Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Degenerative diseases of the cervical spine: comparison of a multiecho data image combination sequence with a magnetisation transfer saturation pulse and cervical myelography and CT

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assessing degenerative disease in the cervical spine remains a challenge. There is much controversy about imaging the cervical spine using MRI. Our aim in this prospective study was to compare a T2*-weighted 2D spoiled gradient-echo multiecho sequence (MEDIC) with a magnetisation transfer saturation pulse with cervical myelography and postmyelographic CT. Using an assessment scale we looked at the vertebral bodies, intervertebral discs, neural foramina, anterior and posterior nerve roots, grey matter, ligamenta flava, oedema in the spinal cord and stenosis of the spinal canal. We also evaluated postmyelography CT and the MEDIC sequence for assessing narrowing of the neural foramina in a cadaver cervical spine. We examined 67 disc levels in 18 patients, showing 18 disc prolapses and 21 osteophytes narrowing the spinal canal or the neural foramina. All MRI studies showed these abnormalities findings equally well. Postmyelography CT was significantly better for showing the bony structures and the anterior and posterior nerve roots. The MEDIC sequence provided excellent demonstration of soft-tissue structures such as the intervertebral disc and ligamentum flavum. No statistical differences between the imaging modalities were found in the assessment of narrowing of the neural foramina or the extent of spinal stenosis. The cadaver measurements showed no overestimation of abnormalities using the MEDIC sequence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1a, b
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yousem DM, Atlas SW, Hackney DB (1992) Cervical spine disk herniation: comparison of CT and 3 DFT gradient echo MR scans. J Comput Assist Tomogr 16: 345–351

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Held P, Seitz J, Fründ R, et al (2001) Comparison of two-dimensional gradient echo, turbo spin echo and two-dimensional turbo gradient spin echo sequences in MRI of the cervical spinal cord anatomy. Eur J Radiol 38: 64–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Held P, Dorenbeck U, Seitz J, Fründ R, Albrich H (2003) MRI of the abnormal cervical spinal cord using 2D spoiled gradient echo multiecho sequence (Medic) with magnetization transfer saturation pulse. J Neuroradiol 30: 83–90

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gilliams AR, Soto JA, CarterA P (1997) Fast spin echo vs conventional spin echo in cervical spine imaging. Eur Radiol 7: 1211–1214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsuruda JS, Remley K (1990) Effects of magnetic susceptibility artifacts and motion in evaluating the cervical neural foramina on 3DFT gradient–echo MR imaging. AJNR 12: 237–241

    Google Scholar 

  6. Reul J, Gievers B, Weils J, Thron A (1995) Assessment of the narrow cervical spinal canal: a prospective comparison of MRI, myelography and CT-myelography. Neuroradiology 37: 187–191

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Melhem ER, Benson ML, Beauchamp NJ, Lee RR (1996) Cervical spondylosis: three-dimensional gradient-echo MR with magnetization transfer. AJNR 17: 705–711

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yousem DM, Atlas SW, Goldberg HI, Grossmann RI (1990) Degenerative narrowing of the cervical spine neural foramina: evaluation with high-resolution 3DFT gradient-echo MR Imaging. AJNR 12: 229–236

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tien RD, Buxton RB, Schwaighofer BW, Chu PK (1991) Quantitation of structural distortion of the cervical neural foramina in gradient-echo MR imaging. JMRI 1: 683–687

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Czervionke LF, Daniels DL, Wehrli FW, et al (1988) Magnetic susceptibility artifacts in gradient-recalled echo MR imaging. AJNR 9: 1149–1155

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Grossman RI, Gomori JM, Ramer KN, Lexa FJ, Schnall MD (1994) Magnetization transfer: theory and clinical applications in neuroradiology. RadioGraphics 14: 279–290

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. Dorenbeck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dorenbeck, U., Schreyer, A.G., Schlaier, J. et al. Degenerative diseases of the cervical spine: comparison of a multiecho data image combination sequence with a magnetisation transfer saturation pulse and cervical myelography and CT. Neuroradiology 46, 306–309 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-004-1175-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-004-1175-5

Keywords

Navigation