Skip to main content
Log in

Food and habitat choice in floating seaweed clumps: the obligate opportunistic nature of the associated macrofauna

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The species composition of macrofauna associated with floating seaweed rafts is highly variable and influenced by many factors like spatial and temporal variation, period since detachment and probably also the seaweed species. The presence of seaweed preferences was assessed by a combination of in situ seaweed samplings and multiple-choice aquarium experiments in a controlled environment, using the seaweed-associated grazing organisms Idotea baltica and Gammarus crinicornis. Results from the sampling data confirm that the seaweed composition influences macrofaunal species composition and abundance: samples dominated by Sargassum muticum displayed higher densities but lower diversities compared to samples dominated by Ascophyllum nodosum and Fucus vesiculosus. Seaweed preference was also apparent from the multiple-choice experiments, but did not exactly match the results of the community analysis: (1) I. baltica had high densities in seaweed samples (SWS) dominated by F. vesiculosus and A. nodosum, while in the experiments, this isopod was most frequently associated with Enteromorpha sp. and F. vesiculosus, and fed mostly on S. muticum, A. nodosum and Enteromorpha sp.; (2) G. crinicornis had high densities in SWS dominated by F. vesiculosus, while in the experiments, this amphipod was most frequently associated with S. muticum, but fed most on A. nodosum and F. vesiculosus. It is clear from the laboratory experiments that preference for habitat (shelter) and food can differ among seaweed species. However, food and habitat preferences are hard to assess because grazer preference may change if choices are increased or decreased, if different sizes of grazers are used, or if predators or other grazers are added to the experiments. The effects of seaweed composition may also be blurred due to the obligate opportunistic nature of a lot of the associated macrofaunal species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrontes J (1990) Diet, food preference and digestive efficiency in intertidal isopods inhabiting macroalgae. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 139:231–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boström C, Mattila J (1999) The relative importance of food and shelter for seagrass associated invertebrates—a latitudinal comparison of habitat choice by isopod grazers. Oecologia 120:162–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw C, Collins P, Brand AR (2003) To what extent does upright sessile epifauna affect benthic biodiversity and community composition? Mar Biol 143:783–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2001) PRIMER v5: user manual/tutorial. PRIMER-E., Plymouth Marine Laboratory, UK, pp 91

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke KR, Warwick RM (1994) Change in marine communities. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, UK, pp 144

