Enobosarm (ostarine, MK-2866, or GTx-024) is a non-steroidal selective androgen receptor modulator. This study evaluated the effect of various regimens of enobosarm (EN) on bone healing in an orchiectomized rat model for aged male osteoporosis and compared it to testosterone (T) treatment. Ninety eight-month-old male Sprague Dawley rats were either orchiectomized (Orx) or left intact (Non-Orx) and divided into groups (n = 15/group): (1) Non-Orx; (2) Orx; (3) Orx+T-th; (4) Orx+EN-th; (5) Orx+T-pr; and (6) Orx+EN-pr. Prophylaxis (Pr) treatments were applied immediately after Orx for up to 18 weeks. Therapy (Th) treatments were applied 12 weeks after Orx for up to 6 weeks. Bilateral tibia osteotomy with plate osteosynthesis was performed 12 weeks after Orx in all groups. EN and T were mixed with the diet; the daily dosage was 0.35 ± 0.06 and 41 ± 8 mg/kg BW, respectively. Both T treatments improved bone healing by increasing callus volume and area, bone volume and density, and cortical width; they had no effect on prostate or levator ani weight. EN-pr increased the callus area and callus density and decreased cortical density, but increased prostate weight. The effect of T-pr and T-th on bone was stronger than EN-pr. EN-th affected bone healing negatively by reducing callus density and area and delaying osteotomy bridging. Levator ani weight was increased in both EN groups. EN treatment after fracture is not advisable in aged males. EN-pr treatment as a therapy for bone healing in men could be further investigated; endocrinological side effects must be closely monitored.
Fractured bones impair the quality of life of patients, and osteoporosis impedes normal bone healing processes [1, 2]. Despite increasing recognition of the problem of male osteoporosis, postmenopausal osteoporosis has been the focus of research, and most treatments have been developed for women. In men, there are only a few options for osteoporosis treatment. Non-pharmacologic treatment includes diet and lifestyle changes to reduce the risk of fracture [3, 4]. Therapeutic options include the administration of bisphosphonates, human parathyroid hormone, teriparatide, denosumab, or romosozumab. These treatments are prescribed to prevent osteoporotic fractures. There is, however, no approved treatment for support of a fast and undisturbed healing process .
Testosterone is an essential hormone for the maintenance of bone and muscle mass in men. In males, osteoporosis occurs primarily due to diminished testicular testosterone production. Testosterone supplementation offers a treatment for this condition [5, 6]. The major limitations of testosterone replacement therapy in elderly men are negative side effects, so its benefits should be weighed against the risks of replacement [6, 7].
Recently, the application of non-steroidal selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) has been suggested for the treatment of osteoporosis and frailty [8, 9]. Enobosarm (ostarine, MK-2866, or GTx-024) is a non-steroidal SARM that binds to the androgen receptor (AR) with tissue selectivity and cannot be converted to dihydrotestosterone and estrogen . Therefore, it is thought to cause fewer side effects than testosterone [9, 11]. Treatment with enobosarm is not approved for human use in any country so far; however, it is sold on the internet . It has been used by athletes and was banned by the World Anti-Doping Agency (https://www.wada-ama.org/en/content/what-is-prohibited/prohibited-at-all-times/anabolic-agents, retrieved 19 May 2020). Enobosarm has been studied in several phase-II and phase-III clinical trials in patients with cancer cachexia, sarcopenia, breast cancer, and stress urinary incontinence [12,13,14,15]. It reportedly improves muscle mass, showing a beneficial effect on bone in experimental studies [9, 16, 17]. Recently, we showed a favorable effect of enobosarm treatment on bone healing in a rat model of postmenopausal osteoporosis . This raises the question of whether these results can be extended to bone healing in male rats. Gender differences in response to SARMs have not been studied as of yet, and most reports present either combined data for both sexes or single-sex data [9, 12, 13, 17, 18].
The present study evaluated the effect of various regimens of enobosarm on bone healing in an orchiectomized rat model for aged male osteoporosis and compared it to treatment with testosterone.
