Abstract
An analytic model that describes the kinetics of the process of gas hydrate film growth along the gas–water interface is presented. This model is based on the assumption that this process is controlled only by the mass transfer of gas molecules dissolved in water to the moving front of the gas hydrate film. In the presented model, the driving force of the process of gas hydrate film growth along the gas–water interface is the concentration driving force. The calculated data obtained in the framework of the presented model are compared with the available experimental data on the kinetics of methane hydrate film growth on a planar water surface and on the surface of a methane bubble suspended in water. Moreover, the calculated data obtained in the framework of the presented model are compared with the available experimental data on the kinetics of carbon dioxide hydrate film growth on the surface of a carbon dioxide bubble suspended in water. As a result of this comparison, the dependence of the thickness of carbon dioxide hydrate film on the concentration driving force was determined.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chong ZR, Yang SHB, Babu P, Linga P, Li X-S (2016) Review of natural gas hydrates as an energy resource: prospects and challenges. Appl Energy 162:1633–1652
Vorotyntsev VM, Malyshev VM (2011) Gas hydrates: nanosized phases in the separation and purification of substances by crystallization. Russ Chem Rev 80:971–991
Rehder G, Eckl R, Elfgen M, Falenty A, Hamann R, Kähler N, Kuhs WF, Osterkamp H, Windmeier C (2012) Methane hydrate pellet transport using the self-preservation effect: a techno-economic analysis. Energies 5:2499–2523
Shagapov VS, Musakaev NG, Khasanov MK (2015) Formation of gas hydrates in a porous medium during an injection of cold gas. Int J Heat Mass Transf 84:1030–1039
Shagapov VS, Chiglintseva AS, Belova SV (2017) On the theory of formation of a gas hydrate in a heat-insulated space compacted with methane. J Eng Phys Thermophys 90:1147–1161
Veluswamy HP, Kumar A, Seo Y, Lee JD, Linga P (2018) A review of solidified natural gas (SNG) technology for gas storage via clathrate hydrates. Appl Energy 216:262–285
Sloan ED (ed) (2010) Natural gas hydrates in flow assurance. Gulf Professional Publishing, Burlington
Taylor CJ, Miller KT, Koh CA, Sloan ED (2007) Macroscopic investigation of hydrate film growth at the hydrocarbon/water interface. Chem Eng Sci 62:6524–6533
Molokitina NS, Nesterov AN, Podenko LS, Reshetnikov AM (2019) Carbon dioxide hydrate formation with SDS: further insights into mechanism of gas hydrate growth in the presence of surfactant. Fuel 235:1400–1411
Li S-L, Sun C-Y, Liu B, Feng X-J, Li F-G, Chen L-T, Chen G-J (2013) Initial thickness measurements and insights into crystal growth of methane hydrate film. AIChE J 59:2145–2154
Freer EM, Selim MS, Sloan ED (2001) Methane hydrate film growth kinetics. Fluid Phase Equilib 185:65–75
Sun C-Y, Chen G-J, Ma C-F, Huang Q, Luo H, Li Q-P (2007) The growth kinetics of hydrate film on the surface of gas bubble suspended in water or aqueous surfactant solution. J Cryst Growth 306:491–499
Peng BZ, Dandekar A, Sun CY, Luo H, Ma QL, Pang WX, Chen GJ (2007) Hydrate film growth on the surface of a gas bubble suspended in water. J Phys Chem B 111:12485–12493
Tanaka R, Sakemoto R, Ohmura R (2009) Crystal growth of clathrate hydrates formed at the interface of liquid water and gaseous methane, ethane, or propane: variations in crystal morphology. Cryst Growth Des 9:2529–2536
Beltrán JG, Servio P (2010) Morphological investigations of methane-hydrate films formed on a glass surface. Cryst Growth Des 10:4339–4347
Melnikov VP, Nesterov AN, Reshetnikov AM, Istomin VA, Kwon VG (2010) Stability and growth of gas hydrates below the ice–hydrate–gas equilibrium line on the P–T phase diagram. Chem Eng Sci 65:906–914
Melnikov VP, Nesterov AN, Reshetnikov AM, Istomin VA (2011) Metastable states during dissociation of carbon dioxide hydrates below 273 K. Chem Eng Sci 66:73–77