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin G, Hay ME (1996) Susceptibility to herbivores depends on the recent history of both the plant and animal. Ecology 77:1531–1543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denton AB, Chapman ARO (1991) Feeding preferences of gammarid amphipods among four species of Fucus. Mar Biol 109:503–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Druce BE, Kingsford MJ (1995) An experimental investigation on the fishes associated with drifting objects in coastal waters of temperate Australia. Bull Mar Sci 57:378–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgar GJ (1987) Dispersal of fauna and floral propagules associated with drifting Macrocystis pyrifera plants. Mar Biol 95:599–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine ML (1970) Faunal variation on pelagic Sargassum. Mar Biol 7:112–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goecker ME, Kåll SE (2003) Grazing preferences of marine isopods and amphipods on three prominent algal species of the Baltic Sea. J Sea Res 50:309–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay ME, Renaud PE, Fenical W (1988) Large mobile versus small sedentary herbivores and their resistance to seaweed chemical defenses. Oecologia 75:246–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemmi A, Jormalainen V (2004) Genetic and environmental variation in performance of a marine isopod: effects of eutrophication. Oecologia 140:302–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert SH (1971) The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52(4):577–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingolfsson A (1995) Floating clumps of seaweed around Iceland: natural microcosms and a means of dispersal for shore fauna. Mar Biol 122:13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingolfsson A (1998) Dynamics of macrofaunal communities of floating seaweed clumps off western Iceland: a study of patches on the surface of the sea. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 231:119–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingolfsson A (2000) Colonization of floating seaweed by pelagic and subtidal benthic animals in southwestern Iceland. Hydrobiologia 440:181–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingolfsson A, Ólaffson E (1997) Vital role of drift algae in the life history of the pelagic harpacticoid Parathalestris croni in the northern North Atlantic. J Plankton Res 19:15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jormalainen V, Honkanen T, Heikkila N (2001) Feeding preferences and performance of a marine isopod on seaweed hosts: costs of habitat specialization. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 220:219–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsford MJ (1992) Drift algae and small fish in coastal waters of northeastern New Zealand. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 80:41–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsford MJ (1995) Drift algae: a contribution to near-shore habitat complexity in the pelagic environment and an attractant for fish. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 116:297–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsford MJ, Choat JH (1985) The fauna associated with drift algae captured with a plankton-mesh purse seine net. Limnol Oceanogr 30:618–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicotri ME (1980) Factors involved in herbivore food preference. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 42:13–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ólaffson E, Ingolfsson A, Steinarsdottir MB (2001) Harpacticoid copepod communities of floating seaweeds: controlling factors and implications for dispersal. Hydrobiologia 453/454:189–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orav-Kotta H, Kotta J (2004) Food and habitat choice of the isopod Idotea baltica in the northeastern Baltic Sea. Hydrobiologia 514:79–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavia H, Carr H, Åberg P (1999) Habitat and feeding preferences of crustacean mesoherbivores inhabiting the brown seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum (L.) Le Jol. and its epiphytic macroalgae. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 236:15–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen CH, Renaud PE (1989) Analysis of feeding preference experiments. Oecologia 80:82–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragan MA, Jensen A (1977) Quantitative studies on brown algal phenols. I. Estimation of absolute polyphenol content of Ascophyllum nodosum (L.) Le Jol. and Fucus vesiculosus (L.). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 30:209–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Safran P, Omori M (1991) Some ecological observations on fishes associated with drifting seaweed off Tohoku coast, Japan. Mar Biol 105:395–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salemaa H (1987) Herbivory and microhabitat preferences of Idotea sp. (Isopoda) in the northern Baltic sea. Ophelia 27:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffelke B, Evers D, Walhorn A (1995) Selective grazing of the isopod Idotea baltica between Fucus evanescens and F. vesiculosus from Kiel Fjord (western Baltic). Mar Biol 124:215–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoner AW, Greening HS (1984) Geographic variation in the macrofaunal associates of pelagic Sargassum and some biogeographic implications. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 20:185–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson PA, Malm T, Engkvist R (2004) Distribution and host plant preference of Idotea baltica (Pallas) (Crustacea: Isopoda) on shallow rocky shores in the central Baltic Sea. Sarsia 89:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiel M (2003) Rafting of benthic macrofauna: important factors determining the temporal succession of the assemblage of detached macroalgae. Hydrobiologia 503:49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiel M, Gutow L (2005a) The ecology of rafting in the marine environment. I. The floating substrata. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 42:181–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiel M, Gutow L (2005b) The ecology of rafting in the marine environment. II. The rafting organisms and community. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 43:279–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Tully O, Oȁ9Ceidigh P (1986) The ecology of Idotea species (Isopoda) and Gammarus locusta (Amphipoda) on surface driftweed in Galway Bay (west of Ireland). J Mar Biol Assoc UK 66:931–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomi J, Jormalainen V, Ilvessalo H (1988) Does the aquatic isopod Idotea baltica minimize the survival costs of reproduction? Oikos 52:245–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandendriessche S, Vincx M, Degraer S (2006) Floating seaweed in the neustonic environment: a case study from Belgian coastal waters. J Sea Res 55:103–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viejo R, Åberg P (2003) Temporal and spatial variation in the density of mobile fauna and grazing damage on the seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum. Mar Biol 142:1229–1241

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author acknowledges a specialisation grant from the ȁ8Institute for the Promotion of Innovation through Science and Technology in Flandersȁ9. The authors would like to express their gratitude to Saskia Van Gaever and Jeroen Speybroeck for their help with the samplings; and to Dries Bonte for the introduction to Log-Linear Analysis. Special thanks go to André Cattrijsse of the Flanders Marine Institute, and to the crewmembers of the research vessel Zeeleeuw. Marleen De Troch, two anonymous referees and the editor are acknowledged for their highly useful comments and corrections on earlier versions of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sofie Vandendriessche.

Additional information

Communicated by O. Kinne, Oldendorf/Luhe

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vandendriessche, S., De Keersmaecker, G., Vincx, M. et al. Food and habitat choice in floating seaweed clumps: the obligate opportunistic nature of the associated macrofauna. Mar Biol 149, 1499–1507 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-006-0292-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-006-0292-6

Keywords

Navigation