Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of the operation range of a vertical two-phase closed thermosyphon

  • Original
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comprehensive model, proposed for a vertical two-phase closed thermosyphon (TPCT) by the present authors, is further developed by utilizing the criteria for dryout, flooding and boiling limits to investigate the effects of filling ratio on them together, while the available models can just consider one or two limits of them. A new concept named dryout ratio is proposed, which can be used for predicting dryout limit. The empirical correlation and the empirical value, provided by other researchers, are used for predicting flooding and boiling limit, respectively. The experiments with nitrogen as working fluid are performed, and compared with the calculations. The maximum filling ratio is introduced, beyond which the liquid could be carried to condenser and the heat transfer performance can be deteriorated. And then the closed operation range of a vertical TPCT is finally determined, which has not been reported before. The effects of operating pressure and geometries on the range are also analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

Area (m2)

C 1C 7 :

Equation coefficients

C f :

Frictional coefficient

C o :

Distribution parameter

$$ C_{\text{o}} = 1.2 - 0.2\sqrt {{{\rho_{\text{v}} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\rho_{\text{v}} } {\rho_{\text{l}} }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\rho_{\text{l}} }}} $$
c p :

Specific heat (J kg−1 K−1)

D :

Diameter (m)

Dr :

Dryout ratio

FR :

Filling ratio

g :

Gravitational acceleration (m s−2)

h :

Heat transfer coefficient (W m−2 K−1)

h fg :

Latent heat of vaporization (J kg−1)

J :

Superficial velocity (m s−1)

J * :

Dimensional superficial velocity

\( J_{k}^{*} = J_{k} \sqrt {{{\rho_{k} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\rho_{k} } {\left( {\rho_{\text{l}} - \rho_{\text{v}} } \right)gD}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\left( {\rho_{\text{l}} - \rho_{\text{v}} } \right)gD}}} \quad (k{\text{ = l, v)}} \)

L :

Length (m)

M :

Mass (kg)

N f :

Dimensional parameter

p :

Pressure (MPa)

Q :

Heat transfer rate (W)

q :

Radial heat flux (W m−2)

Re :

Reynolds number

T :

Temperature (K)

u :

Flow velocity (m s−1)

V vj :

Vapor drift velocity (m s−1)

x :

Axial coordinate

y :

Radial coordinate

δ :

Liquid film thickness (m)

σ:

Surface tension (N m−1)

ρ:

Density (kg m−3)

α:

Void fraction

μ:

Dynamic viscosity (Pa s)

ν:

Kinematic viscosity (m2 s−1)

τ:

Shear stress (N m−2)

λ:

Thermal conductivity (W m−1 K−1)

Γ:

Mass flow rate per unit width (Kg m−1 s−1)

a:

Adiabatic section

c:

Condenser section

cr:

Critical value

e:

Evaporator section

ef:

Liquid film region in evaporator

f:

Friction force

i:

Interface of liquid and vapor

l:

Liquid

m:

Mass transfer

max:

Maximum

NB:

Nucleate boiling

NC:

Natural convection

p:

Liquid pool

s:

Saturation

v:

Vapor

w:

Wall

References

  1. Imura H, Ssasaguchi K, Kozai H (1983) Critical heat flux in a closed two phase thermosyphon. Int J Heat Mass Transf 26(8):1181–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Streltsov AI (1975) Theoretical and experimental investigation of optimum filling for heat pipe. Heat Transf Soviet Res 7(1):23–27

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nguyen-Chi H, Groll M, Dang-Van T (1979) Experimental investigation of closed two-phase thermosyphons. In: AIAA 14th thermophysics conference. Orlando, Florida, pp 79–1106

  4. Shiraishi M, Yoneya M, Yabe A (1984) Visual study of operating limit in the two-phase closed thermosyphon. In: Proceedings of the 5th international heat pipe conference. Tsukuba, Japan, pp 10–17

  5. Wallis GB (1969) One-dimensional two-phase flow. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kutateladze SS (1972) Elements of hydrodynamics of gas-liquid systems. Fluid Mech Soviet Res 1:29–50

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bezrodnyi MK (1978) Upper limit of maximum heat transfer capacity of evaporative thermosyphons (in Russian). Teploenergetika 25(8):63–66

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tien CL, Chung KS (1978) Entrainment limits in heat pipes. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international heat pipe conference. Palo Alto, CA, pp 36–40

  9. Prenger FC (1984) Performance limits of gravity-assisted heat pipes. In: Proceedings of the 5th international heat pipe conference. Tsukuba, Japan, pp 1–5

