Skip to main content
Log in

A numerical model for wet steam circulating in horizontal wellbores during starting stage of the steam-assisted-gravity-drainage process

  • Original
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Steam-assisted-gravity-drainage (SAGD) has been proved effective in heavy oil recovery. Preheating of the wellbore-surrounding reservoir is to circulate steam in the injector and producer so that heat can be conducted into surrounding oil layer. At this stage, the amount of steam injected into the reservoir is neglected. As a result, creating a large temperature difference between wellbore and annuli is key during the preheating process. A model is established for estimating steam properties in the wellbores so that the highest steam temperature in wellbores can be achieved. The model is comprised of mass, energy and momentum balance equations and the model is solved with numerical method. It is found that: (a) rich heat energy reflected in high steam quality does little effect on heat absorption rate of oil layer. The only effective method for temperature increase in oil layer is to increase the steam temperature in wellbores; (b) in order to increase the heat conduction rate to oil layer, a lower steam quality, a higher steam pressure and a lower mass flow rate is recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

w :

The mass flow rate (kg/s)

r :

The radius (m)

L :

The length of the long tube or annuli (m)

v :

The flow velocity (m/s)

p :

The wet steam pressure (Pa)

τ f :

The shear force of steam flow in long tube and annuli (N)

h :

The enthalpy of wet steam (J/kg)

T :

The temperature of the wet steam under a certain pressure (K)

f wall :

The friction coefficient of the long tube

U :

The heat transfer factor (W/(m2·K))

h fITi :

The forced convection heat transfer factor (W/(m2·K))

h fITo :

The forced convection heat transfer factor (W/(m2·K))

L v :

The latent heat of vaporization (kJ/kg)

h w :

The enthalpy of water (kJ/kg)

T h :

The temperature at the interface between cement sheath and oil layer (K)

f wi :

The convective heat transfer coefficient (W/(m2·K))

T ei :

The formation temperature (K)

ω :

Annuli/oil-layer heat capacity radio (dimensionless)

θ :

The angle between wellbore and the horizontal line (rad)

ρ :

The density of wet steam at the cross-section (kg/m3)

Q :

The heat conduction (transfer) rate (J/s)

λ :

The thermal conductivity (W/(m·K))

References

  1. Ashrafi O, Navarri P, Hughes R, Lu D (2016) Heat recovery optimization in a steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) plant. Energy 111:981–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fengrui S, Yuedong Y, Guozhen L, Xiangfang L (2018) Numerical simulation of supercritical-water flow in concentric-dual-tubing wells. SPE Journal 23(6):2188–2201. https://doi.org/10.2118/191363-PA

  3. Zhang Z, Liu H, Dong X, Qi P (2017) Unified model of heat transfer in the multiphase flow in Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage process. J Pet Sci Eng 157:875–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sun FR, Yao YD, Li GZ, Li XF, Li Q, Yang J, Wu JQ (2018) A coupled model for CO2 & superheated steam flow in full-length concentric dual-tube horizontal wells to predict the thermophysical properties of CO2 & superheated steam mixture considering condensation. J Pet Sci Eng 170:151–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sivaramkrishnan K, Huang B, Jana AK (2015) Predicting wellbore dynamics in a steam-assisted gravity drainage system: numeric and semi-analytic model, and validation. Appl Therm Eng 91:679–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sun FR, Yao YD, Li GZ, Li XF (2018) Performance of geothermal energy extraction in a horizontal well by using CO2 as the working fluid. Energy Convers Manag 171:1529–1539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sun FR, Yao YD, Li GZ, Li XF (2018) Geothermal energy development by circulating CO2 in a U-shaped closed loop geothermal system. Energy Convers Manag 174:971–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang C, Liu P, Wang F, Atadurdyyev B, Ovluyagulyyev M (2018) Experimental study on effects of CO2 and improving oil recovery for CO2 assisted SAGD in super-heavy-oil reservoirs. J Pet Sci Eng 165:1073–1080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sivagnanam M, Wang J, Gates ID (2017) On the fluid mechanics of slotted liners in horizontal wells. Chem Eng Sci 164:23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sun FR, Yao YD, Li GZ, Li XF (2018) Geothermal energy extraction in CO2 rich basin using abandoned horizontal wells. Energy 158:760–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou W, Dong M, Chen S (2015) Investigation of initial water mobility and its effects on SAGD performance in bitumen reservoirs and oil sands. J Pet Sci Eng 135:39–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun FR, Yao YD, Li GZ, Zhang SK, Xu ZM, Shi Y, Li XF (2019) A slip-flow model for oil transport in organic nanopores. J Pet Sci Eng 172:139–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gotawala DR, Gates ID (2011) Stability of the edge of a SAGD steam chamber in a bitumen reservoir. Chem Eng Sci 66(8):1802–1809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yu HT, Li Q, Sun FR (2019) Numerical simulation of CO2 circulating in a retrofitted geothermal well. J Pet Sci Eng 172:217–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sun FR, Yao YD, Li GZ, Qu SY, Zhang SK, Shi Y, Xu ZM, Li XF (2018) Effect of pressure and temperature of steam in parallel vertical injection wells on productivity of a horizontal well during the SAGD process: a numerical case study. SPE International Heavy Oil Conference & Exhibition, SPE-193659-MS, Kuwait City

