Skip to main content
Log in

Transcervical access via direct neck exposure for neurointerventional procedures in the hybrid angiosuite

  • Interventional Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

A complicated course of the femoral route for neurointervention can prevent approaching the target. Thus, we determined whether transcervical access in the hybrid angiosuite is applicable and beneficial in real practice.

Methods

From January 2014 to March 2017, this approach was used in 17 of 453 (3.75%) cases: 11 cerebral aneurysms (4 ruptured, 7 unruptured), 4 acute occlusions of the large cerebral artery, 1 proximal internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis, and 1 direct carotid cavernous fistula (CCF).

Results

All patients were elderly (mean age, 78.1 years). The main cause was severe tortuosity of the supra-aortic course or the supra-aortic and infra-aortic courses (eight and five cases, respectively), orifice disturbance (three cases), and femoral occlusion (one case). Through neck dissection, 6–8Fr guiding catheters were placed via subcutaneous tunneling to enhance device stability and support. All cerebral aneurysms were embolized (eight complete and three neck remnants) using the combination of several additional devices. Mechanical stent retrieval with an 8Fr balloon guiding catheter was successfully achieved in a few runs (mean, 2 times; range, 1–3) within the proper time window (mean skin to puncture, 17 ± 4 min; puncture to recanalization, 25 ± 4 min). Each stent was satisfactorily deployed in the proximal ICA and direct CCF without catheter kick-back. All puncture sites were closed through direct suturing without complications.

Conclusions

In the hybrid angiosuite, transcervical access via direct neck exposure is feasible in terms of device profile and support when the femoral route has an unfavorable anatomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kurisu K, Osanai T, Kazumata K, Nakayama N, Abumiya T, Shichinohe H, Shimoda Y, Houkin K (2016) Ultrasound-guided femoral artery access for minimally invasive neuro-intervention and risk factors for access site hematoma. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 56:745–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gedikoglu M, Oguzkurt L, Gur S, Andic C, Sariturk C, Ozkan U (2013) Comparison of ultrasound guidance with the traditional palpation and fluoroscopy method for the common femoral artery puncture. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 82:1187–1192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Larrazabal R, Klurfan P, Sarma D, Gunnarsson T (2010) Surgical exposure of the carotid artery for endovascular interventional procedures. Acta Neurochir 152:537–544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dorfer C, Standhardt H, Gruber A, Ferraz-Leite H, Knosp E, Bavinzski G (2012) Direct percutaneous puncture approach versus surgical cutdown technique for intracranial neuroendovascular procedures: technical aspects. World Neurosurg 77:192–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nii K, Kazekawa K, Onizuka M, Aikawa H, Tsutsumi M, Tomokiyo M, Iko M, Kodama T, Matsubara S, Go Y, Tanaka A (2006) Direct carotid puncture for the endovascular treatment of anterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:1502–1504

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ribo M, Flores A, Rubiera M, Pagola J, Mendonca N, Rodriguez-Luna D, Pineiro S, Meler P, Alvarez-Sabin J, Molina CA (2013) Difficult catheter access to the occluded vessel during endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke is associated with worse clinical outcome. J Neurointerv Surg 5(Suppl 1):i70–i73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jadhav AP, Ribo M, Grandhi R, Linares G, Aghaebrahim A, Jovin TG, Jankowitz BT (2014) Transcervical access in acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg 6:652–657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yuzawa I, Kurata A, Suzuki S, Ozawa H, Hagiwara H, Niki J, Yamada M, Fujii K, Kan S, Kitahara T (2007) Efficacy of a direct puncture approach for anterior circulation aneurysms using a newly developed guiding catheter—especially for geriatric patients. Surg Neurol 67:30–34; discussion 34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Matsuda Y, Terada T, Masuo O, Matsumoto H, Ohshima K, Tsumoto T, Tsuura M (2013) The clinical results of transcervical carotid artery stenting and frequency chosen as the approach route of carotid artery stenting in 1,067 consecutive cases. Acta Neurochir 155:1575–1581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Levy EI, Boulos AS, Fessler RD, Bendok BR, Ringer AJ, Kim SH, Qureshi AI, Guterman LR, Hopkins LN (2002) Transradial cerebral angiography: an alternative route. Neurosurgery 51:335–340 discussion 340-332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wiesmann M, Kalder J, Reich A, Brockmann MA, Othman A, Greiner A, Nikoubashman O (2016) Feasibility of combined surgical and endovascular carotid access for interventional treatment of ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg 8:571–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ross IB, Luzardo GD (2006) Direct access to the carotid circulation by cut down for endovascular neuro-interventions. Surg Neurol 65:207–211 discussion 211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ruzsa Z, Nemes B, Pinter L et al (2014) A randomised comparison of transradial and transfemoral approach for carotid artery stenting: RADCAR (RADial access for CARotid artery stenting) study. EuroIntervention 10:381–391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Montorsi P, Galli S, Ravagnani PM, Tresoldi S, Teruzzi G, Caputi L, Trabattoni D, Fabbiocchi F, Calligaris G, Grancini L, Lualdi A, de Martini S, Bartorelli AL (2016) Carotid artery stenting with proximal embolic protection via a transradial or transbrachial approach: pushing the boundaries of the technique while maintaining safety and efficacy. J Endovasc Ther 23:549–560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mokin M, Snyder KV, Levy EI, Hopkins LN, Siddiqui AH (2015) Direct carotid artery puncture access for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke: technical aspects, advantages, and limitations. J Neurointerv Surg 7:108–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Blanc R, Piotin M, Mounayer C, Spelle L, Moret J (2006) Direct cervical arterial access for intracranial endovascular treatment. Neuroradiology 48:925–929

