Skip to main content
Log in

Costello’s pushforward formula: errata and generalization

  • Published:
manuscripta mathematica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Costello’s pushforward formula relates virtual fundamental classes of virtually birational algebraic stacks. Its original formulation omits a necessary hypothesis, whose addition is not sufficient to correct the proof. We supply a substitute for Costello’s notion of pure degree and prove the pushforward formula with this definition. We also show the hypotheses of the corrected pushforward formula are satisfied in a variety of its applications. Some adjustments to the original proofs are required in several cases, including the original one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In the fiber products on pp. 575 and 591, \(\overline{{\mathcal {M}}}_{s(\eta )}\) and \(\overline{{\mathcal {M}}}_{r(s(\eta ))}\) were presumably meant to be \(\overline{{\mathcal {M}}}_{s(\eta )}(X)\) and \(\overline{{\mathcal {M}}}_{r(s(\eta ))}(X)\), respectively.

References

  1. Manolache, C.: Virtual pull-backs. J. Algebr. Geom. 21(2), 201–245 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Herr, L.: Extending rational maps of nodal curves. MathOverflow. https://mathoverflow.net/users/86614/leo herr. https://mathoverflow.net/q/366308. Accessed 22 July 2020

  3. Herr, L.: Most divisors on a curve aren’t special? MathOverflow. https://mathoverflow.net/users/86614/leo herr. https://mathoverflow.net/q/380120. Accessed 31 Dec 2020

  4. Herr, L.: The log product formula. arXiv e-prints arXiv:1908.04936 (2019)

  5. Raynaud, M., Gruson, L.: Critères de platitude et de projectivité techniques de “platification” d’un module. Invent. Math. 13, 1 (1971)

  6. Costello, K.: Higher genus Gromov–Witten invariants as genus zero invariants of symmetric products. Ann. Math. (2) 164(2), 561–601 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Abramovich, D., Corti, A., Vistoli, A.: Twisted bundles and admissible covers. Commun. Algebra 31(8), 3547–3618 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Abramovich, D., Vistoli, A.: Compactifying the space of stable maps. J. Am. Math. Soc. 15, 09 (1999)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Abramovich, D., Graber, T., Vistoli, A.: Gromov–Witten theory of Deligne–Mumford stacks. Am. J. Math. 130(5), 1337–1398 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. The Stacks Project Authors. Stacks Project (2020). https://stacks.math.columbia.edu

  11. Behrend, K.: Gromov–Witten invariants in algebraic geometry. Invent. Math. 127, 01 (1996)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Abramovich, D., Marcus, S., Wise, J.: Comparison theorems for Gromov–Witten invariants of smooth pairs and of degenerations. Ann. l’Inst. Four. 64(4), 1611–1667 (2014)

  13. Harris, J., Morrison, I.: Moduli of Curves. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, New York (1998)

  14. Hartshorne, R.: Algebraic Geometry. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer (1977)

  15. Vakil, R.: The moduli space of curves and Gromov–Witten theory. arXiv Mathematics e-prints arXiv:math/0602347 (2006)

  16. Jarvis, T., Kaufmann, R., Kimura, T.: Pointed admissible g-covers and g-equivariant cohomological field theories. Compos. Math. 141, 03 (2003). arXiv:math.ag/0302316

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Cavalieri, R.: Generating functions for Hurwitz–Hodge integrals. Adv. Math. 218, 1419–1429, 08 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Wise, J.: Obstruction theories and virtual fundamental classes. arXiv e-prints arXiv:1111.4200 (2011)

  19. Raptis, G.: On the homotopy type of certain cobordism categories of surfaces. arXiv e-prints arXiv:1008.5089 (2010)

  20. Andreini, E., Jiang, Y., Tseng, H.-H.: Gromov–Witten theory of banded gerbes over schemes. arXiv e-prints arXiv:1101.5996 (2011)

  21. Cavalieri, R., Marcus, S., Wise, J.: Polynomial families of tautological classes on \(\cal{M} _{g,n}^{rt}\). arXiv e-prints arXiv:1107.0857 (2011)

  22. Marcus, S., Wise, J.: Stable maps to rational curves and the relative Jacobian. Algebraic Geom. (2013)

  23. Marcus, S., Wise, J.: Logarithmic compactification of the Abel–Jacobi section. Proceed. London Math. Soc. 121 (2020)

  24. Chang, H.L., Li, J. An algebraic proof of the hyperplane property of the genus one GW-invariants of quintics. J. Differ. Geom. 100(2), 251–299 (2015)

  25. Ranganathan, D.: Logarithmic Gromov–Witten theory with expansions. Algebraic Geom. (2019)

  26. Li, W.-P., Qin, Z.: The cohomological crepant resolution conjecture for the Hilbert–Chow morphisms. J. Differ. Geom. 104, 01 (2012)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Andreini, E., Jiang, Y., Tseng, H.-H.: Gromov–Witten theory of root gerbes I: structure of genus \(0\) moduli spaces. arXiv e-prints arXiv:0907.2087 (2009)

  28. Matsuki, K., Olsson, M.: Kawamata–Viehweg vanishing as Kodaira vanishing for stacks. arXiv Mathematics e-prints arXiv:math/0212259 (2002)

  29. Chen, Q.: The degeneration formula for logarithmic expanded degenerations. J. Algebr. Geom. 23, 09 (2010)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Pomam, F.: Virtual classes of Artin stacks. arXiv e-prints arXiv:1211.4339 (2012)

  31. Ogus, A.: Lectures on Logarithmic Algebraic Geometry. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press (2018)

  32. Abramovich, D., Fantechi, B.: Orbifold techniques in degeneration formulas. arXiv e-prints arXiv:1103.5132 (2011)

  33. Abramovich, D., Wise, J.: Birational invariance in logarithmic Gromov–Witten theory. arXiv e-prints arXiv:1306.1222 (2013)

  34. Abramovich, D., Cadman, C., Wise, J.: Relative and orbifold Gromov–Witten invariants. Algebr. Geom. 04 (2010)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Kevin Costello for his correspondence and blessing to write this document. The first author would also like to thank Sarah Arpin, Gebhard Martin, Fabio Bernasconi, Tommaso de Fernex, Y.P. Lee, You-Cheng Chou, and the Math Overflow community [2, 3]. Both authors would like to thank Dan Abramovich for useful correspondence and encouragement.