Materials and Methods
Ninety eight-month-old male Sprague Dawley® rats (Janvier, Le Genest-Saint-Isle, France) were used in the experiment (Fig. 1). Seventy-five rats were bilaterally orchiectomized (Orx). Fifteen rats were left non-orchiectomized (Non-Orx) to serve as a healthy control group (group 1). Anesthesia was as follows: intraperitoneal (IP) injection of ketamine (Inresa Arzneimittel GmbH, Freiburg, Germany), xylazine (Xylariem, Pharma-Partner Vertriebs GmbH, Oostkamp, Belgium), and midazolam (Rotexmedica GmbH, Trittau, Germany) (80 mg, 4 mg and 2.5 mg/kg body weight [BW], respectively). After eight rats died, the anesthesia was changed to isoflurane inhalation with the addition of subcutaneous (SC) injection of carprofen (5 mg/kg BW, Caprive, Bayer Vitalo GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany) and no further losses were observed.
The Orx rats were divided into five groups (groups 2–6, 15 rats each). In group 2, the Orx rats were left untreated to serve as osteoporotic controls (Fig. 1). In groups 3 and 4 (Orx+T-th, Orx+EN-th), treatments with testosterone propionate (T) or enobosarm (EN), respectively, were started 12 weeks after Orx and were applied for up to 6 weeks (therapy [th]). In groups 5 and 6 (Orx+T-pr, Orx+EN-pr), rats were treated either with T or with EN, respectively, immediately following Orx for up to 18 weeks (prophylaxis [pr]).
EN and T were mixed with a soy-free diet by Ssniff Special Diets GmbH (Soest, Germany) at a concentration of 8.56 mg and 1 g per kg of diet, respectively, to achieve a daily EN dosage of 0.4 mg/kg body weight (BW) [17, 18], and a T dosage of 50 mg/kg BW [19,20,21]. EN (Purity > 98%, No.:841205-47-8) was obtained from Shanghai Biochempartner Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China) through the distributor Hölzel Diagnostika (Cologne, Germany). Testosterone propionate was supplied by Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, USA). All rats were fed with a soy-free pelleted diet (Ssniff Special Diets GmbH)  and had free access to food and demineralized water throughout the experiment. The food intake was calculated by a weekly weighing of the remaining food in the cage. The daily dosage calculated at the end of the experiment averaged over the treatment weeks to 0.35 ± 0.06 mg/kg BW for enobosarm and 41 ± 8 mg/kg BW for testosterone (Table 1).
After 12 weeks post-orchiectomy, all rats underwent a bilateral metaphyseal osteotomy of the tibia . Briefly, a transverse osteotomy (0.5 mm) was created using an ultrasound saw (Piezosurgery®, Mectron Medical Technology, Carasco, Italy). The tibia was fixed with the aid of a T-titan plate and four screws (Stryker Trauma, Selzach, Switzerland). During the operation, the rats were anesthetized by IP 75 mg ketamine, 5 mg midazolam per kg BW, SC 0.1 mg/kg BW buprenorphine (Temgesic® RB Pharmaceuticals Limited, Berkshire, UK), and isoflurane inhalation. After ten rats died, the dosage of ketamine and midazolam was reduced (38 mg and 2.5 mg/kg BW, respectively) and no further losses were observed.
Postoperative pain therapy was given with buprenorphine (SC) and metamizol (drinking water). Buprenorphine was applied as follows: days 1–2 post-osteotomy, 0.1 mg/kg BW 3 times/day; day 3, 0.1 mg/kg BW twice/day, days 4–5, 0.05 mg/kg BW twice/day; days 6–10, 0.05 mg/kg BW once/day. Metamizol was dissolved in demineralized water (20 g/L, Novaminsulfon, Winthrop Arzneimittel GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) After 10 days, the complications (dehydration, obstipation, ileus, and death [n = 15]) were observed and the pain therapy was immediately interrupted. During week 14, food intake was not measured due to complications from the postoperative pain therapy. During this week, the rats were fed additionally with oat flakes and bread, and received 1–2 drops/day of Herbi Colan (WDT, Garbsen, Germany) for regulation of digestive processes.
During the further healing period, the newly built callus was labeled by SC injection of fluorescent dyes . Calcein green (CG, 10 mg/kg BW, Waldeck GmbH, Münster, Germany) was applied on day 22, alizarin complexone (AC, 30 mg/kg BW, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) on day 32, and tetracycline hydrochloride (TC, 25 mg/kg BW, Carl Roth GmbH+Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany) on day 42 after osteotomy, respectively (Fig. 1).
Animals were decapitated under CO2 anesthesia 6 weeks after osteotomy. Blood samples were collected for further analysis. Heart, liver, kidney, spleen, musculus gastrocnemius (M. gastrocnemius), M. soleus, M. levator ani, and prostata were extracted and weighed. After removal of soft tissues and extraction of the plates and screws, both tibiae were stored at − 20 °C for further micro-CT, biomechanical, and histological analysis. At the end of the experiment, the following number of animals could be analyzed in each group: Non-Orx, 12; Orx, 8; Orx+T-th, 5; Orx+EN-th, 7, Orx+T-pr, 9, and Orx+EN-pr, 9.
Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), magnesium, calcium, and phosphor were measured in serum at the Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Medical Center, Goettingen, Germany. Analyses were performed using an automated chemistry analyzer (Architect c16000 analyzer, Abbott, Wiesbaden, Germany) and commercially available kits (Architect, Abbott) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Osteocalcin (OC) and Cross Linked C-telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTX-I) were assessed using commercial analysis kits, rat-MID™ Osteocalcin EIA and RatLaps (CTX-I) EIA (Immunodiagnostic Systems GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany).
Analysis of Bone Healing
Micro-computed Tomographical (micro-CT) Analysis
Both tibiae were scanned using a Quantum FX micro-CT (Caliper Sciences, Hopkinton, MA, USA). The scan protocol was as follows: 70 kVp, 200 μA, 2-min exposure time, 360° rotation, 3600 projections, 20 × 20 mm2 field of view, 512-pixel matrix, and 40 × 40 × 40 μm3 effective voxel size [18, 23]. A phantom block with five hydroxyapatite elements of several mineral densities was scanned with each tibia to convert the data into bone mineral density (g/cm3). The scans were analyzed with the program developed in our laboratory [18, 23]. The measurement area extended 1.5 mm proximally and distally from the osteotomy line. The parameters assessed were as follows: total bone mineral density (total BMD), bone mineral density and bone volume (bone BMD and bone volume), osseous callus BMD and volume (callus BMD and callus volume), and osseous callus fraction (osseous callus V/total callus V) .
A three-point bending test was applied using a testing device (Zwick/Roell, type 145660 Z020/TND, Ulm, Germany), as previously described in detail . The roller stamp was loaded at the osteotomy line at the tibial tuberosity at a feed motion rate of 5 mm/min. The test was stopped automatically by the software (testXpert, Zwick/Roell) before plastic deformation ended with a bone fracture. Stiffness (N/mm), the slope of the linear rise of the curve during elastic deformation and yield load (N), end point of elastic deformation were calculated using MS Excel (MS Office 2016) .
Tibiae were embedded in methyl methacrylate (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), and 150-µm-thick longitudinal sections of tibiae were cut using a diamond saw microtome (Leica SP1600, Leica Instruments GmbH, Nussloch, Germany) [23, 24]. The time of the first osseous bridging of the osteotomized bone ends was determined visually using a microscope (Leica, Leitz DM RXE) by analyzing all sections (at least ten). The CG-stained callus was built within 0–22 days after osteotomy, the AC-stained callus was formed within 23–32 days, and the TC-stained callus tissue was built within 33–42 days after osteotomy . Three central representative histological sections (Fig. 2a–f) were chosen to measure the total area (Tt.Ar.) and labeling-specific area (CG, AC, and TC) of the callus. These sections were microradiographed using a Faxitron Cabinet X-ray system (Hewlett–Packard, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA) and Kodak Industrex film (SR45, 100 NIF, Kodak, Paris, France). Using microradiographs (Fig. 2g–l), cortical width and density distal to osteotomy (Ct. Wi. and Ct. Dn., respectively), periosteal, and endosteal callus width and density (Cl. Wi. and Cl. Dn., respectively) were determined . The measurement area of the tibia was 1.5 mm proximally and distally from the osteotomy line. Three regions were identified: ventral, plate side (v); dorsal, opposite site (d); and (e) endosteal part [23, 24].
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism (Version 5.04, GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA). A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey test were applied (p < 0.05) to analyze differences between the treatment groups. Data are shown as means and standard deviations (SD).
