Abstract
Objective: In vitro studies have shown that tacrine is metabolized by cytochrome P4501A2 (CYP1A2). One of the monohydroxy-metabolites has been incriminated with tacrine-induced hepatotoxicity. The aim of this study was to establish whether the potent CYP1A2 inhibitor fluvoxamine in clinically relevant doses could inhibit tacrine metabolism.
Methods: Eighteen healthy young men were enrolled in an open, randomized crossover study. In the first study period a single oral dose of tacrine 40 mg was given. In the second period the volunteers were randomized to maintenance doses of fluvoxamine 50 or 100 mg per day, and a single oral dose of tacrine 20 mg was given.
Results: Fluvoxamine was found to be a very potent inhibitor of tacrine metabolism. A fractional decrement in tacrine clearance of approximately 85% was found with both fluvoxamine doses, which was in good agreement with a prediction based on in vitro data. The medians of the steady-state concentration of fluvoxamine were 43 nM (range 25–49) and 70 nM (range 44–124) in the 50 mg per day and 100 mg per day groups, respectively. The steady-state concentration of fluvoxamine correlated with the fractional decrement in tacrine clearance (Spearman Rs = 0.53, P < 0.05). Modest, but statistically significant, reductions in the formation of the metabolites 1- and 2-hydroxytacrine were found during concomitant fluvoxamine treatment.
Conclusion: Fluvoxamine at clinically relevant doses is a potent inhibitor of tacrine metabolism. This interaction is very likely to have clinical relevance. Whether concomitant fluvoxamine treatment reduces tacrine-induced hepatotoxicity needs further study.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: 16 September 1998 / Accepted in revised form: 27 January 1999
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Teilmann Larsen, J., Lindal Hansen, L., Spigset, O. et al. Fluvoxamine is a potent inhibitor of tacrine metabolism in vivo. E J Clin Pharmacol 55, 375–382 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002280050643
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002280050643