Abstract
The tropical seagrass Halophila stipulacea invaded the Eastern Mediterranean Sea in the late nineteenth century and progressively spread throughout the basin ever since. Its spread is expected to continue north-westward as the Mediterranean Sea becomes warmer, potentially changing the seagrass biogeography of the basin. Given the power of genomics to assess invasion dynamics in non-model species, we report the first ddRAD-seq study of H. stipulacea and small-scale population genomic analysis addressing its century-old Mediterranean invasion. Based on 868 SNPs and 35 genotyped native (Red Sea) and exotic (from Cyprus, Greece, and Italy) samples, results suggest that genetic structure was high, especially between major geographic discontinuities, and that exotic populations maintain comparably lower genetic diversity than native populations, despite 130 years of invasion. The evidence of high heterozygosity excess, coupled with previously reported male-dominated and rare flowering records in the exotic range, suggests that clonal propagation likely played a pivotal role in the successful colonization and spread of H. stipulacea in the Mediterranean. This shift in reproductive strategy, particularly evident in the Italian populations located closest to the western boundary and representing more recent establishments, underscores the importance of this cost-effective mode of reproduction, especially during the initial stages of invasion, raising questions about the species future expansion trajectory. Our findings serve as a catalyst for future research into the species’ invasion dynamics, including deciphering the intricate roles of acclimatization and rapid adaptation, important for a comprehensive assessment of invasion risks and improving management strategies aimed at conserving seagrass ecosystems.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Globalization, increased trade, and climate change have facilitated the spread of species beyond their natural ranges and dispersal limits (Meyerson and Mooney 2007; Hulme 2009, 2017). Exotic species that successfully establish and spread can become invasive and cause adverse ecological, environmental, and economic impacts (Simberloff et al. 2013; Gallardo et al. 2016; Anton et al. 2019; Diagne et al. 2021). The Mediterranean Sea stands out as a hot spot for exotic species (Costello et al. 2010; Tempesti et al. 2020), harboring a total of 1000 validated exotic species, with 786 of them found in the Eastern Mediterranean (Aegean and Levantine Sea) (Zenetos et al. 2022a, b). Over the past few decades, the basin has experienced a persistent increasing trend, with an annual introduction rate of 14 new exotic species (Zenetos et al. 2022c). Its vulnerability to species introductions has been linked to the high volume of shipping traffic, aquaculture, aquarium trade, and the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869, which artificially connected the Mediterranean Sea to the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean (Zenetos et al. 2012). The ongoing tropicalization (i.e., waters becoming warmer) of the Mediterranean Sea is expected to further favor the occurrence and spread of exotic tropical species over temperate native ones (Bianchi and Morri 2003; Raitsos et al. 2010; Chefaoui et al. 2018; Zenetos and Galanidi 2020; Beca-Carretero et al. 2020), raising concerns about the future of the native biodiversity and the relative ecosystem services.
The exotic seagrass Halophila stipulacea (Forsskål) Ascherson, 1867, originally native to the Red Sea, Persian Gulf, and Indian Ocean (Lipkin 1975a), is considered one of the first Lessepsian immigrants (Den Hartog 1970). Reported first in Rhodes (Greece) and Cyprus at the end of the nineteenth century (Fritsch 1895; Lipkin 1975b), this small species has progressively spread across the Mediterranean basin, with Cannes on the French Riviera as the most recent western limit (Thibaut et al. 2022). In contrast to its introduction in the eastern Caribbean islands, where in less than 2 decades it spread rapidly and outcompeted or even displaced native seagrasses (Willette et al. 2014; Smulders et al. 2017; Scheibling et al. 2018), its Mediterranean invasion has been described as slow and punctuated in space, generally colonizing habitats devoid of native macrophytes (Winters et al. 2020). However, recent evidence of competitive displacement and competitive advantage (i.e., signatures of stress) between H. stipulacea and the native Cymodocea nodosa (Ucria) Ascherson, 1870, in Tunisia (Sghaier et al. 2014) and the Aegean Sea (Conte et al. 2023), respectively, suggests that its previously considered harmless introduction may be changing. Bennett et al. (2021) suggest that subtropical and tropical species introduced to higher latitude rangers are time-bombs triggering invasive behavior once climate warming narrows the thermal gap between the introduced and original range.
Furthermore, the recent evidence of a shift in the thermal niche of exotic H. stipulacea populations from the warm waters of the Red Sea to the cooler thermal regime of the Mediterranean (Wesselmann et al. 2020), coupled with its arrival in the French Riviera 30 years earlier than predicted by species distribution models under climate change (Nguyen et al. 2020; Beca-Carretero et al. 2020; Wesselmann et al. 2021), suggests that acclimation and/or adaptive processes together with the dispersal capacity of the species have been underestimated. The ecological implications of a change in the seagrass biogeography from a basin dominated by the native Posidonia oceanica (Linnaeus) Delile, 1813, to a replacement by species with lower habitat complexity and fewer ecological services (Nordlund et al. 2016), highlight the need for a more comprehensive assessment of the mechanisms that govern the spread of H. stipulacea to improve our predictability of its invasive potential.
Recent advances in genomics have provided new methodologies and approaches for detecting and understanding the processes involved in successful invasions and the associated ecological and evolutionary consequences (Chown et al. 2015). In particular, the development of reduced-representation sequencing techniques, such as RAD-Seq and genotyping by sequencing (GBS) (Narum et al. 2013), has made possible to cost-effectively genotype large numbers of markers for numerous samples and populations, including species with little or no previous genomic information available, which is often the case for invasive species (Ellegren 2014; Matheson and McGaughran 2022). The high number and advanced resolution of present-day genomic markers allow for more accurate estimates of pre- and post-introduction genetic variation, as well as more precise demographic inferences and phylogeographic reconstructions that enable identification of invasion routes, putative source populations, and number of independent introductions (Rašić et al. 2014; Rius et al. 2015a, b; Chown et al. 2015; Resh et al. 2021). In addition, invasion genomics has provided new insights into the adaptive response of invasive species by enabling the identification of loci and genomic regions that are under selection and may contribute to the evolution of genotypes with increased fitness that favor adaptive spread (Davidson et al. 2011; Chown et al. 2015; Bernardi et al. 2016; Forsström et al. 2017; Chen et al. 2021; Xiang et al. 2023).
Although research on the genomics of invasive species is increasing, data are still lacking for many species (Matheson and McGaughran 2022). For seagrasses in particular, their partially clonal propagation strategy presents intrinsic challenges (Halkett et al. 2005; Arnaud-Haond et al. 2020). These include the sampling effort that should account for the possibility of collecting samples belonging to the same clone, the still difficult and sometimes ambiguous distinction between multi-locus genotypes (MLGs), and the interpretation of genomic patterns considering that standard bioinformatics and theoretical frameworks are based on sexually reproducing panmictic populations (Halkett et al. 2005; Crow and Kimura 2017). Nevertheless, the insights that genomic studies can bring to seagrass biology have encouraged researchers to overcome these limitations and lay the groundwork for the development of seagrass genomics (Procaccini et al. 2007; Davey et al. 2016). Considerable progress has been made in Zostera marina Linnaeus, 1753 (Olsen et al. 2016) and a few other seagrass species (Lee et al. 2016; Phair et al. 2021; Nguyen et al. 2023), but genetic and genomic studies on H. stipulacea remain extremely limited (Tsakogiannis et al. 2020). With respect to H. stipulacea invasion, to our knowledge, only two genetic studies have been published. One study used randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) to assess the genetic variation in two western Mediterranean meadows, concluding that the populations had high within and between genetic variability (Procaccini et al. 1999). The second study used the rDNA region (ITS1–5.8S–ITS) to look at the genetic relationship between Mediterranean and Red Sea populations, providing the first molecular analysis supporting the Lessepsian origin hypothesis and suggesting a recent disjunction and continuous and intensive gene flow (Ruggiero and Procaccini 2004). However, the polymorphic information content of these DNA markers falls below those for microsatellites and SNPs (Liu and Cordes 2004; Grover and Sharma 2016), limiting the power of these conclusions.
