Skip to main content
Log in

On ends of finite-volume noncompact manifolds of nonpositive curvature

  • Published:
Inventiones mathematicae Aims and scope

Abstract

In this paper we confirm a folklore conjecture which suggests that for a complete noncompact manifold \(M\) of finite volume with sectional curvature \(-1 \leq K \leq 0\), if the universal cover of \(M\) is a visibility manifold, then the fundamental group of each end of \(M\) is almost nilpotent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams, S., Ballmann, W.: Amenable isometry groups of Hadamard spaces. Math. Ann. 312(1), 183–195 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Ballmann, W.: Spaces of nonpositive curvature. Jahresber. Dtsch. Math.-Ver. 103(2), 52–65 (2001)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Ballmann, W., Gromov, M., Schroeder, V.: Manifolds of Nonpositive Curvature. Progress in Mathematics, vol. 61. Birkhäuser, Boston (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Belegradek, I.: Topology of open nonpositively curved manifolds. In: Geometry, Topology, and Dynamics in Negative Curvature. London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., vol. 425, pp. 32–83. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2016)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Bishop, R.L., O’Neill, B.: Manifolds of negative curvature. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 145, 1–49 (1969)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Bowditch, B.H.: Discrete parabolic groups. J. Differ. Geom. 38(3), 559–583 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Breuillard, E., Fujiwara, K.: On the joint spectral radius for isometries of non-positively curved spaces and uniform growth. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 71(1), 317–391 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Breuillard, E., Green, B., Tao, T.: The structure of approximate groups. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 116, 115–221 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Bridson, M.R., Haefliger, A.: Metric Spaces of Non-positive Curvature. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol. 319. Springer, Berlin (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Buser, P., Karcher, H.: Gromov’s Almost Flat Manifolds. Astérisque, vol. 81. Société Mathématique de France, Paris (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Caprace, P.-E.: Amenable groups and Hadamard spaces with a totally disconnected isometry group. Comment. Math. Helv. 84(2), 437–455 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Caprace, P.-E., Monod, N.: Fixed points and amenability in non-positive curvature. Math. Ann. 356(4), 1303–1337 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheeger, J., Colding, T.H.: Lower bounds on Ricci curvature and the almost rigidity of warped products. Ann. Math. (2) 144(1), 189–237 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, L., Rong, X., Xu, S.: A geometric approach to the modified Milnor problem. Commun. Contemp. Math. 26(5), 2350018 (2024)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. de la Harpe, P.: Topics in Geometric Group Theory. Chicago Lectures in Mathematics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Di Cerbo, L.F.: A gap property for the growth of closed 3-manifold groups. Geom. Dedic. 143, 193–199 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Eberlein, P.: Lattices in spaces of nonpositive curvature. Ann. Math. (2) 111(3), 435–476 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Eberlein, P.B.: Geometry of Nonpositively Curved Manifolds. Chicago Lectures in Mathematics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Eberlein, P., O’Neill, B.: Visibility manifolds. Pac. J. Math. 46, 45–109 (1973)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Eberlein, P., Hamenstädt, U., Schroeder, V.: Manifolds of nonpositive curvature. In: Differential Geometry: Riemannian Geometry (Los Angeles, CA, 1990). Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., vol. 54, pp. 179–227. Am. Math. Soc., Providence (1993)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Grigorchuk, R.I.: Degrees of growth of \(p\)-groups and torsion-free groups. Mat. Sb. (N.S.) 126(168), 194–214, 2 (1985)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Gromov, M.: Manifolds of negative curvature. J. Differ. Geom. 13(2), 223–230 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Gromov, M.: Groups of polynomial growth and expanding maps. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 53, 53–73 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Gromov, M.: Metric Structures for Riemannian and Non-Riemannian Spaces, Modern Birkhäuser Classics, Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston (2007). English ed. Based on the 1981 French original, with appendices by Katz, M., Pansu, P. and Semmes, S., Translated from the French by Sean Michael Bates

    Google Scholar 

  25. Heintze, E.: Mannigfaltigkeiten negativer krümmung, Habilitation-schrift (1976)

  26. Heintze, E., Im Hof, H.-C.: Geometry of horospheres. J. Differ. Geom. 12(4), 481–491 (1977)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Kapovitch, V., Wilking, B.: Structure of fundamental groups of manifolds with Ricci curvature bounded below. ArXiv e-prints (2011)

  28. Karlsson, A., Margulis, G.A.: A multiplicative ergodic theorem and nonpositively curved spaces. Commun. Math. Phys. 208(1), 107–123 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Leeb, B.: A Characterization of Irreducible Symmetric Spaces and Euclidean Buildings of Higher Rank by Their Asymptotic Geometry. Bonner Mathematische Schriften [Bonn Mathematical Publications], vol. 326. Universität Bonn, Mathematisches Institut, Bonn (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Raghunathan, M.S.: Discrete Subgroups of Lie groups. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, vol. 68. Springer, New York (1972)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Schroeder, V.: Finite volume and fundamental group on manifolds of negative curvature. J. Differ. Geom. 20(1), 175–183 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Uwe, A., Schroeder, V.: Graph manifolds, ends of negatively curved spaces and the hyperbolic 120-cell space. J. Differ. Geom. 35(2), 299–336 (1992)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Wu, Y.: Translation lengths of parabolic isometries of \(\mathrm{CAT}(0)\) spaces and their applications. J. Geom. Anal. 28(1), 375–392 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Prof. P. Eberlein and Prof. S. T. Yau for their interests. They are also grateful to anonymous referees for their careful reading and valuable comments, one of which especially improves the statement of Proposition 1.4.

Funding

The second named author is partially supported by a grant from Tsinghua university and the NSFC grants No. 12171263 and 12361141813.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yunhui Wu.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: A visibility manifold with a finite volume quotient is not necessarily Gromov hyperbolic

Appendix: A visibility manifold with a finite volume quotient is not necessarily Gromov hyperbolic

In this appendix we construct a complete surface of finite volume with curvature \(-1 \leq K <0\), whose universal cover is a visibility manifold but not a Gromov hyperbolic space. This example shows that the argument in the proof of Corollary 3.5 is not adapted to general visibility manifolds.

Let \((S,g)\) be a noncompact surface of constant negative curvature −1 with finite volume. Such a surface has only finitely many cusps. For simplicity we further assume that \(S\) has only one cusp \(E\), which can be expressed as \(\mathbb{S}^{1} \times [0,\infty )\) endowed with the hyperbolic metric \(\exp (-2t) \mathrm{d}\tilde{s}^{2}+\mathrm{d}t^{2}\), where \(\mathrm{d}\tilde{s}^{2}\) is the flat metric on \(\mathbb{S}^{1}\).

Let \(h:[0,\infty ) \to \mathbb{R}\) be a smooth function such that

  1. (1)

    \(h\) is positive and monotonically decreasing,

  2. (2)

    \(h''/h\) is positive and monotonically decreasing,

  3. (3)

    \(h=\exp (-t) \) for \(0 \leq t \leq 1\),

  4. (4)

    \(h=\dfrac{1}{t^{2}}\) for \(t \geq 3\).

Such a function could be constructed by elementary calculus.

We change the metric on \(E=\mathbb{S}^{1} \times [0,\infty )\) to \(h^{2}(t) \mathrm{d}\tilde{s}^{2} + \mathrm{d}t^{2}\) and obtain a new smooth metric \(g'\) on \(S\). Since both \(\mathbb{S}^{1}\) and \([0,\infty )\) are complete, their warped product is also complete (e.g., see [5, Lemma 7.2]). We first show that \((S,g')\) is a finite volume surface with bounded nonpositive curvature whose universal cover is a visibility manifold.

Let \(S'=S - (\mathbb{S}^{1} \times (3,\infty ))\). \(S'\) is a compact surface with boundary. The volume of \(S\) with respect with the new metric \(g'\) is

$$\begin{aligned} \textrm{Vol}_{g'}(S) =& \textrm{Vol}_{g'}(S')+\textrm{Vol}_{g'}( \mathbb{S}^{1} \times (3,\infty )) \\ =& \textrm{Vol}_{g'}(S') + \int _{0}^{1} \int _{3}^{\infty }h(t) \, \mathrm{d}s \mathrm{d}t \\ =& \textrm{Vol}_{g'}(S') + \int _{3}^{\infty }\dfrac{1}{t^{2}} \, \mathrm{d}t \\ =& \textrm{Vol}_{g'}(S') + \dfrac{1}{3}< \infty . \end{aligned}$$

To see that \((S,g')\) is visible, we check that it satisfies a visibility criterion due to Eberlein and O’Neill [19, Proposition 5.9], which states that if a nonpositively curved manifold \(M\) has curvature order \(\leq 2\) at a point \(p \in M\), i.e., if

$$ \int _{1}^{\infty }|k(\gamma _{\omega}(t))| t \,\mathrm{d}t = \infty \textrm{ for all } \omega \in \mathrm{S}_{p} M, $$

where \(\gamma _{\omega}\) is the geodesic ray with initial velocity \(\omega \) and \(k(\gamma _{\omega}(t))=\min \{|K(\pi )|: \pi \subset \mathrm{T}_{ \gamma _{\omega}(t)} \text{ is a two-dimensional subspace}\}\). Then \(M\) is a visibility manifold.

