Skip to main content
Log in

Transient heat flux assessment using a platinum thin film sensor for short-duration applications

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rapid fluctuations in heat transfer rates make it challenging to determine the surface temperature history and the estimation of accurate heat generation in research applications such as IC engines, gas turbines, and high-speed space vehicles. Therefore, thin-film heat flux sensors (TFHFS) are generally used to measure the heat flux in such applications due to their high sensitivity and quick response time. The present study demonstrates that increasing the annealing heat treatment temperature will enhance the adhesion of the thin film and the capabilities of these hand-made TFHFS for transient measurements at low temperatures and for short periods. In the present work, TFHFS is fabricated in-house using platinum as a sensing element and Macor as an insulating substrate. The sensitivity (S) and temperature coefficient of resistance (TCR) are estimated using an oil batch calibration technique. At the same time, the performance of TFHFS is tested in a dynamic convective environment. The TFHFS is exposed to the convective environment using a designed calibration set-up, and their transient heat fluxes are computed by conducting several trials. Additionally, the numerical solution has been accomplished using various experimental parameters. In comparison to the outcomes of the experimental method, it is observed that the average fluctuating temperature and mean surface heat flux have an inaccuracy of 0.33% and 4.17% respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

R:

Electrical resistance (Ω)

Ra :

Average roughness (µm)

Rh :

Resistance during heating (Ω)

Rc :

Resistance during cooling (Ω)

k:

Thermal conductivity \(\left(\mathrm W/\mathrm{mK}\right)\)

Ϲ:

Specific heat (J/kg-K)

\(\sqrt{\rho {\text{C}}k}\) :

Thermal effusivity (J/m2 s0.5 K)

T:

Temperature (K or ℃)

S:

Sensitivity (ohm/K)

r:

Coefficient of correlation

t:

Test time (s)

I:

Current supplied (A)

q:

Heat flux (W/m2)

TFGs:

Thin film gauges

TCR:

Temperature coefficient of resistance

CCS:

Constant current source

DAS:

Data acquisition system

RTD:

Resistance temperature detector

MWCNTs:

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes

TFHFS:

Thin film heat flux sensors

PTFHFS:

Platinum thin film heat flux sensors

SEM:

Scanning electron microscope

ρ:

Density (kg/m3)

β:

Angle with X-axis (o)

ᾳ:

Thermal diffusivity (m2/s)

γ:

Temperature coefficient of resistance (K1)

Δ:

Difference

s:

Substrate

0:

Room temperature

h:

Heating

c:

Cooling

References

  1. Alkidas AC, Myers JP (1982) Transient heat-flux measurements in the combustion chamber of a spark-ignition engine. J Heat Transf 104(1):62–67. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3245069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wyszynski L (2001) Unsteady in-cylinder heat transfer in a spark ignition engine : experiments and modeling. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D J Automobile Eng. https://doi.org/10.1243/0954407011528329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jagadeesh G (2000) Forebody convective hypersonic. 37:137–139. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.3537

  4. Sanderson SR, Sturtevant B (2013) Transient heat flux measurement using a surface junction thermocouple. 2781. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1484255

  5. Wang J, Qian J, Li J et al (2024) Enhanced interfacial boiling of impacting droplets upon vibratory surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 658:748–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2023.12.095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang J, Li Y, Zhong M, Zhang H (2021) Investigation on a gas-atomized spray cooling upon flat and micro-structured surfaces. Int J Therm Sci 161:106751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2020.106751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jones TV, Oldfield MLG, Ainsworth RW, Arts T (1993) Transient cascade testing, NATO advanced Group for Aerospace Research and Development AG328 (Chapter 5)

  8. Heat Flux Sensor – gSKIN ® -XP. https://shop.greenteg.com/heat-flux-sensor-gskin-xp/. Accessed 11 Mar 2024

  9. Sarma Shrutidhara, Sahoo Niranjan, Unal A (2016) Calibration of a silver thin film gauge for short duration convective step heat load. Sādhanā 41:787–794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-016-0513-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gopalakrishna Narayana SS (2019) Experimental investigation of heat transfer over double-disc spike-blunt body at Mach 5.7. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 102:452–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2018.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Srulijes J, Seiler F, Hennig P, Gleich P (2010) Heat transfer at the nose of a high-speed missile. Notes Numer Fluid Mech Multidiscip Des 112:373–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14243-7_46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Holmberg D, Steckler K, Womeldorf C, Grosshandler W (1997) Facility for calibrating heat flux sensors in a convective environment. Am Soc Mech Eng Heat Transf Div HTD 353:165–168