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Sun FR, Yao YD, Li GZ (2018) Comments on: the flow and heat transfer characteristics of compressed air in high-pressure air injection wells [Arabian Journal of Geosciences (2018) 11: 519]. Arab J Geosci 11(20):631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Riyi L, Shangchao Q, Wenli S, Jianping Y, Xinwei W, Hongyuan W, Shizhong W, Zhengdong S (2018) Study on parameters of steam injection in SAGD circulating preheating section. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science) 42(1):134–141

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sun FR, Yao YD, Li GZ, Zhao L, Liu H, Li XF (2018) Water performance in toe-point injection wellbores at supercritical state. SPE Trinidad and Tobago Section Energy Resources Conference, Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago, SPE-191151-MS

  19. Pan J, You H, Pan Y, Wu D, Yu L, Wang X, Qiu X, Zhang M (2016) Application of optical sensing system in heavy oil recovery. Measurement 79:198–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sun FR, Yao YD, Li GZ, Li XF, Sun J (2018) Comparison of steam front shape during steam flooding process under varying steam state condition: numerical analysis. Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi SPE-192996-MS

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Sun FR, Yao YD, Li XF (2018) The heat and mass transfer characteristics of superheated steam in horizontal wells with toe-point injection technique. J Pet Explor Prod Technol 8(4):1295–1302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sun FR, Yao YD, Li GZ, Li XF, Zhang T, Lu CG, Liu WY (2018) An Improved Two-phase Model for Saturated Steam Flow in Multi-point Injection Horizontal Wells under Steady-state Injection Condition. J Pet Sci Eng 167:844–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sun FR, Yao YD, Li XF, Li GZ, Han S, Liu Q, Liu WY (2018) Type curve analysis of multi-phase flow of multi-component thermal fluid in toe-point injection horizontal wells considering phase change. J Pet Sci Eng 165:557–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sun FR, Yao YD, Li XF, Li GZ, Liu Q, Han S, Zhou Y (2018) Effect of Friction Work on Key Parameters of Steam at Different State in Toe-point Injection Horizontal Wellbores. J Pet Sci Eng 164:655–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sun FR, Yao YD, Li XF, Li GZ, Sun ZA (2018) Numerical Model for Predicting Distributions of Pressure and Temperature of Superheated Steam in Multi-point Injection Horizontal Wells. Int J Heat Mass Transf 121:282–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sun FR, Yao YD, Li XF, Li GZ, Miao YN, Han S, Chen ZL (2018) Flow Simulation of the Mixture System of Supercritical CO2 & Superheated Steam in Toe-point Injection Horizontal wellbores. J Pet Sci Eng 163:199–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sun FR, Yao YD, Li XF (2018) The Heat and Mass Transfer Characteristics of Superheated Steam Coupled with Non-condensing Gases in Horizontal Wells with Multi-point Injection Technique. Energy 143:995–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Satter A (1965) Heat losses during flow of steam down a wellbore. J Petroleum Technol: 845–851