In fact, direct computation gives

$$ K_{g'}(q)= \textstyle\begin{cases} \;\;-1 & \text{for } q \in S \setminus E \\ -\dfrac{h''(t)}{h(t)} & \text{for } q \in \mathbb{S}^{1} \times \{t\} \subset E \end{cases} $$

where \(K_{g'}(q)\) is the Gaussian curvature at \(q\) with respect with the metric \(g'\). By the choice of \(h\), \(-1 \leq K_{g'}<0\). We have for any \(p \in \mathbb{S}^{1} \times \{0\}\) and for any \(\omega \in \mathrm{S}_{p} S\),

$$\begin{aligned} \int _{1}^{\infty }|K_{g'}(\gamma _{\omega}(t))| t \,\mathrm{d}t \geq & \int _{1}^{\infty }\dfrac{h''}{h}(t) t \,\mathrm{d}t \\ \geq & \int _{3}^{\infty }(\dfrac{1}{t^{2}})''/(\dfrac{1}{t^{2}}) \cdot t \, \mathrm{d}t \\ =& \int _{3}^{\infty }\dfrac{6}{t} \,\mathrm{d}t = \infty , \end{aligned}$$

hence by the visibility criterion the universal cover of \((S,g')\) is a visibility surface.

It remains to show that \((S,g')\) is not Gromov hyperbolic. Let \(\tilde{S}\) be the universal cover of \((S,g')\). Assume now that \(\tilde{S}\) is \(\delta \)-hyperbolic for some \(\delta >0\). Let \(\gamma \) be a geodesic ray in \(S\) converging to the end \(E\) and \(\tilde{\gamma}\) be a lift of \(\gamma \) to \(\tilde{S}\). It is not hard to see that a horoball in \(\tilde{S}\) centered at \(\tilde{\gamma}(\infty )\) is given by \(\mathbb{R} \times [0,\infty )\) endowed with the metric \(h^{2}(t)\mathrm{d}s^{2}+\mathrm{d}t^{2}\). Denote by \(H_{-t}\) the horosphere \(\mathbb{R} \times \{t\}\) and by \(d_{H}\) the horospherical distance between two points on the same horosphere.

Let \(T>3+12 \delta \) be a sufficiently large constant. Set \(x_{0}=(0,T)\) and \(y_{0}=(2 \delta T^{2},T)\). We have

$$ d_{H}(x_{0},y_{0})=\int _{0}^{2 \delta T^{2}} \dfrac{1}{T^{2}} \, \mathrm{d}s= 2\delta . $$

Where \(d_{H}(\cdot , \cdot )\) is the induced distance on the horosphere \(H\).

Let \(x=(0,T-2\delta )\) and \(y=(2 \delta T^{2},T-2\delta )\). The projection of the geodesic segment \(\gamma _{x,y}\) onto the horosphere \(H_{-T}\) is exactly the horospherical geodesic segment from \(x_{0}\) to \(y_{0}\). Together with a standard infinitesimal argument, this yields that

$$ d(x,y) > d_{H}(x_{0},y_{0})=2\delta . $$
(40)

On the other hand,

$$ d(x,y) \leq d_{H}(x,y) =\dfrac{2\delta T^{2}}{(T-2\delta )^{2}}< 3 \delta . $$

Set \(w=(0,T-8\delta )\) and \(z=(2 \delta T^{2},T-8\delta )\), we have

$$ d(x,w)=d(y,z)=6 \delta \geq 2d(x,y) $$

and

$$ d(z,w) \leq d_{H}(z,w)=\int _{0}^{2 \delta T^{2}} \dfrac{1}{(T-8\delta )^{2}} \, \mathrm{d}s= 2\delta \cdot \dfrac{T^{2}}{(T-8\delta )^{2}}. $$

Together with (40) we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} d(z,w)-d(x,y) \leq & 2\delta \cdot \dfrac{T^{2}}{(T-8\delta )^{2}}-2 \delta \\ =& 32 \delta ^{2} \cdot \dfrac{T- 4\delta}{(T-8\delta )^{2}}, \end{aligned}$$

which tends to 0 as \(T \to \infty \). This contradicts Lemma 3.4. Therefore \(\tilde{S}\) cannot be Gromov hyperbolic. See Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

\(d(z,w)\) and \(d(x,y)\) can be arbitrarily close

Hence we have constructed a complete visibility surface \(S\) with bounded nonpositive curvature and finite volume whose universal cover is not Gromov hyperbolic. Examples in higher dimensions can be obtained similarly using warped products.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ji, R., Wu, Y. On ends of finite-volume noncompact manifolds of nonpositive curvature. Invent. math. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-024-01266-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-024-01266-0

Navigation