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marom H, Eizenberg M (2006) The effect of surface roughness on the resistivity increase in nanometric dimensions. J Appl Phys 99:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2204349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bouchard PO, Chambers UHF (1966) Description of the 120-inch hypersonic shock tunnel and anticipated performance (Technical report AFAPL-TR-65-129)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaser A, Gerlach E (1995) Scattering of conduction electrons by surface roughness in thin metal films. Z Phys B 97:139–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Buttsworth DR, Jones TV (1998) A fast-response total temperature probe for unsteady compressible flows. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 120:694–702. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2818456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Palasantzas G, Barnaś J (1997) Surface-roughness fractality effects in electrical conductivity of single metallic and semiconducting films. Phys Rev B - Condens Matter Mater Phys 56:7726–7731. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.56.7726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Krzak-Roś J, Filipiak J, Pezowicz C et al (2009) The effect of substrate roughness on the surface structure of TiO 2, SiO2, and doped thin films prepared by the sol-gel method. Acta Bioeng Biomech 11:21–29

    Google Scholar 

  19. Peng ZL, Chen SH (2011) Effects of surface roughness and film thickness on the adhesion of a bioinspired nanofilm. Phys Rev E - Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys 83:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.83.051915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller CG (1981) Comparison of thin-film resistance heat-transfer gages with thin-skin transient calorimeter gages in conventional hypersonic wind tunnels. NASA Tech Memo

    Google Scholar 

  21. Persson BNJ, Scaraggi M (2014) Theory of adhesion: role of surface roughness. J Chem Phys 141. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4895789

  22. Ainsworth RW, Allen JL, Davies MRW et al (1989) Developments in instrumentation and processing for transient heat transfer measurement in a full-stage model turbine. J Turbomach 111:20–27. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3262232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Iliopoulou V, Dénos R, Billiard N, Arts T (2004) Time-averaged and time-resolved heat flux measurements on a turbine stator blade using two-layered thin-film gauges. J Turbomach 126:570–577. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1791647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Prajapati H, Deshmukh NN (2019) Design and development of thin wire sensor for transient temperature measurement. Meas J Int Meas Confed 140:582–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.04.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sahoo N, Saravanan S, Jagadeesh G, Reddy KPJ (2006) Simultaneous measurement of aerodynamic and heat transfer data for large angle blunt cones in hypersonic shock tunnel. Sadhana - Acad Proc Eng Sci 31:557–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02715914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Taler J (1996) A semi-numerical method for solving inverse heat conduction problems. Heat Mass Transf Stoffuebertragung 31:105–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02333307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zubair SM (1993) Heat conduction in a semi-infinite solid subject to time-dependent surface heat fluxes: an analytical study. Wärme Stoffübertragung 28:357–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01539534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kumar R, Sahoo N, Kulkarn V, Singh A (2011) Laser based calibration technique of thin film gauges for short duration transient measurements. J Therm Sci Eng Appl 3:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4005075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kumar R, Sahoo N, Kulkarni V (2012) Conduction based calibration of handmade platinum thin film heat transfer gauges for transient measurements. Int J Heat Mass Transf 55:2707–2713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.01.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Desikan SLN, Suresh K, Srinivasan K, Raveendran PG (2016) Fast response co-axial thermocouple for short duration impulse facilities. Appl Therm Eng 96:48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.11.074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kumar R, Sahoo N, Kulkarni V (2010) Design, fabrication, and calibration of heat transfer gauges for transient measurement. Proc ASME 2010 Int Mech Eng Congr Expo IMECE2010, pp 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2010-40253

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Sahoo N, Kumar R (2016) Performance assessment of thermal sensors during short-duration convective surface heating measurements. Heat Mass Transf Stoffuebertragung 52:2005–2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kumar R, Sahoo N (2013) Dynamic calibration of a coaxial thermocouples for short duration transient measurements. J Heat Transfer 135. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4024593

