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-006-0112-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Woollam DH, Millen JW (1955) The perivascular spaces of the mammalian central nervous system and their relation to the perineuronal and subarachnoid spaces. J Anat 89(2):193–200

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Weed LH (1923) The absorption of cerebrospinal fluid into the venous system. Am J Anatomy 31(3):191–221. https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1000310302

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Krahn V (1982) The pia mater at the site of the entry of blood vessels into the central nervous system. Anat Embryol (Berl) 164(2):257–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00318509

  13. Zhang ET, Inman CB, Weller RO (1990) Interrelationships of the pia mater and the perivascular (Virchow-Robin) spaces in the human cerebrum. J Anat 170:111–123

  14. Pollock H, Hutchings M, Weller RO, Zhang ET (1997) Perivascular spaces in the basal ganglia of the human brain: their relationship to lacunes. J Anat 191(Pt 3):337–346. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-7580.1997.19130337.x

  15. Morris AW, Sharp MM, Albargothy NJ, Fernandes R, Hawkes CA, Verma A, Weller RO, Carare RO (2016) Vascular basement membranes as pathways for the passage of fluid into and out of the brain. Acta Neuropathol 131(5):725–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1555-z

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Weller RO, Sharp MM, Christodoulides M, Carare RO, Mollgard K (2018) The meninges as barriers and facilitators for the movement of fluid, cells and pathogens related to the rodent and human CNS. Acta Neuropathol 135(3):363–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-018-1809-z

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pizzo ME, Wolak DJ, Kumar NN, Brunette E, Brunnquell CL, Hannocks MJ, Abbott NJ, Meyerand ME, Sorokin L, Stanimirovic DB, Thorne RG (2018) Intrathecal antibody distribution in the rat brain: surface diffusion, perivascular transport and osmotic enhancement of delivery. J Physiol 596(3):445–475. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP275105

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Abbott NJ, Pizzo ME, Preston JE, Janigro D, Thorne RG (2018) The role of brain barriers in fluid movement in the CNS: is there a ‘glymphatic’ system? Acta Neuropathol 135(3):387–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-018-1812-4

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zlokovic BV (2011) Neurovascular pathways to neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease and other disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci 12(12):723–738. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3114

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Cserr HF, Ostrach LH (1974) Bulk flow of interstitial fluid after intracranial injection of blue dextran 2000. Exp Neurol 45(1):50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4886(74)90099-5

  21. Iliff JJ, Wang M, Zeppenfeld DM, Venkataraman A, Plog BA, Liao Y, Deane R, Nedergaard M (2013) Cerebral arterial pulsation drives paravascular CSF-interstitial fluid exchange in the murine brain. J Neurosci 33(46):18190–18199. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1592-13.2013

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Wolak DJ, Thorne RG (2013) Diffusion of macromolecules in the brain: implications for drug delivery. Mol Pharm 10(5):1492–1504. https://doi.org/10.1021/mp300495e

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Smith AJ, Jin BJ, Verkman AS (2015) Muddying the water in brain edema? Trends Neurosci 38(6):331–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2015.04.006

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Asgari M, de Zelicourt D, Kurtcuoglu V (2016) Glymphatic solute transport does not require bulk flow. Sci Rep 6:38635. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38635

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith AJ, Yao X, Dix JA, Jin BJ, Verkman AS (2017) Test of the ‘glymphatic’ hypothesis demonstrates diffusive and aquaporin-4-independent solute transport in rodent brain parenchyma. eLife 6. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27679

  26. Weller RO, Kida S, Zhang ET (1992) Pathways of fluid drainage from the brain–morphological aspects and immunological significance in rat and man. Brain Pathol 2(4):277–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3639.1992.tb00704.x

  27. Preston SD, Steart PV, Wilkinson A, Nicoll JA, Weller RO (2003) Capillary and arterial cerebral amyloid angiopathy in Alzheimer’s disease: defining the perivascular route for the elimination of amyloid beta from the human brain. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 29(2):106–117. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2990.2003.00424.x