BW and food intake did not differ significantly between the groups if analyzed weekly (Suppl. Figure 1). BW averaged 702 g (from 542 to 830 g, SD = 75 g) at the beginning of the study and 673 g (506–870, SD = 88 g) at the end of the study. Analysis of BW over the weeks showed significantly lower BW in all five Orx groups compared with the Non-Orx group (Table 1). Food intake over the weeks was not different among the groups (Table 1). Daily food intake of rats was 29 ± 5 g on average. Food intake as well as BW decreased during the 1st week after the osteotomy operation (week 13, Suppl. Figure 1).
Dosage of EN and T did not differ between the th and the pr groups (Table 1). In both groups, the dosage decreased in correspondence with the decreased food intake after osteotomy (Suppl. Figure 1).
The weight of the heart, liver, kidney, and spleen did not differ among the treatment groups (data not shown). The weight of M. levator ani was higher in the Non-Orx group compared with the Orx, Orx+T-th, and Orx+T-pr groups (Table 1). Both EN treatments (th and pr) increased the weight of M. levator ani compared to the Orx rats. Prostate weight was significantly higher in Non-Orx rats than in the Orx groups (Table 1). In the Orx+EN-pr group, the weight of the prostate was higher than in the Orx, Orx+T-th, and Orx+T-pr groups. The weight of M. gastrocnemius and M. soleus did not differ significantly between the groups (Table 1).
Serum levels of ALP, CTX-I, magnesium, and calcium did not differ among the groups, whereas phosphorus was elevated in the Orx+T-pr and Orx+EN-pr groups compared with the Orx group (Table 1). The OC level was decreased in both the EN-treated groups compared with the Orx and Orx+T-th groups (Table 1).
Bone Healing Analysis
Micro-CT analysis at the osteotomy site revealed increased total BMD and osseous callus fraction in the Orx+T-th group compared with the Orx group (Fig. 3a, d). Callus BMD was significantly lower in the Orx group than in the Non-Orx group. In the Orx+EN-pr group, callus BMD was higher than in the Orx group, whereas cortical BMD was reduced compared with that of the Non-Orx group (Fig. 3b, c). Both T treatments (th and PR) elevated bone and callus volume (Fig. 3e, f). Bone BMD and cortical volume were not different among the groups (data not shown).
Biomechanical analysis did not show any significant differences in yield load or stiffness of the tibiae among the treatment groups (Table 1).
Analysis of histological sections of tibia revealed delayed osseous bridging in the Orx-EN-th group, whereas all other Orx groups and the Non-Orx rats showed comparable occurrences of the first osseous bridging (Table 1).
Quantitative analysis of fluorescence-stained callus showed that more callus was built in the Orx+T-pr and Orx+EN-pr groups compared with the Orx group during the first 3 weeks of healing (CG staining), whereas in the Orx group, total callus formation was delayed (Fig. 4). During weeks 4 and 5 of healing (AC stainings), T-th treatment caused increased callus formation, whereas within the final weeks of healing (TC staining), no differences were recorded between the groups (Fig. 4). The amount of total callus was lower in the Orx and Orx+EN-th groups than in the Non-Orx group and higher in the Orx+T-th and Orx+T-pr groups compared with the Orx group (Fig. 4).
Analysis of microradiographs showed thicker cortical bone in the Orx+T-th and Orx+T-pr groups than in the Orx group and lower callus density in the Orx+EN-th group compared with the Non-Orx group at the dorsal aspect (Table 1). Endosteal callus density was lower in all T- and EN-treated groups than in the Non-Orx rats (Table 1). At the ventral aspect, no significant differences were observed between the groups (data not shown).
Our results showed that T treatments elicited a stronger effect on bone healing than EN treatments in the orchiectomized rat model. Both testosterone treatments (T-pr and T-th) were effective in improving bone parameters such as callus volume and area, bone volume and density, and cortical width, irrespective of duration of treatment. Similar to the T-pr treatment, the EN-pr treatment increased callus area formed during the 1st weeks of healing, and additionally enhanced callus density and decreased cortical density. The EN-th treatment affected bone healing negatively, reducing callus density and area and delaying the occurrence of osseous bridging.
