Skip to main content
Log in

The role of 2-hydroxyglutarate magnetic resonance spectroscopy for the determination of isocitrate dehydrogenase status in lower grade gliomas versus glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article has been updated

Abstract

Purpose

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) provides a non-invasive means of determining isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) status. Determination of 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG) presence through MRS is a means of determining IDH status; however, differences may be seen by grade. The goal of this paper is to perform a diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) meta-analysis on 2-HG MRS for IDH status in both lower-grade glioma (LGG) and glioblastoma (GBM) in preoperative patients.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Diagnostic Test Accuracy guidelines. Quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2. The search was up to date as of 09/02/2021. Nine English-language journal articles were included.

Results

The meta-analysis found a pooled sensitivity of 93% (95% CI 58–99%) and specificity of 84% (95% CI 51–96%) for LGG (n= 181). For GBM (n= 77), the pooled sensitivity was 84% (95% CI 25.0–99%) and the specificity was 97% (95% CI 43–100%).

Conclusion

2-HG MRS shows promise as a non-invasive means of determining IDH status, with specificity higher for GBM and sensitivity higher for LGG. The wide confidence intervals are notable, however, in particular related to the small number of IDH-mutant GBM studied. Diagnostic heterogeneity was particularly present for LGG, and the hierarchical summary receiver operator curves showed poor predictive accuracy in both groups. For more conclusive results, diagnostic test accuracy statistics need to be quantified with larger studies and more deliberate study design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 07 April 2021

    Supplementary material has been updated

References

  1. Yan H, Parsons DW, Jin G, McLendon R, Rasheed BA, Yuan W, Kos I, Batinic-Haberle I, Jones S, Riggins GJ, Friedman H (2009) IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. N Engl J Med 360(8):765–773. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0808710

  2. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Kleihues P, Ellison DW (2016) The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 131(6):803–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Louis DN, Wesseling P, Aldape K, Brat DJ, Capper D, Cree IA, Eberhart C, Figarella-Branger D, Fouladi M, Fuller GN, Giannini C, Haberler C, Hawkins C, Komori T, Kros JM, Ng HK, Orr BA, Park S-H, Paulus W, Perry A, Pietsch T, Reifenberger G, Rosenblum M, Rous B, Sahm F, Sarkar C, Solomon DA, Tabori U, van den Bent MJ, von Deimling A, Weller M, White VA, Ellison DW (2020) cIMPACT-NOW update 6: new entity and diagnostic principle recommendations of the cIMPACT-Utrecht meeting on future CNS tumor classification and grading. Brain Pathol 30(4):844–856. https://doi.org/10.1111/bpa.12832

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Wick W, Meisner C, Hentschel B, Platten M, Schilling A, Wiestler B, Sabel MC, Koeppen S, Ketter R, Weiler M, Tabatabai G, von Deimling A, Gramatzki D, Westphal M, Schackert G, Loeffler M, Simon M, Reifenberger G, Weller M (2013) Prognostic or predictive value of MGMT promoter methylation in gliomas depends on IDH1 mutation. Neurology 81(17):1515–1522. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a95680

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lasocki A, Rosenthal MA, Roberts-Thomson SJ, Neal A, Drummond KJ (2020) Neuro-oncology and radiogenomics: time to integrate? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6769

  6. Lasocki A, Anjari M, Ӧrs Kokurcan S, Thust SC (2020) Conventional MRI features of adult diffuse glioma molecular subtypes: a systematic review. Neuroradiology. 63:353–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-020-02532-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bhandari A, Liong R, Koppen J, Murthy S, Lasocki A (2021) Non-invasive determination of IDH and 1p19q status of lower-grade gliomas using MRI radiomics: a systematic review. Am J Neuroradiol 42:94–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rauschecker AM, Rudie JD, Xie L, Wang J, Duong MT, Botzolakis EJ, Kovalovich AM, Egan J, Cook TC, Bryan RNJR (2020) Artificial intelligence system approaching neuroradiologist-level differential diagnosis accuracy at brain. MRI. 295(3):626–637

    Google Scholar 

  9. Andronesi OC (2018) Precision oncology in the era of radiogenomics: the case of D-2HG as an imaging biomarker for mutant IDH gliomas. Neuro-oncology 20(7):865–867. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noy085

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Suh CH, Kim HS, Jung SC, Choi CG, Kim SJ (2018) 2-Hydroxyglutarate MR spectroscopy for prediction of isocitrate dehydrogenase mutant glioma: a systemic review and meta-analysis using individual patient data. Neuro-oncology 20(12):1573–1583. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noy113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Tietze A, Choi C, Mickey B, Maher EA, Parm Ulhøi B, Sangill R, Lassen-Ramshad Y, Lukacova S, Østergaard L, von Oettingen G (2018) Noninvasive assessment of isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation status in cerebral gliomas by magnetic resonance spectroscopy in a clinical setting. J Neurosurg 128(2):391–398. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.10.Jns161793

