Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intertidal populations of Ulva spp. and Undaria pinnatifida are good habitat providers for invertebrates but not for fish

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vegetated habitats play a key role in the structure and function of ecosystems by modifying local environmental conditions and providing food and habitat to a great range of organisms. The aim of this study is to assess the relative importance of two widely distributed macroalgae species in providing ecosystem functions in coastal areas where they are prevalent (Patagonia, Argentina, Lat 43.73°, Lon 64.92°) in comparison to low-vegetated areas without these two species. In October 2018 and May 2019, we tested whether Ulva spp. and Undaria pinnatifida perform a series of ecosystem functions commonly associated with vegetated coastal environments. Our study suggests that Ulva spp. decreases water current and provides habitat for epifauna, as the adjacent low-vegetated areas without Ulva spp. present higher gypsum block dissolution rates, lower biomass and richness of total epifauna, and lower grazer biomass than areas dominated by Ulva spp. U. pinnatifida, on the other hand, only showed a positive effect on epifauna biomass relative to low-vegetated areas, and no effect on the rest of the variables measured, despite providing similar levels of coverage to Ulva spp., and having a larger and more complex structure. None of the two macroalgae influence the habitat use by fishes. Despite smaller size and a labile structure, Ulva spp. presence had an effect on more variables than U. pinnatifida, and the function provided by U. pinnatifida was also provided by Ulva spp., namely U. pinnatifida did not provide new functions to the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Lucila Amione, Andrea Arcángel, Miguel Camarero, Raul González, Macarena Marello and Mariel Ojeda who kindly assisted in the field and laboratory. This study funded by a post-doctoral fellowship awarded to PdlB by CONICET and Maimonides University and was supported by grants from the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina [PIP CONICET 112-201501-00465CO]; and the Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (ANPCyT), Argentina [PICT-2018-03107] to MN.

Funding

This study funded by a post-doctoral fellowship awarded to PdlB by CONICET and Maimonides University and was supported by grants from the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina [PIP CONICET 112-201501-00465CO]; and the Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (ANPCyT), Argentina [PICT-2018-03107] to MN. The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript. The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection were performed by Paula de la Barra, Patricio J. Pereyra, Marianela Gastaldi, Juan F. Saad, Emiliano A. Rodríguez and Maite A. Narvarte. Data analysis and first draft of the manuscript was written by Paula de la Barra. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paula de la Barra.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

This is an observational study so no approval of research ethics committees was required to accomplish its goals. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. All the authors consented to and agreed to carry out this research. The Argentine national guidelines for the sampling, care, and experimental use of organisms for the study have been followed and the necessary approvals obtained.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: P. Kraufvelin.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 250 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de la Barra, P., Pereyra, P.J., Gastaldi, M. et al. Intertidal populations of Ulva spp. and Undaria pinnatifida are good habitat providers for invertebrates but not for fish. Mar Biol 170, 91 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-023-04238-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-023-04238-9

Keywords

Navigation