  28. Weller RO, Nicoll JA (2003) Cerebral amyloid angiopathy: pathogenesis and effects on the ageing and Alzheimer brain. Neurol Res 25(6):611–616. https://doi.org/10.1179/016164103101202057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Carare RO, Bernardes-Silva M, Newman TA, Page AM, Nicoll JA, Perry VH, Weller RO (2008) Solutes, but not cells, drain from the brain parenchyma along basement membranes of capillaries and arteries: significance for cerebral amyloid angiopathy and neuroimmunology. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 34(2):131–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2990.2007.00926.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bakker EN, Bacskai BJ, Arbel-Ornath M, Aldea R, Bedussi B, Morris AW, Weller RO, Carare RO (2016) Lymphatic clearance of the brain: perivascular, paravascular and significance for neurodegenerative diseases. Cell Mol Neurobiol 36(2):181–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10571-015-0273-8

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Schley D, Carare-Nnadi R, Please CP, Perry VH, Weller RO (2006) Mechanisms to explain the reverse perivascular transport of solutes out of the brain. J Theor Biol 238(4):962–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.07.005

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Di Marco LY, Farkas E, Martin C, Venneri A, Frangi AF (2015) Is vasomotion in cerebral arteries impaired in Alzheimer’s disease? J Alzheimers Dis 46(1):35–53. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-142976

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Albargothy NJ, Johnston DA, MacGregor-Sharp M, Weller RO, Verma A, Hawkes CA, Carare RO (2018) Convective influx/glymphatic system: tracers injected into the CSF enter and leave the brain along separate periarterial basement membrane pathways. Acta Neuropathol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-018-1862-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Jayadev R, Sherwood DR (2017) Basement membranes. Curr Biol 27(6):R207–R211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.02.006

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bower NI, Hogan BM (2018) Brain drains: new insights into brain clearance pathways from lymphatic biology. J Mol Med (Berl) 96(5):383–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-018-1634-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shibata M, Yamada S, Kumar SR, Calero M, Bading J, Frangione B, Holtzman DM, Miller CA, Strickland DK, Ghiso J, Zlokovic BV (2000) Clearance of Alzheimer’s amyloid-beta1-40 peptide from brain by LDL receptor-related protein-1 at the blood-brain barrier. J Clin Invest 106(12):1489–1499. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI10498

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Montagne A, Zhao Z, Zlokovic BV (2017) Alzheimer’s disease: a matter of blood-brain barrier dysfunction? J Exp Med 214(11):3151–3169. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20171406

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Perry VH, Teeling J (2013) Microglia and macrophages of the central nervous system: the contribution of microglia priming and systemic inflammation to chronic neurodegeneration. Semin Immunopathol 35(5):601–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00281-013-0382-8

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Ginhoux F, Greter M, Leboeuf M, Nandi S, See P, Gokhan S, Mehler MF, Conway SJ, Ng LG, Stanley ER, Samokhvalov IM, Merad M (2010) Fate mapping analysis reveals that adult microglia derive from primitive macrophages. Science 330(6005):841–845. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1194637

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. London A, Cohen M, Schwartz M (2013) Microglia and monocyte-derived macrophages: functionally distinct populations that act in concert in CNS plasticity and repair. Front Cell Neurosci 7:34. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2013.00034

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Ma Q, Zhao Z, Sagare AP, Wu Y, Wang M, Owens NC, Verghese PB, Herz J, Holtzman DM, Zlokovic BV (2018) Blood-brain barrier-associated pericytes internalize and clear aggregated amyloid-beta42 by LRP1-dependent apolipoprotein E isoform-specific mechanism. Mol Neurodegener 13(1):57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-018-0286-0

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Mato M, Ookawara S (1981) Influences of age and vasopressin on the uptake capacity of fluorescent granular perithelial cells (FGP) of small cerebral vessels of the rat. Am J Anat 162(1):45–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1001620105

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. van Lessen M, Shibata-Germanos S, van Impel A, Hawkins TA, Rihel J, Schulte-Merker S (2017) Intracellular uptake of macromolecules by brain lymphatic endothelial cells during zebrafish embryonic development. eLife 6. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25932

  44. Venero Galanternik M, Castranova D, Gore AV, Blewett NH, Jung HM, Stratman AN, Kirby MR, Iben J, Miller MF, Kawakami K, Maraia RJ, Weinstein BM (2017) A novel perivascular cell population in the zebrafish brain. eLife 6. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24369