Orx impaired callus formation during the early stages of bone healing, and this effect remained until the end of the study. The orchiectomized rat model applied in the present study is often used to study male osteoporosis and osteoporotic bone healing [22, 25,26,27]. Orchiectomy was confirmed by the absence of testis and by the reduction in prostata and levator ani weights .
BW, food intake, weight of organs, and leg muscles were not affected by either Orx or EN and T treatments. The analysis of BW over experimental weeks revealed a lower BW in all Orx rats than in Non-Orx rats. This decrease in BW as a consequence of the Orx is a known phenomenon in rats that occurs independently of food intake [22, 29].
Testosterone has been shown to have a direct, positive effect on bone healing by inducing callus formation and improving the biomechanical stability of fractured bone [30, 31]. As testosterone is aromatized to estrogen, it not only acts on bone directly via ARs but also indirectly via estrogen receptors (ERs) [9, 32]. Previous reports showed that men with mutations in ERs or aromatase genes suffered from severe osteoporosis, indicating that aromatization of testosterone to estradiol is essential for skeleton homeostasis [32,33,34]. In contrast to T, enobosarm does not aromatize to estrogen and acts solely via the ARs on bone [9, 16]. This could explain the different effects of T compared with EN on bone healing in our study.
In the present study, we observed a positive effect of enobosarm on bone healing applied immediately after Orx (EN-pr) in male rats. Increased callus area formed during the first 3 weeks of healing and decreased cortical density compensated by enhanced callus density after 6 weeks of healing indicated an advantage of long-term EN treatment for bone healing. However, short-term EN treatment (EN-th) applied after the osteotomy affected bone healing negatively. In the ovariectomized rat model, EN applied at dosages of 0.4 and 4 mg/kg BW improved osteoporotic bone tissue , where the higher dosage (4 mg/kg BW) had a stronger effect on bone healing than the lower one (0.4 mg/kg BW) . However, the latter showed fewer uterotrophic effects and was therefore chosen in this study to minimize possible side effects. In contrast to the present data, EN applied after osteotomy enhanced callus formation and did not impair bone healing in the ovariectomized rat model . Furthermore, the weight of the gastrocnemius muscle and BW were significantly enhanced after EN treatments in the female rat model . This is different from the present data showing the lack of EN effects on the weight of leg muscles and BW in male rats. There are limited data on gender differences in response to SARM treatments. Experimental and clinical studies on EN reported either combined data for both genders or single-sex data [9, 12, 13, 17, 18]. A study on another non-steroidal SARM, GSK2881078, demonstrated enhanced sensitivity of muscle tissue in women compared to men . A favorable influence of EN on bone healing observed in female rats could be positively enhanced by its indirect effect on muscle tissue along with the direct effect via ARs . Besides the gender effect, the effect of rat age could contribute to the differences in bone healing under EN treatments. Growing females used in the previous study (3 months old)  may have responded to the EN treatments differently from aged male rats used in this study.
In the present study, we found that levator ani weight was significantly elevated by both EN treatments, whereas the weight of the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles was not changed. The different response of levator ani muscle and other skeletal muscles was also previously reported after administration of testosterone in juvenile male rats . The levator ani muscle of the rat is widely used as an index of myotrophic activity of steroidal hormones and various SARMs [9, 28, 37]; it provides a sensitive and rapid assessment of the anabolic activity of substances . However, the use of levator ani muscle as a single indicator of the anabolic effect of substances is critical , and other skeletal muscles have to be considered.
In our study, the anabolic effect of EN on the levator ani muscle was stronger (EN-pr: 89% and EN-th: 84% of the Non-Orx group) than its androgenic effect on the prostate (EN-pr: 51% and EN-th: 32% of the Non-Orx rats). The weight of the prostate was significantly increased solely after long-term treatment with EN-pr; there was no significant change following either short-term treatment (EN-th) or both testosterone treatments. In accordance with our data, other preclinical studies on arylpropionamide SARMs, including andarine and ostarine (enobosarm), reported increased weight of the levator ani in Orx rats to the level of sham-operated animals and only partially increased the weight of the prostate. Furthermore, enobosarm was more potent than testosterone propionate at the levator ani in rats [9, 11, 38, 39], which is in agreement with our data. The lack of androgenic activity of T treatments in the prostate can be explained by the limited bioavailability of oral testosterone propionate. This application was chosen based on previous studies that showed the favorable effect of T on bone [19,20,21].
