Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Measurement of heat transfer coefficient and pressure drops in a compact heat exchanger with lance and offset fins for water based Al2O3 nano-fluids

  • Original
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Compact Heat Exchangers (CHEs) are widely used in various applications in thermal fluid-systems including aerospace due to their compactness and light weight coupled with high effectiveness. Among the different types of CHEs for Aircraft Environmental Control System (ECS) and Avionics cooling applications, a cross-flow CHE with Lance & Offset fin is of special interest because of their high heat rejection capability. In the present work, the heat transfer coefficient of water based Al2O3 nano-fluid (NF) flowing in a Compact Plate-fin Heat Exchanger having Lance & Offset fins is studied experimentally. As part of experimental investigation a test setup is designed and developed. Experiments are conducted in the range of mass flux from 50 to 350 kg/s m2 (100 ≤ Re ≤ 600) at room temperature as well as at higher temperatures up to 70 °C. In this study, Al2O3 volume concentration in water is varied from 0.255% to 0.51%. The variation of heat transfer coefficients and pressure drops of Al2O3 nano-fluid with respect to water are presented in graphical form for different mass fluxes. The heat transfer coefficient gets enhanced in low NF temperature regions (between 30 °C-45 °C) up to 25% for 1%NF and up to 35% for 2%NF, where as there is only a marginal improvement at higher operating temperatures (between 60 °C-75 °C). The uncertainty analysis is carried out for heat transfer coefficient based on sensors specification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A:

Total heat transfer area (m2)

b:

Fin height (m)

C:

Heat capacity rate

C*:

Ratio of heat capacity rates

cp :

Specific heat capacity (J kg−1 K−1)

Dh :

Hydraulic diameter (m)

dp :

Particle diameter (m)

F:

Flow meter

f v :

Volumetric particle fraction

h:

Heat transfer coefficient (W m−2 K−1)

j :

Colburn factor

k:

Thermal conductivity (W m−1 K−1).

l:

Length (m)

m:

Mass flux, kg m−2 s−1

NTU:

Number of transfer units

Pr:

Prandtl number

Q:

heat transfer rate (W)

Re:

Reynolds number

s:

Fin spacing (m)

T:

Temperatures/Temperature sensor

t:

Fin thickness (m)

U:

Overall heat transfer coefficient (W m−2 K−1)

W:

Mass flow rate (kg s−1)

ρ:

Density (kg m−3)

ε:

Effectiveness

μ :

Viscosity, (m pa sec)

η:

Overall fin efficiency

bf:

Base fluid

c:

Cold side

h:

Hot side

i:

Inlet

o:

Outlet

min:

Minimum

max:

Maximum

np:

Nanoparticle

w:

Water

CHE:

Compact Heat Exchanger

ECS:

Environmental Control System

FPI:

Fins Per Inch

lpm:

Liter per minute

NF:

Nanofluid

References

  1. Kays WM, London AL (1984) Compact Heat Exchangers, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gunnasegaran P, Shuaib NH, Abdul Jalal MF, Sandhita E (2012) Numerical Study of Fluid Dynamic and Heat Transfer in a Compact Heat Exchanger Using Nanofluids, International scholarly Research notices. ISRN Mechanical Engineering 2012:585496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta HK, Agrawal GD, Mathur J (2012) An overview of Nanofluids: A new media towards green environment. Int J Environ Sci 3(1):433–440

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chandra Sekhara Reddy M, Vasudeva Rao V (2014) Experimental investigation of heat transfer coefficient and friction factor of ethylene glycol water based TiO2 nanofluid in double pipe heat exchanger with and without helical coil inserts. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 50:68–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Syam Sundar L, Singh MK (2013) Convective heat transfer and friction factor correlations of nanofluid in a tube and with inserts: A review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 20:23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chandra Sekhara Reddy M, Vasudeva Rao V (2013) Experimental studies on thermal conductivity of blends of ethylene glycol-water-based TiO2 nanofluids. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 46(2013):31–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramaraju RV, Kota M, Manap HB, Chandra Sekhara Reddy M, Vasudeva Rao V (2014) Enhancement heat transfer coefficient in an automobile radiator using multi walled carbon nano tubes (MWCNTS), proceedings of ASME 2014 international Mechanical Engineering congress and exposition, IMECE2014, 14–20

  8. Mohammed HA, Bhaskaran G, Shuaib NH, Saidur R (2011) Heat transfer and fluid flow characteristics in microchannels heat exchanger using nanofluids: A review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15(3):1502–1512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pantzali MN, Kanaris AG, Antoniadis KD, Mouza AA, Paras SV (2009) Effect of nanofluids on the performance of a miniature plate heat exchanger with modulated surface. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 30:691–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Buongiorno J et al (2009) A benchmark study on the thermal conductivity of nanofluids. J Appl Phys 106(094312)

  11. Bhimani VL, Rathod PP, Sorathiya AS (2013) Experimental Study of Heat Transfer Enhancement using Water based Nanofluids as a new coolant for Car Radiators. Int J of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering 3(6):295–302

