Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Performance of thermoelectric generators for direct and indirect contact with cooling water

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thermoelectric generators (TEGs) are devices that produce electricity due to the temperature difference between their cold and hot surfaces. The enhanced heat transfer from the cold surfaces of TEGs can increase their electricity efficiency. In this research, an experiment was arranged to study the direct and indirect contact of cooling water on the cold surfaces of the TEGs series and its results on their electricity efficiency. In this experiment, cooling water was flowing inside an aluminum tube with a rectangular cross-section. By changing the slope of the pipe, mixed convection was created in the cooling water. The results showed that the electrical efficiency of the TEGs was higher in the conditions of indirect contact as well as opposing mixed convection. In one of the results, the maximum electricity generation in indirect contact is 48 mW at pipe slop of \({30}^{\circ }\) to 35 mW at pipe slop of \({90}^{\circ }\), more than direct contact. Since the connection of cold surfaces of TEGs happens indirectly through expensive metal plates such as copper and aluminum, therefore, the results of this research can be useful in the economic evaluation and improvement of such devices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\(\dot{m}\) :

Water mass flow rate inside aluminum pipe, \((kg/s)\)

\(Ri\) :

Richardson dimensionless number, \((Ri=Gr/{\mathrm{Re}}^{2})\)

\(t\) :

Time, (\(s\))

\({Q}_{h,teg}\) :

The total heat transferred to the hot surfaces of 5 TEGs, \((MJ)\)

\({Q}_{c,teg}\) :

The total heat dissipated from the hot surfaces of 5 TEGs, \((MJ)\)

\({T}_{h}\) :

Temperature of the hot surface of TEG, \({(}^{\circ }C)\)

\({T}_{c}\) :

Temperature of the cold surface of TEG, \({(}^{\circ }C)\)

\({W}_{heater}\) :

Electric power of the heater, \((W)\)

\({W}_{tegs}\) :

Experimental maximum electrical power generated by 5 TEGs, \((W)\)

\({W}_{tegs,theoritical}\) :

Theoretical maximum electrical power generated by 5 TEGs, \((W)\)

\(\beta\) :

Tilt angle of aluminum pipe, (\({}^{\circ }\))

\({\eta }_{tegs}\) :

5 TEGs experimental maximum electrical efficiencies, (%)

\({\eta }_{tegs,theoritica}\) :

5 TEGs theoretical maximum electrical efficiencies, (%)

References

  1. Jaziri N, Boughamoura A, Muler J et al (2020) A comprehensive review of Thermoelectric Generators: Technologies and common applications. Energy Rep 6:264–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zoui MA, Bentouba S, Stocholm J, Bourouis M (2020) A review on thermoelectric generators: Progress and applications. Energies 13:3606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Champier D (2017) Thermoelectric generators: A review of applications, Energy Conv Manage 140:167–181

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yazawa K, Fisher TS, Groll EA, Shakouri A (2017) High exergetic modified Brayton cycle with thermoelectric energy conversion. Appl Therm Eng 114:1366–1371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Patowary R, Baruah DC (2018) Thermoelectric conversion of waste heat from IC engine driven vehicles: A review of its application, issues, and solutions. Int J Energy Res 1–20

  6. Stathopoulos P, Fernàndez-Villa J (2018) On the potential of power generation from thermoelectric generators in gas turbine combustors. Energies 11:2769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Khanmohammadi S, Chaghakaboodi HA, Musharavati F (2021) A new design of solar tower system amplified with a thermoelectric unit to produce distilled water and power. Appl Therm Eng 197:117406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ginzton EL, Contact L (2022) Radiative-cooling-based nighttime electricity generation with power density exceeding 100 mW/m2. iScience 25:104858

  9. Cho YH, Park J, Change N, Kim J (2020) Comparison of cooling methods for a thermoelectric generator with forced convection. Energies 13:3185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yusuf A, Ali MH (2021) Comparative study of conventional and water circulating-heat sink cooling base thermoelectric generator system for optimum solar thermal waste heat recovery. J Appl Sci Environ Manage 25:503–509

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mansour MA et al (2023) Effect of liquid saturated porous medium on heat transfer from thermoelectric generator. I J Thermofluieds 17:100264

