Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of a selective CYP2C9 inhibitor on the pharmacokinetics of nateglinide in healthy subjects

  • Pharmacokinetics and Disposition
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of the study was to determine the effect of a potent and selective CYP2C9 inhibitor, sulfinpyrazone (Anturane), on the pharmacokinetics of nateglinide (Starlix), a novel antidiabetic drug which is primarily (~70%) metabolized via CYP2C9.

Methods

This was a randomized, open-label, two-period, crossover study in 18 healthy volunteers. Nateglinide was administered as a single 120-mg oral dose alone (reference) on day 1 or in combination with sulfinpyrazone (test) on day 7, following twice-daily 200-mg oral doses (i.e., 400 mg/day) of sulfinpyrazone for 7 days. Pharmacokinetic parameters of nateglinide were determined following the administration of nateglinide alone, and when administered in combination with sulfinpyrazone. Plasma nateglinide concentrations were determined using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method.

Results

The administration of nateglinide in combination with sulfinpyrazone resulted in ~28% higher mean AUC of nateglinide (90% CI for test-reference ratio: 1.20–1.39) with no differences in mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax; 90% CI test-reference ratio: 0.86–1.12) compared with nateglinide-alone treatment. The time to reach Cmax (tmax) and the elimination half-life of nateglinide were similar between the two treatments. Both treatments were safe and well tolerated.

Conclusions

Sulfinpyrazone increased the mean exposure of nateglinide by 28% when both drugs were administered in combination. Nateglinide, given as a single dose or co-administered with multiple doses of sulfinpyrazone, was safe and well tolerated in healthy subjects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Whitelaw DC, Clark PM, Smith JM, Nattrass M (2000) Effects of the new oral hypoglycemic agent nateglinide on insulin secretion in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Med 17:225–229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Calles-Escandon J, Robbins DC (1987) Loss of early phase of insulin release in humans impairs glucose tolerance and blunts thermic effect of glucose. Diabetes 37:1167–1172

    Google Scholar 

  3. Keilson L, Mather S, Walter YH, Subramanian S, McLeod JF (2000) Synergistic effects of nateglinide and meal administration on insulin secretion in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:1081–1086

    Google Scholar 

  4. Weaver ML, Orwig BA, Rodriguez LC, Graham ED, Chin JA, Shapiro JM et al (2001) Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of nateglinide in humans. Drug Metab Dispos 29:415–421

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McLeod JF (2004) Clinical pharmacokinetics of nateglinide. Clin Pharmacokinet 43:97–120

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals (2002) Starlix (nateglinide tablets): prescribing information. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ

  7. Schlicht F, Staiger C, de Vries J, Gundert-Remy U, Hildebrandt R, Harenberg J et al (1985) Pharmacokinetics of sulfinpyrazone and its major metabolites after a single dose and during chronic treatment. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 28:97–103

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. He M, Kunze KL, Trager WF (1995) Inhibition of (S)-warfarin metabolism by sulfinpyrazone and its metabolites. Drug Metab Dispos 23:659–663

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Miners JO, Birkett DJ (1998) Cytochrome P4502C9: an enzyme of major importance in human drug metabolism. Br J Clin Pharmacol 45:525–538

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosenkranz B, Fischer C, Jakobsen P, Kirstein Pedersen A, Frolich JC (1983) Plasma levels of sulfinpyrazone and of two of its metabolites after a single dose and during the steady state. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 24:231–235

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mahoney C, Wolfram KM, Nash PV, Bjornsson TD (1983) Kinetics and metabolism of sulfinpyrazone. Clin Pharmacol Ther 33:491–497

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Walter E, Staiger C, deVries J, Zimmermann R, Weber E (1981) Induction of drug-metabolizing enzymes by sulfinpyrazone. Eur J Clin Pharmacology 19:353–358

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lentjes EG, van Ginneken CA (1982) Determination of sulfinpyrazone and four metabolites and its application to pharmacokinetic studies in man. Pharm Weekbl 4:207

    Google Scholar 

  14. Note for Guidance on the Investigation of Drug Interactions (1997) Discussion in the efficacy working party (EWP), London, 17 Dec 1997, CPMP/EWP/560/95

  15. Niemi M, Neuvonen M, Juntti-Patinen L, Backman JT, Neuvonen PF (2003) Effect of fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of nateglinide. Clin Pharmacol Ther 74:25–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sunkara G, Bigler H, Wang Y, Smith T, McLeod J, Prasad P, Ligueros-Sylvan M (2004) Nateglinide does not affect the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of acenocoumarol. Curr Med Res Opin 20:41–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kirchheiner J, Meineke I, Muller G, Bauer S, Rohde W, Meisel C, Roots I, Brockmoller J (2004) Influence of CYP2C9 and CYP2D6 polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of nateglinide in genotyped healthy volunteers. Clin Pharmacokinet 43:267–278

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gangadhar Sunkara.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sabia, H., Sunkara, G., Ligueros-Saylan, M. et al. Effect of a selective CYP2C9 inhibitor on the pharmacokinetics of nateglinide in healthy subjects. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 60, 407–412 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-004-0778-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-004-0778-4

Keywords

Navigation