  29. Hasan AR, Kabir CS (1991) Heat transfer during two-phase flow in wellbores: Part I-formation temperature. In: Proceedings of the 66th annual technical conference and exhibition. SPE, Dallas, pp. 469–478

  30. Cheng WL, Huang YH, Lu DT, Yin HR (2011) A novel analytical transient heat conduction time function for heat transfer in steam injection wells considering the wellbore heat capacity. Energy 36:4080–4088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cheng WL, Huang YH, Liu N, Ma R (2012) Estimation of geological formation thermal conductivity by using stochastic approximation method based on well-log temperature data. Energy 38:21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Caetano EF (1985) Upward two-phase flow through an annulus [Doctoral thesis]. University of Tulsa

  33. Hasan AR, Kabir CS (1992) Two-phase flow in vertical and inclined annuli. Int J Multiphase Flow 18(2):279–293

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Lage ACVM., Time RW (2000) Mechanical model for upward two-phase flow in annuli. In: Proceedings of the 2000 SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. SPE, Dallas, pp. 1–11

  35. Lage A (2002) An Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Upward Two-Phase Flow in Annuli. SPE J 7(3):325–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yu TT, Zhang HQ, Li MX, Sarica C (2010) A mechanistic model for gas/liquid flow in upward vertical annuli. SPE Prod Oper 285–295

  37. Hasan AR (1995) Void fraction in bubbly and slug flow in downward vertical and inclined systems. SPE Prod Facil: 172–176

  38. Wu H, Wu X, Wang Q et al (2011) A wellbore flow model of CO2 separate injection with concentric dual tubes and its affecting factors. Acta Pet Sin 32(4):722–727

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yang DW, Huang SB, Ma DL, Zhao YW, Zhou HJ (1999) Selection of models for two-phase flow in the steam injection well. J Univ Petrol China 23(2):44–56

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kaya AS, Sarica C, Brill JP (2001) Mechanistic Modeling of Two-Phase Flow in Deviated Wells. Spe Production & Facilities 16(3):156–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ni XF, Cheng LS, Li CL (2005) An JQ. A new model for the steam properties in steam injection wells. Chin J Comput Phys 22(3):251–255

    Google Scholar 

  42. Orkiszewski J (1967) Predicting two-phase flow pressure drops in vertical pipe. J Petrol Technol: 829–838

  43. Beggs DH, Brill JP (1973) A study of two-phase flow in inclined pipes. J Petrol Technol: 607–617

  44. Hasan AR, Kabir CS, Sayarpour M (2007) A basic approach to wellbore two-phase flow modeling. In: Proceedings of the 2007 SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. SPE, Anaheim, pp. 1–9

