Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of continuous veno–venous haemodiafiltration and continuous veno–venous haemofiltration on the pharmacokinetics of fluconazole

  • Pharmacokinetics and Disposition
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Objective: To compare the elimination of fluconazole by continuous veno–venous haemodiafiltration (CVVHD) and continuous veno–venous haemofiltration (CVVH) at different dosages. Intervention: Patients received doses of 400 mg (n=3), 600 mg (n=1) or 800 mg (n=2) fluconazole as a short-time infusion once a day. Patients underwent CVVHD the first day and CVVH the second day. CVVHD and CVVH were performed using an acrylonitrile hollow-fibre filter at a constant blood flow of 90 ml/min and a substitution flow of 1000 ml/h (predilution). During CVVHD, the dialysate flow was 1000 ml/h. Ultrafiltration rates were 1158±90.5 ml/h during CVVHD and 1167±81.6 ml/h. Serum and ultrafiltrate/dialysate concentrations of fluconazole were determined on nine occasions over 24 h. Participants: Six critically ill patients with acute renal failure (ARF) and serious fungal infection. Results: Extracorporeal clearance (CVVHD 30.5±6.0 ml/min, CVVH 17.5±4.0 ml/min) and total clearance of fluconazole (CVVHD 37.9±4.4 ml/min, CVVH 25.3±6.5 ml/min) were significantly higher during CVVHD (P<0.05). During CVVHD, the sieving coefficient (SCVVHD) was 0.88 (range 0.54–1) and the elimination half-life (t 1/2) was 14.8–35.1 h. During CVVH, the SCVVH was 0.96 (range 0.56–1.02) and t 1/2 was 24.0–51.6 h. Conclusions: A daily dosage of 400–800 mg fluconazole is recommended in the treatment of life-threatening fungal infections in critically ill patients undergoing CVVHD since the clearance of CVVHD may considerably exceed the clearance in patients with normal renal function, which is about 20 ml/min. Drug monitoring is highly recommended for these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Accepted in revised form: 11 September 2000

Electronic Publication

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muhl, E., Martens, T., Iven, H. et al. Influence of continuous veno–venous haemodiafiltration and continuous veno–venous haemofiltration on the pharmacokinetics of fluconazole. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 56, 671–678 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002280000216

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002280000216

Navigation