Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Apparent diffusion coefficient vale of the brain in patients with Gaucher’s disease type II and type III

  • Paediatric Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this work is to assess the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of the brain for diagnosis of patients with Gaucher’s disease type II and type III.

Methods

Prospective study was conducted upon 13 patients (nine boys and four girls aged 8 months–14 years: mean 6.1 years) with Gaucher’s disease type II and III and for age-matched control group (n = 13). Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging using a single-shot echo-planar imaging with a diffusion-weighted factor b of 0, 500, and 1,000 s/mm2 was done for all patients and volunteers. The ADC value was calculated in ten regions of the brain parenchyma and correlated with genotyping.

Results

There was significantly lower ADC value of the cortical frontal (P = 0.003), cortical temporal (P = 0.04), frontal subcortical white matter (P = 0.02), corticospinal tract (P = 0.001), cerebellum (P = 0.001), medulla (P = 0.002), and midbrain (P = 0.02) between patients and volunteers. There was significant difference in the ADC value of the frontal and temporal gray matter (P = 0.04 and 0.05, respectively) between patients with heterozygous and homozygous gene mutation.

Conclusion

We concluded that ADC value is a new promising quantitative imaging parameter that can be used for the detection of brain abnormalities in patients with Gaucher’s disease type II and type III and has a correlation with genotyping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Elstein D, Abrahamov A, Hadas-Halpern I, Zimran A (2001) Gaucher’s disease. Lancet 358:324–327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sidransky E (2004) Gaucher disease: complexity in a “simple” disorder. Mol Genet Metab 83:6–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brady RO (2003) Gaucher’s disease: past, present and future. Bailliere’s Clin Haematol 10:621–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Charrow J, Andersson HC, Kaplan P et al (2000) The Gaucher’s registry: demographics and disease characteristics of 1,698 patients with Gaucher’s disease. Arch Intern Med 160:2835–2843

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mehta A (2006) Epidemiology and natural history of Gaucher’s disease. Eur J Intern Med 17:S2–S5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cherin P, Sedel F, Mignot C et al (2006) Neurological manifestations of type 1 Gaucher’s disease: is a revision of disease classification needed? Rev Neurol 162:1076–1083

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Erikson A, Bembi B, Schiffmann R (1997) Neuronopathic forms of Gaucher’s disease. Bailliere’s Clin Haematol 10:711–723

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Grewal R, Doppelt S, Thompson M, Katz D, Brady R, Barton N (1991) Neurologic complications of nonneuronopathic Gaucher’s disease. Arch Neurol 48:1271–1272

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vellodi A, Bembi B, de Villemeur T, Collin-Histed T, Erikson A, Mengel E et al (2001) Management of neuropathic Gaucher disease: a European consensus. J Inherit Metab Dis 24:319–327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Barranger JA, Rice EO, Swaney WP (1999) Gene transfer approaches to the lysosomal storage disorders. Neurochem Res 24:601–615

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pasmanik-Chor M, Madar-Shapiro L, Stein O, Aerts H, Gatt S, Horowitz M (1997) Expression of mutated glucocerebrosidasecerebrosidase alleles in human cells. Hum Mol Genet 6:887–895

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sibille E, Eng C, Kim S et al (1993) Phenotype/genotype correlations in Gaucher disease type I: clinical and therapeutic implications. Am J Hum Genet 52:1094–1101

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Koprivica V, Stone DL, Park JK, Callahan M, Frisch A, Cohen IJ et al (2000) Analysis and classification of 304 mutant alleles in patients with type 1 and type 3 Gaucher disease. Am J Hum Genet 66:1777–1786

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hyerowitz R, Mizukami H, Richardson K, Finn L, Tivt C, Proia R (2004) Global gene expression in a type 2 Gaucher disease brain. Mol Genet Metab 83:288–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tayebi N, Stone D, Sidransky E (1999) Type 2 Gaucher disease: an expanding phenotype. Mol Genet Metab 68:209–219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Thoeny H, Keyzer F (2007) Extracranial applications of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 17:1385–1393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Aicardi J (1993) The inherited leukodystrophies: a clinical overview. J Inherit Metab Dis 16:733–743

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Blaster S, Feigenbaum A (2004) A neuroimaging approach to inborn errors of metabolism. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 14:307–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Meikle P, Hopwood J, Clague A (1999) Prevalence of lysosomal storage disorders. JAMA 281:249–254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chang YC, Huang CC, Chen CY, Zimmerman RA (2000) MRI in acute neuropathic Gaucher’s disease. Neuroradiology 42:48–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin DS, Lin SP, Liang DC, Ho CS, Wu MC (1999) Technetium-99 m-HmPAO brain SPECT in infantile Gaucher’s disease. Pediatr Neurol 20:66–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sakuragawa N, Sasaki M, Fueki N, Yoshikawa H (1991) Uncoupling of blood flow and oxygen metabolism in the cerebellum in type 3 Gaucher disease. Brain Dev 13:190–192

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mercimek-Mahmutoglu S, Gruber S, Rolfs A, Stadlbauer A, Woeber C, Kurnik P et al (2007) Neurological and brain MRS findings in patients with Gaucher disease type 1. Mol Genet Metab 91:390–395

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Patay Z (2005) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in leukodystrophies. Eur Radiol 15:2284–2303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schneider JFL, Il’yasov KA, Boltshauser E, Hennig J, Martin E (2003) Diffusion tensor imaging in cases of adrenoleukodystrophy: preliminary experience as a marker for early demyelination. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24:819–824

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. ter Rahe B, Majoie C, Akkerman E, den Heeten G, Poll-The B, Barth P (2004) Peroxisomal biogenesis disorder: comparison of conventional MR imaging with diffusion-weighted and diffusion-tensor imaging findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 25:1022–1027

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sener R (2003) Metachromatic leukodystrophy. Diffusion MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopy. Acta Radiol 44:440–443

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Conradi N, Kyllerman M, Mansson J, Percy A, Svennerholm L (1991) Late-infantile Gaucher disease in a child with myoclonus and bulbar signs: neuropathological and neurochemical findings. Acta Neuropathol 82:152–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wong K, Sidransky E, Verma A et al (2004) Neuropathology provides clues to the pathophysiology of Gaucher disease. Mol Genet Metab 82:192–207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kaye E, Ullman M, Wilson E, Barranger J (1986) Type 2 and type 3 Gaucher disease: a morphological and biochemical study. Ann Neurol 20:223–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee R (ed) (1982) The pathology of Gaucher disease. Alan R Liss, New York, pp 177–217

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sener RN (2001) Diffusion MRI: apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in the normal brain and a classification of brain disorders based on ADC values. Comput Med Imaging Graph 25:299–326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang L, Thomas K, Davidson M, Casey B, Heier L, Ulug A (2005) MR quantitation of volume and diffusion changes in the developing brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:45–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abdel Razek, A.A.K., Abd El-Gaber, N., Abdalla, A. et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient vale of the brain in patients with Gaucher’s disease type II and type III. Neuroradiology 51, 773–779 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-009-0548-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-009-0548-1

Keywords

Navigation