  45. Sun FR, Yao YD, Li XF, Yu PL, Ding GY, Zou M (2017) The flow and heat transfer characteristics of superheated steam in offshore wells and analysis of superheated steam performance. Comput Chem Eng 100:80–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sun FR, Yao YD, Chen MQ, Li XF, Zhao L, Meng Y, Sun Z, Zhang T, Feng D (2017) Performance analysis of superheated steam injection for heavy oil recovery and modeling of wellbore heat efficiency. Energy 125:795–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sun FR, Yao YD, Li XF, Yu PL, Zhao L (2017) Zhang Y. A numerical approach for obtaining type curves of superheated multi-component thermal fluid flow in concentric dual-tubing wells. Int J Heat Mass Transf 111:41–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sun FR, Yao YD, Li XF, Zhao L (2017) Type Curve Analysis of Superheated Steam Flow in Offshore Horizontal wells. Int J Heat Mass Transf 113:850–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sun FR, Yao YD, Li XF, Zhao L, Ding GY, Zhang XJ (2017) The Mass and Heat Transfer Characteristics of Superheated Steam Coupled with Non-condensing Gases in Perforated Horizontal Wellbores. J Pet Sci Eng 156:460–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Sun FR, Yao YD, Li XF, Tian J, Zhu GJ, Chen ZM (2017) The flow and heat transfer characteristics of superheated steam in concentric dual-tubing wells. Int J Heat Mass Transf 115:1099–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Sun FR, Yao YD, Li XF, Li H, Chen G, Sun ZA (2017) Numerical Study on the Non-isothermal Flow Characteristics of Superheated Steam in Ground Pipelines and Vertical Wellbores. J Pet Sci Eng 159:68–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Sun FR, Yao YD, Li XF, Li GZ, Chen ZL, Chang YC, Cao M, Han S, Chaohui L, Feng D, Sun Z (2018) Effect of Flowing Seawater on Supercritical CO2 - Superheated Water Mixture Flow in an Offshore Oil Well Considering the distribution of heat generated by the work of friction. J Pet Sci Eng 162:460–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Sun FR, Yao YD, Li XF, Li GZ, Huang L, Liu H, Chen ZL, Liu Q, Liu WY, Cao M, Han S (2018) Exploitation of Heavy Oil by Supercritical CO2: Effect Analysis of Supercritical CO2 on H2O at Superheated State in Integral Joint Tubing and Annuli. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology 8(3):557–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Sun FR, Yao YD, Li GZ, Li XF, Chen MQ, Chen G, Zhang T (2018) Analysis of Superheated Steam Performance in Offshore Concentric Dual-tubing Wells. J Pet Sci Eng 166:984–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Sun FR, Yao YD, Li GZ, Li XF, Lu CG, Chen ZL (2018) A Model for Predicting Thermophysical Properties of Water at Supercritical State in Offshore CDTW. Measurement 124:241–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Sun FR, Yao YD, Li XF (2018) Numerical simulation of superheated steam flow in dual-tubing wells. J Pet Explor Prod Technol 8(3):925–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Sun FR, Yao YD, Li XF (2017) Effect of gaseous CO2 on superheated steam flow in wells. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal 20(6):1579–1585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Sun FR, Yao YD, Li XF (2018) Effect Analysis of Non-condensable Gases on Superheated Steam Flow in Vertical Single-tubing Steam Injection Pipes Based on the Real Gas Equation of State and the Transient Heat Transfer Model in Formation. J Pet Explor Prod Technol 8(4):1325–1330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Sun FR, Yao YD, Li XF (2018) Li GZ. A brief communication on the effect of seawater on water flow in offshore wells at supercritical state. J Pet Explor Prod Technol 8(4):1587–1596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Wang YP, Li MZ, Gao X, Yao ZL (2010) A new parameter-calculating method for steam flooding in horizontal wellbore. J Southwest Petrol Univ 32(4):127–132

    Google Scholar 

  61. Dong XH, Liu HQ, Zhang ZX, Wang CJ (2014) The flow and heat transfer characteristics of multi-thermal fluid in horizontal wellbore coupled with flow in heavy oil reservoirs. J Pet Sci Eng 122:56–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Emami-Meybodi H, Saripalli HK, Hassanzadeh H (2014) Formation heating by steam circulation in a horizontal wellbore. Int J Heat Mass Transf 78:986–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Dong XH, Liu HQ, Hou JR, Chen ZX (2016) Transient fluid flow and heat transfer characteristics during co-injection of steam and condensable gases in horizontal wells. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science) 40(2):105–114

    Google Scholar 

  64. Li M, Chen H, Zhang Y et al (2015) A Coupled Reservoir/Wellbore Model to Simulate the Steam Injection Performance of Horizontal Wells. Energy Technology 3(5):535–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Chen WJ, Li MZ, Di QF et al (2017) Numerical simulation of the outflow performance for horizontal wells with multiple steam injection values. Acta Pet Sin 38(6):696–704

    Google Scholar 

  66. Minghai X, Ying R, Mikang W et al (1993) Analysis on mass and heat transfer in horizontal wellbore of steam injection well. Journal of the University of Petroleum, China (Edition of Natural Science) 17(5):60–65

    Google Scholar 

  67. Jingling L, Zhihong Z, Shengjun D et al (2014) Heat transfer calculation and influence factors analysis for SAGD circulation phase in dual horizontal wells. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology 35(1):82–86

    Google Scholar 

  68. Best DA, Lesage RP, Arthur JE (1990) Steam circulation in horizontal wellbores. SPE/DOE 20203-MS

  69. Liu HQ (2013) Principle and design of thermal oil recovery. Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  70. Gu H (2016) Mass and Heat Transfer Model and Application of Wellbore/Formation Coupling During Steam Injection in SAGD Process (Doctoral Dissertation). Beijing: China University of Petroleum

