Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hemodynamic vascular biomarkers for initiation of paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysms using patient-specific computational fluid dynamic simulation based on magnetic resonance imaging

  • Interventional Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We performed computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for patients with and without paraclinoid internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms to evaluate the distribution of vascular biomarkers at the aneurysm initiation sites of the paraclinoid ICA.

Methods

This study included 35 patients who were followed up for aneurysms using 3D time of flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and 3D cine phase-contrast MR imaging. Fifteen affected ICAs were included in group A with the 15 unaffected contralateral ICAs in group B. Thirty-three out of 40 paraclinoid ICAs free of aneurysms and arteriosclerotic lesions were included in group C. We deleted the aneurysms in group A based on the 3D TOF MRA dataset. We performed CFD based on MR data set and obtained wall shear stress (WSS), its derivatives, and streamlines. We qualitatively evaluated their distributions at and near the intracranial aneurysm initiation site among three groups. We also calculated and compared the normalized highest (nh-) WSS and nh-spatial WSS gradient (SWSSG) around the paraclinoid ICA among three groups.

Results

High WSS and SWSSG distribution were observed at and near the aneurysm initiation site in group A. High WSS and SWSSG were also observed at similar locations in group B and group C. However, nh-WSS and nh-SWSSG were significantly higher in group A than in group C, and nh-SWSSG was significantly higher in group A than in group B.

Conclusion

Our findings indicated that nh-WSS and nh-SWSSG were good biomarkers for aneurysm initiation in the paraclinoid ICA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Connolly ES Jr, Rabinstein AA, Carhuapoma JR, Derdeyn CP, Dion J, Higashida RT, et al (2012) Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 43:1711–1737

  2. Shojima M, Oshima M, Takagi K, Torii R, Hayakawa M, Katada K, Morita A, Kirino T (2004) Magnitude and role of wall shear stress on cerebral aneurysm: computational fluid dynamic study of 20 middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Stroke 35:2500–2505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Meng H, Wang Z, Hoi Y, Gao L, Metaxa E, Swartz DD, Kolega J (2007) Complex hemodynamics at the apex of an arterial bifurcation induces vascular remodeling resembling cerebral aneurysm initiation. Stroke 38:1924–1931

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Japan Investigators UCAS, Morita A, Kirino T, Hashi K, Aoki N, Fukuhara S et al (2012) The natural course of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in a Japanese cohort. N Engl J Med 366:2474–2482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Malek AM, Alper SL, Izumo S (1999) Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. JAMA 282:2035–2042

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Markl M, Chan FP, Alley MT, Wedding KL, Draney MT, Elkins CJ, Parker DW, Wicker R, Taylor CA, Herfkens RJ, Pelc NJ (2003) Time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 17:499–496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Isoda H, Ohkura Y, Kosugi T, Hirano M, Takeda H, Hiramatsu H, Yamashita S, Takehara Y, Alley MT, Bammer R, Pelc NJ, Namba H, Sakahara H (2010) In vivo hemodynamic analysis of intracranial aneurysms obtained by magnetic resonance fluid dynamics (MRFD) based on time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI. Neuroradiology 52:921–928

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Steiger HJ, Liepsch DW, Poll A, Reulen HJ (1988) Hemodynamic stress in terminal saccular aneurysms: a laser-Doppler study. Heart Vessel 4:162–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Isoda H, Takehara Y, Kosugi T, Terada M, Naito T, Onishi Y et al (2015) MR-based computational fluid dynamics with patient-specific boundary conditions for the initiation of a sidewall aneurysm of a basilar artery. Magn Reson Med Sci 14:139–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. He X, Ku DN (1996) Pulsatile flow in the human left coronary artery bifurcation: average conditions. J Biomech Eng 118:74–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shimogonya Y, Ishikawa T, Imai Y, Matsuki N, Yamaguchi T (2009) Can temporal fluctuation in spatial wall shear stress gradient initiate a cerebral aneurysm? A proposed novel hemodynamic index, the gradient oscillatory number (GON). J Biomech 42:550–554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mantha A, Karmonik C, Benndorf G, Strother C, Metcalfe R (2006) Hemodynamics in a cerebral artery before and after the formation of an aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:1113–1118