The serum level of OC, a marker for bone turnover, was significantly reduced after both EN treatments (pr and th) in the present study. Similarly, Gao et al.  reported decreased serum OC levels after treatments with SARM S4 (andarine) in the castrated male rat and suggested its antiresorptive activity. In-vitro studies showed that EN induced differentiation of bone marrow cells to osteoblasts and inhibited osteoclast differentiation . Thus, we hypothesized that EN applied in Orx rats could also have an antiresorptive activity slowing bone turnover, which would be advantageous in high-turnover osteoporosis; however, it might be a disadvantage if applied directly after the fracture. Indeed, anti-osteoporotic drugs such as bisphosphonates, with their known effect of decreasing bone turnover, impair or slow bone healing and are not prescribed for patients with fractures [41, 42]. Further detailed histomorphological analysis of bone tissue could help to clarify the in-vivo effects of EN on bone cells, osteoblasts, and osteoclasts.
Enhancement of serum phosphorus levels to the level of Non-Orx healthy rats after long-term treatments with T and EN was recorded. Vanderschueren et al.  reported low serum phosphate levels and diminished bone parameters in Orx rats, whereas testosterone treatment restored these parameters. An elevated serum phosphorus level after enobosarm treatment was also measured in ovariectomized rats . This systemic effect of EN should be clarified in further studies.
To summarize, EN-pr applied after Orx improved several parameters of bone healing. However, the overall impact of EN-pr treatment on bone healing was less than that of T. EN-pr showed an additional side effect on the prostate. EN-th applied after osteotomy appeared to have an unfavorable effect on bone healing. The weight of the levator ani muscle was increased after both EN treatments, indicating localized anabolic activity; however, other skeletal muscles did not respond to these treatments. T improved bone healing irrespective of the duration of the treatments (th and pr) and without having an effect on the prostate or the levator ani muscle.
The limitation of the present study is the investigation of fracture healing at one point of time. The time point was set at 6 weeks after osteotomy, enabling analysis of callus formation before callus resorption occurred and assessment of biomechanical properties of calcified callus .
In conclusion, the results of this study indicate that EN-pr treatment could be further investigated as a therapy for bone healing in men; its side effects should, however, be closely examined. Based on our data, administration of the SARM enobosarm immediately after fracture is not advisable in aged male rats. Furthermore, gender-specific differences in the response of the musculoskeletal system to SARMs or steroid hormones should be evaluated in future research. Testosterone applied as hormone replacement therapy has a positive effect on bone healing; however, its clinical application is limited due to its side effects .
MacKenzie EJ, Bosse MJ, Pollak AN, Webb LX, Swiontkowski MF, Kellam JF, Smith DG et al (2005) Long-term persistence of disability following severe lower-limb trauma. Results of a seven-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1801–1809
Brandi ML (2012) Drugs for bone healing. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 21:1169–1176
Adler RA (2014) Osteoporosis in men. Bone Res 2:14001. https://doi.org/10.1038/boneres.2014.1
Willson T, Nelson SD, Newbold J, Nelson RE, LaFleur J (2015) The clinical epidemiology of male osteoporosis: a review of the recent literature. Clin Epidemiol 7:65–76
Snyder PJ, Peachey H, Hannoush P, Berlin JA, Loh L, Lenrow DA, Holmes JH et al (1999) Effect of testosterone treatment on body composition and muscle strength in men over 65 years of age. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:2647–2653
Gruenwald DA, Matsumoto AM (2003) Testosterone supplementation therapy for older men: potential benefits and risks. J Am Geriat Soc 51:101–115
Ahmed T, Alattar M, Pantalone K, Haque R (2020) Is testosterone replacement safe in men with cardiovascular disease? Cureus 12(3):e7324. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7324