  71. Yuan EX (1982) Engineering fluid mechanics. Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing, pp 87–163

    Google Scholar 

  72. Fontanilla Jerry P (1982) Aziz Khalid. Prediction of bottom-hole conditions for wet steam injection wells. J Can Pet Technol 21(2):82–88

    Google Scholar 

  73. Wen J, Xu Y, Li Z, Ma Z, Xu Y (2018) Inter-class sparsity based discriminative least square regression. Neural Networks 102:36–47

  74. Wen J, Zhang B, Xu Y, Yang J, Han N (2018) Adaptive weighted nonnegative low-rank representation. Pattern Recognition 81:326–340

  75. Sheikholeslami M (2019) Numerical approach for MHD Al2O3-water nanofluid transportation inside a permeable medium using innovative computer method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 344:306–318

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  76. Fu H, Li Z, Liu Z, Wang Z (2018) Research on big data digging of hot topics about recycled water use on micro-blog based on particle swarm optimization. Sustainability 10:2488

  77. Fengrui S, Yuedong Y, Guozhen L (2018) Comments on heat and mass transfer characteristics of steam in a horizontal wellbore with multi-point injection technique considering wellbore stock liquid. Int J Heat Mass Transf 132:1319–1321

  78. Miao Y, Li X, Zhou Y, et al (2018) A dynamic predictive permeability model in coal reservoirs: Effects of shrinkage behavior caused by water desorption. Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering 168:533–541

  79. Yang, A.M.; Yang, X.L.; Chang, J.C.; Bai, B.; Kong, F.B.; Ran, Q.B. Research on a fusion scheme of cellular network and wireless sensor networks for cyber physical social systems. Ieee Access 2018, 6(99):18786–18794

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the National Basic Research Program of China (2015CB250900), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (Grant No.NCET-13-1030) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.40974055).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fengrui Sun, Yuedong Yao, Guozhen Li or Wenyuan Liu.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1. Steam density calculation

The density of wet steam can be calculated by the weighted mean method. The weight coefficient is determined by the steam quality x, which can be expressed as [69, 70]:

$$ {\rho}_{wetsteam}={\left(\frac{1-x}{\rho_{water}}+\frac{x}{\rho_{steam}}\right)}^{-1} $$
(11)
$$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{l}{\rho}_{water}=3786.31-37.2487\times T+0.196246\times {T}^2-5.04708\times 0.0001\times {T}^3\\ {}+6.29368\times 0.0000001\times {T}^4-{3.0848}^{\ast }0.0000000001\times {T}^5\end{array}} $$
(12)
$$ {\rho}_{steam}={e}^{-93.7072+0.833941\times T-0.00320809\times {T}^2+6.57652\ast 0.000001\times {T}^3-6.93747\times {10}^{-9}\times {T}^4+2.97203\times {10}^{-12}\times {T}^5} $$
(13)

Appendix 2. Shear force calculation

According to the theory of fluid mechanics, the shear force for wet steam flow in wellbores can be expressed as [70, 71]:

$$ {\tau}_f=\frac{1}{4}\pi {r}_{longtube,i}{f}_{wall}{\rho}_{longtube}{v}_{longtube}^2 dL $$
(14)

Where, fwall is the function of Reynolds number (Rei) and wellbore roughness (ε). The calculation method of friction coefficient is shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Basic parameters used for calculation [70, 71]

Appendix 3. Heat conduction from long tube to surrounding annuli

The heat conduction rate from long tube to surrounding annuli can be expressed as [70,71,72]:

$$ \frac{d{Q}_{longtube}}{dz}=2\pi {r}_{longtube,o}{U}_{longtube,o}\left({T}_{longtube}-{T}_{annuli}\right) $$
(15)
$$ {U}_{IT o}={\left[\frac{r_{IT o}}{\lambda_{IT}}\ln \frac{r_{IT o}}{r_{iITi}}+\frac{r_{IT o}}{h_{fITi}{r}_{IT i}}+\frac{1}{h_{fITo}}\right]}^{-1} $$
(16)

