Skip to main content
Log in

Impingement heat transfer with pressure recovery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 27 May 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

A conventional impinging jet is effective at transferring a large heat flux. However a significant pressure loss is also experienced by the free jet of a jet impingement heat transfer device due to rapid expansion because it does not incorporate effective pressure recovery. A novel high-flux impingement heat transfer device, called the Tadpole, is developed to improve the heat transfer and pressure loss (performance) characteristics of the conventional impingement domain by incorporating pressure recovery with a diffuser. The Tadpole is scrutinized through an experimental comparison with a conventional jet impinging on the inner wall of a hemisphere under the turbulent flow regime. The Tadpole demonstrates promising capability by exceeding the performance characteristics of the impinging jet by up to 7.3% for the heat transfer coefficient while reducing the pressure loss by 13%. Multiple dimensional degrees of freedom in the Tadpole’s flow domain can be manipulated for an enhanced heat transfer coefficient, a reduced total pressure loss or a favourable combination of both metrics. A Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model is developed, the Four-Equation Transition SST turbulence model demonstrates satisfactory experimental validation with a deviation of < 5% for the heat transfer coefficient and < 23% for the total pressure loss. The Tadpole is a promising heat transfer device for high-flux applications and is recommended for further work incorporating design improvements and multidimensional optimization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Further data can be made available on request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Change history

Notes

  1. The turbulence intensity was not investigated experimentally. Instead, it was approximated using fully developed turbulent duct flow empirical correlations from [32].

  2. The incremental effects can be observed by zooming into Fig. 13.

Abbreviations

A :

Area (m2)

\(C_\mathrm {p}\) :

Static pressure recovery coefficient (-)

d :

Diameter (m)

h :

Heat transfer coefficient (W/(m2K))  

K :

Loss factor (-)

k :

Thermal conductivity (W/(m K))

k :

Turbulence kinetic energy (m2/s2)

l :

Length (m)

\(\dot{m}\) :

Mass flow rate (kg/s)

p :

Pressure (Pa)

Pr :

Prandtl number (-)

\(\dot{Q}\) :

Heat rate (W)

r :

Radius (m)

Re :

Reynolds number (-)

T :

Temperature (°C or  K)

TI :

Turbulence intensity (-)

V :

Velocity (m/s)

\(y^+\) :

Dimensionless distance from a wall (-)

\(\alpha\) :

Angle centred at heat transfer surface origin (°)

\(\alpha\) :

Absorptivity (-)

\(\varepsilon\) :

Emissivity (-)

\(\varepsilon\) :

Turbulence dissipation rate (m2/s2)

\(\eta\) :

Efficiency (-)

\(\theta\) :

Angle (°)

\(\xi\) :

Axial Tadpole offset from concentricity (mm)

\(\rho\) :

Density (kg/m3)

\(\phi\) :

Normalized characteristic (-)

\(\omega\) :

Specific turbulence dissipation rate (1/s)

1:

Inlet

2:

Outlet

al:

Aluminium

aw:

Adiabatic wall

c:

Nozzle throat

d:

Diffuser

DO:

Discrete ordinates

es:

Exterior heat transfer surface

h:

Half angle

i:

Inner

is:

Interior heat transfer surface

it:

Inner tube

n:

Nozzle region

nose:

Tadpole’s nose

os:

Outer shell

s:

Static

t:

Tadpole surface, total

ABS:

Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene

CFD:

Computational Fluid Dynamics

CSP:

Concentrating Solar Power

DO:

Discrete Ordinates

HT:

Heat Transfer

LES:

Large Eddy Simulation

LRN:

Low Reynolds Number

HRN:

High Reynolds Number

RANS:

Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes

SCRAP:

Spiky Central Receiver Air Pre-heater

SS:

Supersonic

SST:

Shear Stress Transport

TS:

Transonic

References

  1. Goldstein R, Behbahani A, Heppelmann K (1986) Streamwise distribution of the recovery factor and the local heat transfer coefficient to an impinging circular air jet. Int J Heat Mass Transf 29(8):1227–1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(86)90155-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Achari AM, Das MK (2015) Application of various RANS based models towards predicting turbulent slot jet impingement. Int J Therm Sci 98:332–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2015.07.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fabbri M, Jiang S, Dhir VK (2003) Experimental investigation of single-phase micro jets impingement cooling for electronic applications. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2003 Heat Transfer Summer Conference. Heat Transfer: Volume 3, ASMEDC, Las Vegas, https://doi.org/10.1115/HT2003-47162

  4. Garbrecht O, Al-sibai F, Kneer R, Wieghardt K (2012) Numerical Investigation of a New Molten Salt Central Receiver Design. In: SolarPACES 2012, Marrakech

  5. Wang W, Laumert B (2018) An axial type impinging receiver. Energy 162:318–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.08.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lubkoll M, Erasmus DJ, Harms TM, Von Backström TW, Kröger DG (2020) Performance characteristics of the spiky central receiver air pre-heater (SCRAP). Sol Energy 201:773–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.03.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Quick J (2020) Computational investigation of swirling jet impingement in a concentrated solar tower cavity receiver. Master’s thesis, University of Pretoria, South Africa

  8. Kobayashi T, Banno M, Amaoka K (2000) Leading edge structure of aircraft airfoil and method of fabricating the same. https://patents.google.com/patent/US6119978

  9. Brand JH, Dowhan MJ (2009) Anti-icing apparatus and method for aero-engine nose cone. https://patents.google.com/patent/US20090120099A1

  10. Bunker RS, Metzger DE (1990) Local Heat Transfer in Internally Cooled Turbine Airfoil Leading Edge Regions: Part I - Impingement Cooling Without Film Coolant Extraction. J Turbomach 112(3):451–458. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2927680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zamma J, Nishimura Y, Nakajima Y, Sakai T (1984) Bayonet tube heat exchanger. Patent. https://patents.google.com/patent/US4431049A/en

  12. Alzoubi MA, Sasmito AP (2017) Thermal performance optimization of a bayonet tube heat exchanger. Appl Therm Eng 111:232–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.09.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ma T, Zeng M, Ji Y, Zhu H, Wang Q (2011) Investigation of a novel bayonet tube high temperature heat exchanger with inner and outer fins. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36(5):3757–3768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.12.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Damiani L, Montecucco M, Prato AP (2013) Conceptual design of a bayonet-tube steam generator for the ALFRED lead-cooled reactor. Nucl Eng Des 265:154–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.06.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Erasmus DJ, Lubkoll M, Von Backström TW (2020) Jet impingement heat transfer within a hemisphere. Heat Mass Transf. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-020-02977-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Çengel YA, Cymbala JM (2014) Fluid Mechanics Fundamentals and Applications, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Adkins RC, Jacobsen OH, Chevalier P (1983) A preliminary study of annular diffusers with constant diameter outer walls (suitable for turbine exits). The American Society of Mechanical Enigneers 1(83-GT-218), https://doi.org/10.1115/83-GT-218

  18. Erasmus DJ, Von Backström TW, McDougall D, Lubkoll M (2019) Heat transfer device, PCT international patent application. PCT/IB2019/060650

  19. Bekker GM, Meyer CJ, Van der Spuy SJ (2020) Numerical investigation of pressure recovery for an induced draught fan arrangement. R&D J South African Inst Mech Eng 36:19–28, http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2309-8988/2020/v36a3

  20. Herschel C (1888) Apparatus for measuring the quantity of water flowing through a pipe. https://pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?PageNum=0&docid=00381373&IDKey=&HomeUrl=/

  21. Kröger DG (2008) Spiky Central Receiver Air Pre-heater (SCRAP). Stellenbosch University, Tech Rep

  22. Viereckl F, Schleicher E, Schuster C, Lippmann W, Hurtado A (2019) Experimental and theoretical investigation of the boiling heat transfer in a low-pressure natural circulation system. Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow 1(4):286–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42757-019-0023-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. VDI (2010) VDI-Wärmeatlas, 10th edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  24. Eucken A (1940) Allgemeine Gesetzmäßigkeiten für das Wärmeleitvermögen verschiedener Stoffarten und Aggregatzustände. Forschung auf dem Gebiet des Ingenieurwesens A 11(1):6–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02584103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. MatWeb (2019) Overview of materials for acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), molded. http://www.matweb.com/search/datasheet_print.aspx?matguid=eb7a78f5948d481c9493a67f0d089646&n=1

