Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessing the impact of hepatitis C virus coinfection on lopinavir/ritonavir trough concentrations in HIV-infected patients

  • Pharmacokinetics and Disposition
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Chronic hepatitis C is an emerging issue in the management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease because both diseases have the same route of transmission, leading to a very high prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfection in the HIV-positive patient population. Lopinavir is extensively metabolized by the hepatic cytochrome P450 3A4, and the pharmacokinetics of this protease inhibitor (PI) could be influenced by liver impairment. However, data currently available on the impact of HCV-coinfection on lopinavir plasma concentrations are both limited and conflicting.

Methods

This was an observational, open-label study in which adult HIV-infected outpatients on stable antiretroviral treatment that included two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) plus lopinavir/ritonavir for at least 4 weeks were asked to participate. The trough plasma concentration (C trough) of lopinavir and ritonavir was assessed at steady state by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method.

Results

A total of 65 HIV-positive patients were enrolled in the study. These patients were stratified into two groups based on the absence/presence of HCV-coinfection: 45 were monoinfected (HIV+/HCV−) and 20 were coinfected (HIV+/HCV+). The lopinavir C trough in plasma was comparable between HIV+/HCV+ and HIV+/HCV− patients, without any statistically significant difference (geometric mean ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.61–1.42; p = 0.581). The mean ritonavir C trough was also comparable in the two groups. Almost all samples were found to be within the therapeutic plasma level range (97% in HIV+/HCV− group and 100% in HIV+/HCV+ group). No correlation was found between lopinavir plasma levels and adverse events (such as diarrhoea and hypertriglyceridaemia) or immune-virological parameters of HIV disease.

Conclusions

Among the HIV-positive patients participating in this study, the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir did not significantly change in those HIV-positive patients coinfected with HCV and in the absence of liver cirrhosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mohsen AH, Easterbrook P, Taylor CB, Norris S (2002) Hepatitis C and HIV-1 coinfection. Gut 51:601–608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rockstroh JK, Mocroft A, Soriano V et al (2005) Influence of hepatitis C virus infection on HIV-1 disease progression and response to highly active antiretroviral therapy. J Infect Dis 192:992–1002

    Google Scholar 

  3. Den Brinker M, Wit FW, Wertheim-van Dillen PM, et al (2000) Hepatitis B and C virus coinfection and the risk for hepatotoxicity of highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 infection. AIDS 14:3451–3455

    Google Scholar 

  4. Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at: http://www.aidsinfo.nih.gov/ContentFiles/AdultandAdolescentGL.pdf

  5. van Waterschoot RA, ter Heine R, Wagenaar E et al (2010) Effects of cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) and the drug transporters P-glycoprotein (MDR1/ABCB1) and MRP2 (ABCC2) on the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir. Br J Pharmacol 160:1224–1233

    Google Scholar 

  6. FDA notifications (2005) FDA approves new Kaletra formulation. AIDS Alert 20:142–143

    Google Scholar 

  7. Abbott Laboratories (2001) Kaletra. European summary of product characteristics. Issued: 20 Mar, 2001. Abbott Laboratories, Maidenhead

    Google Scholar 

  8. Back DJ, Khoo SH, Gibbons SE, Merry C (2001) The role of therapeutic drug monitoring in treatment of HIV infection. Br J Clin Pharmacol 51:301–308

    Google Scholar 

  9. Crommentuyn KM, Kappelhoff BS, Mulder JW, et al (2005) Population pharmacokinetics of lopinavir in combination with ritonavir in HIV-1-infected patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol 60:378–389

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wateba MI, Billaud E, Dailly E, Jolliet P, Raffi F (2006) Low initial trough plasma concentrations of lopinavir are associated with an impairment of virological response in an unselected cohort of HIV-1-infected patients. HIV Med 7:197–199

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dickinson L, Robinson L, Tjia J, et al (2005) Simultaneous determination of HIV protease inhibitors amprenavir, atazanavir, indinavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir and saquinavir in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 829:82–90

    Google Scholar 

  12. Moltó J, Blanco A, Miranda C, et al (2007) Variability in non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase and protease inhibitors concentrations among HIV-infected adults in routine clinical practice. Br J Clin Pharmacol 63:715–721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wolfe R, Carlin JB (1999) Sample-size calculation for a log-transformed outcome measure. Control Clin Trials 20:547–554

    Google Scholar 

  14. Peng JZ, Pulido F, Causemaker SJ, et al (2006) Pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV/hepatitis C virus-coinfected subjects with hepatic impairment. J Clin Pharmacol 46:265–274

    Google Scholar 

  15. Barreiro P, Rodrıguez-Novoa S, Labarga P et al (2007) Influence of liver fibrosis stage on plasma levels of antiretroviral drugs in HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Infect Dis 195:973–979

    Google Scholar 

  16. Slish J, Ma Q, Zingman BS, et al (2007) Assessing the impact of substance use and hepatitis coinfection on atazanavir and lopinavir trough concentrations in HIV-infected patients during therapeutic drug monitoring. Ther Drug Monit 29:560–565

    Google Scholar 

  17. Canta F, Marrone R, Bonora S, et al (2005) Pharmacokinetics and hepatotoxicity of lopinavir/ritonavir in non-cirrhotic HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfected patients. J Antimicrob Chemother 55:280–281

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moltò J et al (2007) Lopinavir/ritonavir pharmacokinetics in HIV and hepatitis C virus coinfected patients without liver function impairment: influence of liver fibrosis. Clin Pharmacokinet 46:85–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Micheli V, Regazzi M, Dickinson L, Meraviglia P, et al (2008) Lopinavir/ritonavir pharmacokinetics in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with or without cirrhosis. Ther Drug Monit 30:306–313

    Google Scholar 

  20. Donnerer J, Haas BJ, Kessler HH (2008) Single-measurement therapeutic drug monitoring of the HIV/AIDS drugs abacavir, zidovudine, lamivudine, efavirenz, nevirapine, lopinavir and nelfinavir. Pharmacology 82:287–292

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonardo Calza.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Calza, L., Mosca, L., Pocaterra, D. et al. Assessing the impact of hepatitis C virus coinfection on lopinavir/ritonavir trough concentrations in HIV-infected patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 67, 143–149 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-010-0904-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-010-0904-4

Keywords

Navigation