Zhang X, Lanter JC, Sui Z (2009) Recent advances in the development of selective androgen receptor modulators. Expert Opin Ther Patents 19:1239–1258
Narayanan R, Coss CC, Dalton JT (2018) Development of selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs). Mol Cell Endocrinol 465:134–142
Garber K, Arbor A (2016) No longer going to waste. Nat Biotechnol 34:458–461
Zilbermint MF, Dobs AS (2009) Nonsteroidal selective androgen receptor modulator Ostarine™ in cancer cachexia. Future Oncol 5:1211–1220
Dalton JT, Barnette KG, Bohl CE, Hancock ML, Rodriguez D, Dodson ST, Morton RA, Steiner MS (2011) The selective androgen receptor modulator GTx-024 (enobosarm) improves lean body mass and physical function in healthy elderly men and postmenopausal women: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2:153–161
Dobs AS, Boccia RV, Croot CC, Gabrail NY, Dalton JT, Hancock ML, Johnston MA, Steiner MS (2013) Effects of enobosarm on muscle wasting and physical function in patients with cancer: a double-blind, randomised controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:335–345
Crawford J, Prado CM, Johnston MA, Gralla RJ, Taylor RP, Hancock ML, Dalton JT (2016) Study design and rationale for the phase 3 clinical development program of enobosarm, a selective androgen receptor modulator, for the prevention and treatment of muscle wasting in cancer patients (POWER Trials). Curr Oncol Rep 18:37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-016-0522-0
Dalton JT (2017) The long and winding road for selective androgen receptor modulators. Br J Clin Pharmacol 83:2131–2133
Kearbey JD, Gao W, Narayanan R, Fisher SJ, Wu D, Miller DD, Dalton JT (2007) Selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) treatment prevents bone loss and reduces body fat in ovariectomized rats. Pharm Res 24:328–335
Hoffmann DB, Komrakova M, Pflug S, von Oertzen M, Saul D, Weiser L, Walde TA et al (2019) Evaluation of ostarine as a selective androgen receptor modulator in a rat model of postmenopausal osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Metab 37:243–255
Komrakova M, Furtwängler J, Hoffmann DB, Lehmann W, Schilling AF, Sehmisch S (2020) The selective androgen receptor modulator ostarine improves bone healing in ovariectomized rats. Calcif Tissue Int 106:147–157
Stürmer EK, Seidlová-Wuttke D, Sehmisch S, Rack T, Wille J, Frosch KH, Wuttke W, Stürmer KM (2005) Standardized bending and breaking test for the normal and osteoporotic metaphyseal tibias of the rat: effect of estradiol, testosterone, and raloxifene. J Bone Miner Res 21:89–96
Seidlová-Wuttke D, Stürmer KM, Stürmer EK, Sehmisch S, Wuttke W (2006) Contrasting effects of estradiol, testosterone and of a black cohosh extract on density, mechanical properties and expression of several genes in the metaphysis of the tibia and on fat tissue of orchidectomized rats. Maturitas 55:64–74
Stuermer EK, Sehmisch S, Tezval M, Tezval H, Rack T, Boekhoff J, Wuttke W, Herrmann T, Seidlova-Wuttke D, Stuerrmer KM (2009) Effect of testosterone, raloxifene and estrogen replacement on the microstructure and biomechanics of metaphyseal osteoporotic bones in orchiectomized male rats. World J Urol 27:547–555
Komrakova M, Krischek C, Wicke M, Sehmisch S, Tezval M, Rohrberg M, Brandsch T, Stuermer KM, Stuermer EK (2011) Influence of intermittent administration of parathyroid hormone on muscle tissue and bone healing in orchiectomized rats or controls. J Endocrinol 209:9–19
Komrakova M, Fiebig J, Hoffmann DB, Krischek C, Lehmann W, Stuermer KM, Sehmisch S (2018) The advantages of bilateral osteotomy over unilateral osteotomy for osteoporotic bone healing. Calcif Tissue Int 103:80–94
Komrakova M, Weidemann A, Dullin C, Ebert J, Tezval M, Stuermer KM, Sehmisch S (2015) The impact of strontium ranelate on metaphyseal bone healing in ovariectomized rats. Calcif Tissue Int 97:391–401
Wink CS, Felts WJL (1980) Effects of castration on the bone structure of male rats: a model of osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 32:77–82