  45. Tarasoff-Conway JM, Carare RO, Osorio RS, Glodzik L, Butler T, Fieremans E, Axel L, Rusinek H, Nicholson C, Zlokovic BV, Frangione B, Blennow K, Menard J, Zetterberg H, Wisniewski T, de Leon MJ (2015) Clearance systems in the brain-implications for Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurol 11(8):457–470. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2015.119

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Johanson CE, Duncan JA 3rd, Klinge PM, Brinker T, Stopa EG, Silverberg GD (2008) Multiplicity of cerebrospinal fluid functions: new challenges in health and disease. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 5:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8454-5-10

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Oreskovic D, Klarica M (2010) The formation of cerebrospinal fluid: nearly a hundred years of interpretations and misinterpretations. Brain Res Rev 64(2):241–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.04.006

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Bulat M, Klarica M (2011) Recent insights into a new hydrodynamics of the cerebrospinal fluid. Brain Res Rev 65(2):99–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.08.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Oreskovic D, Rados M, Klarica M (2017) Role of choroid plexus in cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics. Neuroscience 354:69–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.04.025

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Bradbury MW, Cserr HF, Westrop RJ (1981) Drainage of cerebral interstitial fluid into deep cervical lymph of the rabbit. Am J Physiol 240(4):F329-336. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.1981.240.4.F329

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Szentistvanyi I, Patlak CS, Ellis RA, Cserr HF (1984) Drainage of interstitial fluid from different regions of rat brain. Am J Physiol 246(6 Pt 2):F835-844. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.1984.246.6.F835

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Engelhardt B, Carare RO, Bechmann I, Flugel A, Laman JD, Weller RO (2016) Vascular, glial, and lymphatic immune gateways of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 132(3):317–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1606-5

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Absinta M, Ha SK, Nair G, Sati P, Luciano NJ, Palisoc M, Louveau A, Zaghloul KA, Pittaluga S, Kipnis J, Reich DS (2017) Human and nonhuman primate meninges harbor lymphatic vessels that can be visualized noninvasively by MRI. eLife 6. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.29738

  54. Raper D, Louveau A, Kipnis J (2016) How do meningeal lymphatic vessels drain the CNS? Trends Neurosci 39(9):581–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2016.07.001

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Da Mesquita S, Louveau A, Vaccari A, Smirnov I, Cornelison RC, Kingsmore KM, Contarino C, Onengut-Gumuscu S, Farber E, Raper D, Viar KE, Powell RD, Baker W, Dabhi N, Bai R, Cao R, Hu S, Rich SS, Munson JM, Lopes MB, Overall CC, Acton ST, Kipnis J (2018) Functional aspects of meningeal lymphatics in ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 560(7717):185–191. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0368-8

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Weller RO, Subash M, Preston SD, Mazanti I, Carare RO (2008) Perivascular drainage of amyloid-beta peptides from the brain and its failure in cerebral amyloid angiopathy and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Pathol 18(2):253–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3639.2008.00133.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Fonck E, Feigl GG, Fasel J, Sage D, Unser M, Rufenacht DA, Stergiopulos N (2009) Effect of aging on elastin functionality in human cerebral arteries. Stroke 40(7):2552–2556. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.528091

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Weller RO, Djuanda E, Yow HY, Carare RO (2009) Lymphatic drainage of the brain and the pathophysiology of neurological disease. Acta Neuropathol 117(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-008-0457-0

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Farkas E, de Vos RA, Donka G, Jansen Steur EN, Mihaly A, Luiten PG (2006) Age-related microvascular degeneration in the human cerebral periventricular white matter. Acta Neuropathol 111(2):150–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-005-0007-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Alamowitch S, Plaisier E, Favrole P, Prost C, Chen Z, Van Agtmael T, Marro B, Ronco P (2009) Cerebrovascular disease related to COL4A1 mutations in HANAC syndrome. Neurology 73(22):1873–1882. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c3fd12

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Lanfranconi S, Markus HS (2010) COL4A1 mutations as a monogenic cause of cerebral small vessel disease: a systematic review. Stroke 41(8):e513-518. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.581918

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Mestre H, Kostrikov S, Mehta RI, Nedergaard M (2017) Perivascular spaces, glymphatic dysfunction, and small vessel disease. Clin Sci (Lond) 131(17):2257–2274. https://doi.org/10.1042/CS20160381