  26. Mikron Instrument Company (2003) Table of emissivity of various surfaces. Mikron Instrument Company Inc, USA

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fives North American Combustion I (2001) North American Combustion Handbook, 3rd edn. page 85, Fives North American Combustion, Inc., USA, https://app.knovel.com/hotlink/toc/id:kpCHVIE001/north-american-combustion/north-american-combustion

  28. Erasmus D (2020) The development of a novel impingement heat transfer device. Master’s thesis, Stellenbosch University, South Africa, https://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/109296

  29. Kröger DG (2004) Air-cooled Heat Exchangers and Cooling Towers, 1st edn. Stellenbosch University, South Africa

    Google Scholar 

  30. Johnston IH (1953) The effect of inlet conditions on the flow in annular diffusers. Memorandum M.167, National Gas Turbine Establishment

  31. Launder B, Spalding D (1983) Paper 8 - The Numerical Computation of Turbulent Flows. In: Patankar SV, Pollard A, Singhal AK, Vanka SP (eds) Numerical Prediction of Flow, Heat Transfer, Turbulence and Combustion, Pergamon, pp 96 – 116, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-030937-8.50016-7

  32. ANSYS (2016) Fluent theory guide. in: ANSYS documentation. Tech. Rep. 17, ANSYS

  33. Bredberg J (2000) On the wall boundary condition for turbulence models. Department of Thermo and Fluid Dynamics, Chalmers University of Technology, Tech. rep.

    Google Scholar 

  34. McDougall D (2019) Numerical simulation of jet impingement cooling of the inside of a hemisphere with application to SCRAP. Master’s thesis, Stellenbosch University, South Africa, http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/106154

  35. Menter FR (1993) Zonal two equation \(k\)-\(\omega\) turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. AIAA Paper 93-2906 https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19960044572

  36. Lee DH, Chung YS, Won SY (1999) The effect of concave surface curvature on heat transfer from a fully developed round impinging jet. Int J Heat Mass Transf 42(13):2489–2497. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0017-9310(98)00318-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Langtry RB, Menter FR (2009) Correlation-based transition modeling for unstructured parallelized computational fluid dynamics codes. AIAA J 47(12):2894–2906. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.42362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Craig KJ, Slootweg M, Meyer JP (2018) Heat transfer enhancement in molten salt central receiver using jet impingement. In: 5th Southern African Solar Energy Conference (SASEC), Durban, South Africa., vol 5, https://www.sasec.org.za/full_papers/53.pdf

  39. Zuckerman N, Lior N (2006) Jet Impingement Heat Transfer: Physics, Correlations, and Numerical Modeling. Advances in Heat Transfer 39(C):565–631, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2717(06)39006-5

  40. Schobeiri MT (2010) Fluid Mechanics for Engineers. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. Taylor J (1997) An introduction to error analysis: The study of uncertainties in physical measurement, 2nd edn. University Science Books, USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is dedicated to our late co-author, Professor Theodor Willem von Backström. The support of the Solar Thermal Energy Research Group (STERG) is appreciated. The assistance and guidance of the Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering workshop is also appreciated. The South African centre for high performance computing (CHPC) and the HPC1 (Rhasatsha) high performance computer at the University of Stellenbosch are acknowledged for their computational power.

Funding

This research was funded by the Solar Thermal Energy Research Group (STERG) at Stellenbosch University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Derwalt J. Erasmus: Investigation, Matti Lubkoll: Supervision, Ken J. Craig: Supervision, Theodor W. von Backström: Supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Derwalt J. Erasmus.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflicts of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised due to addition of author affiliation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Erasmus, D.J., Lubkoll, M., Craig, K.J. et al. Impingement heat transfer with pressure recovery. Heat Mass Transfer 58, 1857–1875 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-022-03186-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-022-03186-2

Navigation