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Branzoli F, Pontoizeau C, Tchara L, Di Stefano AL, Kamoun A, Deelchand DK, Valabregue R, Lehericy S, Sanson M, Ottolenghi C, Marjanska M (2019) Cystathionine as a marker for 1p/19q codeleted gliomas by in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Neuro-oncology 21(6):765–774. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noz031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Choi C, Ganji SK, DeBerardinis RJ, Hatanpaa KJ, Rakheja D, Kovacs Z, Yang XL, Mashimo T, Raisanen JM, Marin-Valencia I, Pascual JM, Madden CJ, Mickey BE, Malloy CR, Bachoo RM, Maher EA (2012) 2-hydroxyglutarate detection by magnetic resonance spectroscopy in IDH-mutated patients with gliomas. Nat Med 18(4):624–629. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Crisi G, Filice S, Michiara M, Crafa P, Lana S (2018) 2-Hydroxyglutarate detection by short echo time magnetic resonance spectroscopy in routine imaging study of brain glioma at 3.0 T. J Comput Assist Tomogr 42(3):469–474. https://doi.org/10.1097/rct.0000000000000705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Di Ieva A, Magnussen JS, McIntosh J, Mulcahy MJ, Pardey M, Choi C (2020) Magnetic resonance spectroscopic assessment of isocitrate dehydrogenase status in gliomas: the new frontiers of spectrobiopsy in neurodiagnostics. World Neurosurg 133:e421–e427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.09.040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Moon KS, Lesniak MS (2014) Glioblastoma: risk factors, diagnosis and treatment options. Int J Cancer Res Prev 7(3-4):183–212

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pope WB, Prins RM, Albert Thomas M, Nagarajan R, Yen KE, Bittinger MA, Salamon N, Chou AP, Yong WH, Soto H, Wilson N, Driggers E, Jang HG, Su SM, Schenkein DP, Lai A, Cloughesy TF, Kornblum HI, Wu H, Fantin VR, Liau LM (2012) Non-invasive detection of 2-hydroxyglutarate and other metabolites in IDH1 mutant glioma patients using magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Neuro-Oncol 107(1):197–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-011-0737-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cuccarini V, Antelmi L, Pollo B, Paterra R, Calatozzolo C, Nigri A, DiMeco F, Eoli M, Finocchiaro G, Brenna G, Tramacere I, Bruzzone MG, Anghileri E (2020) In vivo 2-hydroxyglutarate-proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (3 T, PRESS technique) in treatment-naive suspect lower-grade gliomas: feasibility and accuracy in a clinical setting. Neurol Sci 41(2):347–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-04087-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nguyen TB, Melkus G, Taccone M, Moldovan ID, Ghinda D, Gotfrit R, Torres CH, Zakhari N, Chakraborty S, Woulfe J, Jansen G, McInnes MD, Thornhill RE, Cameron I, AlKherayf F (2021) Preoperative determination of isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation in gliomas using spectral editing MRS: a prospective study. J Magn Reson Imaging 53(2):416–426. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, Leeflang MM, Sterne JA, Bossuyt PMM (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155(8):529–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dwamena B (2007) MIDAS: Stata module for meta-analytical integration of diagnostic test accuracy studies. Statistical Software Components

  22. Harbord RM, Whiting P (2009) Metandi: meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy using hierarchical logistic regression. Stata J 9(2):211–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0900900203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Branzoli F, Di Stefano AL, Capelle L, Ottolenghi C, Valabrègue R, Deelchand DK, Bielle F, Villa C, Baussart B, Lehéricy S, Sanson M, Marjanska M (2018) Highly specific determination of IDH status using edited in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Neuro-oncology 20(7):907–916. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nox214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cuccarini V, Antelmi L, Pollo B, Paterra R, Calatozzolo C, Nigri A, Di Meco F, Eoli M, Finocchiaro G, Brenna G, Tramacere I, Bruzzone MG, Anghileri E (2020) In vivo 2-hydroxyglutarate-proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (3 T, PRESS technique) in treatment-naïve suspect lower-grade gliomas: feasibility and accuracy in a clinical setting. Neurol Sci 41(2):347–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-04087-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Natsumeda M, Igarashi H, Nomura T, Ogura R, Tsukamoto Y, Kobayashi T, Aoki H, Okamoto K, Kakita A, Takahashi H, Nakada T, Fujii Y (2014) Accumulation of 2-hydroxyglutarate in gliomas correlates with survival: a study by 3.0-tesla magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2:158. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-014-0158-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Öz G, Deelchand DK, Wijnen JP, Mlynárik V, Xin L, Mekle R, Noeske R, Scheenen TW, Tkáč I Experts' Working Group on Advanced Single Voxel 1H MRS, Andronesi O (2020) Advanced single voxel 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy techniques in humans: Experts' consensus recommendations. NMR in Biomedicine, p.e4236. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4236

  27. Ozturk-Isik E, Cengiz S, Ozcan A, Yakicier C, Ersen Danyeli A, Pamir MN, Özduman K, Dincer A (2020) Identification of IDH and TERTp mutation status using 1H-MRS in 112 hemispheric diffuse gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 51(6):1799–1809. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Horbinski C (2013) What do we know about IDH1/2 mutations so far, and how do we use it? Acta Neuropathol 125(5):621–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-013-1106-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Leeflang MMG, Bossuyt PMM, Irwig L (2009) Diagnostic test accuracy may vary with prevalence: implications for evidence-based diagnosis. J Clin Epidemiol 62(1):5–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.04.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Arian Lasocki was supported by a Peter MacCallum Cancer Foundation Discovery Partner Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhishta Bhandari.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

This was not needed as the study was a meta-analysis of already published data

Informed consent

This was not needed as a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed of existing literature

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 49.5 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhandari, A., Sharma, C., Ibrahim, M. et al. The role of 2-hydroxyglutarate magnetic resonance spectroscopy for the determination of isocitrate dehydrogenase status in lower grade gliomas versus glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. Neuroradiology 63, 1823–1830 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-021-02702-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-021-02702-1

Keywords

Navigation