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Hawkes CA, Gentleman SM, Nicoll JA, Carare RO (2015) Prenatal high-fat diet alters the cerebrovasculature and clearance of beta-amyloid in adult offspring. J Pathol 235(4):619–631. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.4468

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Sweeney MD, Zhao Z, Montagne A, Nelson AR, Zlokovic BV (2019) Blood-brain barrier: from physiology to disease and back. Physiol Rev 99(1):21–78. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00050.2017

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Bowman GL, Dayon L, Kirkland R, Wojcik J, Peyratout G, Severin IC, Henry H, Oikonomidi A, Migliavacca E, Bacher M, Popp J (2018) Blood-brain barrier breakdown, neuroinflammation, and cognitive decline in older adults. Alzheimers Dement 14(12):1640–1650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2018.06.2857

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Kress BT, Iliff JJ, Xia M, Wang M, Wei HS, Zeppenfeld D, Xie L, Kang H, Xu Q, Liew JA, Plog BA, Ding F, Deane R, Nedergaard M (2014) Impairment of paravascular clearance pathways in the aging brain. Ann Neurol 76(6):845–861. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24271

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Barkhof F, Fox NC, Bastos-Leite AJ, Scheltens P (2011) Neuroimaging in dementia. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00818-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Bastos Leite AJ, Scheltens P, Barkhof F (2004) Pathological aging of the brain: an overview. Top Magn Reson Imaging 15(6):369–389. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.rmr.0000168070.90113.dc

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Bastos-Leite AJ, van der Flier WM, van Straaten EC, Staekenborg SS, Scheltens P, Barkhof F (2007) The contribution of medial temporal lobe atrophy and vascular pathology to cognitive impairment in vascular dementia. Stroke 38(12):3182–3185. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.490102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Ramirez J, Berezuk C, McNeely AA, Gao F, McLaurin J, Black SE (2016) Imaging the perivascular space as a potential biomarker of neurovascular and neurodegenerative diseases. Cell Mol Neurobiol 36(2):289–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10571-016-0343-6

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Patankar TF, Mitra D, Varma A, Snowden J, Neary D, Jackson A (2005) Dilatation of the Virchow-Robin space is a sensitive indicator of cerebral microvascular disease: study in elderly patients with dementia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26(6):1512–1520

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Potter GM, Doubal FN, Jackson CA, Chappell FM, Sudlow CL, Dennis MS, Wardlaw JM (2015) Enlarged perivascular spaces and cerebral small vessel disease. Int J Stroke 10(3):376–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijs.12054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Bokura H, Kobayashi S, Yamaguchi S (1998) Distinguishing silent lacunar infarction from enlarged Virchow-Robin spaces: a magnetic resonance imaging and pathological study. J Neurol 245(2):116–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004150050189

  74. Wardlaw JM, Smith EE, Biessels GJ, Cordonnier C, Fazekas F, Frayne R, Lindley RI, O’Brien JT, Barkhof F, Benavente OR, Black SE, Brayne C, Breteler M, Chabriat H, DeCarli C, de Leeuw FE, Doubal F, Duering M, Fox NC, Greenberg S, Hachinski V, Kilimann I, Mok V, Oostenbrugge R, Pantoni L, Speck O, Stephan BC, Teipel S, Viswanathan A, Werring D, Chen C, Smith C, van Buchem M, Norrving B, Gorelick PB, Dichgans M, STandards for ReportIng Vascular changes on nEuroimaging (STRIVE v1) (2013) Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration. Lancet Neurol 12(8):822–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70124-8

  75. Kwee RM, Kwee TC (2007) Virchow-Robin spaces at MR imaging. Radiographics 27(4):1071–1086. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.274065722

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. van der Knaap MS, Valk J (2005) Magnetic resonance of myelination and myelin disorders. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27660-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Adams HH, Hilal S, Schwingenschuh P, Wittfeld K, van der Lee SJ, DeCarli C, Vernooij MW, Katschnig-Winter P, Habes M, Chen C, Seshadri S, van Duijn CM, Ikram MK, Grabe HJ, Schmidt R, Ikram MA (2015) A priori collaboration in population imaging: the Uniform Neuro-Imaging of Virchow-Robin Spaces Enlargement consortium. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 1(4):513–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2015.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Potter GM, Chappell FM, Morris Z, Wardlaw JM (2015) Cerebral perivascular spaces visible on magnetic resonance imaging: development of a qualitative rating scale and its observer reliability. Cerebrovasc Dis 39(3–4):224–231. https://doi.org/10.1159/000375153