Here, we apply double-digest Restriction-site Associated DNA sequencing (ddRAD-seq) to discover single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to assess the genetic diversity and structure of H. stipulacea populations from its native (Red Sea) and exotic (Mediterranean Sea) biogeographic range. Our results provide new insights into the demographic history and genomic patterns underlying the colonization, establishment, and subsequent spread of H. stipulacea in the Mediterranean Sea.
Methods
Study sites and sample collection
Halophila stipulacea shoots were collected from monospecific shallow-water meadows (< 10 m depth) across its native (Red Sea) and exotic (Mediterranean Sea) range (Table 1; Fig. 1). In particular, seagrass samples were collected from two sites in Cyprus, three sites in Greece, two sites in Italy, and three sites in Saudi Arabia. The sampling was conducted during July–October 2017, except for Liopetro (Greece) which was sampled in September 2019. At each site, five replicate samples were randomly collected by hand using SCUBA-diving. The replicates were at least 5 m apart from each other to minimize the risk of sampling within the same clonal patch, a well-established practice in seagrass research as exemplified in studies by Procaccini et al. (2001); Arnaud‐Haond et al. (2007) and Jahnke et al. (2017). Each replicate consisted of a piece of horizontal rhizome containing five shoots. After being gently cleaned with seawater to remove debris and epiphytes, each replicate was stored at – 20 ºC until arrival at the lab and then stored at – 80 ºC. The samples from Liopetro were immersed in RNAlater™ Stabilization Solution and stored at – 20 ºC.
DNA isolation, library preparation, and sequencing
The leaf and/or rhizome tissue of each replicate were homogenized using a mortar and pestle under constant addition of liquid nitrogen. From the finely powdered tissue produced, 100–150 mg were used for DNA extraction following a modified cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (24:1) isolation protocol based on the original method (Doyle and Doyle 1990), with the inclusion of an RNAse treatment (RiboShredder RNase Blend, Epicentre, Madison, WI, USA) of 1 h at 37 °C. The DNA pellet was re-suspended in 50 μL of 5 mmol/L Tris, pH 8.5. Afterward, the DNeasy PowerClean Pro® Cleanup Kit (Qiagen, UK) was used to remove polysaccharides, polyphenols, and other PCR-inhibiting substances that affect downstream applications. DNA quality and quantity were checked through a 0.7% agarose gel electrophoresis and using the NanoDrop ND 1000 (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA).
The double-digest restriction-associated DNA (ddRAD) libraries were prepared following the protocol established by Peterson et al. (2012), with some modifications as described in Manousaki et al. (2016) and briefly explained below. DNA samples were processed in quadruplicates (15 ng of DNA each) and treated as independent samples throughout the whole laboratory analysis. Each DNA sample was digested with two high-fidelity (RE) restriction enzymes: SbfI (CCTGCA, recognition site GG) and NlaIII (CATG, recognition site C) from New England Biolabs, NEB, UK. Briefly, the genomic DNA was digested at 37 °C for 9 min using 20 units of enzyme per microgram of DNA and 0.6 µl of CutSmart Buffer (NEB), in a 6 µl total reaction volume. The reactions were left to cool at room temperature and 3 µl of an adapter mixture was added and incubated at room temperature for 10 min. The adapter mixture contained individual combinations of P1 (SbfI-compatible) and P2 (NlaIII-compatible), at concentrations of 6 and 96 nM, respectively, in a 1 × reaction buffer Nº 2 (NEB). Adapters P1 and P2 included a five- to seven-base sequence (barcode) for sample identification after sequencing. Ligation was performed over 3 h at 22 ºC by adding 3 µl of ligation mixture containing 4 mM rATP (Promega, UK) and 2000 T4 ligase units (NEBs) in a 1 × CutSmart buffer (NEB). The ligated samples were pooled and purified using the column MinElute PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, UK) and eluted in 68 µl EB buffer (Qiagen, UK). Size selection of the ligated pooled samples was performed by agarose gel separation using a selection window between 400 and 700 bp. Selected gel fragments were purified using a MinElute agarose gel extraction kit (Qiagen, UK), and eluted in 65 µl of EB buffer. PCR amplification was performed on the size-selected fragments (16 cycles of PCR on 12.5 µl reactions, each with 0.4 μl of Template DNA) using a Taq high-fidelity polymerase (Q5 Hot Start High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase, NEB). The PCR reactions were pooled equimolarly into a single pool, purified using a column MinElute PCR purification kit (Qiagen, UK), and eluted in 52 µl of EB Buffer. To maximize the removal of small fragments, the 52 µl were purified using an equal volume of AMPure magnetic beads (Perkin-Elmer, UK). Finally, the ddRAD library was eluted in 25 µl of EB buffer and sequenced at the Institute of Marine Biology, Biotechnology and Aquaculture (IMBBC) of HCMR in Crete on an Illumina MiSeq (v2 chemistry, 300 cycle kit, 162 bp paired-end reads).
Raw data processing, SNP calling, filtering, and clone correction
The quality of the Illumina sequence data was initially assessed using FastQC v0.11.9 (Andrews 2010). Based on the FastQC results, all reads were trimmed to 150 bp to remove poor-quality base calls at the end of the read. Subsequently, quality filtering, demultiplexing, and de novo SNP calling were conducted using STACKS v2.62 (Catchen et al. 2011, 2013; Rochette et al. 2019). The process_radtags.pl function was first used to filter out low-quality reads, reads missing the expected “sbfI” or “nlaIII” cut site, and demultiplex the remaining reads according to the unique combination of in-line barcode allowing two mismatches (–c –q –r –renz_1 sbfI –renz_2 nlaIII –inline_inline –adapter_mm 2). After demultiplexing, the quadruplicates of each sample were merged for all posterior analysis. Given that the H. stipulacea draft genome is still highly fragmented and the percentage of complete BUSCO score is below 50% (Tsakogiannis et al. 2020), the denovo_map.pl function instead of the ref_map.pl function was used to build the loci (‘stacks’) and call the SNPs. Building of the loci was controlled by the following parameters: minimum number of raw reads required to form an initial ‘stack’ (m = 4), number of mismatches allowed between two stacks to merge them (M = 4), and number of mismatches allowed between loci when building the catalog (n = 4). Only the first SNP per RAD locus (–write_single_snp) was retained to ensure independence and avoid inherent linkage disequilibrium bias. In addition, an haplotype-based analysis was conducted by retaining all the SNPs per RAD locus. However, considering that the outcomes closely resembled the patterns observed in the biallelic SNP analysis (one SNP per RAD locus), the main text focused on the biallelic SNP analysis, while the haplotype-based results, serving as supplementary and corroborative evidence, are presented in the supplementary information (Supplementary Information; Methods, Tables SI1 and SI2 and Fig. SI1). FastQC and STACKS analysis were performed in the IMBBC High performance computing (HPC) “Zorbas” (Zafeiropoulos et al. 2021).