  34. Jadhav A, Kulkarni V, Peetala RK (2020) Influence of substrate roughness on calibration parameters and thermal performance of thin film gauge. Heat Mass Transf Stoffuebertragung 56:2569–2583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-020-02887-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rout AK, Sahoo N, Kalita P (2021) Transient response characteristics and performance assessment of a calorimetric surface junction probe under impulsive thermal loading. J Heat Transfer 143:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4050822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Goswami R, Kumar R (2019) Dynamic calibration of temperature sensors from light rays for transient measurement. Therm Sci 23(3 Part B):1901–1910. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI170303198G

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nguyen TP, Thiery L, Euphrasie S et al (2019) Calibration tools for scanning thermal microscopy probes used in temperature measurement mode. J Heat Transfer 141. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4043381

  38. Tiggelaar RM, Sanders RGP, Groenland AW, Gardeniers JGE (2009) Stability of thin platinum films implemented in high-temperature microdevices. Sensors Actuators A Phys 152:39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2009.03.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hamdi M, Ektessabi AM (2001) Influence of annealing temperature on simultaneous vapor deposited calcium phosphate thin films. J Vac Sci Technol A Vacuum Surfaces, Film 19:1566–1570. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.1380228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cho S, Joshi Y (2019) Thermal performance of microelectronic substrates with submillimeter integrated vapor chamber. J Heat Transfer 141. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4042328

  41. Alam T, Kumar R (2021) Evaluation of response characteristics of thin film gauge for conductive heat transfer mode. Trans Inst Meas Control 43:687–699. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142331220960665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Cook WJ, Felderman EJ (1966) Reduction of data from thin-film heat-transfer gages-a concise numerical technique. AIAA J 4(3):561–562. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.3486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhuang JR, Werner K, Schlünder EU (1995) Study of the analytical solution to the heat transfer problem and surface temperature in a semi-infinite body with a constant heat flux at the surface and an initial temperature distribution. Heat Mass Transf 30:183–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01476528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sahoo N, Peetala RK (2011) Transient surface heating rates from a nickel film sensor using inverse analysis. Int J Heat Mass Transf 54:1297–1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2010.11.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Žužek V, Batagelj V, Bojkovski J (2010) Determination of PRT hysteresis in the temperature range from - 50 °C to 300 °C. Int J Thermophys 31:1771–1778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-010-0823-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sahoo N, Peetala RK (2010) Transient temperature data analysis for a supersonic flight test. J Heat Transfer 132:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4001128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kinnear KM, Lu FK (1998) Design, calibration and testing of transient thin film heat transfer gauges. 20th AIAA Advanced Measurement and Ground Testing Technology Conference. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1998-2504

    Book  Google Scholar 

  48. Jadhav A, Peetala R, Kulkarni V (2020) Multi-walled carbon nano-tubes for performance enhancement of thin film heat flux sensors. Heat Mass Transf Stoffuebertragung 56:1537–1549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-019-02765-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sarma S, Singh S, Garg A (2021) Laminated Ag and Ag/CNT nanocomposite films as sensing element for efficient thin film temperature sensors. Meas J Int Meas Confed 172:108876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Manjhi SK, Kumar R (2019) Transient heat flux measurement analysis from coaxial thermocouples at convective based step heat load. Numer Heat Transf Part A Appl 75:200–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407782.2019.1580955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Collins M, Chana K, Povey T (2015) New technique for the fabrication of miniature thin-film heat flux gauges. Meas Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/26/2/025303

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the Department of Science and Technology- Science and Engineering Research Board (DST-SERB) for their financial support in the development of thin film gauges and provision of essential experimental facilities under Project Number- ECR/2017/000260.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A- Research's work. B- project idea and project supervisor. C- project supervisor. D-support of research work. E- project supervisor

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ravi K. Peetala.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dongare, S., Peetala, R.K., Gohil, T.B. et al. Transient heat flux assessment using a platinum thin film sensor for short-duration applications. Heat Mass Transfer (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-024-03473-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-024-03473-0

Navigation