Saito K, Kishimoto M, Tanaka R, Ohmura R (2011) Crystal growth of clathrate hydrate at the interface between hydrocarbon gas mixture and liquid water. Cryst Growth Des 11:295–301
Wu R, Kozielski KA, Hartley PG, May EF, Boxall J, Maeda N (2013) Methane–propane mixed gas hydrate film growth on the surface of water and Luvicap EG solutions. Energy Fuels 27:2548–2554
Kitamura M, Mori YH (2013) Clathrate-hydrate film growth along water/methane phase boundaries–an observational study. Cryst Res Technol 48:511–519
Li S-L, Sun C-Y, Liu B, Li Z-Y, Chen G-J, Sum AK (2014) New observations and insights into the morphology and growth kinetics of hydrate films. Sci Rep 4:4129
Daniel-David D, Guerton F, Dicharry C, Torré J-P, Broseta D (2015) Hydrate growth at the interface between water and pure or mixed CO2/CH4 gases: influence of pressure, temperature, gas composition and water-soluble surfactants. Chem Eng Sci 132:118–127
Liu Z, Li H, Chen L, Sun B (2018) A new model of and insight into hydrate film lateral growth along the gas–liquid interface considering natural convection heat transfer. Energy Fuels 32:2053–2063
Mori YH (2001) Estimating the thickness of hydrate films from their lateral growth rates: application of a simplified heat transfer model. J Cryst Growth 223:206–212
Mochizuki T, Mori YH (2006) Clathrate-hydrate film growth along water/hydrate-former phase boundaries–numerical heat-transfer study. J Cryst Growth 290:642–652
Saito K, Sum AK, Ohmura R (2010) Correlation of hydrate-film growth rate at the guest/liquid-water interface to mass transfer resistance. Ind Eng Chem Res 49:7102–7103
Kishimoto M, Ohmura R (2012) Correlation of the growth rate of the hydrate layer at a guest/liquid-water interface to mass transfer resistance. Energies 5:92–100
Mochizuki T, Mori YH (2017) Simultaneous mass and heat transfer to/from the edge of a clathrate-hydrate film causing its growth along a water/guest-fluid phase boundary. Chem Eng Sci 171:61–75
Vlasov VA (2013) Formation and dissociation of gas hydrate in terms of chemical kinetics. React Kinet Mech Catal 110:5–13
Frank-Kamenetskii DA (1969) Diffusion and heat transfer in chemical kinetics, 2nd edn. Plenum Press, New York
Fogler HS (2016) Elements of chemical reaction engineering, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Kendallville
Bergman TL, Lavine AS, Incropera FP, DeWitt DP (2011) Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer, 7th edn. Wiley, New York
Lide DR (ed) (2009) CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, 90th edn. Boca Raton, CRC Press
Moore JC, Battino R, Rettich TR, Handa YP, Wilhelm E (1982) Partial molar volumes of “gases” at infinite dilution in water at 298.15 K. J Chem Eng Data 27:22–24
Ricaurte M, Torré J-P, Asbai A, Broseta D, Dicharry C (2012) Experimental data, modeling, and correlation of carbon dioxide solubility in aqueous solutions containing low concentrations of clathrate hydrate promoters: application to CO2–CH4 gas mixtures. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:3157–3169
Lu W, Guo H, Chou IM, Burruss RC, Li L (2013) Determination of diffusion coefficients of carbon dioxide in water between 268 and 473 K in a high-pressure capillary optical cell with in situ Raman spectroscopic measurements. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 115:183–204
Takeya S, Udachin KA, Moudrakovski IL, Susilo R, Ripmeester JA (2010) Direct space methods for powder X-ray diffraction for guest–host materials: applications to cage occupancies and guest distributions in clathrate hydrates. J Am Chem Soc 132:524–531
Sloan ED, Koh CA (2008) Clathrate hydrates of natural gases, 3rd edn. CRS Press, Boca Raton
Rettich TR, Handa YP, Battino R, Wilhelm E (1981) Solubility of gases in liquids. 13. High-precision determination of Henry’s constants for methane and ethane in liquid water at 275 to 328 K. J Phys Chem 85:3230–3237