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Maclullich AM, Wardlaw JM, Ferguson KJ, Starr JM, Seckl JR, Deary IJ (2004) Enlarged perivascular spaces are associated with cognitive function in healthy elderly men. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75(11):1519–1523. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2003.030858

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Ballerini L, Booth T, Valdes Hernandez MDC, Wiseman S, Lovreglio R, Munoz Maniega S, Morris Z, Pattie A, Corley J, Gow A, Bastin ME, Deary IJ, Wardlaw J (2020) Computational quantification of brain perivascular space morphologies: associations with vascular risk factors and white matter hyperintensities. A study in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936. NeuroImage Clin 25:102120.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102120

  81. Ramirez J, Berezuk C, McNeely AA, Scott CJ, Gao F, Black SE (2015) Visible Virchow-Robin spaces on magnetic resonance imaging of Alzheimer’s disease patients and normal elderly from the Sunnybrook Dementia Study. J Alzheimers Dis 43(2):415–424. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-132528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Wang X, Valdes Hernandez Mdel C, Doubal F, Chappell FM, Piper RJ, Deary IJ, Wardlaw JM (2016) Development and initial evaluation of a semi-automatic approach to assess perivascular spaces on conventional magnetic resonance images. J Neurosci Methods 257:34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.09.010

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Dubost F, Yilmaz P, Adams H, Bortsova G, Ikram MA, Niessen W, Vernooij M, de Bruijne M (2019) Enlarged perivascular spaces in brain MRI: automated quantification in four regions. NeuroImage 185:534–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Ballerini L, Lovreglio R, Valdes Hernandez MDC, Ramirez J, MacIntosh BJ, Black SE, Wardlaw JM (2018) Perivascular spaces segmentation in brain MRI using optimal 3D filtering. Sci Rep 8(1):2132. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19781-5

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Sepehrband F, Barisano G, Sheikh-Bahaei N, Cabeen RP, Choupan J, Law M, Toga AW (2019) Image processing approaches to enhance perivascular space visibility and quantification using MRI. Sci Rep 9(1):12351. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48910-x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Schwartz DL, Boespflug EL, Lahna DL, Pollock J, Roese NE, Silbert LC (2019) Autoidentification of perivascular spaces in white matter using clinical field strength T1 and FLAIR MR imaging. NeuroImage 202:116126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Boespflug EL, Schwartz DL, Lahna D, Pollock J, Iliff JJ, Kaye JA, Rooney W, Silbert LC (2018) MR imaging-based multimodal autoidentification of perivascular spaces (mMAPS): automated morphologic segmentation of enlarged perivascular spaces at clinical field strength. Radiology 286(2):632–642. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017170205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Eide PK, Ringstad G (2015) MRI with intrathecal MRI gadolinium contrast medium administration: a possible method to assess glymphatic function in human brain. Acta Radiol Open 4(11):2058460115609635. https://doi.org/10.1177/2058460115609635

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Taoka T, Naganawa S (2020) Glymphatic imaging using MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 51(1):11–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Taoka T, Masutani Y, Kawai H, Nakane T, Matsuoka K, Yasuno F, Kishimoto T, Naganawa S (2017) Evaluation of glymphatic system activity with the diffusion MR technique: diffusion tensor image analysis along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS) in Alzheimer’s disease cases. Jpn J Radiol 35(4):172–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-017-0617-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. van Veluw SJ, Biessels GJ, Bouvy WH, Spliet WG, Zwanenburg JJ, Luijten PR, Macklin EA, Rozemuller AJ, Gurol ME, Greenberg SM, Viswanathan A, Martinez-Ramirez S (2016) Cerebral amyloid angiopathy severity is linked to dilation of juxtacortical perivascular spaces. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 36(3):576–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X15620434