The R packages SNPfiltR v. 1.0.0 (DeRaad 2022) and vcfR v. 1.13.0 (Knaus and Grünwald 2017) were used to visualize and iteratively filter the biallelic SNP dataset. An initial SNP filtering was done to perform the clone correction analysis, a recommended step to account for the mixed reproductive strategy of seagrasses (sexual and asexual), which may lead to biases on metrics that rely on allele frequencies assuming panmixia. This filtering consisted of retaining only loci with a minimum depth of 5, minimum genotype quality of 20, and within an allele balance ratio of minimum 0.05 and maximum 0.95. As the clone correction analysis was conducted independently for each site, no missing data were allowed for the specimens within each population. The genotype_curve from the R package poppr v. 2.9.3 (Kamvar et al. 2014) was used to check if the dataset per population was sufficient to correctly identify MLGs. The mlg.filter() function was used to identify multi-locus genotypes (MLGs). The genetic distance was calculated with the bitwise.dist function using the default “farthest” neighbor clustering algorithm and its predicted genetic distance threshold. Each MLG was reduced to a single observation, meaning that one organism for each multi-locus lineage (MLL) was retained. Following clone correction, the SNP calling and filtering was repeated from the start on the resulting reduced (clone-free) sample list, each representing a distinct MLL. The same initial SNP filtering criteria was applied, except for allowing SNPs to be retained if they were genotyped in a minimum of 75% of individuals (SNP completeness) and present in at least one specimen from each sampling site. Any invariant sites generated during genotype filtering were subsequently removed (min.mac = 1). This revised dataset served as the foundation for all downstream analyses.
Genetic diversity
Standard genetic diversity indices including allelic richness or rarefied allelic count (Ar), observed heterozygosity (Hobs), expected heterozygosity (Hexp), and fixation index (FIS) were estimated for each sampling site using the R package Hierfstat v. 0.5–11 (Goudet 2005). A total of 1,000 permutations were used to test if there was a significant excess or deficit of heterozygotes (negative or positive FIS, respectively). Clonal diversity or genotypic richness (RMLG) was estimated based on the number of shoots sampled (N) and the number of MLG detected for each population, based on RMLG = (MLG-1)/(N-1) (Dorken and Eckert 2001).
Population differentiation
Individual genetic variation was first explored by a principal component analysis (PCA) using the R package adegenet v. 2.1.8 (Jombart and Bateman 2008; Jombart and Ahmed 2011). The first two principal components were plotted along two axes using ggplot2 v. 3.3.6 (Wickham 2011). Taking into consideration the mixed mode reproduction of H. stipulacea, the most likely number of genetically distinguishable groups (K) was inferred using a sparse negative matrix factorization (snmf) clustering method on the R package LEA v. 3.8.0 (Frichot and François 2015). This approach was chosen over the STRUCTURE algorithm (Pritchard et al. 2000), because it allows for relaxed population genetic assumptions, such as Hardy–Weinberg proportions and panmixia, acknowledged as problematic in clonal or partially clonal organisms. The analysis was performed 100 times with K from 1 to 10, assuming an admixture model, correlated allele frequencies and without population priors. The SNMF’s cross-entropy criterion was used to infer the optimal number of clusters (K). The lower the cross-entropy, the better the model accounts for population structure. The ancestry matrix was generated by estimating the individual admixture coefficients from the lowest cross-entropy run and plot using ggplot2 v. 3.3.6 (Wickham 2011). A Minimum Spanning Network (MSN) analysis was employed to visualize genetic relationships among genotypes. Genetic distances between genotypes were calculated using the `provesti.dist` function and plotted using ‘plot_poppr_msn’, both from the R package poppr v. 2.9.3 (Kamvar et al. 2014). The global and pair-wise FST based on Weir and Cockerham’s estimate was computed between sites using the R package Hierfstat v. 0.5–11 (Goudet 2005), and upper and lower confidence intervals were calculated based on 1000 permutations.
Results
Sequencing, SNP calling, and clone correction
From the 50 specimens sampled, isolating high-molecular-weight (HMW) DNA was not possible for one site from Cyprus (LMP), one site from Saudi Arabia (RAK), and for 5 other samples from different sites. The ddRAD sequencing for the remaining 35 samples generated 29,698,368 reads, with an average of 749,596 reads per individual after trimming and quality filtering. Based on the Farthest Neighbor clustering method and the Provesti’s genetic distance threshold, 27 MLG were identified. Two clones belonged to the native range and six to the exotic range. After clone correction and SNP filtering, a set of 868 high-quality polymorphic SNPs were retained. The final dataset contained 10.62% missing data. Sites had an average SNP completeness of 89.38%, ranging from 98.6% to 61.0%, with the latter corresponding to Cyprus. The lower values can be primarily attributed to lower DNA quality and subsequent lower number of reads. Nevertheless, in light of the lack of previous genomic information, the samples were included in the analysis. However, results pertaining to this specific site should be approached with caution.
Genotypic and genetic diversity
Genotypic richness (RMLG) varied between sites ranging from 0.5 to 1. The allelic richness (Ar) and expected heterozygosity (Hexp) ranged from 1.137 to 1.260 and 0.118 to 0.259, respectively. While values for both indices were consistently lower across all the exotic sites, the most pronounced difference was observed in the Hexp. In the native range, the average Hexp was 0.238, while in the exotic sites, it was 0.134, marking an approximately 1.7-fold time lower Hexp in the exotic sites. The fixation index (FIS) was negative (indicating an excess of heterozygosity) and significant for all sites (Table 2; Table SI3: Confidence intervals). The Italian sites, TER and SAN, as well as SOU in West Crete, Greece, exhibited the highest negative departure, approaching the minimum value of -1 indicative of almost exclusively clonal reproduction. In contrast, the lowest departure was observed in HAD, Saudi Arabia.
Population differentiation
Two principles components explained 41.3% of the total variability of genotyped samples among sites, separating them in three main groups which corresponded to the three major geographic discontinuities in our sampling, Western Mediterranean (Italy), Eastern Mediterranean (Greece and Cyprus), and the Red Sea (Saudi Arabia) (Fig. 2). The MSN reaffirms the distinctiveness of the Italian populations, which form a singular and distinctive clade (Fig. 3). In contrast, the Greek populations, along with the two populations originating from the Red Sea, are more diverse and distinct from each other. Moreover, the MLG with the lowest genetic distance coincides with those demonstrating higher levels of clonality, as indicated by an excess of heterozygotes; specifically, populations TER, SAN, and SOU. The analysis of individual assignment using LEA revealed a finer scale genetic structure (Fig. 4). Under the K = 3 clustering scenario, samples were separated in the same three groups as suggested by the PCA. However, under the K = 4 clustering scenario, in addition to the three main groups reported above, the samples, corresponding to northern (HAD) and central (YAN) Red Sea, were recognized as two distinct genetic clusters. Furthermore, according to K = 5, the most likely genetic clustering scenario considering the lowest cross-entropy criterium, the Greek populations divided into West (SOU) and East Crete (MAR and LIO). Irrespective of the K clustering scenario, the Italian sites (SAN and TER) consistently formed one distinct genetic cluster with no signs of admixture. The overall population differentiation (FST) based on Weir and Cockerham’s estimate was 0.354. Pair-wise FST values between sites ranged from 0.002 to 0.518 and were all significant except for the two Italian sites, TER and SAN (Table 3, Table SI4: Confidence intervals). The highest value was between the Italian site (TER) and central (YAN) Red Sea, corresponding to the highest geographic distance.
