Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Results
Development times and growth rates
Last paragraph should read: “The gross growth efficiency calculated for NIV-NV C. helgolandicus was 0.47 ± 0.19 (mean ± s.d.) and 0.35 ± 0.07 for NIV-NV C. typicus.”
Ingestion rates at different concentrations
Last paragraph should read: “Specific ingestion rates ranged between 0.069–0.443 μg C μg−1 nauplii C d−1 for C. typicus and 0.024–0.812 μg C μg−1 nauplii C d−1 for C. helgolandicus.”
Table 2. Last three columns should read:
Figure 3. The scale from the Y-axis changes in the following way:
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00227-006-0387-0.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
López, E., Anadón, R. & Harris, R.P. Erratum to: Functional responses of copepod nauplii using a high efficiency gut fluorescence technique. Mar Biol 150, 1047–1048 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-006-0461-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-006-0461-7