Vanderschueren D, Van Herck E, Suiker AM, Visser WJ, Schot LP, Bouillon R (1992) Bone and mineral metabolism in aged male rats: short and long term effects of androgen deficiency. Endocrinology 130:2906–2916
Ryu SJ, Ryu DS, Kim JY, Park JY, Kim KH, Chin DK, Kim KS et al (2015) Bone mineral density changes after orchiectomy using a scrotal approach in rats. Korean J Spine 12:55–59
Eisenberg E, Gordan GS (1950) The levator ani muscle of the rat as an index of myotrophic activity of steroidal hormones. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 99:38–44
Gentry RT, Wade GN (1976) Androgenic control of food intake and body weight in male rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol 90:18–25
Gesicki M, Tibba J, Nguyen CK, Beil FT, Rueger JM, Haberland M, Amling M (2003) Testosterone is a potent accelerator of fracture healing: early structural reconstruction and improved biomechanical stability. Osteo Trauma Care 11:3–5
Cheng B-H, Chu T-MG, Chang C, Kang H-Y, Huang K-E (2013) Testosterone delivered with a xcaffold is as effective as bone morphologic protein-2 in promoting the repair of critical-size segmental defect of femoral bone in mice. PLoS ONE 8(8):e70234
Mohamad NV, Soelaiman IN, Chin KY (2016) A concise review of testosterone and bone health. Clin Interv Aging 11:1317–1324
Carani C, Qin K, Simoni M, Faustini-Fustini M, Serpente S, Boyd J, Korach KS, Simpson ER (1997) Effect of testosterone and estradiol in a man with aromatase deficiency. N Engl J Med 337:91–95
Khosla S, Melton LJ III, Riggs BL (2002) Estrogen and the male skeleton. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:1443–1450
Neil D, Clark RV, Magee M, Billiard J, Chan A, Xue Z, Russell A (2018) GSK2881078, a SARM, produces dose-dependent increases in lean mass in healthy older men and women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 103:3215–3224
Vyskočil F, Gutmann E (1977) Anabolic effect of testosterone on the levator ani muscle of the rat. Pflug Arch Eur J Phys 371:3–8
Page ST, Marck BT, Tolliver JM, Matsumoto AM (2007) Tissue selectivity of the anabolic steroid, 19-nor-4-androstenediol-3beta, 17beta-diol in male Sprague Dawley rats: selective stimulation of muscle mass and bone mineral density relative to prostate mass. Endocrinology 149:1987–1993
Jones A, Coss CC, Steiner MS, Dalton JT (2013) An overview on selective androgen receptor modulators: focus on enobosarm. Drugs Future 38:309
Srinath R, Dobs A (2014) Enobosarm (GTx-024, S-22): a potential treatment for cachexia. Future Oncol 10:187–194
Gao W, Reiser PJ, Coss CC, Phelps MA, Kearbey JD, Miller DD, Dalton JT (2005) Selective androgen receptor modulator treatment improves muscle strength and body composition and prevents bone loss in orchidectomized rats. Endocrinology 146:4887–4897
Cao Y, Mori S, Mashiba T, Westmore MS, Ma L, Sato M, Akiyama T et al (2002) Raloxifene, estrogen, and alendronate affect the process of fracture repair differently in ovariectomized rats. JBMR 17:2237–2246
Komrakova M, Rechholtz C, Pohlmann N, Lehmann W, Schilling AF, Wigger R, Sehmisch S, Hoffmann DB (2019) Effect of alendronate or 8-prenylnaringenin applied as a single therapy or in combination with vibration on muscle structure and bone healing in ovariectomized rats. Bone Rep 11:100224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bonr.2019.100224
This study was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG, KO 4646/3-1, SE 1966/6-1). The authors are grateful to their colleagues, R. Castro-Machguth and A. Witt, for their technical support.
Open Access funding provided by Projekt DEAL.
Conflict of interest
Marina Komrakova, Janek Nagel, Daniel Bernd Hoffmann, Wolfgang Lehmann, Arndt Friedrich Schilling, and Stephan Sehmisch declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
The animal study was approved by the regional government (14/1396, Oldenburg, Germany) in accordance with German animal protection laws prior to performing the study.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Komrakova, M., Nagel, J., Hoffmann, D.B. et al. Effect of Selective Androgen Receptor Modulator Enobosarm on Bone Healing in a Rat Model for Aged Male Osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 107, 593–602 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-020-00751-x