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zebarjadi M (2016) Heat management in thermoelectric power generators. Sci Rep 6:20951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Selimefendigil F, Öztop HF, Kolsi L, Omri M (2022) Performance analysis of thermoelectric generator mounted chaotic channel by using non-Newtonian nanofluid and modeling with efficient computational methods. Alexanderia Eng J 61:3527–3549

  14. Shittu S, Li G, Golizadeh Y, Ma X, Zhao X, Ayodele E (2018) Advancements in thermoelectric generators for enhanced hybrid photovoltaic system performance. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 109:24–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li G, Shittu S, Diallo TMO, Yu M, Zhao X, Ji J (2018) A review of solar photovoltaic thermoelectric hybrid system for electricity generation. Energy 158:41–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rodrigo PM, Valera A, Fernandez EF, Almonacid FM (2019) Annual energy harvesting of passively cooled hybrid thermoelectric generator-concentrator photovoltaic modules. IEEE J Photovol 9:1652–1660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yin E, Li Q, Xuan Y (2019) Experimental optimization of operating conditions for concentrating photovoltaic-thermoelectric hybrid system. J Power Sources 422:25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sripadmanabhan IS, Vaithilingam CA, Chong KK, Saidur R, Faizal M et al (2020) A review on various configurations of hybrid concentrator photovoltaic and thermoelectric generator system. Sol Energy 201:122–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kanagaraj N (2021) Photovoltaic and thermoelectric generator combined hybrid energy system with an enhanced maximum power point tracking technique for higher energy conversion efficiency. Sustainability 13:3144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhu W, Deng Y, Wang Y, Shen S, Gulfam R (2016) High-performance photovoltaic thermoelectric hybrid power generation system with optimized thermal management. Energy 100:91–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Naderi M, Ziapour BM, Gendeshmin MY (2021) Improvement of photocells by the integration of phase change materials and thermoelectric generators (PV-PCM-EG) and study on the ability to generate electricity around the clock. J Energy Storage 36:102384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chaturvedi SK, Mohieldin TO, Huang GC (1988) Mixed laminar convection in Trombe wall channels. J Sol Energy Eng 110:31–37

  23. Jackson JD, Cotton MA, Axcell BP (1989) Studies of mixed convection in vertical tubes. Int J Heat and Fluid Flow 10:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. You X, Li S (2021) Fully developed opposing mixed convection flow in the inclined channel filled with a hybrid nanofluid. Nanomaterials 11:1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Oni TO (2022) Thermo-hydraulic characteristics of mixed convection of transition flow in a conduit at different tilts. J Ther Eng 8:363–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Aydin O (1999) Aiding and opposing Mechanisms of mixed convection in a shear- and buoyancy cavity. Int Comm Heat Mass Transfer 26:1019–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chakkingal M, Geus JD, Kenjereš S et al (2020) Assisting and opposing mixed convection with conjugate heat transfer in a differentially heated cavity filled with coarse-grained porous media. Int Comm Heat Mass Transfer 111:104457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Flores FP, Trevino C, Suastegui LM (2016) Transient mixed convection heat transfer for opposing flow from two discrete flush-mounted heaters in a rectangular channel of finite length: Effect of buoyancy and inclination angle. Int J Ther Sci 104:357–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jamali E, Nobakhti MH, Ziapour BM, Khayat M (2023) Performance analysis of a novel model of photovoltaic PV-TEGs system enhanced with flat plate mirror reflectors Energy Conv. Manage 279:116766

    Google Scholar 

  30. Arzhangi T (2022) Experimental study of a design of a new heat exchanger for electricity generation with thermoelectric generators. Master’s thesis, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran, Summer

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Behrooz M. Ziapour: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Investigation, Supervision, Writing - review & editing. Taha argangi: Investigation, Methodology, Experimental works. Mohammad Y. Gendeshmin: Experimental works, Validation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Behrooz M. Ziapour.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ziapour, B.M., Arzhangi, T. & Gendeshmin, M.Y. Performance of thermoelectric generators for direct and indirect contact with cooling water. Heat Mass Transfer 59, 2073–2085 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-023-03383-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-023-03383-7

Navigation