Discussion
We report the first ddRAD-seq study on the non-model seagrass Halophila stipulacea resolving the small-scale population genomic patterns of this century-old Mediterranean Sea invasion. Based on 868 SNPs and 35 successfully genotyped samples, genome-wide analysis suggests high genetic structure between and within native (Red Sea) and exotic (Mediterranean Sea) populations, with a trend indicating lower genetic diversity in the latter. Evidence of heterozygosity excess driven by clonality suggests that clonal propagation has likely played an important role in the Mediterranean spread and the genomic patterns observed.
This small-scale genomic study revealed a gradual increase in genetic differentiation (FST) and a decreasing trend in genetic diversity (Ar and Hexp) as we depart from the native Red Sea, consistent with the species geographical and temporal expansion, which began in the Levantine Sea and progressively expanded throughout the rest of the Mediterranean, reaching the western subregion just over 30 years ago based on available literature (Biliotti and Abdelahad 1990; Gambi et al. 2009). Genetic drift resulting from consecutive founder effects and genetic bottlenecks exerted by a limited number of founding genotypes (Suarez and Tsutsui 2008), may explain the observed lower genetic diversity, however, more extensive sampling is needed to confirm this trend across the exotic range. Counterintuitively, in contrast to expectations from population genetics theory, numerous invasive species do not exhibit a decrease in genetic diversity (Roman and Darling 2007; Rius et al. 2015b). In fact, genetic studies on other Lessepsian immigrants have revealed similar or higher levels of genetic diversity in the introduced populations when compared to their native counterparts, with low genetic structure found between the two ranges, a pattern typical of marine invaders (Bernardi et al. 2010; Riquet et al. 2013).
Genomic patterns of invasive populations are influenced by the introduction history, the nature and extent of genetic bottlenecks, the mating system, and the dispersal ability of the species (Novak 2005; Hernández-Espinosa et al. 2022). Multiple introductions, admixture, and gene flow contribute to counteract the effect of genetic bottlenecks and small population sizes by (re)introducing novel genetic variation (Verhoeven et al. 2011). In this case, our results revealed low levels of admixture and high genetic structure, particularly evident between the three major geographic discontinuities, Red Sea (Saudi Arabia), Eastern Mediterranean (Greece and Cyprus), and Western Mediterranean (Italy), suggesting limited gene flow. Genetic structure was also present within regions as shown by the K = 5 optimal genetic clustering scenario and the significant pair-wise FST values, except for TER and SAN, the two Italian sites located < 10 km apart. Pair-wise FST values were generally high, but within the values previously reported on other seagrasses (e.g., Enhalus acoroides (Nakajima et al. 2014), Thalassia hemprichii (Jahnke et al. 2019), and Posidonia oceanica (Tutar et al. 2022). Our results differ with previous findings by Ruggiero and Procaccini (2004), who initially suggested high gene flow and multiple introductions for the H. stipulacea Mediterranean invasion based on the lack of differentiation found on the ITS nuclear ribosomal DNA region within and between the Mediterranean and the Red Sea. The discrepancy between the two studies could be attributed to the different power of the genetic markers to resolve structure. Single DNA regions, as used by Ruggiero and Procaccini (2004), are useful for phylogenetic analysis, in this case for confirming the Lessepsian origin, but their lower performance may result in less precise estimations of population genetic parameters (Morin et al. 2004).
Population genomic patterns of natural populations are largely influenced by the relative importance of sexual versus asexual reproduction (Barrett et al. 1993; Bengtsson 2003). Changes in reproductive modes such as an increase in clonal propagation are common in invasive species (Barrett et al. 2008; Barrett 2015) as it allows rapid expansion of the remnant genotypes surpassing the costs associated with sexual reproduction, which can be advantageous when colonizing a new environment (Smith and Maynard-Smith 1978). Genotypic richness (RMLG) is the most common indicator of clonality on population genetic analysis. Based on this, RMLG varied across our study area and was generally lower in the exotic populations, suggesting a slightly higher rate of clonality. However, considering the small and uneven number of samples in our study, and the sensitivity of genotypic richness to sample size and spatial sampling design, heterozygote excess is a more reliable indicator of clonality (Arnaud-Haond et al. 2020). Clonality-driven heterozygosity excess has been well documented in other seagrasses, including Zostera marina (Kamel et al. 2012), Halophila ovalis (Xu et al. 2019), Cymodocea serrulata (Arriesgado et al. 2015), Cymodocea nodosa, and Posidonia oceanica (Arnaud-Haond et al. 2020). In light of this, the strong heterozygosity excess observed in the exotic sites, as indicated by the significant negative FIS values, including instances approaching the minimum value of – 1, suggests a recent drastic reduction in effective population size and high clonality rates. This coincides with the hypothesized primarily clonal propagation in the Mediterranean region based on the male-dominated and much less common flowering records than in the native Red Sea (Winters et al. 2020). Moreover, these observations resonate with the expectations outlined by Baker’s Law (Baker 1955), underscoring the importance of this cost-effective mode of reproduction, particularly during the initial phases of invasion. The prevalence of asexual reproduction during invasion has been observed in other species, such as the red alga Agarophyton vermiculophyllum introduced in North America and European coastlines (Krueger-Hadfield et al. 2016; Flanagan et al. 2021), as well as the accidentally introduced green algae Caulerpa taxifolia in the Mediterranean and southern Australia (Arnaud-Haond et al. 2017). Nonetheless, recent evidence of sexual reproduction including the presence of matured seeds capsules in Chios, Greece (Gerakaris and Tsiamis 2015), and adjacent female and male flowers in Cyprus (Nguyen et al. 2018), along with personal observations of seeds in the Aegean Sea (Crete and Cyclades Islands; E. T. Apostolaki), suggest that exotic populations can support sexual reproduction, at least in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea.
Furthermore, an increase in clonal reproduction is particularly common in populations at the edge of the distribution range, as they are typically subjected to suboptimal environmental conditions (Arriesgado et al. 2015). In this case, the Italian populations, at the edge of the western Mediterranean distribution, consistently formed a distinct genetic cluster and a unique clade within the MSN, with no evidence of admixture with other populations. Additionally, these populations stand out for having the lowest genetic diversity, as evidenced by both Ar and Hexp, and the highest clonality, based on the strong heterozygosity excess and the lowest genotypic richness. Due to the limited number of sites and specimens, it is not possible to determine whether this corresponds to a punctual or a frequent case among the western edge populations. However, given that the expected expansion into the rest of the western subregion will most likely be led by these recently founded edge populations, examining how potential long-term effects of a dominant clonal propagation and the impacts of reduced genetic variation in the selection response may influence the subsequent expansion should be considered.
While microsatellite-based population genetic studies typically require 25–30 individuals per population (Hale et al. 2012), SNP markers have been shown to accurately estimate population genetic parameters even when sample sizes are relatively low, with as few as 2–6 specimens in certain cases (Willing et al. 2012; Nazareno et al. 2017; Li et al. 2020; McLaughlin and Winker 2020). Nevertheless, in this case, the low number of samples along with the limited number of SNPs hindered our capacity to make further phylogeographic inferences, including identifying the source population(s) of the western invasion or candidate loci or regions under selection. To address these goals effectively, a higher geographic representation, encompassing additional sites and a higher number of samples per site, coupled with an increased number of SNPs, would be needed to address these goals. This is particularly important considering that the presence of clones can reduce the final number of unique samples available for the analysis. Furthermore, considering the large size of the H. stipulacea genome (3.7 Gb) (Tsakogiannis et al. 2020), an increase in the sequencing effort is indispensable. Conducting a larger scale population genomic analysis will not only contribute to confirm our early findings, but also help deepen our understanding of the demographic history, genetic background and evolutionary processes underlying the colonization, establishment, and subsequent spread of H. stipulacea in the Mediterranean Sea. These insights will, in turn, contribute significantly to the assessment of invasion risks and the refinement of management strategies for the conservation of seagrass ecosystems.
The results presented provide the first ddRAD-seq analysis on the non-model seagrass H. stipulacea and the first population genomic analysis addressing its century-old Mediterranean Sea invasion. The small-scale genome-wide SNP analysis revealed that genetic structure was high, especially between major geographic discontinuities and that exotic populations maintain a comparably lower genetic diversity than native populations, despite 130 years of invasion. Evidence of high heterozygosity excess together with previously reported male-dominated and rare flowering records in the exotic range suggests that clonal propagation has played an important role in the Mediterranean establishment and spread, and the development of the population genetic patterns observed.
Data availability
All sequencing data generated on this study are available on GenBank under the NCBI BioProject Accession No. PRJNA937663 and the BioSample Accession Nos. SAMN33551072-SAMN33551106.
References
Andrews S (2010) FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data
Anton A, Geraldi NR, Lovelock CE, Apostolaki ET, Bennett S, Cebrian J, Krause-Jensen D, Marbà N, Martinetto P, Pandolfi JM, Santana-Garcon J, Duarte CM (2019) Global ecological impacts of marine exotic species. Nat Ecol Evolut 3:787–800. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0851-0
Arnaud-Haond S, Migliaccio M, Diaz-Almela E, Teixeira S, Van De Vliet MS, Alberto F, Procaccini G, Duarte CM, Serrão EA (2007) Vicariance patterns in the Mediterranean Sea: east–west cleavage and low dispersal in the endemic seagrass Posidonia oceanica. J Biogeogr 34:963–976. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01671.x
Arnaud-Haond S, Aires T, Candeias R, Teixeira SJL, Duarte CM, Valero M, Serrão EA (2017) Entangled fates of holobiont genomes during invasion: nested bacterial and host diversities in Caulerpa taxifolia. Mol Ecol 26:2379–2391. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14030
Arnaud-Haond S, Stoeckel S, Bailleul D (2020) New insights into the population genetics of partially clonal organisms: when seagrass data meet theoretical expectations. Mol Ecol 29:3248–3260. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15532
Arriesgado DM, Kurokochi H, Nakajima Y, Matsuki Y, Uy WH, Fortes MD, Campos WL, Nadaoka K, Lian C (2015) Genetic diversity and structure of the tropical seagrass Cymodocea serrulata spanning its central diversity hotspot and range edge. Aquat Ecol 49:357–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-015-9529-0
Baker HG (1955) Self-compatibility and establishment after “Long-distance” dispersal. Evolution 9:347–349
Barrett SCH (2015) Foundations of invasion genetics: the Baker and Stebbins legacy. Mol Ecol 24:1927–1941. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13014
Barrett SCH, Eckert CG, Husband BC (1993) Evolutionary processes in aquatic plant populations. Aquat Bot 44:105–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3770(93)90068-8
Barrett SCH, Colautti RI, Eckert CG (2008) Plant reproductive systems and evolution during biological invasion. Mol Ecol 17:373–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03503.x
Beca-Carretero P, Teichberg M, Winters G, Procaccini G, Reuter H (2020) Projected rapid habitat expansion of tropical seagrass species in the Mediterranean sea as climate change progresses. Front Plant Sci 11:555376. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.555376
Bengtsson BO (2003) Genetic variation in organisms with sexual and asexual reproduction. J Evol Biol 16:189–199. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00523.x
Bennett S, Santana-Garcon J, Marbà N, Jorda G, Anton A, Apostolaki ET, Cebrian J, Geraldi NR, Krause-Jensen D, Lovelock CE, Martinetto P, Pandolfi JM, Duarte CM (2021) Climate-driven impacts of exotic species on marine ecosystems. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 30:1043–1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/GEB.13283
Bernardi G, Azzurro E, Golani D, Miller MR (2016) Genomic signatures of rapid adaptive evolution in the bluespotted cornetfish, a Mediterranean Lessepsian invader. Mol Ecol 25:3384–3396. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13682
Bernardi G, Golani D, Azzurro E (2010) The genetics of Lessepsian bioinvasions. Fish invasions of the Mediterranean Sea: change and renewal 71–84
Bianchi CN, Morri C (2003) Global sea warming and “tropicalization” of the Mediterranean Sea: biogeographic and ecological aspects. Biogeographia J Integ Biogeogr 24:319–327. https://doi.org/10.21426/b6110129
Biliotti M, Abdelahad N (1990) Halophila stipulacea (Forssk.) Aschers. (Hydrocharitaceae): espèce nouvelle pour l’Italie. Posidonia Newsletter 3:23–26
Catchen JM, Amores A, Hohenlohe P, Cresko W, Postlethwait JH (2011) Stacks: building and genotyping loci De Novo from short-read sequences. G3 Genes Genom Genet 1:171–182. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.111.000240
Catchen J, Hohenlohe PA, Bassham S, Amores A, Cresko WA (2013) Stacks: an analysis tool set for population genomics. Mol Ecol 22:3124–3140. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12354
Chefaoui RM, Duarte CM, Serrão EA (2018) Dramatic loss of seagrass habitat under projected climate change in the Mediterranean Sea. Glob Change Biol 24:4919–4928. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14401
Chen Y, Gao Y, Huang X, Li S, Zhan A (2021) Local environment-driven adaptive evolution in a marine invasive ascidian (Molgula manhattensis). Ecol Evol 11:4252–4266. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7322
Chown SL, Hodgins KA, Griffin PC, Oakeshott JG, Byrne M, Hoffmann AA (2015) Biological invasions, climate change and genomics. Evol Appl 8:23–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12234
Conte C, Apostolaki ET, Vizzini S, Migliore L (2023) A Tight Interaction between the Native Seagrass Cymodocea nodosa and the Exotic Halophila stipulacea in the Aegean Sea Highlights Seagrass Holobiont Variations. Plants 12:350. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12020350
Costello MJ, Coll M, Danovaro R, Halpin P, Ojaveer H, Miloslavich P (2010) A census of marine biodiversity knowledge, resources, and future challenges. PLoS ONE 5:e1211. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012110
Crow J, Kimura M (2017) An introduction to population genetics theory. Scientific Pulishers, Jodhpur, India
Davey PA, Pernice M, Sablok G, Larkum A, Lee HT, Golicz A, Edwards D, Dolferus R, Ralph P (2016) The emergence of molecular profiling and omics techniques in seagrass biology; furthering our understanding of seagrasses. Funct Integr Genom 16:465–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-016-0501-4
Davidson AM, Jennions M, Nicotra AB (2011) Do invasive species show higher phenotypic plasticity than native species and if so, is it adaptive? A meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 14:419–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01596.x
Den Hartog C (1970) The sea-grasses of the world
DeRaad DA (2022) snpfiltr: an R package for interactive and reproducible SNP filtering. Mol Ecol Resour 22:2443–2453. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13618
Diagne C, Leroy B, Vaissière AC, Gozlan RE, Roiz D, Jarić I, Salles JM, Bradshaw CJA, Courchamp F (2021) High and rising economic costs of biological invasions worldwide. Nature 592:571–576. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03405-6
Dorken ME, Eckert CG (2001) Severely reduced sexual reproduction in northern populations of a clonal plant, Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae): Reduced sexuality in Northern Decodon. J Ecol 89:339–350. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2001.00558.x
Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13–15
Ellegren H (2014) Genome sequencing and population genomics in non-model organisms. Trends Ecol Evol 29:51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.09.008
Flanagan BA, Krueger-Hadfield SA, Murren CJ, Nice CC, Strand AE, Sotka EE (2021) Founder effects shape linkage disequilibrium and genomic diversity of a partially clonal invader. Mol Ecol 30:1962–1978. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15854
Forsström T, Ahmad F, Vasemägi A (2017) Invasion genomics: genotyping-by-sequencing approach reveals regional genetic structure and signatures of temporal selection in an introduced mud crab. Mar Biol 164:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-017-3210-1
Frichot E, François O (2015) LEA: an R package for landscape and ecological association studies. Methods Ecol Evol 6:925–929. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12382
Fritsch C (1895) Ueber die Auffindung einer marinen Hydrocharideeim Mittelmeer. Verh Zool Bot Ges 45:104–106
Gallardo B, Clavero M, Sánchez MI, Vilà M (2016) Global ecological impacts of invasive species in aquatic ecosystems. Glob Change Biol 22:151–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13004
Gambi MC, Barbieri F, Bianchi CN (2009) New record of the alien seagrass Halophila stipulacea (Hydrocharitaceae) in the western Mediterranean: a further clue to changing Mediterranean Sea biogeography. Marine Biodivers Records 2:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1017/s175526720900058x
Gerakaris V, Tsiamis K (2015) Sexual reproduction of the Lessepsian seagrass Halophila stipulacea in the Mediterranean Sea. Bot Mar 58:51–53. https://doi.org/10.1515/bot-2014-0091
Goudet J (2005) hierfstat, a package for r to compute and test hierarchical F-statistics. Mol Ecol Notes 5:184–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00828.x
Grover A, Sharma PC (2016) Development and use of molecular markers: Past and present. Crit Rev Biotechnol 36:290–302. https://doi.org/10.3109/07388551.2014.959891
Hale ML, Burg TM, Steeves TE (2012) Sampling for microsatellite-based population genetic studies: 25 to 30 individuals per population is enough to accurately estimate allele frequencies. PLoS ONE 7:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045170
Halkett F, Simon JC, Balloux F (2005) Tackling the population genetics of clonal and partially clonal organisms. Trends Ecol Evol 20:194–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.01.001
Hernández-Espinosa R, González-Astorga J, Rico Y, Gallego-Fernández JB (2022) Effect of life-history traits and habitat condition on genetic diversity between invasive and native plant populations. Diversity 14:1025. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14121025
Hulme PE (2009) Trade, transport and trouble: Managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. J Appl Ecol 46:10–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01600.x
Hulme PE (2017) Climate change and biological invasions: evidence, expectations, and response options. Biol Rev 92:1297–1313. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12282
Jahnke M, Casagrandi R, Melià P, Schiavina M, Schultz ST, Zane L, Procaccini G (2017) Potential and realized connectivity of the seagrass Posidonia oceanica and their implication for conservation. Divers Distrib 23:1423–1434. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12633
Jahnke M, D’Esposito D, Orrù L, Lamontanara A, Dattolo E, Badalamenti F, Mazzuca S, Procaccini G, Orsini L (2019) Adaptive responses along a depth and a latitudinal gradient in the endemic seagrass Posidonia oceanica. Heredity 122:233–243. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-018-0103-0
Jombart T, Ahmed I (2011) adegenet 1.3-1: new tools for the analysis of genome-wide SNP data. Bioinformatics 27:3070–3071. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr521
Jombart T, Bateman A (2008) adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24:1403–1405. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn129
Kamel SJ, Hughes AR, Grosberg RK, Stachowicz JJ (2012) Fine-scale genetic structure and relatedness in the eelgrass Zostera marina. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 447:127–137. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09447
Kamvar ZN, Tabima JF, Gr̈unwald NJ (2014) Poppr: an R package for genetic analysis of populations with clonal, partially clonal, and/or sexual reproduction. PeerJ 2:1–14. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.281
Knaus BJ, Grünwald NJ (2017) vcfr: a package to manipulate and visualize variant call format data in R. Mol Ecol Resour 17:44–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12549
Krueger-Hadfield SA, Kollars NM, Byers JE, Greig TW, Hammann M, Murray DC, Murren CJ, Strand AE, Terada R, Weinberger F, Sotka EE (2016) Invasion of novel habitats uncouples haplo-diplontic life cycles. Mol Ecol 25:3801–3816. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13718
Lee H, Golicz AA, Bayer PE, Jiao Y, Tang H, Paterson AH, Sablok G, Krishnaraj RR, Chan C-KK, Batley J, Kendrick GA, Larkum AWD, Ralph PJ, Edwards D (2016) The genome of a Southern hemisphere seagrass species ( Zostera muelleri ). Plant Physiol 172:272–283. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.16.00868
Li H, Qu W, Obrycki J, Meng L, Zhou X, Chu D, Insects BL (2020) Optimizing sample size for population genomic study in a global invasive lady beetle. Harmonia Axyridis inSects 11:290. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11050290
Lipkin Y (1975a) Halophila stipulacea, a review of a successful immigration. Aquat Bot I:203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3770(75)90023-6
Lipkin Y (1975b) Halophila stipulacea in Cyprus and Rhodes, 1967–1970. Aquat Bot 1:309–320
Liu ZJ, Cordes JF (2004) DNA marker technologies and their applications in aquaculture genetics. Aquaculture 238:1–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AQUACULTURE.2004.05.027
Manousaki T, Tsakogiannis A, Taggart JB, Palaiokostas C, Tsaparis D, Lagnel J, Chatziplis D, Magoulas A, Papandroulakis N, Mylonas CC, Tsigenopoulos CS (2016) Exploring a nonmodel teleost genome through rad sequencing-linkage mapping in common pandora, Pagellus erythrinus and comparative genomic analysis. G3 Genes Genom Genet 6:509–519. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.115.023432
Matheson P, McGaughran A (2022) Genomic data is missing for many highly invasive species, restricting our preparedness for escalating incursion rates. Sci Rep 12:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17937-y
McLaughlin JF, Winker K (2020) An empirical examination of sample size effects on population demographic estimates in birds using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data. PeerJ 8:e9939. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9939
Meyerson LA, Mooney HA (2007) Invasive alien species in an era of globalization. Front Ecol 5:199–208. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[199:IASIAE]2.0.CO;2
Morin PA, Luikart G, Wayne RK (2004) SNPs in ecology, evolution and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 19:208–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.01.009
Mtwana Nordlund L, Koch EW, Barbier EB, Creed JC (2016) Seagrass ecosystem services and their variability across genera and geographical regions. PLoS ONE 11:e0163091. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163091
Nakajima Y, Matsuki Y, Lian C, Fortes MD, Uy WH, Campos WL, Nakaoka M, Nadaoka K (2014) The Kuroshio current influences genetic diversity and population genetic structure of a tropical seagrass, Enhalus acoroides. Mol Ecol 23:6029–6044. https://doi.org/10.1111/MEC.12996
Narum SR, Buerkle CA, Davey JW, Miller MR, Hohenlohe PA (2013) Genotyping-by-sequencing in ecological and conservation genomics. Mol Ecol 22:2841–2847. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12350
Nazareno AG, Bemmels JB, Dick CW, Lohmann LG (2017) Minimum sample sizes for population genomics: an empirical study from an Amazonian plant species. Mol Ecol Resour 17:1136–1147. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12654
Nguyen HM, Kleitou P, Kletou D, Sapir Y, Winters G (2018) Differences in flowering sex ratios between native and invasive populations of the seagrass Halophila stipulacea. Bot Mar 61:337–342. https://doi.org/10.1515/bot-2018-0015
Nguyen HM, Yadav NS, Barak S, Lima FP, Sapir Y, Winters G (2020) Responses of invasive and native populations of the seagrass Halophila stipulacea to simulated climate change. Front Mar Sci 6:812. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00812
Nguyen HM, Ruocco M, Dattolo E, Cassetti FP, Calvo S, Tomasello A, Marín-Guirao L, Pernice M, Procaccini G (2023) Signs of local adaptation by genetic selection and isolation promoted by extreme temperature and salinity in the Mediterranean seagrass Posidonia oceanica. Mol Ecol 32:4313–4328. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.17032
Novak S (2005) Genetic bottlenecks in alien plant species: influence of mating systems and introduction dynamics. Species invasions: insights into ecology, evolution and biogeography 201–228
Olsen JL, Rouzé P, Verhelst B, Lin Y-C, Bayer T, Collen J, Dattolo E, De Paoli E, Dittami S, Maumus F, Michel G, Kersting A, Lauritano C, Lohaus R, Töpel M, Tonon T, Vanneste K, Amirebrahimi M, Brakel J, Boström C, Chovatia M, Grimwood J, Jenkins JW, Jueterbock A, Mraz A, Stam WT, Tice H, Bornberg-Bauer E, Green PJ, Pearson GA, Procaccini G, Duarte CM, Schmutz J, Reusch TBH, Van de Peer Y (2016) The genome of the seagrass Zostera marina reveals angiosperm adaptation to the sea. Nature 530:331–335. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16548
Peterson BK, Weber JN, Kay EH, Fisher HS, Hoekstra HE (2012) Double digest RADseq: an inexpensive method for De Novo SNP discovery and genotyping in model and non-model species. PLoS ONE 7:e37135. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0037135
Phair NL, Nielsen ES, von der Heyden S (2021) Applying genomic data to seagrass conservation. Biodivers Conserv 30:2079–2096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-021-02184-w
Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959. https://doi.org/10.1093/GENETICS/155.2.945
Procaccini G, Acunto S, Famaá P, Maltagliati F (1999) Structural, morphological and genetic variability in Halophila stipulacea (Hydrocharitaceae) populations in the western Mediterranean. Mar Biol 135:181–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002270050615
Procaccini G, Orsini L, Ruggiero MV, Scardi M (2001) Spatial patterns of genetic diversity in Posidonia oceanica, an endemic Mediterranean seagrass. Mol Ecol 10:1413–1421. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2001.01290.x
Procaccini G, Olsen JL, Reusch TBH (2007) Contribution of genetics and genomics to seagrass biology and conservation. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 350:234–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2007.05.035
Raitsos DE, Beaugrand G, Georgopoulos D, Zenetos A, Pancucci-Papadopoulou AM, Theocharis A, Papathanassiou E (2010) Global climate change amplifies the entry of tropical species into the eastern Mediterranean Sea. Limnol Oceanogr 55:1478–1484. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2010.55.4.1478
Rašić G, Filipović I, Weeks AR, Hoffmann AA (2014) Genome-wide SNPs lead to strong signals of geographic structure and relatedness patterns in the major arbovirus vector, Aedes aegypti. BMC Genom 15:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-275
Resh CA, Galaska MP, Benesh KC, Gardner JPA, Wei KJ, Yan RJ, Mahon AR (2021) Using genomics to link populations of an invasive species to its potential sources. Front Ecol Evol 9:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.575599
Riquet F, Daguin-Thiébaut C, Ballenghien M, Bierne N, Viard F (2013) Contrasting patterns of genome-wide polymorphism in the native and invasive range of the marine mollusc Crepidula fornicata. Mol Ecol 22:1003–1018. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12161
Rius M, Bourne S, Hornsby HG, Chapman MA (2015a) Applications of next-generation sequencing to the study of biological invasions. Curr Zool 61:488–504
Rius M, Turon X, Bernardi G, Volckaert FAM, Viard F (2015b) Marine invasion genetics: from spatio-temporal patterns to evolutionary outcomes. Biol Invas 17:869–885. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10530-014-0792-0/FIGURES/4
Rochette NC, Rivera-Colón AG, Catchen JM (2019) Stacks 2: analytical methods for paired-end sequencing improve RADseq-based population genomics. Mol Ecol 28:4737–4754. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15253
Roman J, Darling JA (2007) Paradox lost: genetic diversity and the success of aquatic invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:454–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.07.002
Ruggiero MV, Procaccini G (2004) The rDNA its region in the lessepsian marine angiosperm Halophila stipulacea (Forssk.) Aschers. (Hydrocharitaceae): intragenomic variability and putative pseudogenic sequences. J Mol Evol 58:115–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-003-2536-0
Scheibling RE, Patriquin DG, Filbee-Dexter K (2018) Distribution and abundance of the invasive seagrass Halophila stipulacea and associated benthic macrofauna in Carriacou, Grenadines, Eastern Caribbean. Aquat Bot 144:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2017.10.003
Sghaier YR, Zakhama-Sraieb R, Charfi F (2014) Effects of the invasive seagrass Halophila stipulacea on the native Cymodocea nodosa. In: 5th Mediterranean Symposium on Marine Vegetation. pp 167–171
Simberloff D, Martin JL, Genovesi P, Maris V, Wardle DA, Aronson J, Courchamp F, Galil B, García-Berthou E, Pascal M, Pyšek P, Sousa R, Tabacchi E, Vilà M (2013) Impacts of biological invasions: what’s what and the way forward. Trends Ecol Evol 28:58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.07.013
Smith J, Maynard-Smith J (1978) The evolution of sex.
Smulders FOH, Vonk JA, Engel MS, Christianen MJA (2017) Expansion and fragment settlement of the non-native seagrass Halophila stipulacea in a Caribbean bay. Mar Biol Res 13:967–974. https://doi.org/10.1080/17451000.2017.1333620
Suarez A, Tsutsui N (2008) The evolutionary consequences of biological invasions. Mol Ecol 17:351–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03456.x
Tempesti J, Mangano MC, Langeneck J, Lardicci C, Maltagliati F, Castelli A (2020) Non-indigenous species in Mediterranean ports: a knowledge baseline. Mar Environ Res 161:e105056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.105056
Thibaut T, Blanfuné A, Boudouresque CF, Holon F, Agel N, Descamps P, Deter J, Pavy T, Delaruelle G, Verlaque M (2022) Distribution of the seagrass Halophila stipulacea: a big jump to the northwestern Mediterranean Sea. Aquat Bot 176:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2021.103465
Tsakogiannis A, Manousaki T, Anagnostopoulou V, Stavroulaki M, Apostolaki ET (2020) The importance of genomics for deciphering the invasion success of the seagrass Halophila stipulacea in the changing Mediterranean Sea. Diversity 12:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12070263
Tutar O, Ruocco M, Dattolo E, Lacorata G, Corrado R, Watteaux R, Iudicone D, Fach B, Procaccini G (2022) High levels of genetic diversity and population structure in the Mediterranean seagrass Posidonia oceanica at its easternmost distribution limit. ICES J Mar Sci 79:2286–2297. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsac163
Verhoeven KJF, Macel M, Wolfe LM, Biere A (2011) Population admixture, biological invasions and the balance. Proc Royal Soc 278:2–8. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1272
Wesselmann M, Anton A, Duarte CM, Hendriks IE, Agustí S, Savva I, Apostolaki ET, Marbà N (2020) Tropical seagrass Halophila stipulacea shifts thermal tolerance during Mediterranean invasion. Proc R Soc B 287:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.3001
Wesselmann M, Chefaoui RM, Marbà N, Serrao EA, Duarte CM (2021) Warming threatens to propel the expansion of the exotic seagrass Halophila stipulacea. Front Mar Sci 8:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.759676
Wickham H (2011) ggplot2. Wiley Interdisciplin Rev Comput Statist 3:180–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.147
Willette DA, Chalifour J, Debrot AOD, Engel MS, Miller J, Oxenford HA, Short FT, Steiner SCC, Védie F (2014) Continued expansion of the trans-Atlantic invasive marine angiosperm Halophila stipulacea in the eastern Caribbean. Aquat Bot 112:98–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2013.10.001
Willing EM, Dreyer C, van Oosterhout C (2012) Estimates of genetic differentiation measured by FST do not necessarily require large sample sizes when using many SNP markers. PLoS ONE 7:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042649
Winters G, Beer S, Willette DA, Viana IG, Chiquillo KL, Beca-Carretero P, Villamayor B, Azcárate-García T, Shem-Tov R, Mwabvu B, Migliore L, Rotini A, Oscar MA, Belmaker J, Gamliel I, Alexandre A, Engelen AH, Procaccini G, Rilov G (2020) The tropical seagrass halophila stipulacea: reviewing what we know from its native and invasive habitats, alongside identifying knowledge gaps. Front Mar Sci 7:1–28. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00300
Xiang J-X, Saha M, Zhong K-L, Zhang Q-S, Zhang D, Jueterbock A, Krueger-Hadfield SA, Wang G-G, Weinberger F, Hu Z-M (2023) Genome-scale signatures of adaptive gene expression changes in an invasive seaweed Gracilaria vermiculophylla. Mol Ecol 32:613–627. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.16776
Xu N-N, Jiang K, Biswas SR, Tong X, Wang R, Chen X-Y (2019) Clone configuration and spatial genetic structure of two Halophila ovalis populations with contrasting internode lengths. Front Ecol Evol 7:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00170
Zafeiropoulos H, Gioti A, Ninidakis S, Potirakis A, Paragkamian S, Angelova N, Antoniou A, Danis T, Kaitetzidou E, Kasapidis P, Kristoffersen JB, Papadogiannis V, Pavloudi C, Ha QV, Lagnel J, Pattakos N, Perantinos G, Sidirokastritis D, Vavilis P, Kotoulas G, Manousaki T, Sarropoulou E, Tsigenopoulos CS, Arvanitidis C, Magoulas A, Pafilis E (2021) 0s and 1s in marine molecular research: a regional HPC perspective. GigaScience 10:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giab053
Zenetos A, Galanidi M (2020) Mediterranean non indigenous species at the start of the 2020s: Recent changes. Marine Biodivers Records. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41200-020-00191-4
Zenetos A, Gofas S, Morri C, Rosso A, Violanti D, García Raso JE, Çinar ME, Almogi-Labin A, Ates AS, Azzurro E, Ballesteros E, Bianchi CN, Bilecenoglu M, Gambi MC, Giangrande A, Gravili C, Hyams-Kaphzan O, Karachle PK, Katsanevakis S, Lipej L, Mastrototaro F, Mineur F, Pancucci-Papadopoulou MA, Ramos Esplá A, Salas C, San Martín G, Sfriso A, Streftaris N, Verlaque M (2012) Alien species in the Mediterranean Sea by 2012. A contribution to the application of European Union’s Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD). Part 2. Introduction trends and pathways. Mediterr Mar Sci 13:328–352. https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.327
Zenetos A, Albano P, Garcia EL, Stern N, Tsiamis K, Galanidi M (2022a) Corrigendum to the review article (Medit. Mar. Sci. 23/1 2022, 196–212): Established non-indigenous species increased by 40% in 11 years in the Mediterranean Sea. Mediterr Mar Sci 23:876–878. https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.31523
Zenetos A, Albano PG, Garcia EL, Stern N, Tsiamis K, Galanidi M (2022b) Established non-indigenous species increased by 40% in 11 years in the Mediterranean Sea. Mediterr Mar Sci. https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.29106
Zenetos A, Tsiamis K, Galanidi M, Carvalho N, Bartilotti C, Canning-Clode J, Castriota L, Chainho P, Comas-González R, Costa AC, Dragičević B, Dulčić J, Faasse M, Florin A-B, Gittenberger A, Jakobsen H, Jelmert A, Kerckhof F, Lehtiniemi M, Livi S, Lundgreen K, Macic V, Massé C, Mavrič B, Naddafi R, Orlando-Bonaca M, Petovic S, Png-Gonzalez L, Carbonell Quetglas A, Ribeiro RS, Cidade T, Smolders S, Stæhr PAU, Viard F, Outinen O (2022c) Status and trends in the rate of introduction of marine non-indigenous species in European seas. Diversity 14:1077. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14121077
Acknowledgements
The computational work in this study was carried out through the resources of the IMBBC (Institute of Marine Biology, Biotechnology and Aquaculture) HPC facility of the HCMR (Hellenic Centre for Marine Research). Funding for establishing the IMBBC HPC has been received by the MARBIGEN (EU Regpot) project, LifeWatchGreece RI and the CMBR (Centre for the study and sustainable exploitation of Marine Biological Resources) RI. The authors thank Julius Glambedakis, Thanos Dailianis, Marlene Wesselmann, Scott Bennett, and Demetris Kletou for their assistance in sampling. The authors thank Ramon Rivera and Vasileios Papadogiannis for their guidance in the bioinformatic analysis. The publication of the article in OA mode was financially supported by HEAL-Link.
Funding
Open access funding provided by HEAL-Link Greece. This research was co-financed by the projects I-ADAPT (MIS 5006611, Operational Programme ‘Human Resources Development, Education and Lifelong Learning 2014–2020’, Greece and European Social Fund- ESF), DRESSAGE (MIS5045792, Operational Program ‘Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation’, EPAnEK 2014–2020), MEDSHIFT (CGL2015-71809- P, Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competiveness), and CYCLE (PID2021-123723OB-C21, Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ETA, TM, and CAGE conceived and designed the study. ETA, NM, CMD, and SV performed the sampling. AT performed the laboratory analysis. CAGE analyzed and interpretated the data. CAGE drafted the manuscript. All co-authors reviewed and edited previous versions of the manuscript. All co-authors read and approved the final manuscript. ETA and NM acquired the funding. ETA supervised the study.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All co-authors have seen and agreed with the contents of the manuscript and assert that there are no relevant financial or non-financial conflicts of interest to disclose.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: M.Wegner.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
García-Escudero, C.A., Tsigenopoulos, C.S., Manousaki, T. et al. Population genomics unveils the century-old invasion of the Seagrass Halophila stipulacea in the Mediterranean Sea. Mar Biol 171, 40 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-023-04361-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-023-04361-7