This work grew out of a thesis [4] written at the University of Colorado Boulder by the first author and supervised by the second author. The first author was partially funded by NSF RTG grant #1840190. The second author was supported by a Collaboration Grant from the Simons Foundation.

Funding

The first author was partially funded by NSF RTG Grant #1840190. The second author was supported by a Collaboration Grant from the Simons Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leo Herr.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A. Degree of a Generically Finite Morphism

Appendix A. Degree of a Generically Finite Morphism

The stacks project offers two definitions of generic finiteness. We assume our stacks are locally noetherian and elaborate on definition (1) of [10, 073A].

Definition A.1

Let \(f : X \rightarrow Y\) be locally of finite type and \(\eta \in Y\) be a maximal point. We say f is generically finite at \(\eta \) if the preimage \(X \times _Y \eta \) is a finite, nonempty set. Equivalently, there’s an affine open \(V \subseteq Y\) and finitely many \(U_1, \dots , U_n\) such that \(U_i \rightarrow V\) is finite and \(\eta \in V\) and \(X \times _Y \eta \subseteq \bigcup _n U_i\) [10, 02NW].

Given that \(f : X \rightarrow Y\) is generically finite at some maximal \(\eta \), we say it is of degree d at \(\eta \) if [10, 02NY]

$$\begin{aligned} d = \sum _{\xi \in f^{-1}(\eta )} \dim _{R(\eta )} {\mathcal {O}}_{X, \xi }. \end{aligned}$$

A morphism \(f : X \rightarrow Y\) locally of finite type is said to be generically finite or of degree d if it is so at every maximal point \(\eta \in Y\).

A representable morphism \(X \rightarrow Y\) locally of finite type between algebraic stacks is said to be generically finite or of degree d (at a specific maximal point \(\eta \in Y\) or for all) if the same is true for pulling back along some smooth cover \(V \rightarrow Y\) by a scheme (with \(\xi \in V\) mapping to \(\eta \)).

Remark A.2

Generically finite and degree d both pull back along flat, quasicompact morphisms \(Y' \rightarrow Y\) and may be checked after some (equivalently any) flat, quasicompact cover. This is because generalizations lift along flat, quasicompact morphisms, ensuring that maximal points map to each maximal point.

Lemma A.3

Let \(X \rightarrow {\text {Spec}}k\) be a finite morphism from a DM stack to a field. Then X admits a finite étale cover from a scheme.

Proof

Pick a finite type étale cover \(P \rightarrow X\). Then \(P \rightarrow X\) is locally quasifinite [10, 03WS] and hence quasifinite [10, 01TD]. The composite \(P \rightarrow {\text {Spec}}k\) is quasifinite, hence finite [10, 02NH]. The map \(P \rightarrow X\) is then finite. \(\square \)

Definition A.4

A finite DM-type morphism \(X \rightarrow {\text {Spec}}k\) is of pure degree d if, for some (equiv. any) finite étale cover \(P \rightarrow X\) by a scheme,

$$\begin{aligned} \dfrac{\deg (P/{\text {Spec}}k)}{\deg (P/X)} = d. \end{aligned}$$

A DM-type morphism \(X \rightarrow Y\) of locally noetherian artin stacks is generically finite if, for all maximal points \(\eta \rightarrow Y\), the pullback

$$\begin{aligned} X \times _Y \eta \rightarrow \eta \end{aligned}$$

is finite.

Remark A.5

The definition of degree d for generically finite morphisms is determined by its properties:

  • A composite \(X \overset{f}{\rightarrow } Y \overset{g}{\rightarrow } Z\) for which \(\deg f\), \(\deg g\), \(\deg g \circ f\) are well defined satisfies

    $$\begin{aligned} \deg (g \circ f) = \deg f \cdot \deg g.\end{aligned}$$
  • Given a pullback square

    figure w

    with \(Y' \rightarrow Y\) flat and quasicompact, f is generically finite (of degree d) if and only if \(f'\) is.

  • Agreement with the notion for representable morphisms in Definition A.1.

We conclude with two folklore observations that we use in the body of the text.

Remark A.6

(“Stability is an open condition”) Suppose \(f : X \rightarrow Y\) is locally finite type and XY are algebraic stacks. There is a substack \(U \subseteq X\) representing morphisms \(T \rightarrow X\) such that \(f|_T\) is DM type, and this substack is open. A map is DM type when the diagonal is unramified, which is an open condition by The Stacks Project Authors [10, 0475].

This shows that the locus where a family of prestable maps is stable is open in the base.

Remark A.7

If X is an algebraic stack locally of finite type, then its normalization \(X^\nu \rightarrow X\) is finite. This is because normalizations are integral [10, 035Q] and the map is locally of finite type [10, 01WJ].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Herr, L., Wise, J. Costello’s pushforward formula: errata and generalization. manuscripta math. 171, 621–642 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00229-022-01388-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00229-022-01388-w

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation