Skip to main content
Log in

On monoids, \(2\)-firs, and semifirs

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Semigroup Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several authors have studied the question of when the monoid ring \(DM\) of a monoid \(M\) over a ring \(D\) is a right and/or left fir (free ideal ring), a semifir, or a \(2\)-fir (definitions recalled in §1). It is known that for \(M\) nontrivial, a necessary condition for any of these properties to hold is that \(D\) be a division ring. Under that assumption, necessary and sufficient conditions on \(M\) are known for \(DM\) to be a right or left fir, and various conditions on \(M\) have been proved necessary or sufficient for \(DM\) to be a \(2\)-fir or semifir. A sufficient condition for \(DM\) to be a semifir is that \(M\) be a direct limit of monoids which are free products of free monoids and free groups. Warren Dicks has conjectured that this is also necessary. However F. Cedó has given an example of a monoid \(M\) which is not such a direct limit, but satisfies all the known necessary conditions for \(DM\) to be a semifir. It is an open question whether for this \(M,\) the rings \(DM\) are semifirs. We note here some reformulations of the known necessary conditions for a monoid ring \(DM\) to be a \(2\)-fir or a semifir, motivate Cedó’s construction and a variant thereof, and recover Cedó’s results for both constructions. Any homomorphism from a monoid \(M\) into \(\mathbb {Z}\) induces a \(\mathbb {Z}\)-grading on \(DM,\) and we show that for the two monoids just mentioned, the rings \(DM\) are “homogeneous semifirs” with respect to all such nontrivial \(\mathbb {Z}\)-gradings; i.e., have (roughly) the property that every finitely generated homogeneous one-sided ideal is free of unique rank. If \(M\) is a monoid such that \(DM\) is an \(n\)-fir, and \(N\) a “well-behaved” submonoid of \(M,\) we prove some properties of the ring \(DN.\) Using these, we show that for \(M\) a monoid such that \(DM\) is a \(2\)-fir, mutual commutativity is an equivalence relation on nonidentity elements of \(M,\) and each equivalence class, together with the identity element, is a directed union of infinite cyclic groups or of infinite cyclic monoids. Several open questions are noted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Antoine, R., Cedó, F.: Inverting elements in rigid monoids. Comm. Algebra 31, 4179–4194 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Arzhantseva, G.N., Ol’shanskiĭ, A.Yu.: Generality of the class of groups in which subgroups with a lesser number of generators are free (Russian), Mat. Zametki 59, 489–496, 638 (1996); translation in Math. Notes 59, 350–355 (1996)

  3. Bass, H.: Algebraic K-theory. Benjamin, New York, Amsterdam (1968)

  4. Baumslag, G., Shalen, P.B.: Groups whose three-generator subgroups are free. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 40, 163–174 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Bergman, G.M.: On group topologies defined by families of sets (2011, preprint). Readable online at http://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/papers/

  6. Bergman, G.M.: Modules over coproducts of rings. Trans. A. M. S. 200, 1–32 (1974)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Bergman, G.M.: Coproducts and some universal ring constructions. Trans. A. M. S. 200, 33–38 (1974)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Bergman, G.M.: Alternatives to the LaTeX angle bracket symbols \({\setminus }\)langle and \(\setminus \)rangle, http://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/misc/hacks/langl_rangl.html

  9. Cedó, F.: On semifir monoid rings. Publ. Math. 33, 123–132 (1989)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Cedó, F., Pitarch, A.: Construction of left fir monoid rings. J. Algebra 165, 645–660 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Cohen, D.E.: Groups of cohomological dimension one, SLNM 245, Springer, pp. v\(+\)99 1972 .

  12. Cohn, P.M.: On the free product of associative rings. III, J. Algebra 8, 376–383 (1968); Errata at ibid. 10, 123 (1968)

  13. Cohn, P.M.: Dependence in rings. II. The dependence number. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 135, 267–279 (1969)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Cohn, P.M.: Universal Algebra, second edn. Riedel, Dordrecht, Boston (1981)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Cohn, P.M.: Free ideal rings and localization in general rings, New mathematical monographs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)

  16. Dicks, W., Menal, P.: The group rings that are semifirs. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 19(2), 288–290 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Dicks, W., Schofield, A.H.: On semihereditary rings. Comm. Algebra 16, 1243–1274 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Doss, R.: Sur l’immersion d’un semi-groupe dans un groupe. Bull. Sci. Math. 72(2), 139–150 (1948)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Ferguson, H.R.P., Forcade, R.W.: Multidimensional Euclidean algorithms. J. Reine Angew. Math. 334, 171–181 (1982)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Kozhukhov, I.B.: Semigroup rings of free left ideals. Algebra i Logika 21(124), 37–59 (1982)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Lam, T.Y.: Lectures on modules and rings. Springer, Dordrecht (1999)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Mal’cev, A.I.: Über die Einbettung von assoziativen Systemen in Gruppen (Russian, German summary). Mat. Sb. N.S. 6, 331–336 (1939)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mal’cev, A.I.: Über die Einbettung von assoziativen Systemen in Gruppen, II (Russian, German summary). Mat. Sb. N.S. 8, 251–264 (1940)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Menal, P.: The monoid rings that are Bezout domains. Arch. Math. (Basel) 37, 43–47 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. A. Pitarch, Anells de monoide semifir (Catalan), Ph. D. thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 1993, unpublished

  26. Wong, R.W.: Free ideal monoid rings. J. Algebra 53, 21–35 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Warren Dicks and Ferran Cedó for some very helpful correspondence about this material, and to the referee for several useful comments and corrections.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George M. Bergman.

Additional information

Communicated by Boris M. Schein.

After publication of this note, updates, errata, related references etc., if found, will be recorded at http://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/papers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bergman, G.M. On monoids, \(2\)-firs, and semifirs. Semigroup Forum 89, 293–335 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00233-014-9586-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00233-014-9586-z

Keywords

Navigation