    Google Scholar 

  12. Torgal S, Mishra A (2013) Analytical Performances Evaluation of Compact Heat Exchanger Using Nano-fluids. Int J of Scientific Research 2(6):256–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kakaça S, Pramuanjaroenkij A (2016) Analysis of convective heat transfer enhancement by nanofluids: single-phase and two-phase treatments. J Eng Phys Thermophys 89(3)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Anoop KB, Sundararajan T, Das SK (2009) Effect of particle size on the convective heat transfer in nanofluid in the developing region. Int J Heat Mass Transf 52:2189–2195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang D, Wub Z, Sunden B (2016) Effects of hybrid nanofluid mixture in plate heat exchangers. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 72:190–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ganvir RB, Walke PV, Kriplani VM (2017) Heat transfer characteristics in nanofluid - A review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 75:451–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bahiraeia M, Rahmania R, Yaghoobia A, Khodabandehb E, Mashayekhic R, Amanid M (2018) Recent research contributions concerning use of nanofluids in heat exchangers: A critical review. Appl Therm Eng 133:137–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Goudarz K, Jamali H (2017) Heat transfer enhancement of Al2O3-EG nanofluid in a car radiator with wire coil inserts. Appl Therm Eng 118:510–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang D, Wu Z, Sunden B (2015) Pressure drop and convective heat transfer of Al2O3/water and MWCNT/water nanofluids in a chevron plate heat exchanger. Int J Heat Mass Transf 89:620–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang J, Diao Y, Zhao Y, Zhang Y (2016) Thermal-Hydraulic Performance of SiC-Water and Al2O3-Water Nanofluids in the Minichannel. J Heat Transf 138:021705-1

    Google Scholar 

  21. Khoshvaght-Aliabadi M, Sartipzadeh O, Pazdar S, Sahamiyan M (2017) Experimental and parametric studies on a miniature heat sink with offset-strip pins and Al2O3/water nanofluids. Appl Therm Eng 111:1342–1352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Khoshvaght-Aliabadi M, Salami M (2018) Turbulent flow of Al2O3-water nanofluid through plate-fin heat exchanger (PFHE) with offset-strip channels. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress 6:164–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Eastman JA, Choi US, Li S, Thompson LJ, Lee S (1997) Enhanced thermal conductivity through the development of nanofluids. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 457:3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Elias MM, Mahbubul IM, Saidur R, Sohel MR, Shahrul IM, Khaleduzzaman SS, Sadeghipour S (2014) Experimental investigation on the thermo-physical properties of Al2O3 nanoparticles suspended in car radiator coolant. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 54:48–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Eggers JR, Kabelac S (2016) Nanofluids Revisited. J of Applied Thermal Engineering 106:1114–1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.06.100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Khanafer K, Vafai K (2011) A critical synthesis of thermophysical characteristics of nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 54:4410–4428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Buschmann MH (2012) Thermal conductivity and heat transfer of ceramic nanofluids. Int J Therm Sci 62:19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Xuan Y, Roetzel W (2000) Conceptions for heat transfer correlation of nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 43:3701–3707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hasselman D, Johnson LF (1987) Effective Thermal Conductivity of Composites with Interfacial Thermal Barrier Resistance. J Compos Mater 21:508–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Anoop KB, Kabelac S, Sundararajan T, Das SK (2009) Rheological and flow characteristics of nanofluids: influence of electro viscous effects and particle agglomeration. J Appl Phys 106:034909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hu S, Herold KE (1995) Prandtl number effect on offset fin heat exchanger performance: predictive model for heat transfer and pressure drop. Int J Heat Mass Transf 38:1043–1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hu S, Herold KE (1995) Prandtl number effect on offset fin heat exchanger performance: experimental results. Int J Heat Mass Transf 38:1053–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wieting AR (1975) Empirical Correlations for Heat Transfer and Flow Friction characteristics of Rectangular Offset-Fin Plate-Fin Heat Exchangers. J Heat Transf 97:488–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ranganayakulu C, Pallavi P (2011) Development of heat transfer coefficient and friction factor correlations for offset fins using CFD. Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow 21(8):935–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ramana Murthy KV, Ranganayakulu C, Ashok Babu TP (2015) Development of Heat Transfer Coefficient and Friction Factor Correlations for Serrated Fins in Water Medium using CFD. International Journal of Physical Science and Application 5(3):238–248. https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5348/2015/03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Engineering Equation Solver (EES) (2009) F-Chart Software Developed by S.A. Klein. University of Wisconsin, Madison

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research visit of the first author C. Ranganayakulu was financed by UNISA, Johannesburg, South Africa and permitted by Aeronautical Development Agency, Bangalore, India. The financial support and official permission of these two organizations are highly appreciated. Authors gratefully acknowledge and sincerely thank Mr. V. Ramnath from Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, UNISA for his useful technical discussions on solving ε-NTU equations and provision of associated software for estimation of NTU values.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ranganayakulu Chennu.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chennu, R., Veeredhi, V.R. Measurement of heat transfer coefficient and pressure drops in a compact heat exchanger with lance and offset fins for water based Al2O3 nano-fluids. Heat Mass Transfer 56, 257–267 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-019-02707-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-019-02707-w

Navigation