Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
To the Editor,
Commonly used equations for estimating creatinine clearance (CL) and/or glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from serum creatinine are based on steady-state assumptions regarding creatinine formation and elimination and are therefore less applicable to patients with unstable renal function [1,2,3]. A compartmental creatinine model that can describe the dynamics in creatinine parameters over time was previously introduced by Ullah et al. to estimate creatinine clearance [4]. In this model, volume of distribution (Vd) of creatinine was fixed at 60% of total body weight, corresponding to total body water (TBW). This approximation ignores variability, which may lead to biased estimates of other pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters [4]. Therefore, there is a need to enrich the estimation of creatinine PK parameters with experimental data, in the case of Vd including exogenous administration of creatinine. Creatinine PK profiles in healthy subjects with and without ingestion of a cooked meat meal as a creatinine source were previously reported by Mayersohn et al. [5]. Data from this study were reanalyzed using a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) approach to estimate PK parameters for creatinine, refine the dynamic creatinine model, and reduce bias in the estimation of other kinetic parameters.
A one-compartment PK model with linear elimination, first-order absorption, and zero-order creatinine generation was constructed based on the dataset composed of 133 serial creatinine plasma concentrations and 11 creatinine amounts excreted in urine during 24 h. Exponential models were most suitable to describe inter-individual variability (IIV), while two separate proportional errors were best to describe residual variability of plasma concentrations and amounts excreted in urine, respectively. The individual bioavailable creatinine dose for each subject was estimated using a pre-defined arbitrary population dose (180 mg) multiplied by individual post hoc estimates for apparent bioavailability (F1). Both the goodness of fit and visual predictive check plots (Supplemental Figs. 1 and 2) and the bootstrap results showed that the final model was reliable and stable.
Table 1 lists the PK parameters estimated from the final model and the 95% confidence intervals derived from 994 successful bootstrap samples. The typical values for CL and Vd of creatinine were estimated to be 7.92 L/h and 53.9 L (73.8% of the total body weight), which were similar to the reported values [5,6,7]. Incorporating variability on CL and Vd did not significantly improve the model, which may be attributable to the relative homogeneity of the small population studied. As a comparison, when fixing the value of Vd to the estimated TBW, which is 43.8 L (60% of 73 kg), the OFV will increase by 3.230, which does not represent a significant difference, while values of other parameters do not change much. Deciding between various error models was not straightforward due to the limited number of data points, but the point estimates for pharmacokinetic parameters remained essentially unchanged regardless of the error model chosen and are therefore considered as reliable.
The typical value of the creatinine generation rate (CGR) in healthy volunteers was 68.0 mg/h, which is consistent with the value of 65.8 mg/h (male, 31 years, 73 kg) calculated based on the reported equation [2], but higher than the value of 42.8 mg/h and 43.8 mg/h in patients reported by Ullah et al. and Daugirdas et al., respectively [5, 8]. The estimated dose (293 ± 62.0 mg, n = 6) was not fully consistent with the increased creatinine amount excreted in urine after beef ingestion (180 ± 102 mg, n = 5). This does not exclude the possibility that these discrepancies are related to the accuracy of the raw data; furthermore, no demographic information is available in the publication to better define the PPK model.
In this evaluation, a PPK creatinine model was developed using creatinine data with and without ingestion of boiled beef in healthy volunteers. Reasonable parameter estimates including CGR and Vd were obtained from the final well-structured model. The model is a useful starting point for further experimental approaches to improve the understanding of creatinine kinetics, which may involve creatinine “dosing” accompanied by independent methods to assess GFR, e.g., by a test dose of iohexol.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Bragadottir G, Redfors B, Ricksten SE (2013) Assessing glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury–true GFR versus urinary creatinine clearance and estimating equations. Crit Care 17(3):R108. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12777
Cockcroft DW, Gault MH (1976) Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 16(1):31–41. https://doi.org/10.1159/000180580
Scappaticci GB, Regal RE (2017) Cockcroft-Gault revisited: new deliverance on recommendations for use in cirrhosis. World J Hepatol 9(3):131–138. https://doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v9.i3.131
Ullah S, Zoller M, Jaehde U et al (2021) A model-based approach to assess unstable creatinine clearance in critically ill patients. Clin Pharmacol Ther 110(5):1240–1249. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2341
Mayersohn M, Conrad KA, Achari R (1983) The influence of a cooked meat meal on creatinine plasma concentration and creatinine clearance. Br J Clin Pharmacol 15(2):227–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.1983.tb01490.x
Pickering JW, Ralib AM, Endre ZH (2013) Combining creatinine and volume kinetics identifies missed cases of acute kidney injury following cardiac arrest. Crit Care 17(1):R7. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11931
Bjornsson TD (1979) Use of serum creatinine concentrations to determine renal function. Clin Pharmacokinet 4(3):200–222. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-197904030-00003
Daugirdas JT, Depner TA (2017) Creatinine generation from kinetic modeling with or without postdialysis serum creatinine measurement: results from the HEMO study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 32(11):1926–1933. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfx320
Acknowledgements
China Scholarship council is greatly acknowledged for providing a PhD scholarship to Mr. Zhendong Chen.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The authors received no external funding for this work. Zhendong Chen received a scholarship from the China Scholarship Council (CSC) for support of his PhD studies. The funder had no role in design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, and writing and publication of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ZC and CC developed the model and drafted the manuscript. MM performed the clinical trial and provided the data. UF and MT designed and guided the research. All authors contributed to the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, Z., Chen, C., Taubert, M. et al. A population pharmacokinetic model for creatinine with and without ingestion of a cooked meat meal. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 78, 1945–1947 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-022-03398-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-022-03398-9