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Cai K, Tain R, Das S, Damen FC, Sui Y, Valyi-Nagy T, Elliott MA, Zhou XJ (2015) The feasibility of quantitative MRI of perivascular spaces at 7T. J Neurosci Methods 256:151–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.09.001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Barisano G, Law M, Custer RM, Toga AW, Sepehrband F (2021) Perivascular space imaging at ultrahigh field MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 29(1):67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2020.09.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Rajna Z, Raitamaa L, Tuovinen T, Heikkila J, Kiviniemi V, Seppanen T (2019) 3D multi-resolution optical flow analysis of cardiovascular pulse propagation in human brain. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 38(9):2028–2036. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2019.2904762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Barkhof F (2004) Enlarged Virchow-Robin spaces: do they matter? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75(11):1516–1517. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2004.044578

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Awad IA, Johnson PC, Spetzler RF, Hodak JA (1986) Incidental subcortical lesions identified on magnetic resonance imaging in the elderly. II Postmortem pathological correlations. Stroke 17(6):1090–1097. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.17.6.1090

  97. Erkinjuntti T, Inzitari D, Pantoni L, Wallin A, Scheltens P, Rockwood K, Roman GC, Chui H, Desmond DW (2000) Research criteria for subcortical vascular dementia in clinical trials. J Neural Transm Suppl 59:23–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6781-6_4

  98. Bastos-Leite AJ, Kuijer JP, Rombouts SA, Sanz-Arigita E, van Straaten EC, Gouw AA, van der Flier WM, Scheltens P, Barkhof F (2008) Cerebral blood flow by using pulsed arterial spin-labeling in elderly subjects with white matter hyperintensities. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29(7):1296–1301. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1091

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Shams S, Martola J, Cavallin L, Granberg T, Shams M, Aspelin P, Wahlund LO, Kristoffersen-Wiberg M (2015) SWI or T2*: which MRI sequence to use in the detection of cerebral microbleeds? The Karolinska Imaging Dementia Study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36(6):1089–1095. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4248

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Greenberg SM, Charidimou A (2018) Diagnosis of cerebral amyloid angiopathy: evolution of the Boston Criteria. Stroke 49(2):491–497. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016990

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Barkhof F, Fox NC, Bastos-Leite AJ, Scheltens P (2011) Vascular dementia. In: Neuroimaging in dementia. Springer, pp 137–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00818-4_6

  102. Ryan NS, Bastos-Leite AJ, Rohrer JD, Werring DJ, Fox NC, Rossor MN, Schott JM (2012) Cerebral microbleeds in familial Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 135 (Pt 1):e201; author reply e202. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr126

  103. Charidimou A, Boulouis G, Pasi M, Auriel E, van Etten ES, Haley K, Ayres A, Schwab KM, Martinez-Ramirez S, Goldstein JN, Rosand J, Viswanathan A, Greenberg SM, Gurol ME (2017) MRI-visible perivascular spaces in cerebral amyloid angiopathy and hypertensive arteriopathy. Neurology 88(12):1157–1164. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000003746

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Saito S, Ihara M (2014) New therapeutic approaches for Alzheimer’s disease and cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Front Aging Neurosci 6:290. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00290

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Plog BA, Nedergaard M (2018) The glymphatic system in central nervous system health and disease: past, present, and future. Annu Rev Pathol 13:379–394. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pathol-051217-111018

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Xie L, Kang H, Xu Q, Chen MJ, Liao Y, Thiyagarajan M, O’Donnell J, Christensen DJ, Nicholson C, Iliff JJ, Takano T, Deane R, Nedergaard M (2013) Sleep drives metabolite clearance from the adult brain. Science 342(6156):373–377. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1241224

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Shokri-Kojori E, Wang GJ, Wiers CE, Demiral SB, Guo M, Kim SW, Lindgren E, Ramirez V, Zehra A, Freeman C, Miller G, Manza P, Srivastava T, De Santi S, Tomasi D, Benveniste H, Volkow ND (2018) β-Amyloid accumulation in the human brain after one night of sleep deprivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115(17):4483–4488. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1721694115

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. Lucey BP, Bateman RJ (2014) Amyloid-beta diurnal pattern: possible role of sleep in Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. Neurobiol Aging 35(Suppl 2):S29-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.03.035

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Lee H, Xie L, Yu M, Kang H, Feng T, Deane R, Logan J, Nedergaard M, Benveniste H (2015) The effect of body posture on brain glymphatic transport. J Neurosci 35(31):11034–11044. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1625-15.2015