  10. Faghri A, Chen MM, Morgan M (1989) Heat transfer characteristics in two-phase closed conventional and concentric annular thermosyphons. J Heat Transf Trans ASME 111(3):611–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gorbis ZR, Savchenkov GA (1976) Low temperature two-phase closed thermosyphon investigation. In: Proceeding of the 2nd international heat pipe conference. pp 37–45

  12. Bezrodnyi MK, Raynzil’berg SN, Beloyvan AI et al (1976) Crisis of heat and mass transfer in close-loop two-phase thermosiphons employed in cooling metallurgical furnaces. Heat Transf Soviet Res 8(4):99–103

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dobran F (1985) Steady-state characteristics and stability thresholds of a closed two-phase thermosyphon. Int J Heat Mass Transf 28(5):949–957

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Reed JG, Tien CL (1987) Modeling of the two-phase closed thermosyphon. J Heat Transf Trans ASME 109(3):722–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zuo ZJ, Gunnerson FS (1994) Numerical modeling of the steady-state two-phase closed thermosyphon. Int J Heat Mass Transf 37(17):2715–2722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. El-Genk MS, Saber HH (1997) Flooding limit in closed two-phase flow thermosyphons. Int J Heat Mass Transf 40(9):2147–2164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pan Y (2001) Condensation heat transfer characteristics and concept of sub-flooding limit in a two-phase closed thermosyphon. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 28(3):311–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jiao B, Qiu LM, Zhang XB et al (2008) Investigation on the effect of filling ratio on the steady-state heat transfer performance of a vertical two-phase closed thermosyphon. Appl Therm Eng 28(11–12):1417–1426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kataoka I, Ishii M (1987) Drift flux model for large diameter pipe and new correlation for pool void fraction. Int J Heat Mass Transf 30(9):1927–1939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fujita T, Ueda T (1978) Heat transfer to falling liquid films and film breakdown-I, Subcooled liquid film. Int J Heat Mass Transf 21(2):97–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hong W, Tongze M, Huanzhuo C (1990) Condensation heat transfer in two-phase closed thermosyphon (In Chinese). J Eng Thermophys 11(2):182–187

    Google Scholar 

  22. Holman JP (2002) Heat transfer. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lee K-W, Baik S-J, Ro T-S (2000) An utilization of liquid sublayer dryout mechanism in predicting critical heat flux under low pressure and low velocity conditions in round tubes. Nuclear Eng Des 200(1–2):69–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nguyen-Chi H, Groll M (1981) Entrainment or flooding limit in a closed two-phase thermosyphon. In: Proceeding of the 4th international heat pipe conference. London, England, pp 147–162

Download references

Acknowledgments

The project is supported by National Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists of China under Contract No. 50825601 and by the Doctoral Foundation of Ministry of Education, China under contract No. 200803350034.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. M. Qiu.

Appendix

Appendix

The correlation provided by Gorbis et al. [11] for boiling limit is

$$ q_{\max } = A_{3}^{2} q_{\max ,\infty } \left( {0.4 + 0.012D\sqrt {\frac{{g(\rho_{\text{l}} - \rho_{\text{v}} )}}{\sigma }} } \right)^{2} $$
(22)
$$ q_{\max ,\infty } = 0.14h_{\text{fg}} \sqrt {\rho_{\text{v}} } \root{4} \of {{g\sigma (\rho_{\text{l}} - \rho_{\text{v}} )}} $$
(23)
$$ A_{3} = A_{4} (D/L_{\text{c}} )^{ - 0.44} (D/L_{\text{e}} )^{0.55} FR^{{A_{5} }} $$
(24)

where A 4 = 0.538, A 5 = 0.13 at FR ≤ 35%; A 4 = 3.54, A 5 = −0.37 at FR > 35%.

The correlation proposed by Bezrodnyi et al. [12] for boiling limit is

$$ Q_{\max } = A_{6} \frac{\pi }{4}D^{2} p_{\text{v}}^{0.22} L_{\text{e}}^{{A_{7} }} $$
(25)

Equation 25 can be applied for FR > 4.5%. The coefficients of A 6 and A 7 depend on the following rules: A 6 = 20.8 × 106, A 7 = 0 at L e ≥ 0.6 m and D ≥ 27 mm; A 6 = 16 × 106, A 7 = 0 at L e ≥ 0.6 m and D < 27 mm; A 6 = 24.4 × 106, A 7 = 0.33 at L e < 0.6 m.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jiao, B., Qiu, L.M., Gan, Z.H. et al. Determination of the operation range of a vertical two-phase closed thermosyphon. Heat Mass Transfer 48, 1043–1055 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-011-0954-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-011-0954-x

Keywords

Navigation