Klauda JB, Sandler SI (2000) A fugacity model for gas hydrate phase equilibria. Ind Eng Chem Res 39:3377–3386
Guo H, Chen Y, Lu W, Li L, Wang M (2013) In situ Raman spectroscopic study of diffusion coefficients of methane in liquid water under high pressure and wide temperatures. Fluid Phase Equilib 360:274–278
Wagner W, Pruβ A (2002) The IAPWS formulation 1995 for the thermodynamic properties of ordinary water substance for general and scientific use. J Phys Chem Ref Data 31:387–535
Pátek J, Hrubý J, Klomfar J, Součková M, Harvey AH (2009) Reference correlations for thermophysical properties of liquid water at 0.1 MPa. J Phys Chem Ref Data 38:21–29
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Basic Research Program of the Russian Academy of Sciences (project No. IX.135.2.3).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1: Calculation of the concentration driving force
Since the concentration driving force is Δc = cs − ceq, then, for its calculation under given thermobaric conditions, it is necessary to calculate the quantities cs and ceq. In the case of the aqueous gas solution, the following relations for the quantities cs and ceq are valid:
where xs and xeq are the mole fractions of the gas dissolved in water at the liquid water–gas equilibrium and the liquid water–hydrate–gas equilibrium, respectively. In the case of an ideal gas, the quantities xs and xeq are determined from Henry’s law:
where H is the Henry’s constant. In the case of a real gas, the quantities xs and xeq are determined from the following relations:
where f ≡ f ( p, T ) and feq ≡ f ( peq, T ) are the gas fugacities under given thermobaric conditions and under liquid water–hydrate–gas equilibrium conditions, respectively, \( {\upsilon}_{\mathrm{g}}^{\infty } \) is the partial molar volume of the gas in water at infinite dilution, pv is the saturated vapor pressure of water, and R is the gas constant.
In this work, the quantity cs for methane and carbon dioxide was calculated by Eqs. (25) and (29), and the quantity ceq for these gases was calculated by Eqs. (26) and (30). After that, the concentration driving force Δc was calculated. The fugacities f and feq for methane and carbon dioxide were calculated from the Peng–Robinson equation of state.
Appendix 2: Thermophysical properties of substances
The kinematic viscosity of water ν was calculated using the relation ν = μ/ρw, where μ is the dynamic viscosity of water. The values of the mass density of water ρw at different temperatures were taken from a handbook [33].
Carbon dioxide:
\( {\upsilon}_{\mathrm{g}}^{\infty }=33.9 \) cm3/mol Ref. [34],
H = exp(13.99194 − 2650.11724/T) MPa Ref. [35],
D = 0.013942(T/227 − 1)1.7094 mm2/s Ref. [36].
Carbon dioxide hydrate:
Mh = 175.52 g/mol (nh = 7.3), ρh = 1.14 g/cm3 Ref. [37],
peq = exp(44.58 − 10246.28/T) kPa Ref. [38].
Methane:
\( {\upsilon}_{\mathrm{g}}^{\infty }=\exp \left(3.541+0.00123\left(T-273.15\right)\right) \) cm3/mol Ref. [39],
H = 101325 exp(183.786 − 9112.582/T − 25.0405 ln T + 0.00015T) Pa Ref. [40],
D = 0.01595(T/229.8 − 1)1.8769 mm2/s Ref. [41].
Methane hydrate:
Water:
\( {\displaystyle \begin{array}{l}{M}_{\mathrm{w}}=18.015\ \mathrm{g}/\mathrm{mol},\\ {}{p}_{\mathrm{v}}=22.064\exp \left(647.096{T}^{-1}\right(-7.85951783\tau +1.84408259{\tau}^{1.5}\\ {}-11.7866497{\tau}^3+22.6807411{\tau}^{3.5}-15.9618719{\tau}^4\\ {}+1.80122502{\tau}^{7.5}\left)\right)\mathrm{MPa},\mathrm{where}\ \tau =1-T/647.096\end{array}} \) Ref. [42],
\( {\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}\mu =280.68{\tilde{T}}^{-1.9}+511.45{\tilde{T}}^{-7.7}+61.131{\tilde{T}}^{-19.6}\\ {}+0.45903{\tilde{T}}^{-40}\upmu \mathrm{Pa}\ \mathrm{s},\mathrm{where}\ \tilde{T}=T/300\end{array}} \) Ref. [43].
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vlasov, V.A. Diffusion-kinetic model of gas hydrate film growth along the gas–water interface. Heat Mass Transfer 55, 3537–3545 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-019-02671-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-019-02671-5