Skip to main content
Log in

Selective grazing of the isopod Idotea baltica between Fucus evanescens and F. vesiculosus from Kiel Fjord (western Baltic)

  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Grazing rates of the isopod Idotea baltica on Fucus evanescens and F. vesiculosus (Phaeophyta) were quantified in laboratory feeding preference experiments. Fucus species were offered alone (no-choice) or simultaneously (choice). In three of four no-choice experiments and in all four choice experiments, I. baltica significantly preferred F. vesiculosus to F. evanescens. F. evanescens recently immigrated into Kiel Fjord and has increased in abundance since 1990. One possible reason for the competitive success of this species may be that, compared to F. vesiculosus, it is less preferred by I. baltica, the most abundant mesograzer at the study site.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous (1990) Vegetationsuntersuchung in der Kieler Förde 1982–1990. Teknisk Forvaltning Sonderjyllandsamt, Sonderjylland, pp 1–76

  • Arrontes J (1990) Diet, food preference and digestive efficiency in intertidal isopods inhabiting macroalgae. J exp mar Biol Ecol 139: 231–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker KM, Chapman ARO (1990) Feeding preferences of periwinkles among four species of Fucus. Mar Biol 106: 113–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Bokn TL, Lein TE (1978) Long-term changes in fucoid association of the inner Oslofjord, Norway. Norw J Bot 25: 9–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Bokn TL, Murray SN, Moy FE, Magnusson JB (1992) Changes in fucoid distribution and abundances in the inner Oslofjord, Norway: 1974–80 versus 1988–90. Acta phytogeogr suec 78: 117–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Brawley SH (1992) Mesoherbivores. In: John DM, Hawkins SJ, Price JH (eds) Plant-animal interactions in the marine benthos. Claredon Press, Oxford, pp 235–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Brawley SH, Fei XG (1987) Studies of mesoherbivory in aquaria and in an unbarricaded mariculture farm on the Chinese coast. J Phycol 23: 613–623

    Google Scholar 

  • Broenmark C (1985) Interactions between macrophytes, epiphytes and herbivores: an experimental approach. Oikos 45: 26–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman ARO, Johnson CR (1990) Disturbance and organization of macroalgal assemblages in the northwest Atlantic. Hydrobiologia 192: 77–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Denton AB, Chapman ARO (1991) Feeding preferences of gammarid amphipods among four species of Fucus. Mar Biol 109: 503–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy JE (1990) Amphipods on seaweeds: partners or pests? Oecologia 83: 267–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Haathela I (1984) A hypothesis of the decline of the Bladder-Wrack (Fucus vesiculosus L.) in SW Finland in 1975–1981. Limnologica, Berlin 15: 345–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay ME, Renaud PE, Fenical W (1988) Large mobile versus small sedentary herbivores and their resistance to seaweed chemical defence. Oecologia 75: 246–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Kangas P, Autio H, Hällfors G, Luther H, Niemi Å, Salemaa H (1982) A general model of the decline of Fucus vesiculosus at Tvärminne, south coast of Finland in 1977–81. Acta bot fenn 118: 1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Kangas P, Niemi Å (1985) Observations of recolonization by the Bladder-Wrack, Fucus vesiculosus, on the southern coast of Finland. Aqua fenn 15: 133–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Kautsky N, Kautsky H, Kautsky U, Waern M (1986) Decreased depth penetration of Fucus vesiculosus (L.) since the 1940's indicates eutrophication of the Baltic Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 28: 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubchenco J (1978) Plant species diversity in a marine intertidal community: importance of herbivore food preference and algal competitive abilities. Am Nat 112: 23–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan MD, Kitting CL (1984) Productivity and utilization of the seagrass Halodule wrightii and its attached epiphytes. Limnol Oceanogr 29: 1066–1076

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor E (1955) The diet and feeding mechanism of Idotea. J mar biol Ass UK 34: 347–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicotri ME (1980) Factors involved in herbivore food preference. J exp mar Biol Ecol 42: 13–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicotri ME (1977) Grazing effects of four intertidal herbivores on the microflora. Ecology 58: 1020–1032

    Google Scholar 

  • Poore AGB (1994) Selective herbivory by amphipods inhabiting the brown alga Zonaria angustata. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 107: 113–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Roa R (1992) Design and analysis of multiple-choice feeding experiments. Oecologia 89: 509–515

    Google Scholar 

  • Salemaa H (1987) Herbivory and microhabitat preferences of Idotea spp. (Isopoda) in the northern Baltic Sea. Ophelia 27: 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Schueller GH, Peters AF (1994) Arrival of Fucus evanescens (Phaeophyceae) in Kiel Bight (western Baltic). Botanica mar 37: 471–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomi J, Ilvessalo H, Niemelä P, Sirén S, Jormalainen V (1989) Within-plant variation in phenolic content and toughness of the brown alga Fucus vesiculosus L. Botanica mar 32: 505–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt H, Schramm W (1991) Conspicious decline of Fucus in Kiel Bay (western Baltic): what are the causes? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 69: 189–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolken K (1994) Grazing in Seegraswiesen. Dipl. Thesis, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by O. Kinne, Oldendorf/Luhe

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schaffelke, B., Evers, D. & Walhorn, A. Selective grazing of the isopod Idotea baltica between Fucus evanescens and F. vesiculosus from Kiel Fjord (western Baltic). Marine Biology 124, 215–218 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00347125

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00347125

Keywords

Navigation