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Wu H, Mahmood A, Lu D, Jiang H, Xiong Y, Zhou D, Chopp M (2010) Attenuation of astrogliosis and modulation of endothelial growth factor receptor in lipid rafts by simvastatin after traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 113(3):591–597. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.9.JNS09859

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. Iliff JJ, Chen MJ, Plog BA, Zeppenfeld DM, Soltero M, Yang L, Singh I, Deane R, Nedergaard M (2014) Impairment of glymphatic pathway function promotes tau pathology after traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci 34(49):16180–16193. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3020-14.2014

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. He XF, Liu DX, Zhang Q, Liang FY, Dai GY, Zeng JS, Pei Z, Xu GQ, Lan Y (2017) Voluntary exercise promotes glymphatic clearance of amyloid beta and reduces the activation of astrocytes and microglia in aged mice. Front Mol Neurosci 10:144. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2017.00144

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  113. Burgess A, Dubey S, Yeung S, Hough O, Eterman N, Aubert I, Hynynen K (2014) Alzheimer disease in a mouse model: MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound targeted to the hippocampus opens the blood-brain barrier and improves pathologic abnormalities and behavior. Radiology 273(3):736–745. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14140245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Leinenga G, Gotz J (2015) Scanning ultrasound removes amyloid-beta and restores memory in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. Sci Transl Med 7 (278):278ra233. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa2512

  115. Hawkes CA, McLaurin J (2009) Selective targeting of perivascular macrophages for clearance of beta-amyloid in cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(4):1261–1266. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805453106

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Schenk D, Barbour R, Dunn W, Gordon G, Grajeda H, Guido T, Hu K, Huang J, Johnson-Wood K, Khan K, Kholodenko D, Lee M, Liao Z, Lieberburg I, Motter R, Mutter L, Soriano F, Shopp G, Vasquez N, Vandevert C, Walker S, Wogulis M, Yednock T, Games D, Seubert P (1999) Immunization with amyloid-beta attenuates Alzheimer-disease-like pathology in the PDAPP mouse. Nature 400(6740):173–177. https://doi.org/10.1038/22124

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Check E (2002) Nerve inflammation halts trial for Alzheimer’s drug. Nature 415(6871):462. https://doi.org/10.1038/415462a

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Nicoll JA, Wilkinson D, Holmes C, Steart P, Markham H, Weller RO (2003) Neuropathology of human Alzheimer disease after immunization with amyloid-beta peptide: a case report. Nat Med 9(4):448–452. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm840

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Patton RL, Kalback WM, Esh CL, Kokjohn TA, Van Vickle GD, Luehrs DC, Kuo YM, Lopez J, Brune D, Ferrer I, Masliah E, Newel AJ, Beach TG, Castano EM, Roher AE (2006) Amyloid-beta peptide remnants in AN-1792-immunized Alzheimer’s disease patients: a biochemical analysis. Am J Pathol 169(3):1048–1063

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Carare RO (2017) Editorial: clearance pathways for amyloid-beta. Significance for Alzheimer’s disease and its therapy. Front Aging Neurosci 9:339. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00339

  121. Diem AK, Tan M, Bressloff NW, Hawkes C, Morris AW, Weller RO, Carare RO (2016) A simulation model of periarterial clearance of amyloid-beta from the brain. Front Aging Neurosci 8:18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2016.00018

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. Braak H, Braak E, Bohl J, Reintjes R (1996) Age, neurofibrillary changes, Aβ-amyloid and the onset of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Lett 210(2):87–90

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are indebted to Helena Romão Donato, for the assistance with the bibliographical search, and to Sérgio Ferreira, for the assistance with the layout of the illustrations.

Funding

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to António J. Bastos-Leite.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and informed consent

N/A

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gouveia-Freitas, K., Bastos-Leite, A.J. Perivascular spaces and brain waste clearance systems: relevance for neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular pathology. Neuroradiology 63, 1581–1597 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-021-02718-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-021-02718-7

Keywords

  • Brain
  • Cognitive impairment
  • “Glymphatic”
  • Lymphatic
  • Perivascular spaces
  • Virchow-Robin spaces