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dolan JM, Kolega J, Meng H (2013) High wall shear stress and spatial gradients in vascular pathology: a review. Ann Biomed Eng 41:1411–1427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kulcsár Z, Ugron A, Marosfoi M, Berentei Z, Paál G, Szikora I (2011) Hemodynamics of cerebral aneurysm initiation: the role of wall shear stress and spatial wall shear stress gradient. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:587–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Geers AJ, Morales HG, Larrabide I, Butakoff C, Bijlenga P, Frangi AF (2017) Wall shear stress at the initiation site of cerebral aneurysms. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 16:97–115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen H, Selimovic A, Thompson H, Chiarini A, Penrose J, Ventikos Y, Watton PN (2013) Investigating the influence of haemodynamic stimuli on intracranial aneurysm inception. Ann Biomed Eng 41:1492–1504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rafiei A, Hafez A, Jahromi BR, Kivisaari R, Canato B, Choque J, Colasanti R, Fransua S, Lehto H, Andrade-Barazarte H, Hernesniemi J (2017) Anatomic features of paraclinoid aneurysms: computed tomography angiography study of 144 aneurysms in 136 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery 81:949–957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Walker PG, Cranney GB, Scheidegger MB, Waseleski G, Pohost GM, Yoganathan AP (1993) Semiautomated method for noise reduction and background phase error correction in MR phase velocity data. J Magn Reson Imaging 3:521–530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Xiang J, Tremmel M, Kolega J, Levy EI, Natarajan SK, Meng H (2012) Newtonian viscosity model could overestimate wall shear stress in intracranial aneurysm domes and underestimate rupture risk. J Neurointerv Surg 4:351–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ruopp MD, Perkins NJ, Whitcomb BW, Schisterman EF (2008) Youden Index and optimal cut-point estimated from observations affected by a lower limit of detection. Biom J 50:419–430

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang Z, Kolega J, Hoi Y, Gao L, Swartz DD, Levy EI, Mocco J, Meng H (2009) Molecular alterations associated with aneurysmal remodeling are localized in the high hemodynamic stress region of a created carotid bifurcation. Neurosurgery 65:169–177

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kolega J, Gao L, Mandelbaum M, Mocco J, Adnan H, Sabareesh K, Siddiqui AH, Natarajan SK, Meng H (2011) Cellular and molecular responses of the basilar terminus to hemodynamics during intracranial aneurysm initiation in a rabbit model. J Vasc Res 48:429–442

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Meng H, Metaxa E, Gao L, Liaw N, Natarajan SK, Swartz DD, Siddiqui AH, Kolega J, Mocco J (2011) Progressive aneurysm development following hemodynamic insult. J Neurosurg 114:1095–1103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Meng H, Tutino VM, Xiang J, Siddiqui A (2014) High WSS or low WSS? Complex interactions of hemodynamics with intracranial aneurysm initiation, growth, and rupture: toward a unifying hypothesis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35:1254–1262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Marcus T. Alley, PhD, for allowing us to use 3D cine PC MRI developed at Stanford University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haruo Isoda.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This study was funded by the JSPS KAKENHI (Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research) (Grant Number 25293264).

Conflict of interest

Takafumi Kosugi is an employee of Renaissance of Technology Corporation, Hamamatsu, Japan.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Watanabe, T., Isoda, H., Takehara, Y. et al. Hemodynamic vascular biomarkers for initiation of paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysms using patient-specific computational fluid dynamic simulation based on magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroradiology 60, 545–555 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-018-2002-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-018-2002-8

Keywords

Navigation