Appendix 4. Steam enthalpy calculation

The enthalpy of wet steam can be calculated by the weighted mean method. The weight coefficient is determined by the steam quality x, which can be expressed as [69, 70]:

$$ {h}_{wetsteam}=x{L}_v+{h}_w $$
(17)
$$ {L}_v=\sqrt{7184500+11048.6\times T-88.405\times {T}^2+0.162561\times {T}^3-1.21377\times {10}^{-4}\times {T}^4} $$
(18)
$$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{l}{h}_w=23665.2-366.232\times T+2.26952\times {T}^2-0.00730365\times {T}^3\\ {}+1.30241\times {10}^{-5}\times {T}^4-1.22103\times {10}^{-8}\times {T}^5+4.70878\times {10}^{-12}\times {T}^6\end{array}} $$
(19)

Appendix 5. Wellbore heat loss rate

According to the assumption, the amount of steam injected into the oil layer is neglected. As a result, heat conduction from steam in annuli to oil layer is the only way that heat can be transferred to oil layer. The heat conduction rate can be expressed as [69]:

$$ \frac{d{Q}_{an nuli}}{dL}=2\pi {r}_{wo}{U}_{wo}\left({T}_{an}-{T}_h\right) $$
(20)
$$ {U}_{wo}={\left(\frac{r_{wo}}{f_{wi}{r}_{wi}}+\frac{r_{wo}}{\lambda_{cas}}\ln \frac{r_{wo}}{r_{wi}}+\frac{r_{wo}}{\lambda_{cem}}\ln \frac{r_{cem o}}{r_{wo}}\right)}^{-1} $$
(21)
$$ {U}_{wo}={\left(\frac{r_{wo}}{\lambda_{cem}}\ln \frac{r_{cem o}}{r_{wo}}\right)}^{-1} $$
(22)

Hasan et al. [37] found the function relationship between heat conduction rate and time, which was shown as:

$$ \frac{d{Q}_{an}}{dz}=2\pi {\lambda}_e\frac{T_h-{T}_{ei}}{f(t)} $$
(23)

For the f(t) in Eq. (23), many scholars presented different equations. In this paper, the expression of f(t) presented by Cheng et al. [31] is adopted.

$$ f(t)=\frac{16{\omega}^2}{\pi^2}{\int}_0^{\infty}\frac{1-\exp \left(-{\tau}_D{u}^2\right)}{u^3\varDelta \left(u,\omega \right)} du $$
(24)
$$ \varDelta \left(u,\omega \right)={\left[u{J}_0(u)-\omega {J}_1(u)\right]}^2+{\left[u{Y}_0(u)-\omega {Y}_1(u)\right]}^2 $$
(25)

When \( {r}_{cem}^2/\left(4{\alpha}_rt\right)=1/4{\tau}_D<<1 \) is satisfied, the f(t) can be expressed as:

$$ f(t)=\ln \left(2\sqrt{\tau_D}\right)-\frac{C_1}{2}+\frac{1}{4{\tau}_D}\left[1+\left(1-\frac{1}{\omega}\right)\ln \left(4{\tau}_D\right)+{C}_1\right] $$
(26)

Where C1 (dimensionless) denotes the Euler’s constant (C1=0.5772).

According to the principle of continuity, the heat conduction rate can be expressed as:

$$ \frac{d{Q}_{an}}{dL}=\frac{2\pi {r}_{wo}{U}_{wo}\left({T}_{an}-{T}_{ei}\right)}{1+\frac{r_{wo}{U}_{wo}}{\lambda_e}f(t)} $$
(27)

With the rapid development of modern computation technology [73,74,75], numerical methods are widely adopted in simulating the heat and mass transfer processes in nearly all aspects of engineering practices [76,77,78,79]. This paper is proposed based on previous works [17]. This model reveals the physical process of wet steam circulating in a SAGD horizontal well pair. The authors believe that the model will show its usefulness in the engineering applications.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, F., Yao, Y., Li, G. et al. A numerical model for wet steam circulating in horizontal wellbores during starting stage of the steam-assisted-gravity-drainage process. Heat Mass Transfer 55, 2209–2220 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-019-02564-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-019-02564-7

Navigation