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Murayama Y, Arakawa H, Ishibashi T, Kawamura D, Ebara M, Irie K, Takao H, Ikeuchi S, Ogawa T, Kato M, Kajiwara I, Nishimura S, Abe T (2013) Combined surgical and endovascular treatment of complex cerebrovascular diseases in the hybrid operating room. J Neurointerv Surg 5:489–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Iihara K, Satow T, Matsushige T, Kataoka H, Nakajima N, Fukuda K, Isozaki M, Maruyama D, Nakae T, Hashimoto N (2013) Hybrid operating room for the treatment of complex neurovascular and brachiocephalic lesions. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 22:e277–e285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Faggioli G, Ferri M, Rapezzi C, Tonon C, Manzoli L, Stella A (2009) Atherosclerotic aortic lesions increase the risk of cerebral embolism during carotid stenting in patients with complex aortic arch anatomy. J Vasc Surg 49:80–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lam RC, Lin SC, DeRubertis B, Hynecek R, Kent KC, Faries PL (2007) The impact of increasing age on anatomic factors affecting carotid angioplasty and stenting. J Vasc Surg 45:875–880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Linfante I, Cipolla MJ (2016) Improving reperfusion therapies in the era of mechanical thrombectomy. Transl Stroke Res 7:294–302

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaymaz ZO, Nikoubashman O, Brockmann MA, Wiesmann M, Brockmann C (2017) Influence of carotid tortuosity on internal carotid artery access time in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Interv Neuroradiol 23:583–588

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Son S, Kang DH, Hwang YH, Kim YS, Kim YW (2017) Efficacy, safety, and clinical outcome of modern mechanical thrombectomy in elderly patients with acute ischemic stroke. Acta Neurochir 159:1663–1669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3269-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Daou B, Chalouhi N, Tjoumakaris S, Hasan D, Barros G, Rosenwasser RH, Jabbour P (2016) Alternative access for endovascular treatment of cerebrovascular diseases. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 145:89–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Krishnasamy VP, Hagar MJ, Scher DJ, Sanogo ML, Gabriel GE, Sarin SN (2015) Vascular closure devices: technical tips, complications, and management. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 18:100–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cuellar H, Guimaraens L, Ambekar S, Vivas E, Theron J (2015) Angioseal as a hemostatic device for direct carotid puncture during endovascular procedures. Interv Neuroradiol 21:273–276

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Morris PP, Braden G (1999) Neurointerventional experience with an arteriotomy suture device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20:1706–1709

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pierot L, Herbreteau D, Bracard S, Berge J, Cognard C (2006) An evaluation of immediate sheath removal and use of the angio-seal vascular closure device in neuroradiological interventions. Neuroradiology 48:45–49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong Jun Jeon.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This study was funded by the Hallym University Research Fund 2016 (HURF-2016-33).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures in studies involving human participants were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, J.Y., Park, JH., Jeon, H.J. et al. Transcervical access via direct neck exposure for neurointerventional procedures in the hybrid angiosuite. Neuroradiology 60, 565–573 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-018-1994-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-018-1994-4

Keywords

Navigation